Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.4k Topics 28.7k Posts

  • 352 Topics
    2k Posts
    D
    Very cool, I'll need to see if I can find the right weather conditions. Exciting to hear that there are new features coming in the future. Keep up the great work! Sometimes I stream the RJ here Deephack Plays My main channel is here although it's more DCS focussed Deephack
  • 2k Topics
    9k Posts
    B
    One thing to keep in mind @Black-Square is that the MSFS 2024 EFB is also used to file and update flight plans with ATC. At the moment, this functionality is clashing with the Starship. Even if one fully re-creates a flight plan inside the cockpit and doesn't "send to ATC" or "send to avionics" from the EFB, changes in the ATC following (like requesting or terminating flight following) triggers an update that messes up the in-cockpit flight plan mid flight. While my personal favourite option would be the ability import flight plans via the MSFS 2024 EFB (I create plans on the web-based MSFS flight planner, then import via the EFB), if that is too much trouble we would at least need the in-cockpit avionics to not break every time there is a change happening while interacting with the AI ATC! I do enjoy a lot the Starship interface in terms of creating a flight plan, but the EFB is quite convenient to do things like choosing runways based on winds, finding headings between waypoints info or grabbing VOR frequencies.
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 106 Topics
    459 Posts
    H
    I have noticed that using the bleed air it is possible to start all engines at the same time. I assume this isn't actually accurate as there wouldn't be enough pressure to allow that?
  • 380 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    MartynM
    We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.
  • 471 3k
    471 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    We would kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support, and one of our support team will be in the best position to assist with troubleshooting this: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • FS Traffic and GA aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    832 Views
    MarkM
    @gjereza Any GA aircraft models can be added to the FS Traffic fleet by adding the "Title=" entry from the aircraft.cfg into the respective livery field on the "Liveries" page of the Traffic Control Centre app, and then flights can be added for that aircraft on the "Schedules Manager" page. It is important to note that any aircraft added to the FS Traffic fleet must be fully MSFS compatible and preferably be a model that is optimised to be used as AI traffic. The FS Traffic manual can be downloaded via the following link if you would like to read more about this process: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight
  • WB-SIM 172 Classic WT GNS530 - no NAV/COM page

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    274 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Tomahawk

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    503 Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we have implemented some Autopilot controls on the Tomahawk's EFB that can be used for basic autopilot modes such as Heading Hold, Nav Mode, and Altitude Hold. These will also be able to be triggered using control assignments. Mark - Just Flight
  • Nimrod MR2

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    411 Views
    No one has replied
  • Textures in 172SP Classic Enhancement

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    257 Views
    No one has replied
  • TBM850 - Reverse Thrust

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    The stock MSFS binding Throttle Axis 1 (0-100) gives me the full range of forward, beta, and reverse thrust on the 850 (also the Caravan).
  • PA 38

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    536 Views
    C
    @Derek wow, I really am looking forward to flying this! Thank you so much for replying, and I apologize deeply for not looking properly at the website! I can’t wait and I am so grateful that you sent me this!
  • Velocity XL Center Screen Blank

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    441 Views
    Black SquareB
    Sorry I didn't see this post for a while. You may have posted it before we created the general Black Square category on the forums. That center screen is a GTN 750. It should come on if you have either the PMS50 GTN 750 (freeware or payware), or the TDS GTNxi (payware) installed. The free GTN 750 can be obtained here.
  • Whats happened to the Piper Tomahawk?

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    538 Views
    N
    Thanks. Neil
  • Updater app in the future?

    3
    4 Votes
    3 Posts
    550 Views
    RichR
    Hi, It's something we've wanted to do for a while now, and we've made plans to begin work on one next year.
  • The 'sellability' of 'vintage' addons

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    759 Views
    M
    Thanks for the responses! I was never aware the VC10 was not a home grown Justflight product. Thats interesting. Very sad that not enough people, even now in the MSFS crowd have more interest in the vintage stuff. Very sad to see them all harping on about yet another A320 for instance. And not enough of them are beginning to spread their wings (pun intended) and learn some aviation history.
  • Just Flight EFB aspect ratio

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    426 Views
    P
    I've noticed this too! The proportions in the EFB all look a bit off, don't they?
  • Additional Feature for the efb

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    570 Views
    MarkM
    @Tsolis Loading/unloading simulation is something we have considered adding to the EFB in the past. It's not something we are currently working on, but it is a feature that we could feasibly add in a future update to all of our airliners. Thanks again for the feedback! Mark - Just Flight
  • Piper Archer TX-LX for MSFS Desperately Wanted

    Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    333 Views
    No one has replied
  • App button doesnt work

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    411 Views
    S
    @gfmarino81 I'm getting something similar on RNP/RNAV approaches. When I hit the APP button the lateral mode switches from NAV to APP and when it hits the 'glide' sometimes it switches from VS to GS and descends with the procedure but other times it will stay in VS but still descend (from platform altitude) and other times it sails right through the glide and I have to use VS to descend. Very odd. Using the TDS Nxi.
  • WB-SIM 172 install error

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    502 Views
    K
    @mark Hello, Thank you that's what I did and got a response. I'll try to apply it.
  • TBM 850 enhanced cockpit mod

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    603 Views
    D
    Thank you Daniel. Excellent enhancement. Regards Demi
  • TBM850 - RNAV issue.

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    779 Views
    E
    @eker Downloaded latest version GTN750- no cigar. I am new to RNAV. Tried KOAK - activating a RNAV approach, it flies correct, but my guess it flies ordinary GPS as no GS shows up. The RNAV mode on HSI only for the VOR mod setting. Right? Guess this why the HSI flips around... According to youtube - Stay in GPS mode. Pick a RNAV approach - activate. Seems to work, but no GS
  • TBM850 After update - no turbulence

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    280 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB-SIM 172 loads as invisible

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    660 Views
    J
    @pilotjon Did you find a solution to your invisible 172? I'm experiencing the same problem, new computer build with a 4090. Thank you.