Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.8k Topics 36.5k Posts

  • 497 Topics
    2k Posts
    F
    Following up on my earlier report about the electrical bus assignment logic, I have now done a more detailed test series on the Avro RJ, specifically comparing Channel 1 loss (GEN 1 failure) against Channel 2 loss (GEN 4 failure) with both Bus-Tie switches set to OPEN and the APU shut down. The purpose of the two-channel electrical system is redundancy: a single channel failure should never leave the crew without instruments or communications. Each side of the cockpit should be independently powered so that either failure is survivable with roughly equal levels of degradation. TEST CONFIGURATION (both tests): Engines 1 and 4 running APU OFF Bus-Tie AC: OPEN Bus-Tie DC: OPEN TEST 1 – GEN 4 OFF/RESET (Channel 2 lost) Overhead panel annunciators: ANTI SKID INOP L INNER LO PRESS / R OUTER LO PRESS DC BUS 2 OFF / AC BUS 2 OFF GEN 4 OFF LINE R PITOT HTR FAIL MWP captions: ANTI SKID FUEL ICE PROT ELECT Flight deck effects: Right EADI: OFF Right EHSI: still running Right altimeter: OFF Right clock: OFF Right VHF NAV: OFF Right FMC: OFF DME 2: OFF Left side: no failures, fully operational This result is largely correct. Channel 2 loss affects the right side of the cockpit, while the left side remains fully operational. The captain retains full instrumentation to continue flying. TEST 2 – GEN 1 OFF/RESET (Channel 1 lost) Overhead panel annunciators: L OUTER LO PRESS / R INNER LO PRESS DC BUS 1 OFF / AC BUS 1 OFF ESS AC OFF / ESS DC OFF INTAKE 1-4 LO PRESS (with engine anti-ice selected) AUX PITOT HTR FAIL L PITOT HTR FAIL R VANE HTR FAIL RECIRC VALVE MWP captions: ICE PROT FUEL ELECT SCRN HEAT SEL OFF FLT REC OFF ENG A-ICE ON (anti-ice valves fail-safe open due to loss of solenoid power) AIR CON Flight deck effects: Left EADI: OFF Left EHSI: OFF Left altimeter: OFF Left clock: OFF Left FMC: OFF Left TCAS: OFF Right EADI: OFF Right EHSI: OFF Right TCAS: OFF Thrust computer: OFF Upper and lower engine indicator rows: OFF YD: red light EL TRIM: red light With GEN 1 loss, both sides of the cockpit are effectively dead. The crew loses all primary flight instruments, important engine indications, and the thrust computer. This is not survivable in the same way as a Channel 2 failure. Expected Behaviour (per FCOM) The whole point of having two independent channels is that a single channel failure should never leave the crew without instruments or communications. Per the FCOM: Left ADI is powered by 26V ESS AC (Channel 1) Right ADI is powered by 26V AC 2 (Channel 2) DME 1 is powered by ESS AC / ESS DC (Channel 1) DME 2 is powered by AC 2 / DC 2 (Channel 2) Avionics Master 1 controls: left instruments, VOR 1, ILS 1, DME 1, FMS 1, weather radar, GPWS, CVR, FDR, left TCAS, DFGS 1 Avionics Master 2 controls: right instruments, VOR 2, ILS 2, DME 2, FMS 2, right TCAS, DFGS 2 With a Channel 1 failure, the RIGHT side instruments (right EADI, right EHSI, right TCAS) should all remain operational on Channel 2. In the sim, they all fail, indicating that most equipment is wired to Channel 1. Additional item – BATT NO CHARGE 7-second delay Per the FCOM (Avro Electrical, Chapter 8, Topic 11), the BATT NO CHARGE annunciator has a built-in 7-second delay from fault detection to illumination. In the sim, the annunciator appears to illuminate immediately when the charging condition is lost. This is a minor point but worth noting for completeness. Since the failure logic itself is already working correctly (systems do fail when their assigned bus is lost), the fix is most likely a matter of reassigning individual services from Channel 1 to Channel 2 in the configuration, rather than requiring new logic or code.
