Starship

@jmarkows This is correct. Trip planning is only for estimation of your intended flight, much like in the AUX pages of the GNS or Tools pages of the GTN. The MFD Progress or CDU FMS Data screens have the real-time information you are looking for.

thanks a lot @Black-Square , very much appreciated. Its often the little things bringing big joy

Oh, I missed that there was a second thread about this. If you are willing, please go try the first and very simple change that I recommend in this thread to help me pinpoint the issue. Thank you!

There is typically no such thing as official "new" manuals for aircraft. Sometimes they get amendments, or overriding additions in the form of supplemental type certificates, but no such thing exists for Starship, as far as I'm aware. At the present moment, I believe my manual to be the most accurate collection of Starship avionics information, both new and old.

@Faerblaed said in REALLY CONFUSED!!!!: I think there is difference, like modelling is optimized differently, also some other visual things like the registration numbers are different. I would think also in the background logic you would find some optimization differences. The MSFS2024 has click spots in walkaround mode. I would say you should use the corresponding version of the plane for your sim. Also, both installers available when you buy it. Oh yeah you're right. I was thinking more along the lines of systems or something deeper. I'm still new to MSFS so I forgot about the walkaround stuff

@jmarkows said in ITT increasing with altitude?: I thought ITT went down as you climbed because of the reduction in air density and temperate? ITTs will rise because there is less air for cooling. ITTs are the most important thing in turbines because you'll always hit that limit before you hit most others, especially in a climb.

My grandmother would have the same fit.

Perfect thank you!! amazing aircraft

I'm more concerned that after paying millions for an aircraft, they put the lavatory where you get to poop in public. That's a no from me. Doesn't seem like I can lift the seat or pop it out or otherwise have a look at it though.

I've had this issue as well on more than half my flights. MSFS 2020

@Black-Square are you aware of this issue?

Understood. Thanks for the explanation Nick.

@hughesj2 standard rate one turn is not based on a specific bank angle, as bank angle ≠ turn rate. As jmarkows said, a good rule of thumb is (TAS/10)+7. So for a hold at say 210KTAS, angle of bank should be 28 degrees. If you're flying something very slow (say a 172 flying a hold at 100KTAS) the bank angle needed will be significantly less (17 degrees) as you say.

@Orlaam said in Order of checklist items: Well, it was funny to me because I'm still learning. So I was checking the items off in the list with the avionics and turned off the displays, then realized I had a few more items that I couldn't see, lol. How would one use this list without power to the list on the display without referring to paper? You follow what I'm saying? I did this yesterday. I was following the shutdown checklist and deliberately skipped the electronics so I could finish, then 10 seconds later I lost them anyway when I put both engines in cutoff. I very clearly did not think that through

Ah, terribly sorry. I was seeking it in the manual but did not check the tablet schema. Great, thanks for confirming.

Hi Nick, well I kinda think that, given the overall completeness of the product, these little things matter, but that's the geeky IRL pilot side of me, a side that's always been obsessed with avionics.... Any little flashing annunciator is important. Many thanks for the quick turnaround. Overall performance is excellent, maybe the flashing 'to-waypoint' indicator at 10s to turn would be ok too.... Really enjoying your creation.