Starship

I'm not really good with making servers on discord, but feel free to join and help manage server: https://discord.gg/VK9e992TR

@Black-Square Did you have time to take a looki Nick?

@SadBucket Somehow I doubt the canard wing lobby is very strong in MSFS and will convince Asobo to do it Either way, not saying it's easy, but it's Nick after all, if somebody can do it, then it's him.

Yes I bought it in the 2024 marketplace and for me a couple hours later it showed up in the 2020 content manager as an owned product.

I figured it out looking at your code. To get to the analog altimeter settings it's K:KOHLSMAN_INC and K:KOHLSMAN_DEC parameter 3 - parameter 1 is the pilot side display, 2 is the copilot display. You translated ALT_BaroAdjust_*_1 and _2 but nothing for the 3rd one. But this works.

Yep, I was right - descend doesn't work from the copilot side autopilot panel either. Works fine from the pilots side - too bad I can't tune the pilots side to a VOR. I think I'll be hand flying the end of this looking at the other side. What I was expecting was if the AHRS and CDU x sides were on that the two main displays would basically display the exact same as the copilots - wrong expectation? Also noticed that ATC 1/2 doesn't seem to work - transponder stays on the pilot side.

@MD82 said in Perfection defines the BS Starship: @alanfernandes said in Perfection defines the BS Starship: Hi! You can find the cruise performance tables in the official Pilot's Operating Manual for the Starship. Here's the link: https://rps3.com/Files/Starship/Flight%20Deck%20Publications/Starship%20Pilot's%20Operating%20Manual.pdf It includes all the power setting data and performance charts you're looking for. Hope this helps! Cheers. Those I have and use since day 1. I was merely asking because your picture is in digital format. I actually use the manual along with AI to interpolate and calculate the numbers. Those results you saw were generated by the AI, and they line up perfectly with the manual.

It's simply the difference between ISA and OAT. You will come up with either a + or a - difference from ISA. With that you enter the tables. Say you're at FL370. Either the POH (ISA Power setting table) or the aircraft will tell you that ISA is -57°C. Now check you're OAT (IOAT). If your OAT is -47°C, then you're at ISA+10 (10°C warmer). Caution against comparing IOAT value on the instrument against the table value. This value changes with speed, and as your power setting is not set yet, the difference in values might differ as you try to set the power setting.

Every post here shows me that the AP is not being used correctly for climbs, and probably descents too. It's not an A320 Airbus. Best explained in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho7B8AOt7Os. It will change how you approach the whole thing. BTW running at full power or any torque setting that results in prolonged red or even yellow torque numbers will destroy your engines very VERY quickly.

I see, thanks for the reply. Hopefully asobo will improve the lacking physics in the future. Thanks either way!

Although I enjoy flying the Boeing, I'm not really active in the PMDG community. I just notice they seem to have found a way somehow. Perhaps they too guessed correctly in mitigating the issue. If I do come across anything specific I will let you know for sure!