Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.7k Topics 35.9k Posts

  • 484 Topics
    2k Posts
    C
    Yup, I got some help from SI team and we figured it out. Go to your SI Pilot portal > Setting > Aircraft Callsign. Make sure you check the boxes for: Aircraft ICAO - Auto Detect Get Aircraft Callsign from Most Recent SimBrief Flight Plan Disable Auto-Sync Tail Number The [Disable Auto-Sync Tail Number] is key. Yes, even when it is greyed out, you still need to check the box. This seems to work for me so far. If it doesn't work for you, you can try their discord server (they have a support ticket system). They are really quick to respond.
  • 3k Topics
    15k Posts
    MD82M
    Digging up an old thread because I got back into the Starship after a few months. I was busy going over the equipment requirements again, to update my SimBrief profile. In short, if you're not using the GNS 430, but you accept the fact that your Starship has ONE GPS receiver: You are not capable of RNAV10 or RNP4 remote or oceanic as this requires two independent Long Range Navigation Systems. The Starship has 2 FMC's, but they are linked to only ONE receiver. Hence, they are not independent. (There is a designated area where only one LRNS is sufficient) Even though you meet all requirements for Terminal RNAV 1 SID's and STAR's, you can't accept one because it is not line-selectable from your FMS (FAA AC 90-100A 10. b. (3) "General Operating Procedures" pg. 13 You can fly an RNAV GPS approach down to LNAV minima, because you have a GPS receiver and the approach IS line-selectable from the database. Due to having only one GPS receiver, NAT HLA is also not approved. (Except for the fact that you're not RNP4/RNAV10 qualified anyways). Cheers,
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 119 Topics
    506 Posts
    MarkM
    Unfortunately, as you say, I believe this will be a limitation of using Chaseplane with some of our products. The Vulcan, and a few of our other products, rely on the core MSFS camera system to move the user to certain locations in and around the aircraft. As Chaseplane overrides the default camera system, the cameras that we trigger in the code no longer exist, so the camera will not change. It's something we have logged on our internal trackers for further investigation, and to see if there is any form of a workaround we can find for Chaseplane users. In the meantime with the Vulcan, it should be possible to create custom Chaseplane cameras inside the AEO/Navigrator compartment and then trigger those via the Chaseplane interface. Mark - Just Flight
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    S
    Yeah that makes sense, seems like woth an aircraft that could have that many variations you would overrun the budget really quick if you started trying to represent every little thing it could have. Thank you for all the info as well, very educational
  • 714 Topics
    4k Posts
    D
    Hi. One more thing, please, please, please. Could I request you add pause at TOD to the RJ, 146, F28, and upcoming products. Thanks!
  • 506 3k
    506 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Re: Feature Requests Can we please get an updated FS Traffic Manual that shows SETUP Global settings for the latest version of MSFS 2024 instead of ones that no longer exist (e.g. "TRAFFIC AIRPORT QUALITY"). Thanks.
  • 188 Topics
    749 Posts
    D
    Hi, I take off, fly to my destination for about 10 minutes then slowly i start to lose control and the aircraft wants to roll to the left. Gradually gets worse and worse until i end up crashing. Suspects its hydraulics or something. Really weird, it literally starts doing it over sheffield, having taking off from RAF Waddington. Any ideas anybody? Cheers Ian
  • 228 Topics
    1k Posts
    L
    Mine stills on vs 4.3.
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Stand down everyone. I figured it out. Well, not so much 'figured' but stumbled upon it. You know the saying 'If you throw enough s**t at the wall, some of it will stick'? That the method I used.
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    838 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    864 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    403 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    338 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    362 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    271 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    462 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    490 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    260 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    615 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Archer III for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    702 Views
    K
    Thanks Mark, it's good to know it hasn't been forgotten.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • FS Traffic and GA aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    MarkM
    @gjereza Any GA aircraft models can be added to the FS Traffic fleet by adding the "Title=" entry from the aircraft.cfg into the respective livery field on the "Liveries" page of the Traffic Control Centre app, and then flights can be added for that aircraft on the "Schedules Manager" page. It is important to note that any aircraft added to the FS Traffic fleet must be fully MSFS compatible and preferably be a model that is optimised to be used as AI traffic. The FS Traffic manual can be downloaded via the following link if you would like to read more about this process: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight
  • WB-SIM 172 Classic WT GNS530 - no NAV/COM page

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    332 Views
    No one has replied