Skip to content

Black Square Add-Ons

2.8k Topics 17.1k Posts

Subcategories


  • 200 Topics
    1k Posts
    W
    IRL does the Caravan Amphibian have Start Latches or would that be optional ? Start latches on Turboprops are normally set by kkeeping the Prop Lever forward, then move the Popwer lever into Beta and then Condition lever to Cut-Off. This way, special Latches locks the Propeller blades in 0° Blade angle (Beta idle) This is to prevent any thrust from the Propeller on startup. To disenage the Latches, the Power lever is set to idle and the Propeller lever into Feather and then back to forward. This is simulated on the SWS Kodiak 100 Amphibian.
  • 223 Topics
    1k Posts
    X
    Nick, please, a little update or beta test opportunity ,-)
  • 210 Topics
    968 Posts
    SwordS
    Hi, thank you for your reply - it is really interesting how MSFS provides the data differently. I found a way to get the name easily, cause I am also using Simhaptic with a Buttkicker - and this software is more...let's say intelligent than the Moza Cockpit. This detects automatically which aircraft gets loaded (on MSFS, X-Plane or DCS) and it shows the internal name. For your aircrafts those are: bksq-aircraft-baron bksq-aircraft-baronpress bksq-aircraft-baronturbo bksq-aircraft-turbineduke And those names work as well for the Moza presets.
  • 553 4k
    553 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkSM
    Just a wee bit dark over the Indian Ocean, Mauritius to Colombo. [image: 376cb914-6740-46ee-942a-2609ea502045.png]
  • 555 Topics
    3k Posts
    S
    I've noticed this with black square twins tbh. I imagine it's hard enough to get the flight model to feel correct with both engines running let alone with either the critical or non-critical engine failing. I do believe the vmc roll speed is modeled ok though. Best flight model around right now is from A2A, and I can vouch the single engine performance on the Aerostar is very convincing. Not to say that black square is by any means bad. In many ways black square can be much more useful as an effective sim trainer so long as you are aware of some slight limitations in how failures are modeled.
  • 47 273
    47 Topics
    273 Posts
    M
    @Black-Square EGDR Runways 18 & 24 have their signs swapped as well.
  • 461 Topics
    2k Posts
    bernd_lindner_1979B
    Thanks for the great offer, but it's a little too far away... I'm from Bavaria/Germany. And my wife is terrified of spiders So maybe in the next life - but who knows....
  • 428 2k
    428 Topics
    2k Posts
    sg_aviationS
    @Black-Square said in A list of Squawks as a 10+ year TBM Maintainer: This is the only tough one, unfortunately. As I just explained to someone else in another thread, MSFS does not really have any support for beta range, and everything you see here is me fighting with the underlying simulation to get what I want. For whatever reason, the propeller simulation creates a decrease of RPM when reducing the blade pitch into the beta range. I've considered adding yet another patch of my own on top of this simulation to mitigate the problem, but too many patches on top of patches can become a dangerous thing in software, unfortunately. I have no knowledge about the real aircraft behavior, however would like to add one point from a pure flightsim perspective: It is basically impossible to find a power setting that maintains taxi speed at a stable level. If I control the power lever with the keyboard F2 & F3 I can set increments of 1%. If I have a setting that increases speed, reducing by 1% already slows the aircraft down. If this is similar in the real aircraft I would accept this. If not, I would appreciate checking if the a stable speed can be achieved with a broader range of power lever setting, knowing that aircraft weight & weather conditions have an influence as well. Anyway, @Subsonic many thanks for your real maintenance view, if you can also on my comment.
  • Black Square Custom Failure Notes

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    91 Views
    K
    There are a couple of sync issues with the sync of the display when H:Event are used to toggle failures. Here are 2 use cases specifically: USE CASE 1, "show only active failures ENABLED" Here are two failures being toggled remotely in the TBM (causing them to enter FAIL state, as expected) [image: 9a391b9a-8c67-4df3-a5e1-a8b0578c6dd6.png] The tablet shows the state correctly. I then toggle the R BRAKE, causing it to be fixed... [image: b76352b7-3647-40d7-ba69-be4a4920caf5.png] ALL GOOD SO FAR. Lastly, I toggle the GEAR CONTROLLER, which was the only remaining failure. This fixes it as expected however the LAST item isn't cleared from the list and remains in red. Notice ACTIVE FAILURES is 0, which is correct: [image: 8e75aa2f-3fbe-4192-8182-a19683b57ac6.png] if I click RESET on the tablet....it actually triggers the failure... (photo taken after clicking RESET) [image: e2967322-6e50-406a-994c-ba007689069b.png] if I click RESET on the tablet AGAIN...it works as expected, 0 failures and clear panel: [image: 49f4250e-91f3-41a8-8fef-df73233689c1.png] USE CASE #2: "Show only active failures DISABLED" I click R BRAKE and toggle remotely (triggers a fail, as expected) [image: e10d7888-76d7-4915-b10e-b52282113426.png] I click R BRAKE and toggle (triggers a fix, as expected). Notice the tablet remains RED for that item, despite Active Failures correctly updating to 0. [image: 59046a3f-2713-426e-9c3f-3bf671606995.png] The same behavior from use case #1 also happens here where if I click RESET on the tablet, it things it's resetting but it's actually toggling to fail mode...it then takes ANOTHER reset to clear. Keith Smith PilotEdge
  • BlackSquare KingAir Professional for MSFS2024