  • 3k Topics
    15k Posts
    B
    @Black-Square I would LOVE to see the G3X with the GNS 750 with a modern Autopilot option. I know there is a huge group of simmers that prefer the steam gauges, but I think there are as many who prefer the glass cockpits and for some reason the best mod builders always seem to stick with the old stuff. The touchscreen aspect of the G3X is really helpful, especially in VR. An option would be great! By the way the Bonanza A36TC is my favorite plane. I would love it even more with a G3X!
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 120 Topics
    509 Posts
    R
    Thanks for your reply. That’s understood fully. There are a few aircraft on the market place on Xbox that allow if you press jettison it removes the we[on from the payload which is a little more immersive. So not specifically seeing the weapon drop but as close as we can get etc. would this be possible for the marketplace versions at some point? The aircraft that allow this are the IFE aircraft. Sorry for name dropping another developer but it adds to the immersion that big extra. Cheers Rg
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    P
    Just to give this topic some closure, support advised me to disable addons and then it worked so I started to exclude things individually and the problem is caused by GSX, specifically when you have passengers enabled in GSX! There is this phantom passenger light that sticks to the plane at all points. Seems to be a common problem with certain planes when researching this very issue so not sure if this is a GSX issue to fix or an aircraft dev but I can live with not having any pax so I'll consider the problem resolved.
  • 718 Topics
    4k Posts
    F
    What makes you think that?
  • 508 3k
    508 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD
    @KarsPilot If you contact Just Flight about this we will be happy to discuss: https://www.justflight.com/contact-us
  • 188 Topics
    750 Posts
    MarkM
    This isn't something I recall seeing reported before; however, if it is hydraulic-related, the HYD.1 or HYD.2 caption would be illuminated on the CWP. HYD.1 system pressure will vary depending on usage, but should automatically increase pressure once the load on the system is reduced. HYD.2 system requires resetting after engine start via the "HYD 2 RESET" button on the left console. In any case, could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you would be able to provide any screenshots/videos of the behaviour, as well as steps on how we can replicate the behaviour, then that will put our support team in the best position to offer assistance. Mark - Just Flight
  • 229 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    @Mark Thanks a lot! It would really be appreciated! As of now, my PA28-161 is grounded until this has been fixed. Which is a real shame given that everything else about this product is great
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    T
    Hmm the integration of the GPS 100 is still causes a bit of confusion. I'm in MSFS 2024 Even after creating the flight plan on the world map, it will only navigate to the first waypoint. After that it continuously tracks away from it, instead of to the next waypoint. The only way I've been able to change the navigation mid flight, is by using the PMS50 750 plugin to do a direct to to the next waypoint and then GPS100 will update. But this method defeats the purpose of the GPS100.
  • F15 engine shutdown

