Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products

MSFS Products

4.5k Topics 23.8k Posts

  • 206 Topics
    1k Posts
    S

    Hey Mark! I changed the turbulence to low because it really was getting wild on some flights, and have had a significantly more consistent experiene

  • Piston & Turbine Dukes
    Real Taxiways
    Steam Gauge Overhaul
    TBM 850
    1k Topics
    6k Posts
    Black SquareB

    While I haven't tried this myself, I would expect this to solve almost all visually apparent issues. If there are any issues stemming from changes to Working Title avionics, those will still be present. Animation issues caused by Asobo's breaking of the integer divide operator in RPN will still be present (supposedly they are going to fix that one soon...), and lastly, the failure system will definitely be unstable and possess unpredictable outcomes, as it also relies on integer divide.

    Beyond those items, I'm sure the Bonanza will be quite enjoyable in MSFS 2024, and I hope you have some great flights! I just wanted to share some of the things that may not be as perfect under the hood as they might appear.

  • 53 Topics
    225 Posts
    M

    Fair enough, was just in the hope that there might be a simple way around it.

  • 97 Topics
    420 Posts
    MarkM

    The TFR does not have a coupled autopilot mode in the Vulcan. Once an altitude is set on the TFR height selector, the pitch attitude required to maintain that height above the terrain will be displayed by the flight director. This is how is works in the real aircraft too.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 284 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM

    The primary purpose of this update was to fix a couple of ‘back-end’ gauge issues to aid the MS/Asobo team in testing the product in MSFS 2024, so there should be no noticeable changes from a user perspective, other than perhaps the V3 EFB which includes redesigned artwork and Navigraph en-route charts support.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 652 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD

    @Driver-Airframes

    The picture I posted above was a jpeg. The upload seems to be working OK.

    Below is a PDF:

    sa101.pdf

  • 404 Topics
    3k Posts
    GunStraussG

    Understand, partially, as I guess the only reason why only big international airports seem correct, is that you don't notice strange variety of GA aircrafts there, but it stands out at smaller airports?

    https://docs.flightsimulator.com/msfs2024/html/5_Content_Configuration/Environment/Living_World/Traffic.htm?agt=index

    Then, just my two cents, as I've only read the limited information about traffic in the SDK and know nothing about the inner workings of FS Traffic:

    I belive Asobo and Microsoft are the ones who can manage to get the AI-system to properly function. (report traffic behaviour issues you see to them, as precise and concretely as possible)

    I belive a third party will be needed to get all relevant liveries and aircraft types to be represented in MSFS 2024

  • 156 Topics
    644 Posts
    MarkM

    A new flight model for the Hawk is currently in testing and will be released as part of an upcoming update to the Hawk. The update will be free of charge to all customers and will also include MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024 compatibility.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 192 Topics
    1k Posts
    D

    I've just taken the current version, freshly downloaded from the site, for a circuit. I deliberately did not trim at all through the flight so it's not a case of 'it has to be correctly trimmed' as you sometimes see with sim aircraft. Able to lift the nosewheel at around 25-30 kts under power, and on the approach / flare with full flap I was comfortably able to make the rear fuselage touch down before the mainwheels using full aft stick but being a bit more sensible could flare perfectly well and maintain a nose-high attitude down again to 30kts.

    If you are seeing different to that, the only things I can suggest are 1) check you're on the latest version. 2) are your controller curves linear, as recommended?

  • 319 Topics
    2k Posts
    V

    i buy and try the Arrow Bundle, in MSFS 2020 it work fine in MSFS 2024 i get a License Falilure, was to be expected :)
    But i can test the wunderful Plane, cant wait it is ready for 2024 :)

  • H

    Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    51 Views
    MarkM

    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support

    Mark - Just Flight

  • Z

    OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    29 Views
    No one has replied
  • Z

    F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    29 Views
    No one has replied
  • A

    Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    103 Views
    MarkM

    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • J

    Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    112 Views
    J

    Well, I hope you create the Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024.

  • A

    RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    148 Views
    A

    Nice - can't wait!

  • A

    RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    264 Views
    MarkM

    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data.

    There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for.

    With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • O

    WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    78 Views
    No one has replied
  • E

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • D

    So what's the plan with 2024?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    777 Views
    V

    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.

  • PondimusP

    WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    70 Views
    No one has replied
  • S

    Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    422 Views
    S

    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly ;)

  • B

    L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    C

    'love to have one !

  • E

    Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    77 Views
    No one has replied
  • M

    Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    993 Views
    T

    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing.

    https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958

    https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant

    The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.

  • O

    WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    64 Views
    No one has replied
  • D

    Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    507 Views
    R

    Three from me!

  • F

    BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    96 Views
    No one has replied
  • G

    WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    339 Views
    cromagnonC

    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.

  • V

    LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    97 Views
    MarkM

    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly.

    If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support

    Mark - Just Flight