RJ Professional

Hi The LVars JF_RJ_AP_IAS and JF_RJ_AP_MACH will show the value displayed in the IAS/MACH display in the MCP. Is this what you wanted? The LVar JF_RJ_APFD_Speed_Mode can be used to determine if the aircraft is in IAS or MACH mode. The value changes from 0 to 1 when the mode in the PFD changes from IAS to MACH

Hi Mark I found out what the issue was, APU was not running as you mentioned above, Thanks for resolving it. Regards Joe

We would like to add it to all of our MSFS 2024 airlines at some point, but it's not something we would be able to share a timeframe for at the moment. Mark - Just Flight

Appreciate it, thank you.

another feature I'd really like is for the Flight data computers (FMS) to be capable of displaying their outputs. So those of us with external hardware FMS's could use a program like spad.next to display on our hardware. Input is working, not output though.

The 146 and RJ both simulate cabin temperature based on the selected air source and temperature selections, and take into account factors such as if the aircraft is in direct sunlight, or if one or more exterior doors are open. We did make some minor improvements to the Air Conditioning logic with the 146 v2.4 update that will be brought across to the RJ in the next update, but that's primarily related to the DUCT TEMP / CABIN TEMP relationship and rate of change. Mark - Just Flight

I don't recall seeing any other reports of this, so could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you could provide details such as the simulator you're using (including which sim update), and if you have any steps to reproduce this behaviour (including screenshots/video if possible), then our support team will be in the best position to attempt to reproduce this and offer further assistance. Mark - Just Flight

There haven't been any changes to the IRS alignment or FMS logic recently (other than the addition of Simbrief Import in the v1.4 update). However, any feedback that gets sent to us always gets logged on our internal trackers, and we do consider everything each time an update is planned. The exact scope of each update is typically based on the availability of our development teams at the time of the update, so it's tricky to give timeframes for if/when certain bug fixes/features may be included in an update. Mark - Just Flight

We are aware of some scenarios where changing the simulator time (or using active pause) can cause the timers in the RJ code to go out of sync with the timers in MSFS 2024. We are investigating this, and we aim to have a fix implemented in an upcoming update to the RJ. In the meantime, we would recommend minimising any time changes or active pause usage when using the RJ in MSFS 2024. Mark - Just Flight

Maybe it's possible to tie the engine sounds to the values the PED uses instead of the engine simulation variables or calculate separate values specifically for the sounds. That way, you can do whatever you want underneath the hood while fixing the engine sounds. The best of both worlds.

Yes, my experience with both is that they have the same systems depth. The RJ may have EFIS, but don't let that fool you as there's no VNAV, only advisory VNAV (just like the real aircraft). The RJ is much more hands-on than for example the 737NG. Unlike the 146 it has autothrottle, but it won't select a thrust mode automatically like the 737NG would. The procedures are old school just like with the 146 (lenghty procedures with loads of system tests). So it's just a notch above a 146 with an EFIS retrofit. If you want a more hands-on airplane with EFIS that still has a decent autopilot, the RJ is an excellent choice. I prefer the RJ, but that's just my personal taste and not because the product is a better product than the 146.

Thanks Mark... Rob