Starship

Yes I bought it in the 2024 marketplace and for me a couple hours later it showed up in the 2020 content manager as an owned product.

I figured it out looking at your code. To get to the analog altimeter settings it's K:KOHLSMAN_INC and K:KOHLSMAN_DEC parameter 3 - parameter 1 is the pilot side display, 2 is the copilot display. You translated ALT_BaroAdjust_*_1 and _2 but nothing for the 3rd one. But this works.

Yep, I was right - descend doesn't work from the copilot side autopilot panel either. Works fine from the pilots side - too bad I can't tune the pilots side to a VOR. I think I'll be hand flying the end of this looking at the other side. What I was expecting was if the AHRS and CDU x sides were on that the two main displays would basically display the exact same as the copilots - wrong expectation? Also noticed that ATC 1/2 doesn't seem to work - transponder stays on the pilot side.

@MD82 said in Perfection defines the BS Starship: @alanfernandes said in Perfection defines the BS Starship: Hi! You can find the cruise performance tables in the official Pilot's Operating Manual for the Starship. Here's the link: https://rps3.com/Files/Starship/Flight%20Deck%20Publications/Starship%20Pilot's%20Operating%20Manual.pdf It includes all the power setting data and performance charts you're looking for. Hope this helps! Cheers. Those I have and use since day 1. I was merely asking because your picture is in digital format. I actually use the manual along with AI to interpolate and calculate the numbers. Those results you saw were generated by the AI, and they line up perfectly with the manual.

It's simply the difference between ISA and OAT. You will come up with either a + or a - difference from ISA. With that you enter the tables. Say you're at FL370. Either the POH (ISA Power setting table) or the aircraft will tell you that ISA is -57°C. Now check you're OAT (IOAT). If your OAT is -47°C, then you're at ISA+10 (10°C warmer). Caution against comparing IOAT value on the instrument against the table value. This value changes with speed, and as your power setting is not set yet, the difference in values might differ as you try to set the power setting.

Every post here shows me that the AP is not being used correctly for climbs, and probably descents too. It's not an A320 Airbus. Best explained in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho7B8AOt7Os. It will change how you approach the whole thing. BTW running at full power or any torque setting that results in prolonged red or even yellow torque numbers will destroy your engines very VERY quickly.

I see, thanks for the reply. Hopefully asobo will improve the lacking physics in the future. Thanks either way!

Although I enjoy flying the Boeing, I'm not really active in the PMDG community. I just notice they seem to have found a way somehow. Perhaps they too guessed correctly in mitigating the issue. If I do come across anything specific I will let you know for sure!

@jmarkows It seems to work with windowed mode but then I get the ugly white border around my whole screen, but then I get the ugly white border at the top.

@Black-Square Hi Nick! It's really great when developers listen to their customers. It shows how committed they are to improving their systems and making the simulation even more immersive. I'm an Xbox Series X user, and as you know, things are very limited here. The option to import the flight plan directly from Simbrief is very welcome, although I still prefer manually entering everything into the CDU. What I would really like — and I know this isn't the topic of discussion — is to be able to view Navgraph charts on the tablet and to track the aircraft on their map (Simlink feature). I have no idea how complex or easy that would be to implement, but it would certainly be very useful. I miss having that feature to see airport ground positions, follow taxi routes, and so on. It would be exactly what Just Flight already does on their tablet. I hope that one day this comes to the Starship and the other BS aircraft that use the same tablet. Alan / From Brazil

I've had this tab open for weeks, just meaning to congratulate you on your Starship operation experience, and thank you for sharing the story with me. These are exactly the experiences I design my aircraft for, and I think there are none better than Starship among my fleet. Thanks again, and thank you for enjoying my aircraft the way they were designed to be

Awesome explanation!!

I Used The Pro series of Bonanza, Baron and Caravan and the Analog King Air for the tests. In those tests I used The GTN750 with the KX-155 as well. I also used the GNS430 with the Bonanza. I did not use the GNS430 for the Starship earlier BUT after your post here i just tried to switch over to having the FMS1 by the 430. The flights with the 430 were all OK. So to be clear: There is nothing wrong with how the STARSHIP works, It was me expecting a function it probably should not even have. And it flies so nice & really can keep one busy if one wants! Thanks for taking time Nick. Dave.

@Black-Square Ya know Nick, that unreleased update with the interactable control surfaces sounds like a perfect time to add the cockpit window sun shields and "brakes off" sign in the window we chatted about ages ago Also, taking delivery of our IRL Commander in the next 4-6 weeks. I sent a justflight message with my email ages ago, but haven't heard from you. If you want to connect on Commander stuff, feel free to reach out!

@Black-Square Yes, the protection activated even with both items in failure. Regarding the injectors, wouldn't it be better to treat this as a general failure rather than a clog? In the engine animation on the tablet, you can notice the absence of fuel injection (it looks like a small droplet). And finally, in the case of the R ENG DRIVEN FUEL PUMP, the logic is just reversed for it to be activated on the correct engine.