Skip to content

MSFS Products

7.0k Topics 38.4k Posts

  • 503 Topics
    2k Posts
    P
    @Mark Thanks. I will test it again over easter and see if the problem still exists. I‘ve read that there are some people reporting similar issues with other products and even default aircraft here: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/unable-to-click-some-items-with-the-mouse-in-vr/758216/32 Seems to be VR related and probably something for Microsoft/Asobo to solve, not you…
  • 3k Topics
    17k Posts
    M
    You're both welcome, though I didn't do much beyond a glance at .cfg files and trying out various dev mode debug tools in the menu. Thanks Nick for the corrections. I'll make them just for the warm fuzzy feeling that fixing incorrect data always gives Besides the 'show sim forces' debug option (earlier image), it's very interesting to see the different CFD visualisations at work. With one engine inop there is clearly a sudden loss in thrust, even a loss in the downward deflection on the adjacent air flow from the lack of prop wash over the inop engine's wing, but no yaw tendency or rudder forces/effects show up whatsoever (whether AP is engaged or not, in case of a hidden yaw damper interfering). A roll tendency occurs into the dead engine as you might expect, just no yaw. That's in itself is interesting because it seems to show that MSFS decouples various aspects of the flight model; the forces and moments acting on the aircraft may not be purely a result of all the aerodynamic forces shown (else something else is blocking it from occurring). I know there are legacy and modern flight models, and various settings that are old or new - it must be a nightmare to keep track of which settings actually influence the aircraft and which are deprecated (and catching the undocumented ones) - so I don't envy any developer's job there (well I kind of do, in a different life). I'm sure this one is 'on the list' to be investigated in due course anyway. Regards, Martyn
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 125 Topics
    529 Posts
    MarkM
    Missing textures would typically indicate an installation issue, or possibly another mod/product causing a conflict. As a first step, we would recommend reinstalling the latest version of the Vulcan (MSFS 2020: v0.1.3, MSFS 2024: v0.1.4) and then checking if any change is observed with the missing textures and the aileron trim. If either behaviour persists after a reinstall, could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team will be best positioned to be able to further assist with this. Mark - Just Flight
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    J
    Have had this brakes issue when starting from. cold and dark for my last two play sessions. Pedals animate, pressure in system, no braking effect. If I flip my hardware parking brake toggle I get braking, but no braking using the toe brakes on my rudder pedals.
  • 722 Topics
    4k Posts
    P
    Sure, thank you Mark. Amazing plane i love it.
  • 510 3k
    510 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    The essential MSFS 2024 settings for FS Traffic can be found on page 9 of the FS Traffic Operations Manual: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Looking at the screenshots you have provided, we would recommend setting Traffic Type to OFF in the first screenshot (this is a requirement for FS Traffic to prevent the simulator from generating its own default traffic in addition to FS Traffic). In the second screenshot, we would recommend that every setting from Character Quality down to Fauna Density be set to OFF or LOW. Most of these aren't a requirement (apart from Parked Aircraft Quantity, which generates default aircraft at gates), but we recommend setting these to their lowest settings for the best performance, as well as to reduce the likelihood of MSFS reaching a hard-coded limit on how many objects can be loaded in the simulator at any one time. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • 188 Topics
    751 Posts
    S
    Hi Diggler, have you been able to sort this problem out?
  • 230 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    This is intended as a usability feature, so unfortunately, the only way to disable it is to disable tooltips in MSFS settings. We'll add this to our internal feature request tracker to see if there are any changes we can make to this tooltip in a future update. Mark - Just Flight
  • 378 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    Using the msfs 2024 ,Just flight PA-28 turbo, the GPS (TDS750 & 650) Goes dark after 2 minutes. Have to reset flight again but this issue persist. TDS is on version 1.3.1.3 and gauge 3.0.4. On the latest PA-28 version. Tried other aircraft and no issue. Only this aircraft.
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    360 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    441 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    788 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    876 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    902 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    419 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    349 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    381 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    282 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    506 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    519 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    276 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    644 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Archer III for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    739 Views
    K
    Thanks Mark, it's good to know it hasn't been forgotten.