MSFS Products

5.0k Topics 25.9k Posts

  • 339 Topics
    2k Posts

    Fixes that don't exist in the navdata can be entered on the LEGS page in a couple of different ways:

    Place-bearing/distance waypoints can be entered as "POL025/50". Where "POL" is the fix that exists in the navdata, "025" is the bearing from that fix, and "50" is the distance from that fix. Latitude/longitude coordinates can be entered as "N4513.2W000901.2". Where N/S/E/W varies depending on the location of the coordinates.

    Hope that helps.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 1k Topics
    7k Posts

    @Marionettework

    No PMs due to the Online Safety Act

    See: https://www.justflight.com/contact-us

  • 54 Topics
    229 Posts

    We will be turning our attention to our PA28 and PA38 fleets in the near future and beginning the process of bringing them across to MSFS 2024. We'll be sure to share updates as the process progresses.

    The current status of the MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for our products can be found here: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 104 Topics
    456 Posts

    Thx a lot!
    I know the speed bleed-off is supposed to be huge - but only at high AoA's. Check the videos of 558's wingovers (especially Kev's infamous one at the last RIAT display) - 558 was able to keep the vertical climb a lot longer than JF's Vulcan. I'd estimate that about 2.500 ft of vertical climb are missing.
    One main problem is also the lack of nose-up elevator authority at low speeds - one ought to be able to pitch up quicker (alse deducted from the videos).

    I's a pity - a year after her last flight I spent a RIAT lunch break with Kev, but neither bothered to ask him about all the details of her flight dynamics nor even dreamed of being able to fly such a magnificently modelled 558 in some kind of photo realistic flight simulator...

  • 368 Topics
    2k Posts

    When ordering Water service or catering service in the F28, GSX crashes with this error message:

    couatl v5.0 (build 5622)
    panic log started on Mon Apr 28 22:30:17 2025

    problem raised by addon <unknown>
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File ".\common\fsm.py", line 73, in executeDoFuncToCompletion
    File ".\GSX\assistanceServices\water.py", line 189, in do
    AttributeError: 'WaterTruck' object has no attribute 'voice'
    {'Airport': 'KPSP', 'Requested assistance services at': 'Terminal|Gate 17B', 'User Pos': (33.82036539565293, -116.50626727954237, 127.289 m, 1.9458 m, 321.2054203918422, -0.039722082378174206, 0.003490658476948738, -0.030442837233869896, 2.0421599418640137, 1.0)}

  • 665 Topics
    3k Posts

    I have managed to interface with the UNS-1 of the 146, but some LVARS do not seem to be operational!?
    Most of the numerical LVARS of the UNS do not respond; the "1" does for instance but most others do not!
    Also when i check with the Behaviour option of SDK i see the back key and the B key share the same LVAR; both BACK.!?

  • 441 Topics
    3k Posts

    @Mark said in v1.07 breaks compatibility with VATSIM:

    There have been some file structure changes with the FS Traffic v1.0.7 update, but no intentional changes on our side to prevent the use of our models with other Ai traffic injectors. The changes in file structure may require the developers of other AI traffic programs to update the file directories they are using to detect the FS Traffic models in their software.

    With regards to MSFS 2024, FS Traffic is only compatible with MSFS 2020 at this time, so we cannot guarantee functionality with MSFS 2024 at this time. However, the recently released v1.0.7 update does include some backend changes that lay the foundations for MSFS 2024 compatibility in a future update.

    Like all of our MSFS products, FS Traffic will be receiving a free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility update in the near future, with development of that update already well underway. The current status of all of our MSFS 2024 compatibility updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status

    We’ll be posting more news on FS Traffic’s MSFS 2024 compatibility update soon, and we as sharing some further information about what new features, aircraft models and liveries will be coming to the product.

    Mark - Just Flight

    Hi Mark,

    What is different with the file/folder structure under 1.0.7? VPilot seems to look at all sources within SimObjects/Airplanes, but for some reason, it's not detecting the models from FS Traffic.

  • 175 Topics
    688 Posts

    I seem to recall that there are some sim limitations to using WASM gauges as pop-out windows, and as we are using a mixture of WASM and HTML/JS gauges for the EFB, there may be some limitations encountered when using our EFB as a pop-out window.

    This isn't something we have looked into for quite some time though, so it may have changed in recent MSFS updates. We'll log this on our internal bug/feature request tracker to investigate ahead of a future update.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 197 Topics
    1k Posts

    Our PA28 Arrow, Turbo Arrow and Warrior are our next products that will receive MSFS 2024 compatibility updates.

    As with all of our initial MSFS 2024 product updates, we are primarily focusing on bringing these products across to the new simulator "as is", although with additional bug fixes and improvements where possible. The initial releases of our MSFS 2024 native products won't include MSFS 2024 specific features such as career mode compatibility, but they will lay the foundations that will allow us to add such features in the future.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 322 Topics
    2k Posts

    We don't have a timeline to share at the moment at there are a lot of moving pieces to the puzzle that could effect a release date, but the PA28s are the aircraft we will soon be spending most of our development time with.

    Mark - Just Flight

    Mark - Just Flight

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • FSTraffic for MSFS24 - A Model only version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    137 Views

    Yes, we are currently developing free-of-charge MSFS 2024 compatibility updates for all of our MSFS products, including FS Traffic. The status of each of these updates can be viewed at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/articles/just-flight-addons-msfs-2024-compatibility-status

    Mark - Just Flight

  • BLACKSQUARE Bonanza series MSFS2020- Autopilot

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    62 Views

    Finally figured it out after watching a review by Q8Pilot... thankyou Q8Pilot for enlightening me on the active failure mode.
    The problem was because of an active failure that went unnoticed- Autopilot engage failure. Wouldn't have believed it unless I reset active failures and bingo-problem gone.

  • Convair 880/990 Professional for MSFS?

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    404 Views

    Yeah, the CV880/990 would be really cool indeed!
    The problem I see is the aircraft sounds because there are no aircraft available for recording sounds and very few videos of the engine sounds, all of which do not cover the full range of operation.

  • Next Blacksquare release?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    538 Views

    @ADFGVX Probably easier to expand the Analog fleet, since the aerodynamics are already mostly worked out, than to create a new one whole cloth. I'm looking forward to anything BlackSquare releases, whatever it is. And probably official 2024 compatibility updates for the Duke and TBM worked in there somewhere. He's a pretty busy one-man development team.

  • MSFS 24 and Compatibility for older products

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    579 Views

    Many thanks for the response, really looking fwd to the updates.

    Thank you.

    Matt

  • WB-Sim C172 for 2024?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    315 Views

    @windplr The developer requested we remove it from sale whilst they ascertained what was needed work-wise to get it working correctly in FS2024. We're awaiting feedback on that, from the dev.

  • Change install directory

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    193 Views

    Thank you for the feedback. If I could kindly ask you to contact Just Flight support via the following link, our support team will be able to offer assistance with moving the install location of our products: https://www.justflight.com/support

    Mark - Just Flight

  • OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    99 Views
    No one has replied
  • F-16 taileron motion issue

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    96 Views
    No one has replied
  • Navdata and 2024

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    210 Views

    The Navdata in MSFS 2024 isn't something we have investigated just yet. However, the initial compatibility updates for the 146/RJ will focus on making the 2020 versions of the products compatible with 2024, so the initial 2024 versions will retain the Navigraph requirement for updating the Navdata. Once the products are compatible with 2024, we will then investigate what 2024-specific features can be added in future updates, such as the new flight planning/Navdata features.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • RJ Professional on Marketplace?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    252 Views

    Nice - can't wait!

  • RJ Professional Questions

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    370 Views

    The GNLU in the RJ is more akin to an FMS that is found in a 737 rather than an A320, but we have simulated it to a similar depth as our UNS-1 in the 146. The GNLU is, however, a much more modern and complex unit, with more advanced features than the UNS-1 so there should be plenty to keep you busy. Like our UNS-1, we have simulated as much as possible to be functional using the real-world FMS manuals, including the ability to create holding patterns and runway extension waypoints, view Top of Climb and Top of Descent points, and monitor other navigation and performance data.

    There has been a significant rewrite of the autopilot code in the RJ as that was required to allow us to properly simulate how the various aircraft systems all integrated with each other (Flight Guidance System, AutoThrottle, FADEC, Thrust Rating Panel, etc), so there have been improvements to the autopilot across the board. The RJ is also capable of CAT3 autolands in the real world and in the sim, which these autopilot improvements have been crucial for.

    With regards to a release date we have nothing to announce at the moment, but do keep an eye on our social media channels as we'll be sharing more information on the RJ Professional soon.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • WBSim C172 flight characteristics

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    146 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • So what's the plan with 2024?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views

    @qwz020 We hope so yes, we've not had sight or use of the SDK as yet so we're unable to guarantee 100% that will be the case, but we're hoping that's the case.

  • WBSim 172 Copilot

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    128 Views
    No one has replied
  • Starting WBsim C172

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    715 Views

    I did an error : too long pomp and flowed the engine. 2 seconds max to prime, not 3 very long sec as I did, and the engine start normaly ;)

  • L1011 for MSFS 2020?

    7
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views

    'love to have one !

  • Minor issues with WBSim C172

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    145 Views
    No one has replied