Skip to content

Black Square Add-Ons

3.4k Topics 20.6k Posts

Subcategories


  • For discussion and engagement about the Black Square Commander 114 MSFS 2020/2024

    160 1k
    160 Topics
    1k Posts
    G
    @Black-Square a pleasure to help! I did only try it with the KLN 90B though - but I guess it applies generically to the other GPS units.
  • 327 Topics
    2k Posts
    C
    Much appreciated! I will need to check the profile again with the amphibian to see if I can get it to work. What I wonder, haven’t got the time to test it in flight, doesn’t the lever move while on the ground? I’ll be looking forward to the updated version with fix for the inertial separator. That will make the operation before take-off and after landing so much more convenient! I’ve bee flying the Grand Caravan an awful lot the last two days, as our VA just acquired our first Caravan and I’ve been flying it back to base while operating a lot of OnAir jobs. It’s an absolute dream to fly!
  • 291 Topics
    2k Posts
    C
    @Black-Square Thank you. Really enjoying the aircraft. You have done a great job. I saw this discussed but couldn't find anything recent. Appreciate your work.
  • 250 Topics
    1k Posts
    S
    "NAV" tracking now working but now unable to zoom GNS 530 in or out.
  • 605 4k
    605 Topics
    4k Posts
    R
    Hi all, I am submitting these observations in a spirit of constructive cooperation, with the sole objective of helping make this aircraft model as realistic and accurate as possible. Please note that all the tests and observations described below were conducted exclusively on the ground and not during flight. Issue with Yaw Damper (YD) Disengage Annunciation: according to the official documentation (Starship 1 Avionics System - System Manual.pdf downloaded from Robert Scherer's site), after a yaw damper disengagement, the Primary Flight Display (PFD) is supposed to show initially a flashing yellow "YD" annunciation, which becomes steady only after 10 seconds. The behavior I am observing is different: the annunciation is always steady and the autopilot disengage button, on the Honeycomb Alpha, does not cancel the annunciation. It works only the button on the virtual cockpit. Issue with AP/YD Mechanical Interlock: According to the official documentation, raising the AP engage lever engages the autopilot, and a mechanical interlock simultaneously engages the yaw damper. This don't happen, I have to engage manually the YD. Issue with Autopilot Disengagement: the autopilot should disengage when pressing the autopilot disconnect button, the go-around button, the trim switch, or when manually lowering the AP lever. It is not possible to configure the go-around button on any button of Honeycomb Bravo. The autopilot doesn't disconnect when I use the trim switch. Attached an image of the section of page 3-7 of the manual I'm referring to: [image: f5973386-1519-4337-9449-5ac32711e597.png]
  • 585 Topics
    4k Posts
    P
    Hi everyone, I wanted to do an IFR flight on VATSIM with the Grand Duke by Black Square Simulations. While tuning the frequencies before departure, I noticed that I couldn't hear any ATC or other VATSIM audio through the aircraft's radios. I'm using the free GTN750 mod from PMS50, but I also tried the other available instrument/radio configurations in the Grand Duke, and the issue was the same with all of them. I've already checked and tried pretty much everything I could think of: Volume and squelch settings Different COM frequencies The headphone/speaker switch Different radio/instrument configurations vPilot audio input/output settings The "Monitor All" function on the iPad in the aircraft Unfortunately, enabling Monitor All on the iPad didn't make any difference either. The interesting part is that TX seems to work perfectly. ATC could understand me without any problems, so my transmissions were definitely reaching VATSIM. In vPilot, the correct frequencies were also shown and updated when I changed the frequency in the aircraft. I also noticed that the TX indicator lights up when transmitting, and RX lights up when, for example, tuning an ATIS frequency. However, I still don't hear any audio. To rule out an issue with MSFS or vPilot itself, I tried the Fenix A320 in the same MSFS 2020 setup, and the radios worked immediately there. So it seems to be something specific to the Grand Duke. Another interesting detail: I do receive audio from the NAV radios. For example, when tuning a VOR, I can hear the VOR Morse/audio normally as well as any other aircraft sounds. So the aircraft's general radio audio seems to be working, it is just the VATSIM/COM receiver audio that isn't coming through. Has anyone experienced something similar with the Grand Duke or knows if there is a specific setting I might be missing? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!
  • 47 278
    47 Topics
    278 Posts
    Black SquareB
    @Jayman88 Did you check the Activation Details for Real Taxiways 2020 under the "Your Orders" tab on your Just Flight account? Unfortunately, I know that @Voice-of-Reason is away on holiday right now, but I will try to get you an answer from someone at Just Flight if one of the support staff does not see this post in short order. Sorry for the wait!
  • 463 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Breaking: I found a way to solve the problem It can probably be done smarter, but the way it was solved was to delete (or rename) the Packages folder, MSFS will rebuild it after a restart, copy Bsq King Air and Asobo King Air from MSFS2020 to the Community folder and restart the sim. I am soooo happy, because now I can run the Gps via Glassout. And it turned out that I was not the only one with this problem, my brother in law had the same problem. But @Black-Square : pretty pretty please with sugar on the top: please release a 2024 version. I got cat pictures
  • 460 3k
    460 Topics
    3k Posts
    B
    Thanks for your quick reply! So I get this right, that the values from the manual represent the real aircraft and are simply not achievable in the sim due to the "thick air" it simulates at low altitudes?
  • BlackSquare KingAir Professional for MSFS2024

