Skip to content

Black Square Add-Ons

2.8k Topics 17.0k Posts

Subcategories


  • 191 Topics
    1k Posts
    A
    Is there any connection to the surface modeling from the simulator? I've found similar behavior with another popular 737 previously that once at a set taxi speed, it never changes. I see this as well with the Caravan. If I am in Beta at 15kts - It will tend to stay at 15kts. If BETA is ZERO thrust from the prop, I'd expect some friction and other forces to begin reducing the taxi speed where I will eventually need to pop out of beta to maintain forward speed.
  • 222 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Those SDK changes seem promising to my untrained eye, hopefully they're a step towards fixing things in the sim like how you can't reduce RPM in the TBM and compensate with torque; you'll just bleed off airspeed anyway. Of course, I'm sure they're subject to change without notice (or documentation) until SU5 drops
  • 210 Topics
    968 Posts
    S
    Hi, thank you for your reply - it is really interesting how MSFS provides the data differently. I found a way to get the name easily, cause I am also using Simhaptic with a Buttkicker - and this software is more...let's say intelligent than the Moza Cockpit. This detects automatically which aircraft gets loaded (on MSFS, X-Plane or DCS) and it shows the internal name. For your aircrafts those are: bksq-aircraft-baron bksq-aircraft-baronpress bksq-aircraft-baronturbo bksq-aircraft-turbineduke And those names work as well for the Moza presets.
  • 552 4k
    552 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkSM
    @FlightEngineer1 yeah, no. I want an external interface where it reads/writes those vars in real time over SimConnect. Old-school me wants an Excel plug-in so I can run proper Ziegler-Nichols analysis tools. I keep dreaming, and nothing keeps happening.
  • 555 Topics
    3k Posts
    JibletJ
    Can't say I fly the Duke much so take this with a shovel of salt but are you confusing TAS and IAS by any chance? Or have I missed the point?
  • 47 273
    47 Topics
    273 Posts
    M
    @Black-Square EGDR Runways 18 & 24 have their signs swapped as well.
  • 461 Topics
    2k Posts
    bernd_lindner_1979B
    Thanks for the great offer, but it's a little too far away... I'm from Bavaria/Germany. And my wife is terrified of spiders So maybe in the next life - but who knows....
  • 428 2k
    428 Topics
    2k Posts
    sg_aviationS
    @Black-Square said in A list of Squawks as a 10+ year TBM Maintainer: This is the only tough one, unfortunately. As I just explained to someone else in another thread, MSFS does not really have any support for beta range, and everything you see here is me fighting with the underlying simulation to get what I want. For whatever reason, the propeller simulation creates a decrease of RPM when reducing the blade pitch into the beta range. I've considered adding yet another patch of my own on top of this simulation to mitigate the problem, but too many patches on top of patches can become a dangerous thing in software, unfortunately. I have no knowledge about the real aircraft behavior, however would like to add one point from a pure flightsim perspective: It is basically impossible to find a power setting that maintains taxi speed at a stable level. If I control the power lever with the keyboard F2 & F3 I can set increments of 1%. If I have a setting that increases speed, reducing by 1% already slows the aircraft down. If this is similar in the real aircraft I would accept this. If not, I would appreciate checking if the a stable speed can be achieved with a broader range of power lever setting, knowing that aircraft weight & weather conditions have an influence as well. Anyway, @Subsonic many thanks for your real maintenance view, if you can also on my comment.
  • BlackSquare KingAir Professional for MSFS2024

    18
    1 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    I gave in - should've held off.
  • Updated Installers

    feedback
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    193 Views
    M
    @Rich Hi Rich! I think I have noticed a bug with new installers you're using for the Caravan Pro. On initial install, you can select a custom directory, which I did for v1.0. However, after downloading the updated v1.1 installer from the website just now, here is what happened. Normally, the installers can handle updates themselves without having to uninstall the old version. However, this time, even though it said in the installers UI that is was updating from v1 to v1.1 - it did not respect my original custom directory. It deleted the old v1.0 files, and then installed the new v1.1 into the MSFS 2024 community folder like the legacy installers would. Could it be rectified so that when updating an existing addon with InstallShield, it respects your custom install directory of the existing installed addon? Thank you
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    214 Views
    B
    @Black-Square Sounds good.
  • Comm Power Circuits in Black Square Products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    117 Views
    J
    @Black-Square Hi Nick, hopefully things with the Caravan have settled down enough for you to give your thoughts on some of this.
  • Immersion killed due to bad ice effect on static prop cones

