Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.4k Topics 28.8k Posts

  • 352 Topics
    2k Posts
    D
    Very cool, I'll need to see if I can find the right weather conditions. Exciting to hear that there are new features coming in the future. Keep up the great work! Sometimes I stream the RJ here Deephack Plays My main channel is here although it's more DCS focussed Deephack
  • 2k Topics
    9k Posts
    Black SquareB
    I had someone ask a little while ago how I test my aircraft for performance, and I said that I rarely do, unless there is something very specific that I'm looking for. Instead, I just program the only way I know how, which is to conserve resources like it's maybe 2010. As for the numbers, the impact is small, but they all add up with everything else. The blinking is an addition test that must be performed on every loop, regardless of the blink state, for every single indicator that would blink. If it's supposed to only blink for ~10 seconds before coming steady, that's another counter that has to be incremented for every single indicator on every loop, and another test to see if it's supposed to become steady. When it's blinking, writing to the screen is the most resource consuming of all.
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 106 Topics
    459 Posts
    H
    I have noticed that using the bleed air it is possible to start all engines at the same time. I assume this isn't actually accurate as there wouldn't be enough pressure to allow that?
  • 380 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The F70 and F100 won't have a failure system at release, but its on the feature request tracker as something to consider post-release. Mark - Just Flight
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    MartynM
    We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.
  • 471 3k
    471 Topics
    3k Posts
    D
    I am also enjoying 2024. Furthermore, I completely agree with your opinion. At first, I was confused when I turned off the “Air Traffic” option and couldn't see the multi-users. I still don't understand why they tied the multi-users to the “Air Traffic” option. I made a suggestion to ASOBO, but I don't know when they will change it. I think including multi-users in this option was clearly the wrong choice.
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    S
    I don't have 2024 but have a look at your weight and balance. Do you have 2 pilots or 1? If 1, could just be the offset weight of a single pilot.
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • Paris Airports

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    196 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    365 Views
    C
    @derek said in Is Traffic AI Coming to MSFS, I can find nothing saying so? Thanks in advance for any info.: @captchaos https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-fs-traffic-msfs-in-development Thank you Derek, I'm looking forward to this. Thanks again I could only fin xp11. My stupid searching no doubt.
  • SimWorks Studios Kodiak 100 price difference !

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    311 Views
    DerekD
    @sigma1958 said in SimWorks Studios Kodiak 100 price difference !: I just bought the SimWorks Studios Kodiak 100 and I love it, BUT...... I paid US$ 44.99 - bonus points but on SimWorks Studios home page it's listed to 29.99 Euro that's about 34.00 US$. I feel like I'm robbed !!!! We are a UK website website and the prtice is based on an equivalent to the UK price (including VAT) plus card processing. The exchange rate between the £ and $ is different to € to $.
  • Fokker 50 for MSFS

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    467 Views
    No one has replied
  • Authentication Page Issues with F-16 Purchase

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    239 Views
    DerekD
    @joylesstunic said in Authentication Page Issues with F-16 Purchase: Is this happening to a lot of people? I cannot seem to get the assistance I am seeking. First things first-I logged into justflight with my username and password, which is saved. It's the same info I used for the F-14, and the Hawk. I even logged out, logged in and manually input my info, and I successfully logged in. The website acknowledged I was signed in, acknowledged I paid them $35 for the F-16. I am unable to get past the authentication screen where it ask me to manually enter my username and password. I get error code 401, user not authorized. Again, I verified my username and password are correct, so can I get a solution to where I can be flying this plane hopefully sometime in the near future? Have you contacted Just Flight support? They should be able to get you sorted.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Air Hauler 2 MSFS Error

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    753 Views
    J
    @pilotjon AH2 has their own dedicated forums located here: https://ah2.justflight.com/ Slopey, the dev, will more than likely be happy to assist you with that error.
  • Inaccurate Mixture Behaviour on Turbocharged Piston Engines

    4
    4 Votes
    4 Posts
    408 Views
    C
    I've also posted about this in the turbo arrow part of the forums. I've done the fix listed in the thread you post and it works, other than the graphical issue of the mixture automatically moving. Makes it much more realistic. The community manger for MSFS2020 came back saying they were not looking into it that much as they didn't have a default turbocharged aircraft... Well, I'm going to be replying... they do now with the p51's and reno race packs....
  • Updates came out but there is no email to download them

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    321 Views
    P
    @martyn thanks
  • Bendix King AP

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    202 Views
    L
    @ancrm114 I agree, I know the specific plane they used had the AP as listed, but the Arrow/Warrior has other AP options. I don't fly the default aircraft, I use a custom one, so should be able to choose a more functional AP as an option.
  • Warrior & Arrow autopilot with DG not set correctly

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    L
    @martyn so will I, thanks!
  • Air Hauler 2

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    546 Views
    No one has replied
  • PA28 Archer II

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    613 Views
    M
    @martyn would there also be the possibility of the Archer TX/LX to take advantage of the upcoming G1000 NXi ?
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Pa38

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    @mace_rb Wow, that's a beaut.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    203 Views
    petesmiffyP
    Have you updated the Spitfire to v.1.5.3?
  • Please bring the Duchess Model 76 to MSFS.

    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    231 Views
    E
    @ancrm114 me too, really liked it in xp11
  • Piper PA30 / PA-30 Twin Comanche

    pa30 piperpa30
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    272 Views
    No one has replied
  • LEPL Palma de Mallorca static planes?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    167 Views
    No one has replied
  • Please Tell Me a PA44 is in Work

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    277 Views
    T
    Any Twin GA aircraft would be awesome but a PA-44 would probably be my choice too. Sim really needs a JF quality twin. My hope is at the very least in the spirit of bringing their planes over from previous sims they could bring their Duchess Model 76 to MSFS some time soon.