Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.9k Topics 31.6k Posts

  • 417 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    @pete470 said in Simbrief integration is missing.: I imported a flight plan into the FMS last night and definitely did not use the Downloader. Since v1.4 you can definitely import directly from Simbrief… I did import it into the EFB first, I don’t know if that is necessary though…. I’ll try that later if I get time. I could never get the FMS to import when I tried using Simbrief Downloader and so always ended up entering them manually! You are correct! I wasn't aware of that option as I always had the Simbrief Loader app running in the background... I have just loaded a flight plan using the Simbrief import to the FMS. After entering my ID, it worked flawlessly. In the case of the original post, TJ Turner, his solution should be to either uninstall the RJ and then re-install it. If that doesn't resolve his issue, he should try the Simbrief Downloader app...
  • 2k Topics
    12k Posts
    M
    and a +5 deviation does not account for fuel burn that is less than half.
  • 58 Topics
    251 Posts
    MarkM
    Officially, we don't support any of our products on the MSFS Sim Update betas. The Sim Update betas are beta releases, so bugs are expected. It would almost be a full-time job in itself to keep all our products fully compatible with each beta update. Once SU4 fully releases later this year, we'll take stock and provide any necessary changes/fixes to our products to ensure compatibility. Mark - Just Flight
  • 114 Topics
    489 Posts
    MarkM
    We're not aware of any brake issues in Vulcan, however, if you're using MSFS 2024 there have been some changes to Parking Brake control assignments in SU3 that could be causing a conflict. See: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/parking-brake-cant-toggle-on-off/734585 If brake issues exist in multiple aircraft, that typically points to either a control assignment conflict. Mark - Just Flight
  • 391 Topics
    2k Posts
    WooliesW
    Ha, ok, solved it. Apologies
  • 672 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD
    @Woolies You're on social media at the moment
  • 486 3k
    486 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD
    @otreblA said in No traffic at arrival airport: @Derek I'm not crazy or a liar. I didn't say you were. Just that we're not really the sort of business that has 'staff'. From time to time our small teams will work on all sorts of different projects. Sometimes they will impact each other - and I'm guessing this is what you must be referring to - but, most of the time, the team dedicated to one project generally don't work on others at the same time. We also have a number of freelancers. You suggested that your problem with FS Traffic may have been due to a lack of staff and I am just trying to explain that is unlikely to be the case. However, it's certainly true that if we are releasing a big title or a significant update in week 1, another similar thing will need to wait until week 2. To be honest, we wouldn't want to employ enough 'staff' to prevent this - they would spend the rest of the time twiddling their thumbs. With respect to Traffic, the last update was in July, as I mentioned above. The work on it since then has mainly been done as and when, and mostly involves looking into the various updates released for MSFS2024 to see if there is any chance of getting it to work with X-Box S. So far, no good. Getting back to your issue, if you contact Just Flight support with details of the problem they will certainly try and resolve it for you.
  • 182 Topics
    726 Posts
    J
    @Mark H Hi Mark - thanks for your continued follow-up and support - I have a LOT of controls and when I went through all of my assignments and cleaned everything up to just stick and throttle it works. So I indeed did have something bound which was jamming the throttle. My apologies for not doing a more thorough testing. Spent two hours in the plane already. Again thank you for your help.
  • 222 Topics
    1k Posts
    W
    100 percent the flaps are inverted. No aircraft goes nose down when the flaps go down. The aircraft in the aim slows down as it should and it feels like it has lift but it is 100 percent not supposed to be pitching nose down to the point you have to fully pull on the yoke to keep it from crashing.
  • 366 Topics
    2k Posts
    GunStraussG
    @Delta558 It seems that Asobo has used real aircraft data — including input recordings from actual controls and IMU-equipped aircraft — to validate and fine-tune the flight behaviour of several of their planes. Have you done something similar with the PA28s?
  • Harrier II in MSFS 2024 takes off like a homesick angel!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we are currently developing free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for all of our MSFS products, including FS Traffic. The status of each of these updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status Mark - Just Flight
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Yeah, the CV880/990 would be really cool indeed! The problem I see is the aircraft sounds because there are no aircraft available for recording sounds and very few videos of the engine sounds, all of which do not cover the full range of operation.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    647 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    298 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    335 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    633 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    753 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    741 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    359 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    300 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    315 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.