Skip to content

MSFS Products

7.5k Topics 40.9k Posts

  • A category to cover all discussions about the F70 & F100 Professional

    214 935
    214 Topics
    935 Posts
    jvtbaldsJ
    @Martyn Hi Martyn! Thank you for your detailed reply and for taking the time to thoroughly investigate the specific scenarios I provided. I appreciate the offer for a refund, and I must admit I genuinely considered taking that route after my flights today. However, upon reflection, I believe that would be unfair to the immense effort your team has poured into this project over the last three years. Developing a complex add-on for a classic aircraft like the Fokker series especially knowing how incredibly rare it is to find airworthy airframes for reference and data gathering nowadays is a monumental task, and I deeply respect the work that has been accomplished so far. I want to clarify that my frustration does not stem from an inability to understand the complexities of coding systems like the AFCAS, ATS, or CDU. My sheer disappointment occurred because I had previously reported these exact same behaviors via the ticketing system and was explicitly assured they would be resolved in today's v1.2 update. Discovering mid-flight, during critical IFR phases, that the aircraft was still exhibiting the same issues was incredibly disheartening. I would also like to offer a sincere apology if the tone of my initial messages (here or via support system) came across as overly harsh or inelegant. My deep passion for the Fokker 100, combined with my strict professional standards regarding instrument flight procedures, certainly fueled my strong wording in the heat of the moment. To ensure that my feedback is properly tracked and to better assist the development team, I have officially submitted the entire content of my original forum post, along with the unlisted video references, through a new support ticket (Ticket #98051). I am very glad to read your edit and to know that the team was able to reproduce the localizer capture logic issue, as well as investigate the critical FMS route-wipe bug. Seeing the team actively debug these specific scenarios gives me confidence that v1.3 will deliver the necessary stability for serious instrument flying. I will continue flying the F100 and testing its systems. If I encounter new anomalies or experience these same bugs under different operational scenarios, please let me know if I should feel free to continue reporting them via new support tickets. I am more than willing to keep contributing to the refinement of this aircraft. Thank you again for your time and transparency. Best, João
  • 513 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    Yes, we do plan to bring the latest livery_config.ini logic across to the RJ in the next update. Mark - Just Flight
  • 3k Topics
    18k Posts
    johnnyxalmeida95J
    1 - For those familiar with the C208 G1000, you probably know that pressing the HDG knob centers the heading bug to the aircraft's current heading. Would it be possible to implement the same feature in the Caravan? For example, clicking the center of the HDG knob could instantly center the heading bug. If you don't like that idea, would it also be possible to make the HDG knob accelerate after holding the left mouse button for about two seconds while turning it? Right now, it takes quite a while to move the heading bug from one heading to another, especially when making large adjustments. [image: 2292b99e-5ee5-4abe-92e8-4eeb1a8988f5.jpg] 2 -Now, I think this request might be a bit more challenging. In a future update, would it be possible to add an EFB mounted on the windshield, allowing us to view Navigraph charts? Similar to what several other developers have already implemented in MSFS 2024. The current Caravan tablet is mainly focused on aircraft systems, which is great, but it would be fantastic if it also included a menu for Navigraph charts, while keeping all the existing system functions. I think that would be an amazing addition and would make the aircraft even more enjoyable to fly. [image: 20675516-62db-477d-bc81-70eebb160bb7.png] Johnny.
  • 63 Topics
    285 Posts
    C
    Hi Mark, thanks for the reply, understand the situation.....thought this maybe what's happening in that area and not possible to remove entirely. Cheers, Ross
  • 128 Topics
    547 Posts
    MarkM
    It looks like the correct TACAN frequency for the LKH TACAN is 39X. Mark - Just Flight
  • 439 Topics
    2k Posts
    L
    I agree with the above mentioned points. I must say, i usually just excused the erratic AP behavior to it being so old and therefore less accurate but i believe thats something only a real world F28 pilot could comment on. With that being said, i have also noticed that in some occasions (maybe 40% of the time) the G/S of the ILS also oscillates and the AP has difficulty following it especially the closer you get to the runway. Again, i just excused this as the AP being old and less accurate since the margin of error gets smaller the closer you get to the runway it would make sense that a old AP would have difficulty following the GS. Maybe its intentional by JF or a bug. Regarding the speed, i set the power to HP RPM to 80% and let it descend at a speed of 280-300 and pull it idle around 12000 feet to let it slow to 250kts or less. I usually descend at 2000fpm. After 250kts its a bit more tricky to get the aircraft within the 200kts range to drop the flaps. Either i reduce the V/S to 1200-1500fpm or just extend the Speed brakes. But then again, who knows if thats accurate behavior or not. I do feel that the UNS-1 could get a little more love considering the F28 costs 70$ and is in the same price range as the Fenix, PMDG, TFDI, etc... So many features are missing which would be included in the real counterpart. I would say its probably modelled around 60% of the real one. Just the DTO page alone looks so plain compared to the real one. [image: 9c29a2be-53d5-4289-b05f-c3f7702f5a31.png] [image: 63477a02-d330-464f-9fcc-33ca20e1b334.png] Ive been told the F28 should be getting a update later this year but i have my doubts that any major features will be added considering this is the state of the aircraft after almost 3 years. I guess we can only hope. Kind Regards, Leon
  • 728 Topics
    4k Posts
    E
    I'm wondering if we can get a Neptune Aviation livery for the 146 and Aeroflite livery for the RJ as well?
  • 524 3k
    524 Topics
    3k Posts
    H
    I have that problem nearly every time when I enter the sim at a busy airport. I've never been able to solve it but what I do is once you have settled in the sim at your parking spot and dont see any aircraft, hit the esc key and then restart, and you will then get aircraft at the gates.
  • 190 Topics
    754 Posts
    I
    I can't switch the engine master switch to start while in VR in MSFS 2020! It will go to 'on' ok but every time I click it to start it just goes back off again (I only have this problem in VR as the switch works perfectly in flat screen). I've noticed that if I'm behind the front seat the switch moves to start fine as I can click it from the back but while sitting in the front seat it just always goes back to off again and I cant get the mouse pointer behind the switch. Is there a problem with the switch sensitivity area in VR? I've tried configuring the engine master switch to a button on my Turtle Beach Velocity One throttle but none of the control options - toggle engine master switch etc seems to to anything.
  • 235 Topics
    1k Posts
    M
    Hey team, any chance you could release an 8k paintkit? I find that the liveries I produce are really blocky, I used an 8k upscaler to see if it would help on a livery I made and it made the lines seem smoother, but upscaling vs being native 8k is noticable. Even if you then create a 4k version of your livery by scaling down this would still be better than the other way around. I find the details are pretty fuzzy on the existing paintkit when looking at the aircraft in sim so hoping that could be improved.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • KING AIR MSFS v1.1 New Build

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    J
    @qqwertzde Sorry, i can't help with FSUIPC ... Maybe someone else can chime in ... Happy Flying Oliver
  • MSFS Beechcraft Duchess - Planned at ‘study’ level?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    371 Views
    No one has replied
  • air hauler error

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    329 Views
    No one has replied
  • LEPA - No ILS and no other approaches since SU 11 possible

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    522 Views
    DerekD
    @village1111 said in LEPA - No ILS and no other approaches since SU 11 possible: Hello, after SU 11 there are no ILS approches and also no other like VOR DME, RNAV possible at this airport. The developer of this airport should be an upgrade publishing. More information find in the MS Flight Simulator Forum: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/airports-with-custom-ils-broken-since-su11/557724 I hope for an fast solution. Your best bet would be to let Just Flight suppport know and they can look into it. There is a link on the website www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • F15 engine shutdown

    f15
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    628 Views
    L
    @ifrit The only thing I've found that shuts off the engines (and it's not in the checklist) are the Engine Starters (the ones under the covers). Dean maintains a very active Discord channel, support is much better there. Hopefully I can paste a link here to it: https://discord.gg/bSnV87x9 I asked in Discord, and the checklist is out of date, one of the Devs sent me a YouTube of the shutdown, which is basically the same I've developed on my own. https://youtu.be/gYfV51Zfj2Q
  • Curtiss Commando

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    684 Views
    DerekD
    @starpirat said in Curtiss Commando: so many airliners in MSFS now its enough to make me gag and pilots in the sim dont think past them for getting new aircraft. Dont get me wrong i like flying them but there are other great aircraft that can be had. But recently there was a free release of the DC-3 or C-47 This has been a very popular aeroplane in the community and its become my fav now in MSFS2020. In FSX i had your version of Curtiss C-46 Commando. I would love to see this worked on and be ported over to MSFS2020 and most of the work on it has already been done, it just has to be converted to MSFS2020 protocols. This would be an amazing Please think about this . Starpirat Not developed in-house by us and is quite old in software terms. It would have to be built pretty much from scratch for MSFS.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement - Avionics not working

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    @n6722c Amazing ! Thanks !
  • Santa Paula Original Buildings Showing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    @voice-of-reason Hi!! The update did the trick! Thank you guys so much for taking care of the issue
  • Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    489 Views
    DerekD
    @pilot_paul said in Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue: Since the latest MSFS 40th Anniversary update there is now a massive hill between taxiway R4 and R5 making the scenery unusable. Have you been in contact with Just Flight support? They should be able to help with this kind of thing. There is a link at www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • AI is not positioning aircraft

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    248 Views
    No one has replied
  • Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    837 Views
    DerekD
    @mrrick said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: @derek said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: If you bought direct from JF you would have been sent an email when the MSFS version was released. Had a look back and can't seem to find the email, what can we do? It was sent on 8th December 2020 if that helps? If not, your best bet would be to get in touch with JF support.
  • Velocity XL heading bug will not center when knob pressed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    224 Views
    No one has replied
  • Getting the HondaJet into AH2?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    271 Views
    No one has replied
  • AH2 how to change cargo to pax?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    237 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air problems flying a TDS GTN750 NAV Route.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    302 Views
    No one has replied
  • Notification of updates

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DerekD
    @taipan303 said in Notification of updates: @derek it's nothing to do with point 1. Your point 1 was about a new customer buying a product and the T&Cs etc. The whole 5 point process you described is the status quo. I wouldn't be making a suggestion if that process wasn't bad. My suggestion wasn't about the purchase process or the 5 point process you have - my suggestion is for something NEW. My suggestion is to allow a customer to re-subscribe manually to product updates. It doesn't matter if there was a previous unsubscription, because permission is given anew by re-subscribing. There's no company in the world I've ever dealt with that doesn't allow someone to subscribe again overriding previous unsubscriptions. If they ever did I'd just change my email address but I don't have to because when I re-subscribe it's explicit permission to email me again. I think you're arguments are just hashing over the reason why I didn't receive emails originally... when I just want to suggest something new and it's not being understood. I do get the point - you are asking for a system that, when someone has unsubscribed, they can resubscribe but only to receive product updates. Definitely possible in theory. But.... I am not sure how receptive the mail services would be to such a suggestion and whether the work involved would pay off or open us up to spamming accusations. Customers would have to know they needed to reusbscribe after unnsubscribing and I am not sure that many customers are affected. For most "go away and stop bothering me" really does mean that.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Product request

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    501 Views
    b3lt3rB
    See? Patience really is a virtue Sorry for the long-time P3D users but very happy for the rest of us (and me). Commercially from a JF view, this has to be as close to a no-brainer as you're going to get. Now I can start checking the in dev page constantly waiting for news on a -200F variant