Skip to content
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products

MSFS Products

7.8k Topics 42.7k Posts

  • A category to cover all discussions about the F70 & F100 Professional

    275 1k
    275 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    The MAX/OPT flight levels displayed on the FMS PROG page should definitely be achievable at the gross weight entered into the FMS. However, I do recall seeing another user reporting a similar behaviour previously, and that was caused by a third-party weather program generating unrealistically high temperatures at high altitudes. So the first thing that comes to mind is to double-check that the temperature is within approx. IAS +/-15℃ at high altitudes. Aside from that, we'd really need more information before we could provide a more definitive response. If you see that behaviour again, could I kindly ask you to raise a support ticket with Just Flight Support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, could you please include any screenshots/videos of the behaviour and attach the log file generated by the product. That will ensure our support team has enough information to be able to assist further. Instructions for locating the log file can be found here: https://support.justflight.com/en/support/solutions/articles/17000152594-where-to-find-the-log-file-s- Mark - Just Flight

  • 516 3k
    516 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    [image: fd5e28e1-bbe3-41dc-8ec3-d13718b98cf7.png] EDIT: Went through and made sure to delete any cached files and then did another full reinstall and that sorted the issue. Lights now illuminate the ground properly. Unfortunately, a reinstall did not work. It's weird how the lights illuminate the airframe but no interaction with the ground at all. I'll have to go through my community folder and see what I can find.

  • 3k 20k
    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    Mets747M
    @Black-Square If you don't mind me asking, what do you change to make them more visible during the day? Something in the .fx file? Would love to apply that to my light mods on .to. You can DM if you'd like. Thanks Nick!!

  • 66 293
    66 Topics
    293 Posts
    M
    If Working Title puts the Aspen avionics natively into MSFS, that might be an option too. I thought I saw that somewhere as being on their to-do list but I could have been dreaming. It would be inserted into the panel much like the 430/530 units are now...those are Working Title's 430/530's.

  • 128 547
    128 Topics
    547 Posts
    MarkM
    It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight

  • 440 2k
    440 Topics
    2k Posts
    T
    Sorry - been travelling (for real as opposed to in sim) and just saw this. Appreciated ... I wondered if it was something like this I was missing :). I will check it out soon now that I am finally back in town for a good while.

  • 729 4k
    729 Topics
    4k Posts
    J
    @evan_richard1 there was a Neptune scheme made for the old version. I tried to load it into the updated FS2024 version and couldn’t get it to work unfortunately. I have no idea how to get it to work. Old version someone can maybe use as a template. https://flightsim.to/addon/31965/justflight-bae-146-neptune-aviation-tanker-10-old-livery

  • 525 3k
    525 Topics
    3k Posts
    DerekD
    @durieuxdidier This sounds like something Just Flight or Just Trains support could help with. There are links on their websites www.justflight.com and www.justtrains.net        See: https://www.justflight.com/support   https://www.justtrains.net/support

  • 191 757
    191 Topics
    757 Posts
    N
    It's a similar for me. I'm running the PC version, streamed in SU6 on the GeForce Now platform. The plane responds well to elevator trim inputs in flight, however, according to the MSFS cockpit/external HUD the useable range is about 5% up or down which equates to 0.25 degrees up and 0.75 degrees down. To get the trim through the full range takes around 200 seconds - I think this has been mentioned before. According to the HUD, -2% if fine for level flight at FL160, 450 KIAS without external stores of any kind. I can share a video if that would help. Regards, Neil.

  • 237 1k
    237 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    Yes, that is intentional. We removed the tutorial flight files from our aircraft packages in order to comply with some MSFS Marketplace requirements. The manuals likely do still refer to the tutorial flight files, and it is something we have logged to get corrected the next time the manuals get updated. The old tutorial flight files simply loaded the aircraft at the location stated in the tutorial flight; they didn't affect the aircraft systems in any way. So as long as a flight is loaded at the departure airport stated in the manual, it'll still be possible to complete the tutorial flight in full. Mark - Just Flight
  • A

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • V

    KING AIR MSFS v1.1 New Build

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    J
    @qqwertzde Sorry, i can't help with FSUIPC ... Maybe someone else can chime in ... Happy Flying Oliver
  • T

    MSFS Beechcraft Duchess - Planned at ‘study’ level?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    379 Views
    No one has replied
  • B

    air hauler error

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    340 Views
    No one has replied
  • V

    LEPA - No ILS and no other approaches since SU 11 possible

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    541 Views
    DerekD
    @village1111 said in LEPA - No ILS and no other approaches since SU 11 possible: Hello, after SU 11 there are no ILS approches and also no other like VOR DME, RNAV possible at this airport. The developer of this airport should be an upgrade publishing. More information find in the MS Flight Simulator Forum: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/airports-with-custom-ils-broken-since-su11/557724 I hope for an fast solution. Your best bet would be to let Just Flight suppport know and they can look into it. There is a link on the website www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • I

    F15 engine shutdown

    f15
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    647 Views
    L
    @ifrit The only thing I've found that shuts off the engines (and it's not in the checklist) are the Engine Starters (the ones under the covers). Dean maintains a very active Discord channel, support is much better there. Hopefully I can paste a link here to it: https://discord.gg/bSnV87x9 I asked in Discord, and the checklist is out of date, one of the Devs sent me a YouTube of the shutdown, which is basically the same I've developed on my own. https://youtu.be/gYfV51Zfj2Q
  • S

    Curtiss Commando

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    703 Views
    DerekD
    @starpirat said in Curtiss Commando: so many airliners in MSFS now its enough to make me gag and pilots in the sim dont think past them for getting new aircraft. Dont get me wrong i like flying them but there are other great aircraft that can be had. But recently there was a free release of the DC-3 or C-47 This has been a very popular aeroplane in the community and its become my fav now in MSFS2020. In FSX i had your version of Curtiss C-46 Commando. I would love to see this worked on and be ported over to MSFS2020 and most of the work on it has already been done, it just has to be converted to MSFS2020 protocols. This would be an amazing Please think about this . Starpirat Not developed in-house by us and is quite old in software terms. It would have to be built pretty much from scratch for MSFS.
  • L

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • S

    172SP Classic Enhancement - Avionics not working

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    @n6722c Amazing ! Thanks !
  • I

    Santa Paula Original Buildings Showing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    @voice-of-reason Hi!! The update did the trick! Thank you guys so much for taking care of the issue
  • P

    Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    506 Views
    DerekD
    @pilot_paul said in Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue: Since the latest MSFS 40th Anniversary update there is now a massive hill between taxiway R4 and R5 making the scenery unusable. Have you been in contact with Just Flight support? They should be able to help with this kind of thing. There is a link at www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • D

    AI is not positioning aircraft

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    256 Views
    No one has replied
  • M

    Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    864 Views
    DerekD
    @mrrick said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: @derek said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: If you bought direct from JF you would have been sent an email when the MSFS version was released. Had a look back and can't seem to find the email, what can we do? It was sent on 8th December 2020 if that helps? If not, your best bet would be to get in touch with JF support.
  • R

    Velocity XL heading bug will not center when knob pressed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    231 Views
    No one has replied
  • B

    Getting the HondaJet into AH2?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    285 Views
    No one has replied
  • B

    AH2 how to change cargo to pax?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    247 Views
    No one has replied
  • B

    King Air problems flying a TDS GTN750 NAV Route.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    322 Views
    No one has replied
  • TAIPAN303T

    Notification of updates

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DerekD
    @taipan303 said in Notification of updates: @derek it's nothing to do with point 1. Your point 1 was about a new customer buying a product and the T&Cs etc. The whole 5 point process you described is the status quo. I wouldn't be making a suggestion if that process wasn't bad. My suggestion wasn't about the purchase process or the 5 point process you have - my suggestion is for something NEW. My suggestion is to allow a customer to re-subscribe manually to product updates. It doesn't matter if there was a previous unsubscription, because permission is given anew by re-subscribing. There's no company in the world I've ever dealt with that doesn't allow someone to subscribe again overriding previous unsubscriptions. If they ever did I'd just change my email address but I don't have to because when I re-subscribe it's explicit permission to email me again. I think you're arguments are just hashing over the reason why I didn't receive emails originally... when I just want to suggest something new and it's not being understood. I do get the point - you are asking for a system that, when someone has unsubscribed, they can resubscribe but only to receive product updates. Definitely possible in theory. But.... I am not sure how receptive the mail services would be to such a suggestion and whether the work involved would pay off or open us up to spamming accusations. Customers would have to know they needed to reusbscribe after unnsubscribing and I am not sure that many customers are affected. For most "go away and stop bothering me" really does mean that.
  • C

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • b3lt3rB

    Product request

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    517 Views
    b3lt3rB
    See? Patience really is a virtue Sorry for the long-time P3D users but very happy for the rest of us (and me). Commercially from a JF view, this has to be as close to a no-brainer as you're going to get. Now I can start checking the in dev page constantly waiting for news on a -200F variant