Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.5k Topics 29.4k Posts

  • 355 Topics
    2k Posts
    H
    @JRHorse that's essentially the point... (within safe margins)
  • 2k Topics
    10k Posts
    M
    @jmarkows said in OK ... I'll be the one to ask.: @Black-Square said in OK ... I'll be the one to ask.: No rest for the wicked over here. I'm waiting for SU3 to see if I can enable the custom registration numbers before the next update. About this, do you have it disabled for the entire plane, or just the liveries that came with it? I have a friend who dabbles in photoshop and does the liveries for our VA; he made one for Starship and insists the dynamic registration has never not worked for him in 2024, whereas it's never once worked for me. Since SU3 Beta, it has not worked for me 90% of the time. However, if you are patient, you CAN get it to show up. First of all, the system needs to be enabled. I did it for all liveries (default and my own) by removing the "//" at the appropriate part of the panel.cfg. Then, I open a default airplane e.g. B748. I configure it and set the registration number of my Starship. Save & Go Back. Once on the home screen, select the Starship and your particular livery. 75% of the time, after the prop brake populates on the model, your registry will also appear. If not, go back and forth between the default and Starship. It's shameful that something like this has a mind of its own. But at least I can fly with a reg. 100% of the time in SU3. Only the amount of patience varies a bit.
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 106 Topics
    465 Posts
    H
    @Delta558 thanks for checking! Of course not, but knowing pilots making error (which is how I ended up even thinking about this)
  • 381 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    O
    @kutyafal I’m having the exact same issue.
  • 476 3k
    476 Topics
    3k Posts
    V
    Injected aircrafts will be only displayed if I really near. Is it possible that I see it from a greater distance?
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 219 Topics
    1k Posts
    M
    Thanks Mark, I can use the joystick on the index controllers so I've got a work around in the mean time. Appreciate the response!
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    241 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    503 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    629 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    641 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    306 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    269 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    274 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    222 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    928 Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    290 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    988 Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    367 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    176 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    376 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied