MSFS Products

Very cool, I'll need to see if I can find the right weather conditions. Exciting to hear that there are new features coming in the future. Keep up the great work! Sometimes I stream the RJ here Deephack Plays My main channel is here although it's more DCS focussed Deephack

@jmarkows said in Single Engine Airspeed: Doesn't surprise me it's fixed, it's usually painted on the gauge itself with an analog six pack on a twin, isn't it? Plus, do you really want to be climbing high enough for that to matter with one engine out? Yeah on analog gauges it's fixed, but Starship is modern technology, the manual suggest it should be dynamic based on altitude. Even if I wouldn't be climbing high enough for it to make a difference as you say, for one, it's at the wrong position, iit ought to be around 130, and secondly if I'm taking off from an airport that's 12,000ft in elevation it should be at 124kts instead of 130, which would probably make a big difference in being able to climb.

@miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.

I have noticed that using the bleed air it is possible to start all engines at the same time. I assume this isn't actually accurate as there wouldn't be enough pressure to allow that?

The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight

We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.

We would kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support, and one of our support team will be in the best position to assist with troubleshooting this: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight

The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight

Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please

The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight