Skip to content

MSFS Products

6.7k Topics 36.2k Posts

  • 493 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    I'm still keeping my fingers crossed they will add in the ability to let us use the displays of our hardware cdu's.
  • 3k Topics
    15k Posts
    K
    Jetstream or BAE ATP would be awesome. In fact I already posted an ATP request to Justflight. British from top to bottom, an ATP is a legendary aircraft, it's a pity none has decided to bring it to MSFS to date.
  • 61 Topics
    277 Posts
    Z
    WORKING FINE NOW
  • 120 Topics
    509 Posts
    R
    Thanks for your reply. That’s understood fully. There are a few aircraft on the market place on Xbox that allow if you press jettison it removes the we[on from the payload which is a little more immersive. So not specifically seeing the weapon drop but as close as we can get etc. would this be possible for the marketplace versions at some point? The aircraft that allow this are the IFE aircraft. Sorry for name dropping another developer but it adds to the immersion that big extra. Cheers Rg
  • 430 Topics
    2k Posts
    G
    Same Story here... no boundings, but the HP-Levers are in the On Position at the beginning, and going back random to on. Multible times during preflight.
  • 717 Topics
    4k Posts
    F
    One other observation: If the STBY INV logic works the same way on the 146 as described in the Avro FCOM (which I would assume it does, given the shared electrical architecture), then the STBY INV switch should control a relay that switches the EMERG AC busbars between ESS AC and the STBY INV output. With the switch at OFF, the STBY INV should not be powered, but the EMERG AC busbars should be disconnected from ESS AC and connected to the (unpowered) inverter outputs instead. This should result in EMERG AC being unpowered, and the EMERG AC OFF annunciator should illuminate. In the sim, switching STBY INV to OFF does not produce an EMERG AC OFF annunciator. It appears that EMERG AC continues to be fed directly from ESS AC regardless of the STBY INV switch position. The inverter itself seems to work correctly (selecting STBY INV on the AC meter shows voltage at O/RIDE and no voltage at OFF), but the changeover relay that should switch EMERG AC between ESS AC and the inverter output does not seem to be implemented. This would also explain why selecting O/RIDE with ESS AC powered does not cause the heading bug on the left HSI to wander, as described in the manual. I imagine that particular effect would be quite complex to implement in a sim anyway, so that is entirely understandable. Related to this: when the STBY GEN is running (O/RIDE with engine 3 providing green hydraulic pressure), the batteries are correctly disconnected from EMERG DC and BATT 1/2 OFF LINE illuminate, which is great. However, according to the Avro FCOM, selecting STBY INV to O/RIDE while the STBY GEN is delivering power should reconnect the batteries to EMERG DC and open the ESS/EMERG ACO. In the sim, the batteries remain disconnected. This is likely related to the missing STBY INV relay implementation. Of course, if the 146 differs from the Avro in this regard, please disregard!
  • 506 3k
    506 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Re: Feature Requests Can we please get an updated FS Traffic Manual that shows SETUP Global settings for the latest version of MSFS 2024 instead of ones that no longer exist (e.g. "TRAFFIC AIRPORT QUALITY"). Thanks.
  • 188 Topics
    750 Posts
    MarkM
    This isn't something I recall seeing reported before; however, if it is hydraulic-related, the HYD.1 or HYD.2 caption would be illuminated on the CWP. HYD.1 system pressure will vary depending on usage, but should automatically increase pressure once the load on the system is reduced. HYD.2 system requires resetting after engine start via the "HYD 2 RESET" button on the left console. In any case, could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you would be able to provide any screenshots/videos of the behaviour, as well as steps on how we can replicate the behaviour, then that will put our support team in the best position to offer assistance. Mark - Just Flight
  • 228 Topics
    1k Posts
    MarkM
    All the feedback we have received in this thread has been logged on our internal system, and we will be reviewing it ahead of the next update to our PA28s. Mark - Just Flight
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    R
    Stand down everyone. I figured it out. Well, not so much 'figured' but stumbled upon it. You know the saying 'If you throw enough s**t at the wall, some of it will stick'? That the method I used.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement - Avionics not working

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    @n6722c Amazing ! Thanks !
  • Santa Paula Original Buildings Showing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    @voice-of-reason Hi!! The update did the trick! Thank you guys so much for taking care of the issue
  • Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    434 Views
    DerekD
    @pilot_paul said in Lanzarote GCRR taxiway issue: Since the latest MSFS 40th Anniversary update there is now a massive hill between taxiway R4 and R5 making the scenery unusable. Have you been in contact with Just Flight support? They should be able to help with this kind of thing. There is a link at www.justflight.com https://www.justflight.com/support
  • AI is not positioning aircraft

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    213 Views
    No one has replied
  • Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    743 Views
    DerekD
    @mrrick said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: @derek said in Air Hauler 2 MSFS discount: If you bought direct from JF you would have been sent an email when the MSFS version was released. Had a look back and can't seem to find the email, what can we do? It was sent on 8th December 2020 if that helps? If not, your best bet would be to get in touch with JF support.
  • Velocity XL heading bug will not center when knob pressed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    193 Views
    No one has replied
  • Getting the HondaJet into AH2?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    233 Views
    No one has replied
  • AH2 how to change cargo to pax?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    207 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air problems flying a TDS GTN750 NAV Route.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    251 Views
    No one has replied
  • Notification of updates

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DerekD
    @taipan303 said in Notification of updates: @derek it's nothing to do with point 1. Your point 1 was about a new customer buying a product and the T&Cs etc. The whole 5 point process you described is the status quo. I wouldn't be making a suggestion if that process wasn't bad. My suggestion wasn't about the purchase process or the 5 point process you have - my suggestion is for something NEW. My suggestion is to allow a customer to re-subscribe manually to product updates. It doesn't matter if there was a previous unsubscription, because permission is given anew by re-subscribing. There's no company in the world I've ever dealt with that doesn't allow someone to subscribe again overriding previous unsubscriptions. If they ever did I'd just change my email address but I don't have to because when I re-subscribe it's explicit permission to email me again. I think you're arguments are just hashing over the reason why I didn't receive emails originally... when I just want to suggest something new and it's not being understood. I do get the point - you are asking for a system that, when someone has unsubscribed, they can resubscribe but only to receive product updates. Definitely possible in theory. But.... I am not sure how receptive the mail services would be to such a suggestion and whether the work involved would pay off or open us up to spamming accusations. Customers would have to know they needed to reusbscribe after unnsubscribing and I am not sure that many customers are affected. For most "go away and stop bothering me" really does mean that.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Product request

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    439 Views
    b3lt3rB
    See? Patience really is a virtue Sorry for the long-time P3D users but very happy for the rest of us (and me). Commercially from a JF view, this has to be as close to a no-brainer as you're going to get. Now I can start checking the in dev page constantly waiting for news on a -200F variant
  • Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    963 Views
    DerekD
    @saki86-0 said in Issues with Air Hauler 2, unable to create support ticket: @derek clicking on the "customer" part brought me here ) I used the URL directly down to me in my AirHauler Error Message. That's a link to the login button or the 'check ticket status' button. The link to the 'raise a new ticket' is the one I sent you. Very odd. No-one else has reported this issue so will leave it at that for the moment.
  • Double Parking at Lanzarote

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    564 Views
    DerekD
    @may6433 said in Double Parking at Lanzarote: @may6433 Does anyone at Just Flight read and respond to their forums? Your best bet if you have software issues is to contact Just Flight support. There is a link on the wesbite www.justflight.com https://support.justflight.com/support/home see also: https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support
  • Ants Tigermoth - flickering tablet

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    212 Views
    No one has replied
  • King Air 350 Steam Gauge Overhaul - what about the flight dynamics?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    696 Views
    L
    @derek Thanks Derek: "The Analog King Air features a slightly improved flight model compared to the default King Air 350i, with tweaks based on operator feedback online." It will be GREAT to finally be able to fly this bird with more accuracy and fidelity.
  • 172SP Classic Enhancement

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    933 Views
    W
    Liveries tend to include more files than needed. One file, the panel.cfg, along with information about what electronics are being used, also contains the info for the tail number. Liveries that are wanting to either change the color, or remove it altogether for painted on numbers, will contain a whole copy of this file, that is based off of the original version. The problem comes from this as the panel.cfg for this plane is completely different and has additional lines that won't be in the one in a livery. If you need assistance with editing a livery, please join us on the official WB-Sim discord https://discord.gg/GwGU3QDHHF where there is a "how to" on the subject and I can provide extra help if needed.
  • OAT/Volt meter not working

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    457 Views
    P
    Hi! Sorry about leaving that out...It is for the 172Classic Enhancement.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied