Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.7k Topics 35.9k Posts

  • 483 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. Could we kindly ask you to forward that feedback to Just Flight Support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team will then be best suited to assist with troubleshooting and/or ensuring that any valid bugs are properly logged. However, just to note that point 1 is intentional logic, as each RJ livery is fitted with accurate equipment configurations by default. Point 2 sounds like expected logic if the engine parameters are on the limit of rounding up/down to the nearest whole number. This will likely vary on every flight as the engines will idle at different speeds/temperatures depending on weather conditions. Mark - Just Flight
  • 3k Topics
    15k Posts
    F
    You know what’s the worst part? I’m the kind of person who spends hours trying to find the mistake on their own before posting on a forum for help… and about an hour after I posted this thread, I realized that I had the wrong course set the whole time. I thought it was correct. So I apologize, and thank you to everyone who replied and tried to help.
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 119 Topics
    506 Posts
    MarkM
    Unfortunately, as you say, I believe this will be a limitation of using Chaseplane with some of our products. The Vulcan, and a few of our other products, rely on the core MSFS camera system to move the user to certain locations in and around the aircraft. As Chaseplane overrides the default camera system, the cameras that we trigger in the code no longer exist, so the camera will not change. It's something we have logged on our internal trackers for further investigation, and to see if there is any form of a workaround we can find for Chaseplane users. In the meantime with the Vulcan, it should be possible to create custom Chaseplane cameras inside the AEO/Navigrator compartment and then trigger those via the Chaseplane interface. Mark - Just Flight
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    S
    I was taking a look through some old F28 cockpit photos online and noticed a few might have had the attitude indicator that has the two bar type of flight director instead of the single triangle. What time frame did that type of equipment become more popular? Always prefered that style for flying approaches.
  • 714 Topics
    4k Posts
    N
    Hello, I am in the process of making some fictional military liveries for cargo missions. I would like to be able to attach the countermeasure suit. How would I go about doing so. It does not look like an option in the aircraft config. Thanks!
  • 506 3k
    506 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Re: Feature Requests Can we please get an updated FS Traffic Manual that shows SETUP Global settings for the latest version of MSFS 2024 instead of ones that no longer exist (e.g. "TRAFFIC AIRPORT QUALITY"). Thanks.
  • 187 Topics
    748 Posts
    MarkM
    Please see: https://community.justflight.com/post/46913 Mark - Just Flight
  • 227 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    From our internal testing of the post-SU4 updates, we reliably see the correct state recalled on the first flight of a session, and then it becomes inconsistent on subsequent flights in the same session. Mark - Just Flight
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Stand down everyone. I figured it out. Well, not so much 'figured' but stumbled upon it. You know the saying 'If you throw enough s**t at the wall, some of it will stick'? That the method I used.
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    833 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    862 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    400 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    331 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    361 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    270 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    457 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    488 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    255 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    614 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Archer III for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    695 Views
    K
    Thanks Mark, it's good to know it hasn't been forgotten.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • FS Traffic and GA aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    MarkM
    @gjereza Any GA aircraft models can be added to the FS Traffic fleet by adding the "Title=" entry from the aircraft.cfg into the respective livery field on the "Liveries" page of the Traffic Control Centre app, and then flights can be added for that aircraft on the "Schedules Manager" page. It is important to note that any aircraft added to the FS Traffic fleet must be fully MSFS compatible and preferably be a model that is optimised to be used as AI traffic. The FS Traffic manual can be downloaded via the following link if you would like to read more about this process: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight
  • WB-SIM 172 Classic WT GNS530 - no NAV/COM page

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    329 Views
    No one has replied