Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.7k Topics 35.9k Posts

  • 483 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. Could we kindly ask you to forward that feedback to Just Flight Support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team will then be best suited to assist with troubleshooting and/or ensuring that any valid bugs are properly logged. However, just to note that point 1 is intentional logic, as each RJ livery is fitted with accurate equipment configurations by default. Point 2 sounds like expected logic if the engine parameters are on the limit of rounding up/down to the nearest whole number. This will likely vary on every flight as the engines will idle at different speeds/temperatures depending on weather conditions. Mark - Just Flight
  • 3k Topics
    15k Posts
    K
    Nope, haven't seen them either, thank you! Super Cargomaster included! Hell yeah! I am already thinking about my "imaginary" feeder cargo operations, with potential routes, hubs, etc. Truly, this aircraft was the missing link. We already have large cargo aircraft, many different types (777, A300, 727, 737, MD11, etc.) we have all kinds of passenger and GA aircraft, but this kind of cargo ops was not entirely possible realistically (the PA12 or the Kodiak are sort of in this league yet not entirely), unless a lot of "imagining" was also imvolved. The Caravan will be the first such dedicated aircraft, purpose-built for this kind of ops. Of course, not limited to cargo, although I will use it 80% cargo, 20% pax ops, probably. The hype is real!
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 119 Topics
    506 Posts
    MarkM
    Unfortunately, as you say, I believe this will be a limitation of using Chaseplane with some of our products. The Vulcan, and a few of our other products, rely on the core MSFS camera system to move the user to certain locations in and around the aircraft. As Chaseplane overrides the default camera system, the cameras that we trigger in the code no longer exist, so the camera will not change. It's something we have logged on our internal trackers for further investigation, and to see if there is any form of a workaround we can find for Chaseplane users. In the meantime with the Vulcan, it should be possible to create custom Chaseplane cameras inside the AEO/Navigrator compartment and then trigger those via the Chaseplane interface. Mark - Just Flight
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    G
    I think it would have been a customer choice rather than before/after a particular year. I've seen pics of early F28s with the bars, but there's also an (excellent) autobiography of an F28 pilot flying in the early 1970s where he specifically mentions the flight director being a 'bird'. So it may have been one of the many customer choices. Although it would be an absolute time/effort sink for JF, in an ideal world it would be great to see some more of the flight deck variations reflected in the model. Bar/Bird flight director, single or twin flight director controls (for different settings for Capt. and FO), autopilot master controls on the pedestal vs. the glareshield, the centre tank fuel pump switches and gauge disappearing when the tank isn't fitted (relatively few F28s had the centre tank bags - mostly military/govt. ones, it seems) and even the early engine instruments (with mechanical fuel flow gauges rather than the digital 'totaliser', which I think was only available on the 4000s and late 3000s). It would be a complete minefield trying to do the job thoroughly though - I've spotted three different positions for the Altitude Controller alone from old photos.
  • 714 Topics
    4k Posts
    N
    Hello, I am in the process of making some fictional military liveries for cargo missions. I would like to be able to attach the countermeasure suit. How would I go about doing so. It does not look like an option in the aircraft config. Thanks!
  • 506 3k
    506 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Re: Feature Requests Can we please get an updated FS Traffic Manual that shows SETUP Global settings for the latest version of MSFS 2024 instead of ones that no longer exist (e.g. "TRAFFIC AIRPORT QUALITY"). Thanks.
  • 187 Topics
    748 Posts
    MarkM
    Please see: https://community.justflight.com/post/46913 Mark - Just Flight
  • 227 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    From our internal testing of the post-SU4 updates, we reliably see the correct state recalled on the first flight of a session, and then it becomes inconsistent on subsequent flights in the same session. Mark - Just Flight
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Stand down everyone. I figured it out. Well, not so much 'figured' but stumbled upon it. You know the saying 'If you throw enough s**t at the wall, some of it will stick'? That the method I used.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement - Avionics not working

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    @n6722c Amazing ! Thanks !
  • Santa Paula Original Buildings Showing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    @voice-of-reason Hi!! The update did the trick! Thank you guys so much for taking care of the issue
  • Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    433 Views
    DerekD
    @pilot_paul said in Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue: Since the latest MSFS 40th Anniversary update there is now a massive hill between taxiway R4 and R5 making the scenery unusable. Have you been in contact with Just Flight support? They should be able to help with this kind of thing. There is a link at www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • AI is not positioning aircraft

