Starship

Hey again For what it's worth, there's another typo in the RTU events: Rtu_TransponderStandbyButton_L should be Rtu_TransponderStandbyButton_1

@SebAvi Probably because no Starship has been equipped with that.

@jmarkows thank you, i will try again. Actually it works. It's only a not correct idle position but dont affect too much. Ciao

All registrations. I assume he draws the stock ones in the same way, that way they can be overridden by a custom one.

@Randolf The standby/transfer pumps are on the battery bus. They will function with battery only.

Thank you and I will try the solution indicated. What seems strange to me is that initially the popouts generated with PopOut Manager were correct, that is, I had a window with only the pilot side PFD. Then, for no apparent reason, this inconvenience. Ciao

Mmm yeah, I read that section a bit differently, but your reading of it makes more sense.

Saw it, yes that worked. Thanks!

@Captain-Bakon It's on the configuration page a tab or two over from where your select the livery before starting a flight.

It’s a fair point. Initially, at least bringing the Flighsim own EFB into the tablet would be appreciated.

Operator error on my part, apparently I wasn't logged in to Discord on sim rig - thanks!

Testing complete - it sesms to be working flawlessly now in MSFS2024! Great stuff. Thanks again.

Here's a quick video on how to fly an ILS approach: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO1KLRUNHfA

Nick has already integrated it in the Dukes (my "weapon of choice" ever since its inclusion), so he is certainly aware of the unit. The KLN-90B is technically only certifiable for RNAV2 at most, and other than DME arcs, it also doesn't do any of the fancier leg types AFAIK. There is an option to not filter out RNAV1 procedures, but otherwise the capabilities will not really be beyond the build in avionics I would think. So while I always love to see the KLN90B in more planes I don't think it should be a high priority thing at least.

missed that, thanks for the hint

Thanks Nick! it's working again

@Captain-Bakon But in general, yes, this is exactly the scenario I envisioned when I included it.