    18
    1 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    I gave in - should've held off.
  • Updated Installers

    feedback
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    229 Views
    M
    @Rich Hi Rich! I think I have noticed a bug with new installers you're using for the Caravan Pro. On initial install, you can select a custom directory, which I did for v1.0. However, after downloading the updated v1.1 installer from the website just now, here is what happened. Normally, the installers can handle updates themselves without having to uninstall the old version. However, this time, even though it said in the installers UI that is was updating from v1 to v1.1 - it did not respect my original custom directory. It deleted the old v1.0 files, and then installed the new v1.1 into the MSFS 2024 community folder like the legacy installers would. Could it be rectified so that when updating an existing addon with InstallShield, it respects your custom install directory of the existing installed addon? Thank you
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    239 Views
    B
    @Black-Square Sounds good.
  • Comm Power Circuits in Black Square Products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    132 Views
    J
    @Black-Square Hi Nick, hopefully things with the Caravan have settled down enough for you to give your thoughts on some of this.
  • Immersion killed due to bad ice effect on static prop cones

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    166 Views
    P
    @Buzz It’s not about staring at the plane from the outside, it’s about visual consistency. Since the spinners are part of the pilot's field of view, a static ice effect on a rotating part looks like a glaring oversight. Black Square is known for 'study-level' systems, so the visuals should match that level of detail. As I mentioned, Just Flight has already proven it’s possible to do it right.
  • Signal Degradation Library, Mod, or Add-On

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    60 Views
    No one has replied
  • Black Square Jetstream or B1900 request

    14
    2 Votes
    14 Posts
    769 Views
    Q
    Another vote for the Beechcraft 1900D here. I've missed this plane since my P3D times 6 years ago.
  • Dynamic registration broken?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    77 Views
    Black SquareB
    Sorry to hear that. To the best of my knowledge, I haven't done anything different in the configuration files between any of my aircraft in this respect. I know this feature has been inconsistent in MSFS 2024 since release, however. Perhaps someone else will chime in with some advice. You could also try Just Flight Support. Since they deal with a lot more aircraft than just my own, they might have seen this before.
  • How to enable failures

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    107 Views
    E
    @Black-Square Thanks so much for the quick response! That's super helpful, and exactly what I was hoping to get. Thanks again!
  • The eternal dilemma; to fly or not to fly?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    200 Views
    J
    I'll fly in any weather, as long as I don't deliberately take off in it and instead let it surprise me at my destination.
  • Turbulence Sounds

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    71 Views
    No one has replied
  • Tutorial missions for Black Square aircrafts

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    357 Views
    B
    ^^ Take him up on it.
  • Twin Otter?...

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    393 Views
    S
    I think A DC3 with Piston and PT6 engine options would be insane too. Imagine a Boris P&W Supercharged Wasp engine...
  • Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

    34
    6 Votes
    34 Posts
    6k Views
    C
    @Outermarker Oh that's really cool! I have a wishlist thread on the main msfs forums asking for a native G500/600 architecture. The G1000 is cool and all, but it's limited to just a handful of airframes - can't just drop it into any plane and be realistic. Same with the G3X - it is certified for the Bo, but wouldn't work for the Baron because it's not multi-engine compatible. That's why the G500/600 would be perfect. You could drop it into just about anything and connect it to a GNS or GTN, and still have a lot of the familiar Garmin functionality of the G1000/G3X.
  • A proposal for Breaker Checking

    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    133 Views
    K
    As long as it's an option - and not forced upon the user -, it's fine. I personally don't want anything turning red, blue, etc.
  • Black Square Tablet Features

    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    hangar_101H
    @SadBucket you don’t necessarily need to rummage between different pages. Sky4Sim has already implemented a plugin that integrates its tablet into the MSFS tablet - for instance. If you want to use only Sky4Sim’s features, you can: just select the Sky4Sim icon and the S4S interface will appear and can navigate only the features provided by S4S — the only difference is that it shows up inside the MSFS tablet. It definitely improves immersion, especially in aircraft that already have the “3D MSFS tablet” available.
  • Avidyne IFD 550/540 in Black Square addons

    4
    5 Votes
    4 Posts
    345 Views
    H
    Would love to see the Avidynes added as an option too!
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    241 Views
    No one has replied
  • Timeline on a Black Square King Air?

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    368 Views
    R
    I went hunting for this relevant post that I knew was squirrelled away in a thread, and found it: https://community.justflight.com/post/44802