Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.6k Topics 35.8k Posts

  • 482 Topics
    2k Posts
    lowkeyL
    Hi everyone, I bought the RJ about a month ago so I'm still relatively new and still learning the full procedures but I've done a couple of full flights already and absolutely loved it. But on my last 3 flights in a row (and a test flight) I've ran into the exact same issue on approach - the plane wobbles from left to right constantly, up to the touchdown when using autoland. I've got no clue what the cause could be. I've been following the exact same checklist the whole time and it just suddenly started to appear a couple of days ago. In this clip I wasn't touching the controls and let autopilot do the whole approach and landing. I had about 5kts of crosswind but I don't think that's relevant (it happened on approaches with no wind as well) and even then it wouldn't make the plane sway the way it does. Can someone tell what the cause of this could be? Or is that normal and there's nothing wrong with it? It's kinda getting on my nerves already...
  • 2k Topics
    15k Posts
    K
    Hi, I do not have the PMS. Only have what comes with the package. It's completely a matter of hit or miss. The same config sometimes yields to a successful ILS capture, sometimes the ILS does not capture. Yes, the indications are fine, the needles move as they should, but HDG mode remains active, APP remains armed but not activated. So far I only noticed this behavior when I was using a config which included the KNS81 RNAV computer, in which case, the issue happened more than 50% of the time. Yes, I always use the NAV 1 radio for the ILS approach, change the NAV source well in advance, change HSI source, the DME source. Everything is well prepared for the capture. I also tend to use HDG mode to intercept the localizer, even when my RNAV waypoint could achieve the same, I switch to HDG mode and expect the LOC to take over - but it does not happen consistently. I never noticed this before I started to use the RNAV computer. In the early BS days, the RNAV computer wasn't working with the autopilot and so I never chose a RNAV panel config - never experienced the problem of non-captured ILS either. But since I bought the new Baron, and since then the Duke, knowing the RNAV can be used with the autopilot, I actually use it a lot - and interestingly, the issue with the ILS appeared. Therefore, I dare to say this behavior is somehow related to the RNAV system and its methods of utilizing the autpilot. Perhaps 3rd party scnery also play a role here (I only fly to 3rd party scenery, never use stock ones, except for those "enhanced" ones). So it may be more than just one thing.
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 119 Topics
    506 Posts
    MarkM
    Unfortunately, as you say, I believe this will be a limitation of using Chaseplane with some of our products. The Vulcan, and a few of our other products, rely on the core MSFS camera system to move the user to certain locations in and around the aircraft. As Chaseplane overrides the default camera system, the cameras that we trigger in the code no longer exist, so the camera will not change. It's something we have logged on our internal trackers for further investigation, and to see if there is any form of a workaround we can find for Chaseplane users. In the meantime with the Vulcan, it should be possible to create custom Chaseplane cameras inside the AEO/Navigrator compartment and then trigger those via the Chaseplane interface. Mark - Just Flight
  • 429 Topics
    2k Posts
    A
    @Joulz said in UNS-1: Database Expired: You keep saying that for 2 or 3 years... In the mean time,others devs such as inibuilds, pmdg or aerosoft implemented a way to update na data from inside the sim. So it shouldn't be too complicated. But apparently it's clearly not your priority, which is a little bit a shame for products of great quality that I otherwise appreciate. Just tired of hearing the same melody again and again... @Joulz said in UNS-1: Database Expired: You keep saying that for 2 or 3 years... In the mean time,others devs such as inibuilds, pmdg or aerosoft implemented a way to update na data from inside the sim. So it shouldn't be too complicated. But apparently it's clearly not your priority, which is a little bit a shame for products of great quality that I otherwise appreciate. Just tired of hearing the same melody again and again... Honestly, there’s no point in having an FMS with outdated data. It feels like a promise that's never fulfilled. Imagine if the Fokker 100 is released the same way? I definitely won't be buying it.
  • 712 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkM
    I'm not able to replicate that behaviour on my side with the latest version of the 146 and GSX, so it'll definitely be worth creating a ticket with Just Flight Support. In the ticket, if you could provide the information that you have in this thread, plus the video that you have recorded, then that will put our support team in the best position to attempt to replicate that, and log it for further investigation if required. Mark - Just Flight
  • 506 3k
    506 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Re: Feature Requests Can we please get an updated FS Traffic Manual that shows SETUP Global settings for the latest version of MSFS 2024 instead of ones that no longer exist (e.g. "TRAFFIC AIRPORT QUALITY"). Thanks.
  • 187 Topics
    748 Posts
    MarkM
    Please see: https://community.justflight.com/post/46913 Mark - Just Flight
  • 227 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    From our internal testing of the post-SU4 updates, we reliably see the correct state recalled on the first flight of a session, and then it becomes inconsistent on subsequent flights in the same session. Mark - Just Flight
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Stand down everyone. I figured it out. Well, not so much 'figured' but stumbled upon it. You know the saying 'If you throw enough s**t at the wall, some of it will stick'? That the method I used.
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    833 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    861 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    400 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    331 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    357 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    270 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    455 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    486 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    255 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    611 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Archer III for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    686 Views
    K
    Thanks Mark, it's good to know it hasn't been forgotten.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • FS Traffic and GA aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    MarkM
    @gjereza Any GA aircraft models can be added to the FS Traffic fleet by adding the "Title=" entry from the aircraft.cfg into the respective livery field on the "Liveries" page of the Traffic Control Centre app, and then flights can be added for that aircraft on the "Schedules Manager" page. It is important to note that any aircraft added to the FS Traffic fleet must be fully MSFS compatible and preferably be a model that is optimised to be used as AI traffic. The FS Traffic manual can be downloaded via the following link if you would like to read more about this process: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight
  • WB-SIM 172 Classic WT GNS530 - no NAV/COM page

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    329 Views
    No one has replied