Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.7k Topics 30.5k Posts

  • 386 Topics
    2k Posts
    L
    @Godwisper The VR issue is still present with the latest version in MSFS 2024. I'm really disapointed to be honest and I would not recommend purchase for users who like to fly in VR. The plane itself seems to be quite good, so far only VR experience is BAD. I logged a ticket but i'm pretty sure the answer will be "we already aware about the issue and working on a fix"
  • 2k Topics
    11k Posts
    MikeyFlyzM
    @Black-Square said in CDU and MFD buttons bug when assigned in axis and ohs: What events are you using for those interactions in Axis and Ohs? I assume the ones at the end of my manual in the Inputs/Outputs section? Well.. not really. I was looking to map the letter CDU buttons (1ABC, 2DEF etc) but I don't see those in the manual, only the line select so I downloaded a profile where the letters supposedly worked on a winwing MCDU but I don't have one so I tried re-mapping them to the virpil push buttons. For example, the profile uses H:CDU_3Button_1 for 3DEF button but when I remap it, nothing happens when pressed.
  • 57 Topics
    247 Posts
    B
    Managed to get on before leaving. Did a proper reinstall still the same. Convinced it was something in my settings. Had a look around and not one of my switches wasn’t in the same position as usual. Flicked that to the normal position and bingo. It was mapped to ‘toggle engine 1 fuel value‘. Removed the binding so won’t happen again. Once again thanks for your reply. It made me do more digging.
  • 112 Topics
    483 Posts
    Y
    https://community.justflight.com/topic/8933/state-saving-in-the-a36-doesn-t-work
  • 388 Topics
    2k Posts
    O
    I think it must be the navdata for that particular airport. Possibly the third party addon messing with it. When I tried a different airport (KSRQ) it worked just fine. The SID from KATL also worked just fine in both flight plans.
  • 671 Topics
    3k Posts
    WooliesW
    Yeah would be very nice to get the amazing 146 into 2024 for sure ... I fear that the F70/100 will be ahead of getting the 146 moved up. Hopefully some news soon
  • 483 3k
    483 Topics
    3k Posts
    K
    I was having similar issues, but I think I fixed them with settings. I already had aircraft traffic quantity and parked a/c quantitiy to none, but there's another setting called "characters quantity". I have no idea what that is, but turning that off too seemed to fix it. Now I load into a major airport and there's traffic all over. With "characters quantity" on I was getting either no traffic, or like a single plane. Just posting this in case it helps anyone else out.
  • 181 Topics
    718 Posts
    MarkM
    Typically, behaviour such as this will be related to a control assignment conflict. An easy way to confirm if this is the case is to unplug all your external hardware (Joystick, Throttle Quadrant, etc.) and then take off using only the mouse and keyboard. If the landing gear/hydraulic issue no longer exists with just the keyboard and mouse plugged in, then it is likely a control conflict with your other hardware. If this behaviour persists, could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link and one of our support team will be able to assist with further troubleshooting: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • 222 Topics
    1k Posts
    G
    Oh wow - I totally missed the fuel auto-switch option in the EFB Thanks for following up - will wait an see if the lights come good with the next few MSFS updates.
  • 361 Topics
    2k Posts
    S
    @Delta558 No worries, have fun! I investigated it a bit further in the meantime. The trim tab seems to have a lot more impact on the overall lift coefficient than the elevator itself - which is odd to me. I tried to map my joystick to the trim axis and the trim to the elevator axis and that actually gave me realistic control over it in slow flight (looks very funny to steer that thing but only the trim tab moves). Can you try landing that thing without trimming it, because that seems to be the core of my problem - i.e. without trim, no slow flight possible because elevator alone cannot create enough lift with that low power setting.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    952 Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    595 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    287 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    315 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    603 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    712 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    703 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    339 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    284 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    298 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    240 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    979 Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    326 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    402 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight