@GaryG said in VC-10 Pro, what's be new?: Looks great - any chance of a BUA and a British Caledonian livery? The livery list on the in-development page is a complete list for the base pack, but we'll include a paint kit and also consider producing new liveries if there is sufficient demand and interest in the product.

@freddy I have been watching a post in the ADE forum for a few days concerning the replacement of SABA with TNCS and how it has to be done. I thought I would give it a go out of interest. Before starting, I had a look at seeing what flights my Traffic X had scheduled for SABA. Much to my surprise there were several B777, B747, A340 and MD11 aircraft all 'hoping' to use this tiny airport which is only suitable for Islanders and Twin Otters. It was very interesting to watch a 747 approach and go-around. All have now been re-routed or deleted of course but I wonder what other 'interesting' schedules' have been come across by Traffic X / Traffic 360 users?

@trindade said in Release details and latest screenshots: @Voice-of-Reason no need to apologize, take your time and keep the good work. Cheers And it won't now be this week unfortunately. This month though..for sure.

Just to add that I had a response in the x-plane.org forum from one of the Thranda team, who made a suggestion. It seems the throttle gate logic is causing me a problem, maybe I can reduce the idle in the acf file. Whatever I try , I can report back. A

@ch0llis Thank you

Hi Maybe I have the same issue with the toe brakes not working as I always start from cold and dark. Will start with engine running to see if I get the toe brakes working. I noticed nice improvement on the flight model. Traffic pattern now works as I m used to. RPM vs airspeed vs flaps now correspond. E.g. 75 KTS 2000 RPM and flaps 10. Flaps now pitch up the plane from 0 to 10 and from 10 to 20 as in real life. And neutral to slight down pitch from 20 to 30 which is expected. Descending at 70 to 75 KTS at 1500 RPM and flaps 10 give -500 FPM so perfect. I have not tested the stalls yet. I like the Librain integration it is a nice plus! However, I noticed weird ground handling and prefer the initial version which was more realistic except the too high sensibility. She also climbs like a rocket: 1000 RPM and 80 KTS even with a pax and luggage which is not really realistic. Still able to start the engine without priming. Still a bit lack of rudder authority. The left yaw tendency is also too weak to my test. But it is already a huge improvement from the initial flight model. Hoping to see another update addressing those points. Also, having the possibility to not display the tips pop up messages would be nice while keeping the fuel vapor lock and spark plugs fooling simulation ON. Keep up the good work! Cheers Stephane PS: with the 152 I have some stutters that I don t have at all using other planes.

@Martyn Thanks all sorted, great service VERY fast

I'll see yours and raise you one of these...

Where in the cockpit is the clickspot for the VR menu ? It is mentioned in the release notes for the latest version but iut is not described in the manual. Christian

thanks Rich...

@stephane130281 If you haven't already done so, submit or update a ticket and we will investigate further, as this isn't an issue that we or our testers can reproduce at the moment.

PMJ, v1.07 was not intended to be an extensive update. We received a report of an issue with the Stormscope and the developer that produced that instrument was able to quickly address the issue so we opted to release that to all customers before waiting for the completion of other pending fixes. As you can imagine, our avionics coding and flight dynamics are handled by different people so there's little correlation. v1.06 was released last month and was intended to address several FDE issues. Further feedback, such as the above from Nic, was received after the release of that update and our FDE creator (@Delta558 ) continues to make improvements based on direct correspondence with any real-world pilots that identify themselves as such. He will get in touch shortly to discuss your feedback. The circuit breakers animations will be fixed in the next update as per your description above. The breakers are functional in v1.07 so it's just the animation direction that needs reversing.

@Simon Hi Simon, Yes both SP1 & SP2 are installed.It seems weird, everything else I've had from Just Flight has been perfect.

Hi Bob, It could be chrome is blocking cookies. https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95647?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en You're welcome to send us a ticket and we can try getting chrome working for you? https://support.justflight.com/support/tickets/new Thanks, Simon

Hi Will, Indeed, sadly Cargo Pilot won't work in W10 regardless of whether its a download or boxed product in any FS platform. Downloads use different DRM so should be ok (apart from Cargo Pilot and other similar programs developed for use in WinXP) in FSX Steam Edition. P3D is a different story though. Most products developed for use in FSX will need/or have been updating to be compatible with P3D (especially P3Dv4 onwards). If you bought previous versions of the boxed products directly from us years ago, again drop us ticket and we can take a look for you. Thanks, Simon

@Rich Thank you, it's working now. Minor glitch in that you have to hold the pickle somewhat longer than 0.8 seconds for a missile launch, or the first rocket launch, but I can easily live with that. A last a working TacPack Hawk, and on my birthday too.

@Martyn thanks! I ll check that out. Cheers

A few recent screenshots of the Route too...

The two products are independent but the GR1 (and our other products) will be updated to address any bugs or feedback that we've received. Martyn

@Pilot101 said in JF products installation for P3d v4 folder: @Delta558 Hi Delta , thanks but i dont understand about re installing aircraft. I had P3d v3 and updated it to version 4 with no problems and kept most my aircraft. Also last time i went to add an aircraft to V4 it seemed to give options of folders out side the sim. So although i follow your point i do not appear to have that problem. Any other suguestions? When you installed P3d v4 did you only do the Client. msi installation?. Or did you install the .msi files after only deleting each of the three file installers in turn? If so you retained the .xml settings from P3D v3 including the addon aircraft NOT in the SimObjects\Airplanes folder. So when you say most aircraft were kept the chances are the only ones that weren't were the ones in the Airplanes folder. This is but one example of the advantage L-M give you from using the outside-the-sim option.