Real Taxiways

I hope you don't mind if I reply to only this post, since the issue is likely the same as your other one. Not too long ago, I described to a user (it might also be mentioned in the manual) how incorrect/misaligned configurations from a scenery creator could possibly create this scenario. Rather than get into the details about how/why, let's focus on solving your problem. Are you running MSFS on PC or Xbox, and do you have the Just Flight store version of Real Taxiways, or the Marketplace version?

@goose-28 Have you read in the manual about using the native 2024 package reorder tool? That should be able to accomplish this by moving Real Taxiway's priority below the handcrafted airports. I configured the package so this should happen by default, but there's a reason the package reorder tool is under the "experimental" options, I guess.

@Black-Square So not compatible, with Xbox MSFS2024 through market place then, as there is no Package Reorder Tool option in Settings, General, Advanced Option page

I'm from the US, but fly in Canada quite a bit, especially the eastern provinces. I'd definitely be interested in other regions for Real Taxiways.

@dadgametime said in Bundle or discount for 2020+2024?: If it went to spam, it’s long gone. That's a shame. Contacting Just Flight Support would be ytour best bet. They can send you another code.

If i understand the manual correctly, this behavior is expected on Handcrafted Airports

Unfortunately, double sided dynamic signs are not possible in MSFS, so I've had to do the best with what is possible within the simulator. I have tailored my new sign models to minimize thickness and any z-fighting when compared to the default models, however.

@Black-Square Hi Nick, Thanks for your update and for all the effort you put into Real Taxiways. I often fly routes in South Asia and the Indian Ocean region (India, Maldives, Middle East connections). At the moment, taxiway data in these areas is quite limited, and I think it would add a lot of value if Real Taxiways could eventually expand there. I know the majority of users are based in the US and Europe, but there are also many players who enjoy flying outside those regions. Even if not as popular, adding coverage for South Asia or parts of Asia would really help bring more realism to flights in those areas. Just wanted to share this as feedback — I’d be very happy to see these regions considered in the future. Thanks again for your hard work!

These 2024 versions of Real taxiways are all available now to buy from the Just Flight website. Marketplace versions will follow. Reminder that current owners of any of the 2020 versions qualify for a 25% discount for the new version. You will have received an email covering this. For all of the details covering these new releases visit the News page here: https://www.justflight.com/articles/new-editions-of-real-taxiways-for-msfs-2024

I've added that to the list for the next update. Thank you.

Interesting! I wonder how that happened. I might have been something in an old version of the default airport that was carried over to later Real Taxiways updates, since my software won't automatically rename taxiway signs if the underlaying airport data changes. I've been working on getting you a new file for KMEM for about an hour, but it appears that Asobo has changed how the external package builder works since last time I compiled updates for Real Taxiways, and it now causes the simulator's launcher to hang... I think I have a working file for you now, but now the problem is getting it to you. These forums are very limited regarding what file types and sizes we can transfer for obvious security reasons. I've been meaning to try this temporary file hosting service that can host small files for a maximum of six days. Please try this download link, and just replace the corresponding file (it sounds like you already know where to find it). KMEM.BGL Let me know how it goes!

Excellent. Glad it's working for you. I've updated the link to download the file again for anyone who runs across this in the future.

make me think I did the editing (replacing) texture mentionned in the workaround with the fs-base folder, in order to remove the MMMM and get black back sign, and forgot to actualise the layout.json I don't know if having inconsistency in size file or number may impact performance, but I guess it's worth it doing it, perhaps this should be added to those steps... (maybe this have 0 impact and I may be wrong, if having *.bak file listed in the json could lead to issue, btw kept a save of the initial layout.json)

@blokkie It works like a charm…

That's an issue I've noticed too. Unfortunately not even a remote idea for a fix, as even removing the airport files does not help. It hasn't bothered me too much, but can see how it'd be really annoying for some. I am 99% sure the problem is within the runway textures, included in the Optional Textures, and if that is the case it would need changes done by the developers.

@derek thank you i have posted a ticket