Skip to content

MSFS Products

7.8k Topics 42.8k Posts

  • A category to cover all discussions about the F70 & F100 Professional

    280 1k
    280 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    If that behaviour occurs again, could I kindly ask you to raise a support ticket for this with Just Flight Support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support The F70 & F100 Professional are complex products, so in order to give our support team the best chance at offering speedy assistance, could you please include any screenshots/videos of the behaviour with your ticket, as well as attaching the log file generated by the product. Instructions for locating the log file can be found here: https://support.justflight.com/en/support/solutions/articles/17000152594-where-to-find-the-log-file-s- Mark - Just Flight
  • 516 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    [image: fd5e28e1-bbe3-41dc-8ec3-d13718b98cf7.png] EDIT: Went through and made sure to delete any cached files and then did another full reinstall and that sorted the issue. Lights now illuminate the ground properly. Unfortunately, a reinstall did not work. It's weird how the lights illuminate the airframe but no interaction with the ground at all. I'll have to go through my community folder and see what I can find.
  • 3k Topics
    20k Posts
    J
    You do realize the sound pack is by a third party, independent developer, right? Without offense to Tyler at Echo19, I'm sure if Nick and Boris find the time to do an official sound update they will make it work for 2020 as well.
  • 66 Topics
    293 Posts
    M
    If Working Title puts the Aspen avionics natively into MSFS, that might be an option too. I thought I saw that somewhere as being on their to-do list but I could have been dreaming. It would be inserted into the panel much like the 430/530 units are now...those are Working Title's 430/530's.
  • 128 Topics
    547 Posts
    MarkM
    It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight
  • 440 Topics
    2k Posts
    T
    Sorry - been travelling (for real as opposed to in sim) and just saw this. Appreciated ... I wondered if it was something like this I was missing :). I will check it out soon now that I am finally back in town for a good while.
  • 730 Topics
    4k Posts
    MarkM
    Could I kindly ask you to raise a support ticket for this with Just Flight Support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team is best positioned to provide assistance and troubleshooting. Mark - Just Flight
  • 525 3k
    525 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD
    @durieuxdidier This sounds like something Just Flight or Just Trains support could help with. There are links on their websites www.justflight.com and www.justtrains.net        See: https://www.justflight.com/support   https://www.justtrains.net/support
  • 191 Topics
    758 Posts
    C
    @Mark Hi, I’ve shelved the Hotas 4 and reset alot of my settings, including the DualSense bindings, and everything is working great now. Spotting the trim sensitivity setting was a game-changer too. Thanks for the help
  • 237 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    Yes, that is intentional. We removed the tutorial flight files from our aircraft packages in order to comply with some MSFS Marketplace requirements. The manuals likely do still refer to the tutorial flight files, and it is something we have logged to get corrected the next time the manuals get updated. The old tutorial flight files simply loaded the aircraft at the location stated in the tutorial flight; they didn't affect the aircraft systems in any way. So as long as a flight is loaded at the departure airport stated in the manual, it'll still be possible to complete the tutorial flight in full. Mark - Just Flight
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    872 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    400 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    479 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    888 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    972 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    990 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    468 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    388 Views
    No one has replied
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    436 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    310 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    641 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.