MSFS Products

Hello Just Flight team, I'd like to report a thing nobody seems to have mentioned so far as your products are known to have a very top notch audio quality overall, which is true ! However it's obvious that the Fokker 100/70 sounds in the cockpit are very centered on the stereo spectrum, the stereo image is pretty narrow. I'm a professional composer & sound designer and, I'm sure you'll agree, I think sounds are as much important as other aspects of the module. This issue really bothers me. I put three different aircraft audios into a vectorscope to visually see the stereo image to prove my point. You can clearly see that the Fokker has a very narrow imaging. This is especially noticable while using headphones. You DON'T actually feel like you're in the aircraft unlike other airplanes which have a wind sound, ventilation, packs...all around you. In the fokker, the windshield, the avionics as well as alarms sounds do sound like they are almost in MONO and in your face. I think this is a real issue that shouldn't be ignored. I can't access the Wwise files as it is encrypted but I can assure this would be quite a simple fix, even if your initial recordings from the real aircraft were recorded in mono (stereo widener, HAAS effect, short reverb (for alarms that scream in the small cockpit compartment...etc) Here are three examples, sampled at the same time (during approach at about the same speed). I get it's different airframes but that doesn't answer the narrow stereo imaging. [image: e25da744-476a-4798-abbf-c3927ef1e84e.png] Sincerely, A Fokker lover

@Mark Any news from the marketplace as it's still not showing the newest version? Thanks

Sorry you guys are dealing with this distraction! I've tried every lighting condition and simulator setting that I can think of, and can't reproduce it for myself. Clearly, I don't doubt what you're seeing, I just don't know how I can deal with it. I think it's likely the master caution/warning, but there is nothing I can do to control the screen-space reflections. Unlike shadows, if you can see the annunciators, then so can the shader. If you really think this changed with the last update to the TBM, then it would likely be caused by the cubemap I [reluctantly] added for the instrument glass reflections. I can give you two ways to test this, but one is a lot easier than the other: If you go into the aircraft's community folder and locate cockpit.cfg, you can try changing the first line to cockpit_type = 0. If that solves the problem, then we know the culprit, but you guys may have to fight my users who want instrument glass reflections for the solution!

Hi! I hope this is the right place for this? I just want to say first that your Tomahawk is one of my favourites to fly, for so many reasons, and that I’ve just recently purchased it again in the PS5 MSFS version. There seems to be a bug where the PSVR2 sense controls can’t give me any right rudder input. It gives me left rudder, but no right rudder at all. The duelsense controller works just fine. This happens when moving on the ground and in the air. Hopefully a relatively easy thing to fix? Thanks!

It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight

Are you encountering these problems?

Thanks for the feedback. We have no plans at the moment to have two cabin options in the QC variant, as it would require some fairly substantial cabin changes to make that work; however, it is something we have logged on our internal feature request tracker for us to consider for future updates/upgrades. Mark - Just Flight

Not sure what you mean by realistic. The software uses real-world schedules, so will depend on time of day, year etc what you see.

If you have any queries or require support for Just Flight or Just Trains titles, your best bet is always to contact our Support team. The forum is mainly aimed at those who wish to discuss or ask general questions about our titles and replies are usually all from users. See:

@tlvid That's some accusation but each to their own and you're entitled to your own opinion. For the record though, this very product has received 19 separate updates since the release. Our other GA aircraft around the same number. So that would suggest quite the opposite of leaving it to rot. These products were released some five years ago and have proved immensely popular but over time they are going to show their age and become eclipsed somewhat by more recent offerings. We try our best given the size of the team and business to improve all of our aircraft, which is no mean feat given the constant stream of sim updates, new third party add-ons for GA aircraft and the like but there comes a time when commercial reality rears its ugly head and we simply have to move on and prioritise other projects to ensure the viability and safety of the business. Furthermore and to defend ourselves further (not that it should be a requirement) we have managed just two brand new releases in the past 24 months and that's largely down to us spending the majority of our time updating current products to ensure 2024 compatibility and to give everything quality of life improvements where requested and possible. That again wouldn't suggest we're keen on leaving our products to rot. Finally, we do aim to supply a set of updates for the GA fleet (that will be the 20th update) and then we'll be following up with something a lot more exciting on this front but more on all of that fairly soon. Sorry you're not happy with how things have turned out and are currently with your PA-28 Warrior and the current solutions suggested aren't helping you but there was a bit of balance required here so I hope this post gives a little context to the situation. Thank you.