    53
    1 Votes
    53 Posts
    11k Views
    P
    Hi everyone, I hope you’re all doing well! Nick, first of all, I’d like to express my gratitude to you for all the dedication and effort you put into developing such incredible aircraft for MSFS. I’ve been flight simming for 18 years, and I’m a huge King Air enthusiast. Seeing your announcement about the King Air 300 has made me incredibly excited, especially because the aircraft I fly the most these days is the Turbine Duke, partly because it gives me a little taste of the King Air experience. I’m really looking forward to the King Air and was wondering if you could share any updates about it. Could you tell us a little about how development is progressing? I know you have other aircraft ahead of it in the pipeline, but even a brief update would really help ease the anticipation! Will we get another update about it this year? Perhaps some screenshots? Most importantly—and I would be extremely grateful if you could answer this—do you have even a rough estimate of when it might be released? Thank you in advance, Nick, and once again, thank you so much for all your hard work! @Black-Square @Voice-of-Reason
  • Aero Commander 685 progress and King Air winglet options?

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    274 Views
    F
    @Black-Square Wait, do you mean within 2026 or within 1 year from this post? Either way, looking forward to your work, which unlike another recent release, is well worth the price...
  • Beech 1900D

    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    542 Views
    J
    Hi, I have a question. Can you tell me if you're developing both the Beechcraft 1900D and Beechcraft 1900C for both MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024? Thank you so much for your help. Sincerely, Connor Richey
  • Aspen Evolution PFD on BS aircrafs installed by me. (Implementation test)

    60
    14 Votes
    60 Posts
    5k Views
    K
    @jerrivel Super excited about the upcoming product! It will give new life to a number of aircraft!
  • What will be next?

    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    352 Views
    H
    Appologies to Nick as quite frankly any aircraft he makes will be a day one purchase from myself. I have a real hankering for a Swearingen Merlin and I think that would go rather well in your turboprop lineup. Although i think my want of the week will no doubt change again
  • Thank you BlackSquare <3

    1
    6 Votes
    1 Posts
    178 Views
    No one has replied
  • Product updates?

