Skip to content

MSFS Products

8.0k Topics 43.4k Posts

  • A category to cover all discussions about the F70 & F100 Professional

    301 1k
    301 Topics
    1k Posts
    K
    Hi everyone, I’ve noticed a behaviour with the Fokker 100 during the final approach that I’m not sure is intended or possibly a bug. When established on the ILS, I regularly find that once I extend the flaps to 25, and especially 42, they seem to generate a huge amount of drag. When reducing speed from around 180/170 knots down to the approach speed, e.g. 132 knots, the autothrust seems unable to keep up with the deceleration. As a result, the aircraft repeatedly gets into the red/low-speed range. If I leave ATS engaged, it then seems to apply almost TOGA thrust to recover the speed, which results in the aircraft accelerating back up to around 160–170 knots. At this point I’ve started taking over manually because otherwise the speed oscillations become quite excessive during the final approach. Is this behaviour intentional and representative of the real Fokker 100, or could there be an issue with the flight model/autothrust logic? I’d be interested to hear if anyone else has experienced the same thing or if there is a specific technique/procedure I might be missing. Thanks!
  • 516 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    We do have this logged on our internal trackers, and we'll be further investigating it ahead of the next RJ update. From our previous investigations, it appears to be a core MSFS 2024 bug, and fixing it on our side will require a rewrite of that autopilot mode's code, which is a significant time investment and needs to be scheduled into our workflow at an appropriate time. Therefore, we can't provide a specific time frame for when the next RJ update will be at this time. From my experience, the aforementioned LVL CHG behaviour may only exist on the first LVL CHG engagement of a flight and only if a specific simconnect call is being made by another program to generate AI traffic. If you experience this behaviour in the sim under those conditions, my recommendation is to toggle LVL CHG ON > OFF > ON, and LVL CHG will then behave as expected for the remainder of the flight. Mark - Just Flight
  • 3k Topics
    21k Posts
    B
    Thanks for your quick reply! So I get this right, that the values from the manual represent the real aircraft and are simply not achievable in the sim due to the "thick air" it simulates at low altitudes?
  • 66 Topics
    293 Posts
    M
    If Working Title puts the Aspen avionics natively into MSFS, that might be an option too. I thought I saw that somewhere as being on their to-do list but I could have been dreaming. It would be inserted into the panel much like the 430/530 units are now...those are Working Title's 430/530's.
  • 128 Topics
    547 Posts
    MarkM
    It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight
  • 441 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    Hi @bonobo611, as Derek said above, we continue to support our entire library of MSFS products and provide updates/upgrades when our resources allow. All of our products received large, free of charge updates/upgrdes last year, which you can read more about here: https://www.justflight.com/articles/end-of-year-round-up-2025-part-one We're always open to feedback on our products, and that community feedback is one of the main drivers we use to decide what product is next to be updated/upgraded. The best way you can log feedback on any of our products is by raising a ticket with Just Flight Support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team is best positioned to assist with troubleshooting, and they will also log any bugs/feature requests on our internal trackers if required. About the two items of feedback provided in your message: The 146 TCAS behaviour isn't something I recall seeing reported previously, but if you see that behaviour again, could you kindly raise a support ticket explaining the behaviour to our support team? Any screenshots/videos showing the behaviour would also be a great help to us, and we can then ensure the appropriate action is taken. The "map not zooming" behaviour is most likely caused by the bottom right corner of the EFB (where the zoom controls are located) overlapping with the interactive checklists on the left side wall. This was introduced a few Sim Updates ago, which affected the method we were using to prevent items from being clicked through the EFB. We do have this logged as an item to keep monitoring with each Sim Update. In the meantime, the zoom buttons will function if you move the EFB to the 'Window' position by clicking the top bezel. We are not aware of any "radio" bugs or regressions caused by recent Sim Updates in the F28, so we would again kindly ask you to raise a support ticket with any feedback you have, and we can ensure appropriate action is taken. Mark - Just Flight
  • 730 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkM
    Could I kindly ask you to raise a support ticket for this with Just Flight Support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team is best positioned to provide assistance and troubleshooting. Mark - Just Flight
  • 526 3k
    526 Topics
    3k Posts
    L
    [image: e182301a-0547-4ccf-91cb-0c9f5269c68f.png]
  • 192 Topics
    760 Posts
    G
    I remember few years ago you could trim the aircfrat fine, I have no binds issues clean profile but when I move the hotas for elevator the trim moves.. Is this normal as can't trim the aircraft now?
  • 237 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    That one has been around for a long time now and I'd be glad to see it gone, but I'm not so sure that isn't just a bug with the sim autopilot itself and not the JF planes.
  • Request: Change Method of License Validation

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. There are no plans at the moment to change the activation process of our products in MSFS 2024, but we will log that request on our internal trackers as something to consider in the future. Mark - Just Flight
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    Mike KutscherM
    I found the problem. I had the JD Clean Glass mod installed, but it was causing problems. I deactivated it, and the pilot is now visible. The problem is usually located about 80 cm in front of the keyboard. Regards, Mike
  • How to download latest version with no account

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    917 Views
    DerekD
    Unfortunately the versions would be incompatible so you'd need to download the third party update from that vendor.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    31 Views
    No one has replied
  • Harrier II in MSFS 2024 takes off like a homesick angel!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we are currently developing free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for all of our MSFS products, including FS Traffic. The status of each of these updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status Mark - Just Flight
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    885 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    412 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    489 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    909 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    996 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    474 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    402 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !