MSFS Products

@JRHorse said in PSA: Simbrief implemented Takeoff Performance Calculator for Avro RJ: I brought this up to the navigraph forums the other day, and when I pointed out that the Avro RJ had the TRP, they implemented flex on both the RJ and the 146. I’ve noticed in a couple of trips though that it has given me a very high flex temp suggestion, 50 C. I found myself nearly running out of available runway on those occasions. I just dialed it down and found a temperature that seemed more suitable. Isn't that sort of the point? If you do optimal temp and flap calculation in the Maddog, you get the same thing. You're trading engine wear for runway.

@Halivan said in Duke in 2024?: Just made an account to help the OP here as I only have 2024 installed on my new PC. I decided not to bother with 2020 anymore. Just google “Contrails how to fake MSFS 2020 install”you will find the steps to create a blank folder in Windows to trick 2020 installers into installing sceneries, airplanes… into that blank folder. You can also change the destination of the “2020 community” folder. Afterwards, just use Addon Linker to link it to 2024’s community folder. Finally, scroll a few posts down from this one and someone explains how to get rid of the patchy liveries. I appreciate that, thank you!

@miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.

@Delta558 thanks for checking! Of course not, but knowing pilots making error (which is how I ended up even thinking about this)

The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight

@kutyafal I’m having the exact same issue.

Injected aircrafts will be only displayed if I really near. Is it possible that I see it from a greater distance?

The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight

It's been a while since we last looked into this, but I believe we ran into a roadblock that prevented us from supporting the use of the VR controllers to control the yokes. We may be able to work around that roadblock now, but we would need to investigate it further to confirm that. We've nudged the priority of this up on our internal bugs list, and we'll investigate it ahead of the next updates to the products. In the meantime, it is possible to use a joystick/yoke/Xbox controller to control the yoke whilst in VR. In this instance, the JustFlight.com and marketplace versions of the product are essentially identical, with the only differences being in the file structure due to marketplace requirements (which doesn't affect VR support). Mark - Just Flight

The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight