Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.3k Topics 34.1k Posts

  • 439 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The 146 and RJ both simulate cabin temperature based on the selected air source and temperature selections, and take into account factors such as if the aircraft is in direct sunlight, or if one or more exterior doors are open. We did make some minor improvements to the Air Conditioning logic with the 146 v2.4 update that will be brought across to the RJ in the next update, but that's primarily related to the DUCT TEMP / CABIN TEMP relationship and rate of change. Mark - Just Flight
  • 2k Topics
    14k Posts
    K
    John Wayne KSNA, no issues w/ RNAV Y 20R, but w/ the RNAV Z (RNP) 20R I am not getting vertical guidance. Is this due to the aircraft / pilot not being authorized for RNP approaches? I tried it from JWARD, and from KLEVR, was at the correct alt for each of these initial apch fixes, but it just won't arm APR. MSFS 2020, latest nav data from Navigraph (December update). Really am enjoying flying the B58P all around SoCal including Vegas. Very nice. Kirk
  • 59 Topics
    253 Posts
    MarkM
    I have just looked into this, and it doesn't look like the PRIMER control assignments are supported in the PA38. I have therefore logged this on our internal bug tracker, and we'll add support for those in the next update. Thanks for reporting this. Mark - Just Flight
  • 115 Topics
    492 Posts
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. I have logged this on our internal trackers and we will investigate this further ahead of the next update to the Vulcan. Mark - Just Flight
  • 418 Topics
    2k Posts
    T
    I have a similar issue with the last several versions of the F28, where when I start from cold and dark the fuel valves are always in the run position. I can move them with my mouse but they are never in the cut off position by default. Between MSFS 2020 and 2024 I've never set any bindings for the fuel and even when I remove fuel related default bindings I still have the issue.
  • 688 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. We do have this logged on our internal trackers as it is something we would like to improve too. It's something that would involve a significant amount of development time to rewrite the code behind this logic, so we wouldn't be able to provide any timeframes for when an improvement may make its way into an update, but it is on our radar. Mark - Just Flight
  • 492 3k
    492 Topics
    3k Posts
    S
    Thanks, @Mark. I looked and it's not there either under MD8x and DC9x. I've never heard them at specific airports, but I've heard them while flying. I'll try to pay attention the next time I fly.
  • 184 Topics
    730 Posts
    MarkM
    The G3X Touch used in our Hawk is one of the default GPS options included in MSFS, developed by Working Title, so we don't actually have any control over its functionality. The logic of the flight plan being removed when the GPS is turned off, I can only assume, is either accurate to the real unit or is a feature that has been implemented for MSFS compatibility. I seem to recall that in order to get a flight plan loaded in the G3X that you have to have departure and arrival airports entered in the flight plan. So if you try and create a flight plan when the aircraft is not on the ground at the departure airport, the GPS may not create the flight plan. Mark - Just Flight
  • 223 Topics
    1k Posts
    C
    @roguefoodie It's a file called flight_model.cfg which you'll find buried in the aircraft install folder in Community. The lines to replace are right at the end of the file. Backup the original file somewhere first so you can easily set it back if something goes wrong.
  • 371 Topics
    2k Posts
    T
    I agree. I would be willing to purchase an upgrade for the Turbo Arrow package.
  • Request: Change Method of License Validation

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. There are no plans at the moment to change the activation process of our products in MSFS 2024, but we will log that request on our internal trackers as something to consider in the future. Mark - Just Flight
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    Mike KutscherM
    I found the problem. I had the JD Clean Glass mod installed, but it was causing problems. I deactivated it, and the pilot is now visible. The problem is usually located about 80 cm in front of the keyboard. Regards, Mike
  • How to download latest version with no account

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    621 Views
    DerekD
    Unfortunately the versions would be incompatible so you'd need to download the third party update from that vendor.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    31 Views
    No one has replied
  • Harrier II in MSFS 2024 takes off like a homesick angel!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we are currently developing free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for all of our MSFS products, including FS Traffic. The status of each of these updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status Mark - Just Flight
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Yeah, the CV880/990 would be really cool indeed! The problem I see is the aircraft sounds because there are no aircraft available for recording sounds and very few videos of the engine sounds, all of which do not cover the full range of operation.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    695 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    312 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    361 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    670 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    786 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    806 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    371 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    310 Views
    No one has replied