Skip to content

Black Square Add-Ons

2.8k Topics 16.7k Posts

Subcategories


  • 165 Topics
    1k Posts
    S
    I mean this never happens with other planes, so i guess it's not hardware related
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Increase the failure rate is functionally the same.
  • 210 Topics
    968 Posts
    S
    Hi, thank you for your reply - it is really interesting how MSFS provides the data differently. I found a way to get the name easily, cause I am also using Simhaptic with a Buttkicker - and this software is more...let's say intelligent than the Moza Cockpit. This detects automatically which aircraft gets loaded (on MSFS, X-Plane or DCS) and it shows the internal name. For your aircrafts those are: bksq-aircraft-baron bksq-aircraft-baronpress bksq-aircraft-baronturbo bksq-aircraft-turbineduke And those names work as well for the Moza presets.
  • 551 4k
    551 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkSM
    @Tadeus72 said in Your favorite medium-long range cruise altitude: Thank you, often when crossing the States I actually look for a scenic route, this might be a great inspiration, will check it out. If you fly it, please let me know how you like it. I think there's one small "error" in it near the Grand Canyon, one airfield you can get into but the runway might be too short to get out of again. Of course, if you're not flying it for the VA you can skip it no problem. I've yet to fly it myself.
  • 550 Topics
    3k Posts
    C
    Is there any way to adjust the trim speed, or reduce the trim sensitivity (MSFS2024)?
  • 47 270
    47 Topics
    270 Posts
    M
    Yep - it's real taxiways. First pic is real taxiways on and 2nd pic is with it off. I've noticed this at a few other airports too - just kept forgetting to report it. Hopefully it's a code fix and not just one off fixes. It's always the sign that's wrong. [image: 93b6eb0d-5023-4f78-b50b-54601c0868ec.jpg] [image: a004a75d-9ee3-47e0-a88c-8dd65ea043c5.jpg]
  • 461 Topics
    2k Posts
    bernd_lindner_1979B
    Thanks for the great offer, but it's a little too far away... I'm from Bavaria/Germany. And my wife is terrified of spiders So maybe in the next life - but who knows....
  • 428 2k
    428 Topics
    2k Posts
    G
    Just sharing my experience, something I haven't encountered for a long time now, a gradual performance degradation over long flight. TLDR: reset the weather radar if sim become stuttery/crawling slow Was doing a long vatsim flight today and after around 2.5 hrs encountered stutters that won't go away. [image: cc8d0502-2e93-466d-8ca7-d0c1ae04db7b.png] After an hour or so sim came down to crawl, tried changing settings/clearing rolling etc/nothing would affect this [image: 9b599774-66de-4dff-a7b5-0c1c7dfb1306.png] Suddenly I recalled posting here ages ago about some constant FPS loss when the wx radar is turned on...so I turned the radar off, eureka!! [image: 780602a3-06e4-4fee-9bf2-54b06b5c1642.png] Now during that flight I still saw gradual performance degradation and luckily another WX reset did the trick. I do however think that the radar range also affects the performance (usually using 120NM in cruise) so I've reduced it to 40NM and that seems to be stable till the end of the flight. Just wanted to share this in case you will encounter this, not sure if this is a bug that manifests only with the TBM850 or a global sim issue with the last beta. *( and didn't reported to MSFS yet.... sorry but I've lost my faith in their bug handling and lacking communication)
  • Updated Installers

    feedback
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    47 Views
    RichR
    Hi, Thanks for the kind words about the recent update to the installers. These changes will be rolled out to all future products, and over time we will add it retrospectively to existing products as they are updated. We have this week reworked the Baron and Bonanza installers to use this feature, and we will work back over the rest in time.
  • Immersion killed due to bad ice effect on static prop cones

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    116 Views
    P
    @Buzz It’s not about staring at the plane from the outside, it’s about visual consistency. Since the spinners are part of the pilot's field of view, a static ice effect on a rotating part looks like a glaring oversight. Black Square is known for 'study-level' systems, so the visuals should match that level of detail. As I mentioned, Just Flight has already proven it’s possible to do it right.
  • Signal Degradation Library, Mod, or Add-On

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    50 Views
    No one has replied
  • Black Square Jetstream or B1900 request

