Skip to content

MSFS Products

5.2k Topics 27.0k Posts

  • 348 Topics
    2k Posts
    MarkM
    The only cause I recall of the Flight Director indicating too great a pitch during takeoff/climb was a throttle axis spiking issue. That's covered in my previous response in this thread, along with a potential workaround for that. Another way of working out if it is throttle axis spiking related, will be to temporarily unplug any external hardware with a throttle axis assignment from your PC (joystick, throttle quadrant, etc.) and then load a flight in the RJ on the runway. With a flight loaded on the runway, enter a flight plan in the FMS takeoff as normal. If the flight director bars indicate 8 degrees pitch up for the takeoff roll, and then indicate the pitch required to maintain V2+10 during the initial climb, then they are behaving as expected and the cause will likely be related to a spiking issue in the throttle axis. If the issue persists with no throttle axis assignment in play, the could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the support ticket, if you could supply a video of the behaviour, then our support team will have the best chance of either reproducing that behaviour and be in the best position to assist with further troubleshooting. Mark - Just Flight
  • 1k Topics
    8k Posts
    RhinozherousR
    Awesome! Thank you very much!
  • 56 Topics
    239 Posts
    M
    Hmm, not sure about the yoke animation, I will check it next time I fly the Tomahawk. I know yoke animation was mentioned by JustFlight at some point, so maybe it's not playing nice with your Saitek yoke? I have a CH Products Flight Sim Yoke which is the predecessor to the Saitek yoke I believe. I do have Saitek rudder pedals, a really old set and I'm surprised they've held up all these years.
  • 105 Topics
    458 Posts
    MarkM
    In v0.1.3 of the Vulcan, we upgraded the GPS from the Aera GPS to the G3X Touch for better MSFS 2024 compatibility. Therefore, the functionality of the GPS has changed slightly as the G3X Touch is a more advanced GPS. To cover each of your points: If a flight plan is created in the MSFS 2024 EFB, the "Send Route To Avionics" button must be pressed in order to import the route into the GPS. If a flight plan is created manually within the GPS, the flight plan must have a departure airport and a destination airport set in order for the autopilot to couple with the GPS (if a flight plan is created in the GPS with only a departure airport and waypoints, the route will be displayed, but the autopilot coupling will not function with an incomplete flight plan). In order for the autopilot to track the GPS flight plan, the ENGAGE knob must be pulled (with IN indicator showing white), the TRACK knob must be pulled, and REMOTE must be selected on the navigational selector. This is a known side effect of a workaround we have put in place to improve touchscreen display interactions in our aircraft in MSFS 2024. If the workaround is no longer required after future MSFS 2024 Sim Updates, we will update the logic so that control cannot be clicked through touchscreen displays. The GPS can also be moved on top of the glareshield by clicking the upper bezel. As the G3X Touch is a default GPS unit in MSFS 2024 (developed by Working Title), we sadly don't have any control over the scaling of the GPS. To circumvent this, we have added custom cameras for each GPS position which moves the camera closer to the GPS display. These cameras can be toggled either via the MSFS Camera menu, or via a clickspot on the right bezel of the GPS. Mark - Just Flight
  • 376 Topics
    2k Posts
    A
    Hello everyone! Drawing on the official manuals, I’ve created a performance calculator for Noise Abatement and Thrust Index (the latter is already automated). It’s completely free—give it a try and see if it meets your needs. Hope you enjoy it! Alan / From Brazil Click here: https://alanmfernandess.github.io/f28perf/
  • 667 Topics
    3k Posts
    F
    You are right, this seems to be a simulator limitation. The PMDG 777 and the Fenix A320 also do not show the DME. In the Fenix I was at least able to tune the DME as a VOR, but that still isn't really correct. Well, this whole thing is pretty bad.
  • 452 3k
    452 Topics
    3k Posts
    MarkM
    Thank you for reporting this. I have passed this on to our development team to investigate further ahead of a future update to FS Traffic. Mark - Just Flight
  • 177 Topics
    699 Posts
    MarkM
    The throttle axis snapping between IDLE and 100% is likely the result of the control conflict. Do you perhaps have any controls assigned to "TOGGLE ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE" or "SET ENGINE 1 FUEL VALVE"? Those assignments are used to move the throttle lever between the HP OFF and IDLE positions, so they could be 'fighting' against the throttle axis position. Mark - Just Flight
  • 218 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    Hi. Sorry if this has already been answered. But juring normal flight, ( I expect this on take-off) I have to constantly steer to the right. I don't remember this happening in 2020, but in 2024 I have this problem. I am using version 0.4.3. any help please
  • 355 Topics
    2k Posts
    DerekD
    If you bought direct from Just Flight the updated versions are automatically added to your account. For other third party sites they are usually updated a day or so after the JF release. For the MarketPlace it's an entirely different kettle of fish. We send the updates to MS where they are tested and then they go into a queue for release. It's not something we have any control over but, if the update is free for JF customers it should also be free on the MP - when it arrives.
  • SC designs F16 wobbling left and right during autopilot on MSFS

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    121 Views
    No one has replied
  • Request: Change Method of License Validation

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    275 Views
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. There are no plans at the moment to change the activation process of our products in MSFS 2024, but we will log that request on our internal trackers as something to consider in the future. Mark - Just Flight
  • Lanzarote Airport request

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    157 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    498 Views
    Mike KutscherM
    I found the problem. I had the JD Clean Glass mod installed, but it was causing problems. I deactivated it, and the pilot is now visible. The problem is usually located about 80 cm in front of the keyboard. Regards, Mike
  • How to download latest version with no account

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    279 Views
    DerekD
    Unfortunately the versions would be incompatible so you'd need to download the third party update from that vendor.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    31 Views
    No one has replied
  • Harrier II in MSFS 2024 takes off like a homesick angel!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    186 Views
    No one has replied
  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    634 Views
    MarkM
    Yes, we are currently developing free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for all of our MSFS products, including FS Traffic. The status of each of these updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status Mark - Just Flight
  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    412 Views
    S
    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode. The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.
  • Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    971 Views
    S
    Yeah, the CV880/990 would be really cool indeed! The problem I see is the aircraft sounds because there are no aircraft available for recording sounds and very few videos of the engine sounds, all of which do not cover the full range of operation.
  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    L
    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.
  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    959 Views
    WooliesW
    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates. Thank you. Matt
  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    697 Views
    V
    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.
  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    452 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight
  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    kiowa oh58d
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    228 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    227 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    456 Views
    MarkM
    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features. Mark - Just Flight
  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    590 Views
    A
    Nice - can't wait!
  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    607 Views
    MarkM
    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data. There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for. With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon. Mark - Just Flight
  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    283 Views
    No one has replied