    8
    8 Votes
    8 Posts
    588 Views
    T
    Full state saving in the Starship? gulps Need to get those checklists ready!
  • Upcoming King Air Avionics

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    523 Views
    R
    I'm all for providing choices for people, especially if they draw more people to check out Nick's excellent planes. I won't be using those big screens, but I'm sure they'll appeal to a lot of folks who don't want to fly analog. Having said that, in the forums and discords I'm in for so many flightsim devs, wow, every avionics suite under the sun is being requested of pretty much every dev. I'm glad I don't have to try to please everyone!
  • SU6 turbine engine improvements

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    154 Views
    No one has replied
  • external lights Black-Square aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    257 Views
    Mets747M
    @Black-Square If you don't mind me asking, what do you change to make them more visible during the day? Something in the .fx file? Would love to apply that to my light mods on .to. You can DM if you'd like. Thanks Nick!!
  • No saving state

    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    2k Views
    Black SquareB
    @Mustang said in No saving state: an 'export/import' feature on the tablet to save/load state files locally I feel the same way, and don't trust anything stored anywhere I can't keep on my desk. Unfortunately, the MSFS architecture purposefully makes it impossible to save files locally from JavaScript. The "work" folder is exclusively for WASM instruments, I believe, but don't quote me.
  • Just Massively Impressed

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    EsotericE
    @Black-Square said in Just Massively Impressed: Thanks for letting me know! I often wonder how many of my users are out there flying my older planes, versus how much of this tends to be "fad" driven. I'm the kind of person who would pick a couple of my favorite airplanes and fly them forever, so it's harder for me to imagine how some users fly something new every couple of months or even weeks! The Analog King Air was my first purchase and the only reason I still have MSFS 2020 installed on my computer. I have all your other aircraft, but I always come back to the King Air. Really looking forward to the Model 300 in MSFS 2024!!!
  • Cessna 177 Cardinal

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    184 Views
    F
    @Mad_X i am sorry, my english is very bad, i am not from the US. i dont understand what you mean, sorry
  • Question About Upcoming Updates

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    374 Views
    hughesj2H
    @Black-Square Hi Nick, looking forward to the upgrades....I see echo19 has created a soundpack for theTBM850....Will any of this batch of upgrades include an official BlackSquare TBM850 soundpack update? Cheers James
  • Suggestion: Iron Man Mode

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    186 Views
    H
    Surely some self control is all that's needed there! Perhaps what would be nice is something like the old fsx a2a aircraft where on the pop up/tablet etc you can choose to inspect the aircraft which when lists the damage/wear and tear.
  • Turboprop engine starting simulation questions

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    207 Views
    E
    Disclaimer, not a dev, info might be gappy or misremembered: FS9, FSX, and MSFS have for ever and always had essentially no way to realistically implement proper turboprop simulation due to core sim limitations, which I'm sure you might know. In recent years BS and a few other developers have managed to squeeze somewhat realistic behaviour out of the platform despite its faults, but still it's only ever been possible to properly recreate turboprop physics by running the addon's physics outside the sim which is rare (Majestic is the only one I know to have done it). Nick is a magician, but even so there's only so much that can be done in recreating a turboprop within MSFS, at least up until now. SU6 included a lot of turbine simulation improvements in its change log, hopefully this will translate to an easier life for devs and a more faithful recreation for us consumers. It's all hope for now though, I haven't seen any devs comment on it yet and it wouldn't be very surprising to find out that the changes hasn't helped all that much, but my fingers are very much crossed! Edit: Again, with no specific knowledge, it's also possible that the SU6 improvements could be great for a ground-up project, but require a complete rework of existing products. Just speculation.
  • Commander 690B engine variant

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    255 Views
    S
    @Black-Square Nick, you told me to reach out to you via the support system a few times, and then confirmed that you received my email, but I've never received a response from you. This goes all the way back to Starship's release. I'd be happy to offer you any references/insight/testing you may need, in addition to access to my 840, if you'd like. If you're considering an MT 5 bladed propeller option, my airplane has them.
  • Velocity XL livery update with remastered landing gear area

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    85 Views
    No one has replied
  • Sunglasses

    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    192 Views
    K
    This would be really neat to implement!
  • Nick, are you tempted to create this gauge for the Twin Commander?

    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    367 Views
    toby23T
    Now you're just teasing me...