    14
    2 Votes
    14 Posts
    690 Views
    Q
    Another vote for the Beechcraft 1900D here. I've missed this plane since my P3D times 6 years ago.
  • Dynamic registration broken?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    65 Views
    Black SquareB
    Sorry to hear that. To the best of my knowledge, I haven't done anything different in the configuration files between any of my aircraft in this respect. I know this feature has been inconsistent in MSFS 2024 since release, however. Perhaps someone else will chime in with some advice. You could also try Just Flight Support. Since they deal with a lot more aircraft than just my own, they might have seen this before.
  • How to enable failures

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    78 Views
    E
    @Black-Square Thanks so much for the quick response! That's super helpful, and exactly what I was hoping to get. Thanks again!
  • The eternal dilemma; to fly or not to fly?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    174 Views
    J
    I'll fly in any weather, as long as I don't deliberately take off in it and instead let it surprise me at my destination.
  • Comm Power Circuits in Black Square Products

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    82 Views
    J
    Well I was hoping there might be a break in which I could bring this up again, but the Caravan seems to have produced an absolute flurry of activity. Maybe in a week or two
  • Turbulence Sounds

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    64 Views
    No one has replied
  • Tutorial missions for Black Square aircrafts

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    334 Views
    B
    ^^ Take him up on it.
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    169 Views
    B
    Hey Nick @Black-Square. Question from the Dev... can you ask the dev at JustFlight to post a specific example of the EXACT URL that is used to trigger a failure? The docs list all the failure variables, but never seem to mention the specific elements of the URL, or the port, etc I was under the impression it was straight HTTP calls directly to a custom listener....he's literally listing URL paramters in the docs. [1:00 PM]Saturday, March 14, 2026 1:00 PM if you can post a message asking him to verify what I listed above, and whether this can be triggered by a vanilla HTTP request, outside of SimConnect, that would give me everything I need.
  • Twin Otter?...

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    339 Views
    S
    I think A DC3 with Piston and PT6 engine options would be insane too. Imagine a Boris P&W Supercharged Wasp engine...
  • Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

    34
    6 Votes
    34 Posts
    6k Views
    C
    @Outermarker Oh that's really cool! I have a wishlist thread on the main msfs forums asking for a native G500/600 architecture. The G1000 is cool and all, but it's limited to just a handful of airframes - can't just drop it into any plane and be realistic. Same with the G3X - it is certified for the Bo, but wouldn't work for the Baron because it's not multi-engine compatible. That's why the G500/600 would be perfect. You could drop it into just about anything and connect it to a GNS or GTN, and still have a lot of the familiar Garmin functionality of the G1000/G3X.
  • A proposal for Breaker Checking

    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    125 Views
    K
    As long as it's an option - and not forced upon the user -, it's fine. I personally don't want anything turning red, blue, etc.
  • Black Square Tablet Features

    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    hangar_101H
    @SadBucket you don’t necessarily need to rummage between different pages. Sky4Sim has already implemented a plugin that integrates its tablet into the MSFS tablet - for instance. If you want to use only Sky4Sim’s features, you can: just select the Sky4Sim icon and the S4S interface will appear and can navigate only the features provided by S4S — the only difference is that it shows up inside the MSFS tablet. It definitely improves immersion, especially in aircraft that already have the “3D MSFS tablet” available.
  • BlackSquare KingAir Professional for MSFS2024

    14
    1 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    R
    @Buzz ah but there is! There’s the B200C, which has a large cargo door
  • Avidyne IFD 550/540 in Black Square addons

    4
    5 Votes
    4 Posts
    317 Views
    H
    Would love to see the Avidynes added as an option too!
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    220 Views
    No one has replied
  • Timeline on a Black Square King Air?

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    327 Views
    R
    I went hunting for this relevant post that I knew was squirrelled away in a thread, and found it: https://community.justflight.com/post/44802
  • Mapping BKSQ switches not shown in MSFS2024 to Honeycomb Alpha/Bravo

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    124 Views
    C
    @jmarkows said in Mapping BKSQ switches not shown in MSFS2024 to Honeycomb Alpha/Bravo: Things like LVars, HVars, etc. need external programs to map them to controllers, the base sim can't do it. Mobiflight is a free tool that does that and has quite the community sourced library of variables already set up. I've never used it to speak to how easy it is to use. There is also FSUIPC, which I use, but has a rather dated UI and it's very manual. There's also SPAD.Next and Axes and Ohs, all of which are payware and come recommended by their users. Thanks - I really appreciate the response. I did some more digging today and have now downloaded SPAD.Next (14 day trial) and found some good examples online.