Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.4k Topics 28.5k Posts

  • 352 Topics
    2k Posts
    D
    Very cool, I'll need to see if I can find the right weather conditions. Exciting to hear that there are new features coming in the future. Keep up the great work! Sometimes I stream the RJ here Deephack Plays My main channel is here although it's more DCS focussed Deephack
  • 2k Topics
    9k Posts
    H
    Enjoyed this one so thought I would share, Cheers James https://youtu.be/1AX4MTZ43mE?si=OPQZ3OFmhAlIiBp8
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 105 Topics
    458 Posts
    MarkM
    In v0.1.3 of the Vulcan, we upgraded the GPS from the Aera GPS to the G3X Touch for better MSFS 2024 compatibility. Therefore, the functionality of the GPS has changed slightly as the G3X Touch is a more advanced GPS. To cover each of your points: If a flight plan is created in the MSFS 2024 EFB, the "Send Route To Avionics" button must be pressed in order to import the route into the GPS. If a flight plan is created manually within the GPS, the flight plan must have a departure airport and a destination airport set in order for the autopilot to couple with the GPS (if a flight plan is created in the GPS with only a departure airport and waypoints, the route will be displayed, but the autopilot coupling will not function with an incomplete flight plan). In order for the autopilot to track the GPS flight plan, the ENGAGE knob must be pulled (with IN indicator showing white), the TRACK knob must be pulled, and REMOTE must be selected on the navigational selector. This is a known side effect of a workaround we have put in place to improve touchscreen display interactions in our aircraft in MSFS 2024. If the workaround is no longer required after future MSFS 2024 Sim Updates, we will update the logic so that control cannot be clicked through touchscreen displays. The GPS can also be moved on top of the glareshield by clicking the upper bezel. As the G3X Touch is a default GPS unit in MSFS 2024 (developed by Working Title), we sadly don't have any control over the scaling of the GPS. To circumvent this, we have added custom cameras for each GPS position which moves the camera closer to the GPS display. These cameras can be toggled either via the MSFS Camera menu, or via a clickspot on the right bezel of the GPS. Mark - Just Flight
  • 379 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    "site not found"
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    MartynM
    We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.
  • 469 3k
    469 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Support for FS-Hud using their API. MSFS 2024 compatibility needs to be improved in respect of injection. Too many work arounds to get it working properly compared to FSTL which just works.
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    msfs 2024
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.
  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    243 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly
  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    'love to have one !
  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    273 Views
    No one has replied
  • Boeing 707 Possible?

    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @sk0941 +FMS/Garmin-y retrofits. But true classics will keep flying one way or another, and in MSFS, its quite easier if one wants to go old school. Already can fly US like it's 1958 with all the original VORs, NDBs, etc from that era. You can also go all celnav (celestial navigation) and fly your DC-6 or Connie that way, which is how they did it before gyroscope INS systems became a thing. https://flightsim.to/file/71888/golden-age-of-air-travel-u-s-navaids-as-of-1958 https://flightsim.to/file/17738/celnav-for-msfs-celestial-navigation-sextant The Wing42 B247 included old AN type radio beacons globally for navigation (where they existed at the time, which was limited coverage). The mods and community stuff will expand with time.
  • WB Cessna 172SP doppelte Pitotrohre

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    222 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fokker F27

    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    924 Views
    R
    Three from me!
  • BAC Provost/Strikemaster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    287 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB 172 - GPS Knobs not working v1.0.8

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    986 Views
    cromagnonC
    after a lot of hassle, it was necessary to delete "wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic-PMS530-patch" so that all the commands were operational. It's not easy to get back on the bandwagon after a break of several months.
  • LEPA - wrong taxiways

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    367 Views
    MarkM
    The taxiways you have listed match up correctly with the Navigraph charts on our end, so this may be an installation issue or some sort of conflict with another mod that is preventing the scenery from displaying correctly. If you could kindly open a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link we will be able to help troubleshoot that with you: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • F-15 version 1.60 WSO switch missing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    175 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    374 Views
    A
    Hello, I bougth the GCXO scenery today and it did not work for me having isntalling the Islands Creations Tenerife scenery.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Archer III for MSFS?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    514 Views
    K
    Thanks Mark, it's good to know it hasn't been forgotten.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • FS Traffic and GA aircraft

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    829 Views
    MarkM
    @gjereza Any GA aircraft models can be added to the FS Traffic fleet by adding the "Title=" entry from the aircraft.cfg into the respective livery field on the "Liveries" page of the Traffic Control Centre app, and then flights can be added for that aircraft on the "Schedules Manager" page. It is important to note that any aircraft added to the FS Traffic fleet must be fully MSFS compatible and preferably be a model that is optimised to be used as AI traffic. The FS Traffic manual can be downloaded via the following link if you would like to read more about this process: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight
  • WB-SIM 172 Classic WT GNS530 - no NAV/COM page

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    274 Views
    No one has replied
  • Piper Tomahawk

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    503 Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we have implemented some Autopilot controls on the Tomahawk's EFB that can be used for basic autopilot modes such as Heading Hold, Nav Mode, and Altitude Hold. These will also be able to be triggered using control assignments. Mark - Just Flight