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    210 Views
    No one has replied
  • Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    728 Views
    DerekD
    @mrrick said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: @derek said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: If you bought direct from JF you would have been sent an email when the MSFS version was released. Had a look back and can't seem to find the email, what can we do? It was sent on 8th December 2020 if that helps? If not, your best bet would be to get in touch with JF support.
  • Velocity XL heading bug will not center when knob pressed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    191 Views
    No one has replied
  • Getting the HondaJet into AH2?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    231 Views
    No one has replied
  • AH2 how to change cargo to pax?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    206 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air problems flying a TDS GTN750 NAV Route.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    250 Views
    No one has replied
  • Notification of updates

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DerekD
    @taipan303 said in Notification of updates: @derek it's nothing to do with point 1. Your point 1 was about a new customer buying a product and the T&Cs etc. The whole 5 point process you described is the status quo. I wouldn't be making a suggestion if that process wasn't bad. My suggestion wasn't about the purchase process or the 5 point process you have - my suggestion is for something NEW. My suggestion is to allow a customer to re-subscribe manually to product updates. It doesn't matter if there was a previous unsubscription, because permission is given anew by re-subscribing. There's no company in the world I've ever dealt with that doesn't allow someone to subscribe again overriding previous unsubscriptions. If they ever did I'd just change my email address but I don't have to because when I re-subscribe it's explicit permission to email me again. I think you're arguments are just hashing over the reason why I didn't receive emails originally... when I just want to suggest something new and it's not being understood. I do get the point - you are asking for a system that, when someone has unsubscribed, they can resubscribe but only to receive product updates. Definitely possible in theory. But.... I am not sure how receptive the mail services would be to such a suggestion and whether the work involved would pay off or open us up to spamming accusations. Customers would have to know they needed to reusbscribe after unnsubscribing and I am not sure that many customers are affected. For most "go away and stop bothering me" really does mean that.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Product request

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    433 Views
    b3lt3rB
    See? Patience really is a virtue Sorry for the long-time P3D users but very happy for the rest of us (and me). Commercially from a JF view, this has to be as close to a no-brainer as you're going to get. Now I can start checking the in dev page constantly waiting for news on a -200F variant
  • Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    928 Views
    DerekD
    @saki86-0 said in Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket: @derek clicking on the "customer" part brought me here ) I used the URL directly down to me in my AirHauler Error Message. That's a link to the login button or the 'check ticket status' button. The link to the 'raise a new ticket' is the one I sent you. Very odd. No-one else has reported this issue so will leave it at that for the moment.
  • Double Parking at Lanzarote

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    552 Views
    DerekD
    @may6433 said in Double Parking at Lanzarote: @may6433 Does anyone at Just Flight read and respond to their forums? Your best bet if you have software issues is to contact Just Flight support. There is a link on the wesbite www.justflight.com https://support.justflight.com/support/home see also: https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support
  • Ants Tigermoth - flickering tablet

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    211 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air 350 Steam Gauge Overhaul - what about the flight dynamics?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    691 Views
    L
    @derek Thanks Derek: "The Analog King Air features a slightly improved flight model compared to the default King Air 350i, with tweaks based on operator feedback online." It will be GREAT to finally be able to fly this bird with more accuracy and fidelity.
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    908 Views
    W
    Liveries tend to include more files than needed. One file, the panel.cfg, along with information about what electronics are being used, also contains the info for the tail number. Liveries that are wanting to either change the color, or remove it altogether for painted on numbers, will contain a whole copy of this file, that is based off of the original version. The problem comes from this as the panel.cfg for this plane is completely different and has additional lines that won't be in the one in a livery. If you need assistance with editing a livery, please join us on the official WB-Sim discord https://discord.gg/GwGU3QDHHF where there is a "how to" on the subject and I can provide extra help if needed.
  • OAT/Volt meter not working

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    449 Views
    P
    Hi! Sorry about leaving that out...It is for the 172Classic Enhancement.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied