Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.4k Topics 28.5k Posts

  • 352 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The windshear warnings are simulated and should trigger when windshear is detected. Terrain radar isn't currently simulated; however, it is something we have on our internal feature request tracker as something to consider for a future update. Mark - Just Flight
  • 2k Topics
    9k Posts
    John S.J
    I haven't seen constant oscillations like the ones mentioned in the other thread, but I can confirm that the autopilot in NAV mode does get a bit wobbly after each leg change. It usually takes a few left-right corrections before it stabilizes. It’s especially noticeable at higher altitudes with 1/2 bank mode enabled. So yeah, kind of quirky
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 105 Topics
    458 Posts
    MarkM
    In v0.1.3 of the Vulcan, we upgraded the GPS from the Aera GPS to the G3X Touch for better MSFS 2024 compatibility. Therefore, the functionality of the GPS has changed slightly as the G3X Touch is a more advanced GPS. To cover each of your points: If a flight plan is created in the MSFS 2024 EFB, the "Send Route To Avionics" button must be pressed in order to import the route into the GPS. If a flight plan is created manually within the GPS, the flight plan must have a departure airport and a destination airport set in order for the autopilot to couple with the GPS (if a flight plan is created in the GPS with only a departure airport and waypoints, the route will be displayed, but the autopilot coupling will not function with an incomplete flight plan). In order for the autopilot to track the GPS flight plan, the ENGAGE knob must be pulled (with IN indicator showing white), the TRACK knob must be pulled, and REMOTE must be selected on the navigational selector. This is a known side effect of a workaround we have put in place to improve touchscreen display interactions in our aircraft in MSFS 2024. If the workaround is no longer required after future MSFS 2024 Sim Updates, we will update the logic so that control cannot be clicked through touchscreen displays. The GPS can also be moved on top of the glareshield by clicking the upper bezel. As the G3X Touch is a default GPS unit in MSFS 2024 (developed by Working Title), we sadly don't have any control over the scaling of the GPS. To circumvent this, we have added custom cameras for each GPS position which moves the camera closer to the GPS display. These cameras can be toggled either via the MSFS Camera menu, or via a clickspot on the right bezel of the GPS. Mark - Just Flight
  • 379 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    "site not found"
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    MartynM
    We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.
  • 469 3k
    469 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    We have the following post that has an explanation of the FS Traffic arrival generation: https://community.justflight.com/post/22215 The post refers to an older build of FS Traffic, however, the comment is still valid for the latest build of FS Traffic and should hopefully answer some of the questions you have regarding the arrival traffic generation. Mark - Just Flight
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • Cessna 140 Weight & Balance

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    209 Views
    No one has replied
  • English Electric Lightning

    Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    94 Views
    No one has replied
  • Has JF considered a Dakota?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    264 Views
    fedar92F
    @phantoms i agree with you, it would be awesome!
  • Mosquito

    Moved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    206 Views
    H
    @derek ,thks mark
  • Airhauler2 Many problems

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    206 Views
    DerekD
    @dharless Sorry to hear you are having so much trouble with the game. Here's what I'd suggest: Post up in the AH2 forum (details in the manual) and see if other users can offer suggestions. If that fails, contact Just Flight support. If AH2 is using up all your RAM it sounds like something is wrong with your setup.
  • Fokker F28 and Horizon Air

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    297 Views
    N
    @dadgametime Not only that, but both liveries for the -1000. I would definitely love to see that and some Canadian Regional liveries as well, as both airlines were operating them in the PacNW around the turn of the century.
  • Real Taxiways USA - Class B, C, D & Non-towered Airports

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    177 Views
    No one has replied
  • Struggling to start engine from cold and dark.

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    262 Views
    SoCalPilotS
    @shutts Next time look at the volts on your battery. It was probably too low. Having the battery switched on while futzing with the radios and nav systems (with lighting on, too) will drain the battery fairly quickly, preventing the electronic fuel pump from working. You can recharge the battery from the EFB. You can also disable the “State Saving” feature and restart the flight from the Main menu—which will reinitialize everything (from a new [not saved] state).
  • PA-28: DME speed at higher sim rate

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    205 Views
    C
    @cranbrookdave Sorry forgot to mention flying Arrrow 3
  • 2 Axis Autopilot Option

    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    117 Views
    No one has replied
  • Random Startup Bugs

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    273 Views
    S
    @katchaplin Yes I am also thinking there may be a conflict with another add on. I removed all of my add on liveries for JF planes and have not had this type of issue repeat so far. So I don't think there is an issue with the GTN750/650. I just put back one recent livery for the Warrior and I will be looking to see if the random bugs come back. I have previously found strange bugs caused by custom interior add ons that had not been updated. I am also really enjoying the docile Warrior for relaxing flights as well as practicing instrument approaches. Don't know what JF did to make their aircraft handle so realistically. Thanks for your thoughts.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    14 Views
    No one has replied
  • Final approach (flaps?) problem

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    404 Views
    D
    @jshrew98 said in Final approach (flaps?) problem: @dan-t I'm experiencing the same. Interesting that there are two of us. We could of course be imagining things both of us, but it really feels way more unstable now - I've not had any more crashes but it behaves the same. I have no idea which is the more realistic behavior. It certainly makes landings more... exciting? Before, I could more or less throw the aircraft in the general direction of the airport and be fine. Now much more care is necessary.
  • Thank you

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    396 Views
    FSF_UKF
    I second that. The aircraft is flying like a dream since your post WU5 updates. It remains my favourite aircraft ever.
  • AH2 tips not appearing in FS2020

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    162 Views
    No one has replied
  • PA28 Aircraft Updates Much Appreciated

    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    228 Views
    No one has replied
  • PA 28 stuck in loading screen

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    392 Views
    L
    @superkaro2014 I solved it. First time I unzip the zipfile (PMS GTN750...) to another map and copy paste in to community folder. This is not good. I unzip directly in community folder and now it's work fine. I don't know way this is but so it's works. This was the solution for my problem. Thanks for helping me. Have a good day Regards.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    164 Views
    No one has replied
  • JustFlight Arrow/Warrior radio question

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    411 Views
    N
    They are functionally the same, I think the only difference is the 175B is "TSO'd" (according to a few internet sources) which from what I can tell means it's TSO Authorized
  • Warrior II rear bench

    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    2k Views
    MartynM
    @Brave-Heart said in Warrior II rear bench: This is unacceptable for a response and you know it as the fact is the seat is not a "feature" of the real life aircraft it is actual fact. Please see above, GA aircraft are routinely modified and many of the features of all our PA28s differ from the original manufacturer configuration, just like in real life. Hopefully it's pretty obvious from all the significant and smaller differences between our PA28s that these were not simple copy-and-paste projects. Each is uniquely configured to match our chosen real world research aircraft. It's already been made clear by me above that we will look at adding the option of reverting to the original rear bench/sofa for those that prefer that configuration, but I think we need to appreciate that it's a relatively niche request, hence it not being discussed by the thousands of owners before now. That's not to say it's not a worthwhile suggestion but it's but no means indictive of short-cuts being taken in the development of the aircraft.