Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.8k Topics 31.0k Posts

  • 395 Topics
    2k Posts
    S
    @Iconography That bug report for SU4 beta sounds exactly like what I am experiencing. I’ll probably go off the beta back to SU3. It’s interesting it only affects certain planes. Fenix A320 is fine for example.
  • 2k Topics
    11k Posts
    P
    @OrionNZ Thanks a million for your help! Knowing that the events themselves were OK let me narrow down my search. It turned out that, for some mysterious reason, the first two lines of the events.txt file weren’t being loaded by my Mobiflight instance — and that’s exactly where I’d put the two definitions, of course. After inserting two dummy lines at the front everything works perfectly now and I can fully enjoy this wonderful plane. Thanks again!
  • 58 Topics
    251 Posts
    MarkM
    Officially, we don't support any of our products on the MSFS Sim Update betas. The Sim Update betas are beta releases, so bugs are expected. It would almost be a full-time job in itself to keep all our products fully compatible with each beta update. Once SU4 fully releases later this year, we'll take stock and provide any necessary changes/fixes to our products to ensure compatibility. Mark - Just Flight
  • 114 Topics
    489 Posts
    MarkM
    We're not aware of any brake issues in Vulcan, however, if you're using MSFS 2024 there have been some changes to Parking Brake control assignments in SU3 that could be causing a conflict. See: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/parking-brake-cant-toggle-on-off/734585 If brake issues exist in multiple aircraft, that typically points to either a control assignment conflict. Mark - Just Flight
  • 388 Topics
    2k Posts
    D
    @Mark They’re really nice products too!!! David
  • 671 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    @Mark Do we have a solution for updating the UNS-1 database yet? It's getting really complicated to keep flying the aircraft this way.
  • 486 3k
    486 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    The Summer 2022 and Winter 22/23 databases are each taken from a specific week in those time periods. I don't recall the exact week off the top of my head, but I think it's somewhere around May 2022 and January 2023. We would like to add new databases in a future update, but we have nothing to announce at the moment. Mark - Just Flight
  • 182 Topics
    723 Posts
    D
    A lot of aircraft are simply not working in SU4 beta at the moment - I've seen development work and testing explicitly having to stay on SU3.
  • 222 Topics
    1k Posts
    G
    Oh wow - I totally missed the fuel auto-switch option in the EFB Thanks for following up - will wait an see if the lights come good with the next few MSFS updates.
  • 361 Topics
    2k Posts
    V
    Is there any update on the new version? It seems version 0.6.2 is still showing on the Marketplace.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    980 Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    619 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    290 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    324 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    621 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    731 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    725 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    346 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    291 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    305 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    246 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    339 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    420 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight