MSFS Products

4.9k Topics 25.7k Posts

  • 336 Topics
    2k Posts

    Hi Mark,
    One of the routes I like to do is EGBB-EICK. Departing runway 15 the RJ picks up the Honiley (HON 113.65) VOR, then I retune to the Compton(CPT114.35) VOR, then I retune to Strumble(113.1) VOR. These I tune on Nav 2 and all work fine. I then tune Nav 2 to the Cork(CRK114.6) VOR but because of the distance away it doesn't tune straight away.
    I then set up the approach, with the ILS usually for runway 34 on Nav 1 (109.15)

    So all goes well until I tune the Cork VOR on Nav 2 and the ILS on Nav 1 which on this flight did not work.

    I have flown this route before and not had a problem. Sometimes I've had the same problem at other airports, Vigo in Spain, Stavanger in Norway. These airports I have flown into at other times with no problem.

    I always use RJ100 but can't see this being the problem, as no one else on the forum has reported any problems with tunning VOR's it must be something I am doing or not.

    Great plane by the way.

    Roger

  • 1k Topics
    7k Posts

    All updates to MSFS 2024 will be free. I appreciate your sentiment :)

    I saw some confusion regarding the Professional Series after one of my new posts, while we're all discussing things here. Those new aircraft, which some might call "updates" of the Steam Gauge Overhaul Series will not be free, though they will come at a discount for existing owners. The Professional Series aircraft represent around 1,000hrs of work each, and roughly a doubling of the scope of each aircraft. In short, my goal was to create new aircraft that I could be really proud of. The longer story is as follows...

    When MSFS 2024 became available, I immediately assessed the difficulty of porting the Steam Gauge Overhaul Series to the new sim. When it became clear that this would take an abundance of effort, if it was possible at all (I was thoroughly thwarted at every turn), I decided it would be far smarter to work on standalone aircraft with loads of new features, rather than spend the same amount of time just to get already aging software into a new simulator that would continue to fight me every step of the way. Creating standalone aircraft frees me of many limitations, increases maintainability drastically, and allows me to focus on new simulation experiences that otherwise would not have happened. I hope the majority of you agree with this approach, but I thought I would take the time to explain it more completely.

  • 54 Topics
    229 Posts

    We will be turning our attention to our PA28 and PA38 fleets in the near future and beginning the process of bringing them across to MSFS 2024. We'll be sure to share updates as the process progresses.

    The current status of the MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for our products can be found here: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 104 Topics
    456 Posts

    Thx a lot!
    I know the speed bleed-off is supposed to be huge - but only at high AoA's. Check the videos of 558's wingovers (especially Kev's infamous one at the last RIAT display) - 558 was able to keep the vertical climb a lot longer than JF's Vulcan. I'd estimate that about 2.500 ft of vertical climb are missing.
    One main problem is also the lack of nose-up elevator authority at low speeds - one ought to be able to pitch up quicker (alse deducted from the videos).

    I's a pity - a year after her last flight I spent a RIAT lunch break with Kev, but neither bothered to ask him about all the details of her flight dynamics nor even dreamed of being able to fly such a magnificently modelled 558 in some kind of photo realistic flight simulator...

  • 363 Topics
    2k Posts

    Hi, when I move the "Center Tank Test" switch during preflight (any version of the F28), nothing happens and the gauge does not move. Am I missing something?

    Thanks!

  • 664 Topics
    3k Posts

    many paths lead to Rome :)

  • 424 Topics
    3k Posts

    Hello again Mark, after the reinstall, I searched and discovered that the necessary files were not in the correct folder. Moved them over and seems to be working now. Thanks again

  • 171 Topics
    678 Posts

    Hi! I can't get the PDF function (which shows a virtual representation of the front of the plane) to full screen. The GPS only displays the PDF in split screen, and in full screen it only shows maps and menus. Note: I have the latest update from April 10th.

    Could someone explain how to do this, if it's possible?

    By the way, in previous versions, the PDF was displayed in full screen.

    Thx in advance!

  • 197 Topics
    1k Posts

    Our PA28 Arrow, Turbo Arrow and Warrior are our next products that will receive MSFS 2024 compatibility updates.

    As with all of our initial MSFS 2024 product updates, we are primarily focusing on bringing these products across to the new simulator "as is", although with additional bug fixes and improvements where possible. The initial releases of our MSFS 2024 native products won't include MSFS 2024 specific features such as career mode compatibility, but they will lay the foundations that will allow us to add such features in the future.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 322 Topics
    2k Posts

    We don't have a timeline to share at the moment at there are a lot of moving pieces to the puzzle that could effect a release date, but the PA28s are the aircraft we will soon be spending most of our development time with.

    Mark - Just Flight

    Mark - Just Flight

  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    46 Views

    Never say never, but we don't have any plans for a models-only version of FS Traffic. With the existing version of the FS Traffic, the FS Traffic Module can be disabled via an option in the Traffic Control Centre, which allows FS Traffic to be used as a model-only product you describe.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    366 Views

    Yeah, the CV880/990 would be really cool indeed!
    The problem I see is the aircraft sounds because there are no aircraft available for recording sounds and very few videos of the engine sounds, all of which do not cover the full range of operation.

  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    485 Views

    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.

  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    542 Views

    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates.

    Thank you.

    Matt

  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    284 Views

    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.

  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    175 Views

    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support

    Mark - Just Flight

  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    91 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    86 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    194 Views

    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    232 Views

    Nice - can't wait!

  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    356 Views

    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data.

    There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for.

    With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    137 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views

    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.

  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    120 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    667 Views

    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly ;)

  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views

    'love to have one !

  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    136 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views

    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing.

    https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958

    https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant

    The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.

  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    98 Views
    No one has replied