    f15
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    564 Views
    L
    @ifrit The only thing I've found that shuts off the engines (and it's not in the checklist) are the Engine Starters (the ones under the covers). Dean maintains a very active Discord channel, support is much better there. Hopefully I can paste a link here to it: https://discord.gg/bSnV87x9 I asked in Discord, and the checklist is out of date, one of the Devs sent me a YouTube of the shutdown, which is basically the same I've developed on my own. https://youtu.be/gYfV51Zfj2Q
  • Curtiss Commando

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    616 Views
    DerekD
    @starpirat said in Curtiss Commando: so many airliners in MSFS now its enough to make me gag and pilots in the sim dont think past them for getting new aircraft. Dont get me wrong i like flying them but there are other great aircraft that can be had. But recently there was a free release of the DC-3 or C-47 This has been a very popular aeroplane in the community and its become my fav now in MSFS2020. In FSX i had your version of Curtiss C-46 Commando. I would love to see this worked on and be ported over to MSFS2020 and most of the work on it has already been done, it just has to be converted to MSFS2020 protocols. This would be an amazing Please think about this . Starpirat Not developed in-house by us and is quite old in software terms. It would have to be built pretty much from scratch for MSFS.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement - Avionics not working

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    @n6722c Amazing ! Thanks !
  • Santa Paula Original Buildings Showing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    @voice-of-reason Hi!! The update did the trick! Thank you guys so much for taking care of the issue
  • Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    438 Views
    DerekD
    @pilot_paul said in Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue: Since the latest MSFS 40th Anniversary update there is now a massive hill between taxiway R4 and R5 making the scenery unusable. Have you been in contact with Just Flight support? They should be able to help with this kind of thing. There is a link at www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • AI is not positioning aircraft

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    215 Views
    No one has replied
  • Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    757 Views
    DerekD
    @mrrick said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: @derek said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: If you bought direct from JF you would have been sent an email when the MSFS version was released. Had a look back and can't seem to find the email, what can we do? It was sent on 8th December 2020 if that helps? If not, your best bet would be to get in touch with JF support.
  • Velocity XL heading bug will not center when knob pressed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    194 Views
    No one has replied
  • Getting the HondaJet into AH2?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    239 Views
    No one has replied
  • AH2 how to change cargo to pax?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    212 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air problems flying a TDS GTN750 NAV Route.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    253 Views
    No one has replied
  • Notification of updates

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DerekD
    @taipan303 said in Notification of updates: @derek it's nothing to do with point 1. Your point 1 was about a new customer buying a product and the T&Cs etc. The whole 5 point process you described is the status quo. I wouldn't be making a suggestion if that process wasn't bad. My suggestion wasn't about the purchase process or the 5 point process you have - my suggestion is for something NEW. My suggestion is to allow a customer to re-subscribe manually to product updates. It doesn't matter if there was a previous unsubscription, because permission is given anew by re-subscribing. There's no company in the world I've ever dealt with that doesn't allow someone to subscribe again overriding previous unsubscriptions. If they ever did I'd just change my email address but I don't have to because when I re-subscribe it's explicit permission to email me again. I think you're arguments are just hashing over the reason why I didn't receive emails originally... when I just want to suggest something new and it's not being understood. I do get the point - you are asking for a system that, when someone has unsubscribed, they can resubscribe but only to receive product updates. Definitely possible in theory. But.... I am not sure how receptive the mail services would be to such a suggestion and whether the work involved would pay off or open us up to spamming accusations. Customers would have to know they needed to reusbscribe after unnsubscribing and I am not sure that many customers are affected. For most "go away and stop bothering me" really does mean that.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Product request

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    444 Views
    b3lt3rB
    See? Patience really is a virtue Sorry for the long-time P3D users but very happy for the rest of us (and me). Commercially from a JF view, this has to be as close to a no-brainer as you're going to get. Now I can start checking the in dev page constantly waiting for news on a -200F variant
  • Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    993 Views
    DerekD
    @saki86-0 said in Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket: @derek clicking on the "customer" part brought me here ) I used the URL directly down to me in my AirHauler Error Message. That's a link to the login button or the 'check ticket status' button. The link to the 'raise a new ticket' is the one I sent you. Very odd. No-one else has reported this issue so will leave it at that for the moment.
  • Double Parking at Lanzarote

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    576 Views
    DerekD
    @may6433 said in Double Parking at Lanzarote: @may6433 Does anyone at Just Flight read and respond to their forums? Your best bet if you have software issues is to contact Just Flight support. There is a link on the wesbite www.justflight.com https://support.justflight.com/support/home see also: https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support
  • Ants Tigermoth - flickering tablet

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    213 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air 350 Steam Gauge Overhaul - what about the flight dynamics?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    700 Views
    L
    @derek Thanks Derek: "The Analog King Air features a slightly improved flight model compared to the default King Air 350i, with tweaks based on operator feedback online." It will be GREAT to finally be able to fly this bird with more accuracy and fidelity.
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    947 Views
    W
    Liveries tend to include more files than needed. One file, the panel.cfg, along with information about what electronics are being used, also contains the info for the tail number. Liveries that are wanting to either change the color, or remove it altogether for painted on numbers, will contain a whole copy of this file, that is based off of the original version. The problem comes from this as the panel.cfg for this plane is completely different and has additional lines that won't be in the one in a livery. If you need assistance with editing a livery, please join us on the official WB-Sim discord https://discord.gg/GwGU3QDHHF where there is a "how to" on the subject and I can provide extra help if needed.