Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.4k Topics 28.5k Posts

  • 352 Topics
    2k Posts
    D
    Very cool, I'll need to see if I can find the right weather conditions. Exciting to hear that there are new features coming in the future. Keep up the great work! Sometimes I stream the RJ here Deephack Plays My main channel is here although it's more DCS focussed Deephack
  • 2k Topics
    9k Posts
    Black SquareB
    @plhought How interesting that the ground comm functionality evaded me (and all the descriptive manuals, from what I could see), despite how many details I have learned about this aircraft. You are also correct about the avionics relays functioning the same as a King Air. I was also looking at section 24-56-00 in the wiring diagram manual, but my rush to answer before Flight Sim Expo must have gotten the better of me. I will add the ground comm functionality immediately. Do you have a page/section in the wiring diagram manual for the ground comm switch? I would assume that the master battery switch also closes the same connection between the RTU1 + COM1 transceiver and the hot battery bus, such that the ground comm switch could be released after the battery is connected, and the RTU1 + COM1 will remain energized.
  • 56 Topics
    241 Posts
    N
    @miked176766 I think I have found the problem. I purchased the PA38 Tomahawk on the MSFS 2020 Marketplace and this updated in MSFS 2020 on Friday (20/06/25). This worked fine in MSFS 2020. I ran MSFS 2024 and looked in my Library for the PA38 Tomahawk which still shows as the 2020 version not certified for MSFS 2024. I set this version to install and stream. On running the aircraft it loaded and allowed me to enter the cockpit. I tested for full control movement stick and rudder which both showed full movement. On starting the engine I could only get aileron movement, no elevator or rudder. With this version still set to stream the loss of elevator and rudder is passed on to the PA28’s that are installed as MS 2024 certified. If I then set the PA 38 to disabled the PA 28’s all return to normal rudder and aileron behaviour. My conclusion is that until we have an MSFS 2024 certified copy of the PA38 Tomahawk in the marketplace this problem will persist.
  • 105 Topics
    458 Posts
    MarkM
    In v0.1.3 of the Vulcan, we upgraded the GPS from the Aera GPS to the G3X Touch for better MSFS 2024 compatibility. Therefore, the functionality of the GPS has changed slightly as the G3X Touch is a more advanced GPS. To cover each of your points: If a flight plan is created in the MSFS 2024 EFB, the "Send Route To Avionics" button must be pressed in order to import the route into the GPS. If a flight plan is created manually within the GPS, the flight plan must have a departure airport and a destination airport set in order for the autopilot to couple with the GPS (if a flight plan is created in the GPS with only a departure airport and waypoints, the route will be displayed, but the autopilot coupling will not function with an incomplete flight plan). In order for the autopilot to track the GPS flight plan, the ENGAGE knob must be pulled (with IN indicator showing white), the TRACK knob must be pulled, and REMOTE must be selected on the navigational selector. This is a known side effect of a workaround we have put in place to improve touchscreen display interactions in our aircraft in MSFS 2024. If the workaround is no longer required after future MSFS 2024 Sim Updates, we will update the logic so that control cannot be clicked through touchscreen displays. The GPS can also be moved on top of the glareshield by clicking the upper bezel. As the G3X Touch is a default GPS unit in MSFS 2024 (developed by Working Title), we sadly don't have any control over the scaling of the GPS. To circumvent this, we have added custom cameras for each GPS position which moves the camera closer to the GPS display. These cameras can be toggled either via the MSFS Camera menu, or via a clickspot on the right bezel of the GPS. Mark - Just Flight
  • 379 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    "site not found"
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    MartynM
    We're aiming to finish work on the 146 upgrade and MSFS 2024 compatibility in July.
  • 469 3k
    469 Topics
    3k Posts
    M
    so as @Derek points out why no arival aircraft in the interface schedules am i missing something
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please
  • 356 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The real-world aircraft does have a difference in elevator deflection angles on each side of neutral (+16 degrees and -8 degrees off the top of my head), so it is expected behaviour to see the difference in movement range. However, from my discussions with our flight model developer, the difference in elevator deflection angle on either side of neutral is something MSFS doesn't handle all too well, so the small deflection angle is necessary in order to preserve the handling qualities of the aircraft. Essentially, even with that small deflection angle that you are seeing in the latest build, the aircraft should have a similar level of effectiveness as if it had the larger deflection angle. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • TDM 850 Torque

