Are you guys changing the windows on the fuselage to be smaller and the engine nacelles for the JT9Ds?

Please submit these to our support team for investigation (https://community.justflight.com/topic/144/technical-support-and-reporting-bugs). The change log on the support page (you should have also received it via email) lists all the changes made in the updates. Anything not included on the list, including the manual and door controls, are still work-in-progress. Thanks Martyn

Thank you

@Craig-Haskell said in fspilotshop, Just Flight activations: @AutoSetup I have now PM'd you the details you need for this, with the instructions on what to do. Would you mind adding the Tristar livery pack 1, which has the essential RAF liveries. Thanks..

The VC10 is widely regarded as one of the most graceful jet airliners ever created, with its long slim fuselage, clean angled-back wings and graceful swept-back tail surfaces.VC10 Professional for FSX and P3D includes accurately modelled Standard and Super civilian variants and C1K, K3 and K4 military variants of the VC10 in a variety of liveries covering their time in airline and RAF service. You can get more detailed description here ,such as cockpit ,systems and liveries and so on. https://docsbay.net/vc10-professional-standard-super-raf Happy to share with you guys.

@Jon_OZ said in best flight simulator, any advise please: @Derek Oh, you saying already the 747 Classic isn’t going to be realistic? Guess it will be as bad as the cls one now then. And I’ll have to update all on current forums as to JF’s view on the new release being a major disappointment. No - it is the most complex and detailed aircraft JF has released to date and by 'to date' I am including all the aircraft we've published in the past such as 747 Ready For Pushback. However, from your posts it is fairly clear that you, personally, are going to be majorly disappointed, irrespective of how the product looks or behaves. The CLS 747, in its day, was an excellent aircraft and still sells well on Steam. If you are happy with FS9 then that's great. The rest of us will stick with PBR in a 64-bit sim.

@RayM Apparently, there are no immediate plans to add military traffic to TG and, although they do say that there will be an upgrade the current GA (which is just a mix of a few T360 and default planes), probably after final release.

@petesmiffy in case it's any help, there should be two bridges at Blackfriars. The Western bridge is the road bridge, the Eastern bridge is the rail bridge (which looks a little different now as they moved the station to on top of the bridge a few years ago). In between the two are unused pillars from an older bridge which has been demolished - nice to see those feature on the screenshot. Perhaps the other extra bridge is the rail bridge which goes across the river to Cannon Street Station (don't know the official name of that one sorry). Steve

"whether or not the toilet fan is operating" WOW. Don't think anyone has done that. Maybe it will depend on how powerful it is. Jim CYWG

@Martin1 No intent to be condescending, the comment about low-level was a fairly flippant attempt at humour! However, the B2 was introduced in the same year Gary Powers was shot down in the U2 and that prompted the move from high level to low level, so the B2 Vulcans only did four or five years of what the original concept was designed around before spending the vast majority of its career (almost 20 years) in the low-level attack role (Blue Steel until 1970, then conventional or tactical nuclear afterwards). I find flying the Vulcan at low level, with the poor visibility from the cockpit, much more rewarding than sticking the autopilot on, hence my comment. Some of the original routings are described online, a couple of the low-level entry points to the UK low flying system being not far from me along the South Wales coastline and there is also a very good video on YouTube of the last days of 617 squadron's Vulcan time with a planned low level sortie. Obviously not everyone's cup of tea, but whilst I hope the fix gets released soon I don't think the package should be described as 'not fit for purpose' solely on the basis of a non-functional autopilot. Anyway, check your PMs for a potential temporary fix. Cheers, Paul.

The TFR is a bit of a bodge - always was on the old RAF Tornado. I seem to remember it can over-correct. We'll definitely look into this as part of the F3 development*. It may be unfixable, but we'll see. *The F3 doesn't have TFR but we will still be under the bonnet on Tornado code in general.

Yes, you can use the tool to switch between having the F1 GTN 650 or 750 visible in the VC.

I've just installed the latest version of the Warrior into FSX:SE and I can't reproduce either the stutters or the clickspot issue - the GPS 100 and Flight1 units have clickspots. Can you submit a support ticket via the website so that we can investigate further?

@alecd said in There seems to be a problem withe new Piper Archer III: I believe I may have found a good temporary fix for the Archer III until Just Flight releases an update: First, open the aircraft.cfg for the JF Archer III. Under [flight_tuning], change the value of "parasite_drag_scalar" from 1.0 to 0.5. Under [piston_engine], change the value of "max_rpm_mechanical_efficiency_scalar" from 1.0 to 0.9 (ignore the fact that is says "Always 1.0). Finally, also under [piston_engine], change the value of "bestpowerspecificfuelconsumption" from 0.52 to 0.8. These changes should give you more accurate cruise performance in terms of True Airspeed and Fuel Flow, and also help with the issue of the prop overspeeding. Hope this helps, Alec It is very close - thanks for this - JF says that if a developer responded to the forum then it is in a list of fixes for the next patch - no timetable. But this solves the problem! Rick

We'll get the Super VC10 thumbnails replaced and update the aircraft.cfg descriptions in the next update.

On the recommendation of JF I've uninstalled the old version of the sim and installed the new. As long as I set the VC10 A/P to LOCVOR the aircraft now follows the GPS flightplan. I'll experiment further but so far I'm really pleased. Del

Hope this helps, I haven't flown down by Exeter yet to get screenshots with coordinates. I will do that when I have some more spare time.

Still a little concerned as to what PW is fitted to the -100/200. Here's hoping you guys dont get it wrong.

Sorted it Martyn what I didn't realise was only the keyboard command 1 or 7 will alter the trim setting. many thanks can you dump the ticket please.?

Yes I might try a different effect, the one used now is almost impossible to see, I agree with what you say some of these effect are way over the top but in this case it's as good as non existent.