MSFS Products

@JRHorse that's essentially the point... (within safe margins)

@Black-Square - Spotted this... and found the easter egg - love it! [image: 1e647410-aec5-45f9-a1f4-9cf45a329c61.png]

@miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.

@Delta558 thanks for checking! Of course not, but knowing pilots making error (which is how I ended up even thinking about this)

The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight

@kutyafal I’m having the exact same issue.

Thank you. Perhaps it is a problem if the aircraft's injected by Beyond ATC. I will test it again.

I found a way to do this. Documenting here for the community. In 2D dev mode, hover over any buttons and hit ctrl + G for any Lvars you're trying to identify.

Hi! I bought this plane a few days ago and I must say that the internal and external quality of the textures is surprisingly low. This is very apparent in the cockpit when you just zoom in a little bit. Can we expect a resolution update to the 8K standards? P.S.: Otherwise the product is great, keep up the good work!

The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight