Ah, that would be because I missed a quotation mark. I've fixed my post above. Give that a try.

Got the installer to work, at last. I had the MSFS2020 version in my Addons Linker folder but not activated but somehow it was still showing up as a link in my community folder. I deleted the link then the MSFS2024 version loaded normally

I was looking for a place to ask about the potential for a 530/430 combo for the TBM (since I have one of each Real Sim Gear unit and not two 530s ) and I stumbled across this topic. Nick, have you seen this? I'm not someone who uses the stock ATC/flight planner and I'm happy to input routes manually, but given you've been investigating and working on a similar thing for the Starship I thought you might be interested.

yeah i think you're right. or maybe something with the free version of the pms750. i swapped it out for a gns530 and everything seems to be working as expected now.

I've been waiting for someone to ask this directly. While I was excited by this new prop shader, I find the implementation to be lacking, particularly in how harsh shadows can create stroboscopic effects in daylight. It also does not allow for as fine artistic control of how the propeller looks when it's spinning, such as the sharpness of the paint lines and the shine of leading edge dings and scratches. I look forward to embracing this technology when I think I can achieve the results I'm looking for. When that time comes, it will take days, or possibly a week to implement across my whole fleet, but hopefully it will be worth it for the results. I will probably offer both versions of the effect, toggleable on the tablet options page for those who still prefer the old effect.

This is strange, I have now tried all the Generic events regarding Mixture, and nothing work. Have anybody gotten the Condition levers in King Air to work with Mobiflight?

@ComputerJones sorry I took soo long to reply. Thank you very very much!!!

Hopefully, this time, with a flightmodel that does it justice, requiring realistic rudder input to counteract the torque. Looking forward to the new Caravan!

Not sure I understand what your issue is, but on my Bravo I'm using PED_MID_Eng1_throttle_OFF with a value of 1 when going to the OFF position and 0 when turning on fuel. That has worked well. I believe I got this from another user, who also had some latch animation variables (which I omitted). I'll see if I can locate it. One thing that did cause me some trouble initially was messing with some other variables, then failing to restart the sim when trying something else. EDIT: This was the post that helped me: https://community.justflight.com/post/33830

Breadcrumbs maybe? Any kind of statement?

Great news, many thanks for the update.

Are you overriding the A/T with your Throttle Levers/Quadrant? That could be fighting the system and not allowing it to come back to idle.

You can't display the WX or Terrain on the ND. They can only be displayed on the WX RADAR screen under the Engine instruments.

Hi, pauleti68, Something to consider is how the Thrust Levers are handled by the Pilots. Yes, I could slap the levers forward and get the thrust I want very quickly. On the other hand, I could be less aggressive with the Levers and achieve a slower acceleration. What I'm trying to say is every application of thrust is variable. But having over 2000hrs on these planes, I can confidently say the simulated rates are very accurate. As has been mentioned, they're small engines. There's not a lot of energy needed to get them rotating. There's a slight difference between the 146 and RJ, as the RJ's have FADEC. You could even argue there's a difference between the 507 engine variants on the 146 (different engine fuel system, not pilot controlled), but that's getting too deep into it.

What Mark said

I am using CP and the RJ with no issues.

Thanks! I was just curious as the manual stated it could be seen on the ND.

Thanks Nick. Glad to know it's already noted. It doesn't detract from the enjoyment, just struck me as odd on a few occasions. It must be so challenging to decide where to focus your efforts when there are so many areas you could work on, old and new, especially with your high standards which shine through in all of your aircraft! Letting little inconsequential issues like this go unfixed are probably frustrating for you, but you have to pick your battles

I would love a GTN 750 + 650 like in the duke, but will happily get anything you can do. It looks great even with dual 750s!