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    154 Views
    P
    @Buzz It’s not about staring at the plane from the outside, it’s about visual consistency. Since the spinners are part of the pilot's field of view, a static ice effect on a rotating part looks like a glaring oversight. Black Square is known for 'study-level' systems, so the visuals should match that level of detail. As I mentioned, Just Flight has already proven it’s possible to do it right.
  • Signal Degradation Library, Mod, or Add-On

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    59 Views
    No one has replied
  • Black Square Jetstream or B1900 request

    14
    2 Votes
    14 Posts
    718 Views
    Q
    Another vote for the Beechcraft 1900D here. I've missed this plane since my P3D times 6 years ago.
  • Dynamic registration broken?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    71 Views
    Black SquareB
    Sorry to hear that. To the best of my knowledge, I haven't done anything different in the configuration files between any of my aircraft in this respect. I know this feature has been inconsistent in MSFS 2024 since release, however. Perhaps someone else will chime in with some advice. You could also try Just Flight Support. Since they deal with a lot more aircraft than just my own, they might have seen this before.
  • How to enable failures

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    97 Views
    E
    @Black-Square Thanks so much for the quick response! That's super helpful, and exactly what I was hoping to get. Thanks again!
  • The eternal dilemma; to fly or not to fly?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    188 Views
    J
    I'll fly in any weather, as long as I don't deliberately take off in it and instead let it surprise me at my destination.
  • Turbulence Sounds

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    69 Views
    No one has replied
  • Tutorial missions for Black Square aircrafts

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    347 Views
    B
    ^^ Take him up on it.
  • Twin Otter?...

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    364 Views
    S
    I think A DC3 with Piston and PT6 engine options would be insane too. Imagine a Boris P&W Supercharged Wasp engine...
  • Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

    34
    6 Votes
    34 Posts
    6k Views
    C
    @Outermarker Oh that's really cool! I have a wishlist thread on the main msfs forums asking for a native G500/600 architecture. The G1000 is cool and all, but it's limited to just a handful of airframes - can't just drop it into any plane and be realistic. Same with the G3X - it is certified for the Bo, but wouldn't work for the Baron because it's not multi-engine compatible. That's why the G500/600 would be perfect. You could drop it into just about anything and connect it to a GNS or GTN, and still have a lot of the familiar Garmin functionality of the G1000/G3X.
  • A proposal for Breaker Checking

    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    132 Views
    K
    As long as it's an option - and not forced upon the user -, it's fine. I personally don't want anything turning red, blue, etc.
  • Black Square Tablet Features

    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    hangar_101H
    @SadBucket you don’t necessarily need to rummage between different pages. Sky4Sim has already implemented a plugin that integrates its tablet into the MSFS tablet - for instance. If you want to use only Sky4Sim’s features, you can: just select the Sky4Sim icon and the S4S interface will appear and can navigate only the features provided by S4S — the only difference is that it shows up inside the MSFS tablet. It definitely improves immersion, especially in aircraft that already have the “3D MSFS tablet” available.
  • Avidyne IFD 550/540 in Black Square addons

    4
    5 Votes
    4 Posts
    333 Views
    H
    Would love to see the Avidynes added as an option too!
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    236 Views
    No one has replied
  • Timeline on a Black Square King Air?

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    353 Views
    R
    I went hunting for this relevant post that I knew was squirrelled away in a thread, and found it: https://community.justflight.com/post/44802
  • Mapping BKSQ switches not shown in MSFS2024 to Honeycomb Alpha/Bravo

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    132 Views
    C
    @jmarkows said in Mapping BKSQ switches not shown in MSFS2024 to Honeycomb Alpha/Bravo: Things like LVars, HVars, etc. need external programs to map them to controllers, the base sim can't do it. Mobiflight is a free tool that does that and has quite the community sourced library of variables already set up. I've never used it to speak to how easy it is to use. There is also FSUIPC, which I use, but has a rather dated UI and it's very manual. There's also SPAD.Next and Axes and Ohs, all of which are payware and come recommended by their users. Thanks - I really appreciate the response. I did some more digging today and have now downloaded SPAD.Next (14 day trial) and found some good examples online.