Skip to content

MSFS Products

7.6k Topics 41.0k Posts

  • A category to cover all discussions about the F70 & F100 Professional

    241 1k
    241 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    v1.2a released.
  • 513 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    Yes, we do plan to bring the latest livery_config.ini logic across to the RJ in the next update. Mark - Just Flight
  • 3k Topics
    19k Posts
    A
    A lot of things aren't simulated in the G1000NXI. Flight envelope protections, for example, are non‑existent. I'm not sure if that kind of functionality could be added by BS as part of a possible customization. Does WT make the code readily available for customization? Adding custom waypoints is another example that's not present in the sim's default G1000NXI either. I think that if the G1000NXI were fully functional since BS is a developer with a very high level of realism then it would definitely be worth it. But if it's just to have what we already know, I probably wouldn't pay for it. Especially because I much prefer analog panels anyway. Alan / From Brazil
  • 66 Topics
    289 Posts
    C
    Are the developers open to make some small changes here to the Tomahawk as per the above request? Could the aerial option be integrated into the EFB tablet ..say under Aerial placement , with the following options: Vertical radio mast -On/Off, Angled radio mast fwd -On/Off Angled radio mast Rear -On/Off How feasible is it to add a Garmin G5 to the cockpit panel?
  • 128 Topics
    547 Posts
    MarkM
    It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight
  • 439 Topics
    2k Posts
    G
    It’s a wonderful aircraft, but I’m unable to fly it in VR because of the cockpit proportions. I hope Just Flight may fix this in the future. None of their previous aircraft had issue like that.
  • 728 Topics
    4k Posts
    S
    Any update, I've recently moved from 2020 to 2024 and this was never an issue before. It's a real deal breaker from an immersion and usability perspective
  • 525 3k
    525 Topics
    3k Posts
    L
    thank you
  • 190 Topics
    754 Posts
    I
    I can't switch the engine master switch to start while in VR in MSFS 2020! It will go to 'on' ok but every time I click it to start it just goes back off again (I only have this problem in VR as the switch works perfectly in flat screen). I've noticed that if I'm behind the front seat the switch moves to start fine as I can click it from the back but while sitting in the front seat it just always goes back to off again and I cant get the mouse pointer behind the switch. Is there a problem with the switch sensitivity area in VR? I've tried configuring the engine master switch to a button on my Turtle Beach Velocity One throttle but none of the control options - toggle engine master switch etc seems to to anything.
  • 235 Topics
    1k Posts
    M
    Hey team, any chance you could release an 8k paintkit? I find that the liveries I produce are really blocky, I used an 8k upscaler to see if it would help on a livery I made and it made the lines seem smoother, but upscaling vs being native 8k is noticable. Even if you then create a 4k version of your livery by scaling down this would still be better than the other way around. I find the details are pretty fuzzy on the existing paintkit when looking at the aircraft in sim so hoping that could be improved.
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    852 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    395 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    472 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    866 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    951 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    970 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    460 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    381 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    427 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    306 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    595 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.