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    487 Views
    I
    @eker Thank you. Should have RFM
  • BS TBM 850 IAS mode AP

    tbm 850 autopilot
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    375 Views
    No one has replied
  • F100 & RJ Professional

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    DerekD
    @marfarkar said in F100 & RJ Professional: just trying to highlight a gap in the business model Unfortunately, the business model also dictates that you need to announce a project as far in advance as possible to ensure that no-one else ends up working on one as well. This is especially true of large study level aircraft. when it is know that internally that the F100 will not see the light of day for a very long time after the F70. Not something we are aware of. If you check out the In Development page you will see that both are part of the same product. See: https://www.justflight.com/in-development/f70-100-professional We have no plans to sell the two variants separately. If we've said that anywhere please let us know and we will correct it.
  • TBM co-pilot HSI

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    239 Views
    No one has replied
  • Black Square product suggestions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    593 Views
    G
    @doctrench I raise you a Piper Cheyenne. Take a look at the one done for FSX by Digital Aviation. Awesome steam plane.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied
  • I am dying for the TBM-850 I need this whaaa, whaaaa

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    474 Views
    V
    @supersixbravo Very soon, let's put it that way. Our developer at Black Square needs to finish the final knockings and once he's a happy man he'll supply code to us and we'll go about getting it released to the expecting public. Looking at this week though.
  • 146 PRO Pilot and CoPilot not showing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    334 Views
    No one has replied
  • Does the Velocity XL still need the WT G3X mod?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    628 Views
    A
    I am using the latest version of Velocity with the WT G3X mod in order to get functioning autopilot.
  • PA-38 Tomahawk Development Update.

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    623 Views
    DerekD
    @mace_rb said in PA-38 Tomahawk Development Update.: I believe Just Flight posted on facebook or possibly it was on the MSFS forums a few months ago that yes the project is very much alive. They did have some issues with the health of one of the key developers but the project has been moved in-house as of a couple of months ago according to their post at that time. Pretty much spot on. It is being worked on. No idea of release date (as with all projects until they are finished) but it shouldn't be too long now
  • New GCXO - Tenerife North Airport

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    393 Views
    DerekD
    @charlx18 said in New GCXO - Tenerife North Airport: Good morning, first of all I have noticed a detail as important as some letters in the middle of the terminal that say "Tenerife Norte" a detail that is too important for those who see the airport every day, you could say that it is the most emblematic of the airport Secondly, I think that with the level of just the docking guide system should be operational, finally, in Tenerife North in almost all the photos that you see there are some blinds lowered by the sun, so I hope these little things for the next update, In any case, it's a good job, but these very important things regarding the airport environment...! If you contact Just Flight support they can prpobably pass this on to the developer. There is a link on the website at www.justflight.com https://support.justflight.com/support/home
  • GCXO huge fps drop

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    236 Views
    No one has replied
  • Order issues with acoount

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    346 Views
    DerekD
    @otoshi said in Order issues with acoount: Hello, I just bought the Velocity XL from the store but there wasnt an option to create an account. But in the confirmation email i need to login in order to download it. But I dont even have an account nor a password. Could somebody help me please? Thanks in advance. https://support.justflight.com/support/solutions/articles/17000064728-where-is-my-order- https://support.justflight.com/support/solutions/articles/17000064716-how-do-i-create-an-account- https://support.justflight.com/support/solutions/articles/17000064726-i-have-not-received-an-email-with-a-download-link
  • F4 Phantom

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    DerekD
    @captnthud said in F4 Phantom: @derek been there done that there's no support category yet. I just want to point out a couple inaccuracies in the flight model it's really pretty good.....though this is a hard plane to get right You should be able to raise a Support ticket - otherwise, you could send a message direct to DC via their FB page.
  • Just Flight Tornado GR1 Update?

    just flight tornado update
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    346 Views
    No one has replied
  • VC-10

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @derek Yes that would make sense. Maybe in the process of time once other projects have cleared, you folks might turn your attention to a VC10 built from the ground up. I hope so, what with all the modern gaps being filled in you guys have brought two top notch retro airliners to MSFS, I hope you continue that theme with others! All the best - Peter
  • f4 phanton

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    300 Views
    V
    @headicus It's not our Phantom. It's from DC Designs. We hope to have it available from our website by the end of the month though. Hope that helps.
  • DC Designs F4 Phantoms

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    267 Views
    No one has replied
  • WB-SIM Cessna 172 update question - don't break what works!

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    Be lovely if we could get the tds sim 750 into the panel.. Dave
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    No one has replied