Increase the failure rate is functionally the same.

+1 for the invisible pushback tug causing this. Have experienced this myself in multiple aircraft and determined by pulling my hair out that it was a tug that had somehow remained connected.

Looks like Nick discovered the problem and has a fix for it

Hi, I'm really enjoying the plane so far. Minor bugs here and there won't take that away! Maybe still someday you'll bring more detailed bus views to electrical view Yes I was talking about the red rectangles. I understand your reasoning about keeping products inline with each other, or maybe you'll change the view on all to more telling. Perhaps black rectangle when not enabled and red to alert raised lid. Clearing the avinics2 situation. You need to be on standby power. Then I have 100% reproduction rate: [image: d3fa7750-c815-4755-9e19-7c9c938aa0f1.jpg] Those conversion numbers might help out too so I don't have to open browser but just could use calculator that's on the desk.

What chart are you looking at? According to the manual, at your altitude and settings, the fuel flow should be 29. [image: 9e5b85be-0003-4a79-8e7d-fece8966a589.png]

If it's an underlying issue with the sim that is causing this excessive thrust at low torque at least it makes sense... I've flown a bit more and the 3rd notch of flaps make a huge difference (who would have thought!). I am now able to control my airspeed in final even on a steep approach. I did a few flights in PNG last night and had a blast!

Looks great!

H:ALT_AltitudeSelectKnob_Dec_1 and H:ALT_AltitudeSelectKnob_Inc_1 are the events for the reference altitude.

@Black-Square is it really only with Starship? I thought it would have been being rolled out to the rest of the fleet by now. Not having the workaround is less of an issue for most starting spots, but drastically limits your options for doing multi leg flights without going back to the menu.

@Black-Square Your responses and activity in this forum (and elsewhere, I'm sure), along with the quality of your products are of the highest calibre, sir. Your workloads must be high so I appreciate you having such an active and involved presence amongst the community who are using your aircraft. Keep doing what you're doing - arguably one of the best developers creating some of the best aircraft on the platform and easily the best customer interaction of all that I have seen to date.

@Rivet Thank you for this very nice note. It's always a pleasure to hear how my users are enjoying the aircraft, and that I can bring a little enjoyment to someone's life with my software. Have fun, and let me know if there is ever anything else I can do for you!

@louise No problem. That's what I'm here for! Glad you're enjoying it.

@batez No worries

@pequenyo Since I already have my own damage simulation, ideally I would like Asobo's to be completely inert. However, since it's quite confusing that "Aircraft Stress Damage" damages the engine, and not "Engine Stress Damage", I have just fixed the metric that was causing the issue so that the Asobo system will only receive damage long after the limits are exceeded. I still highly recommend disabling "Aircraft Stress Damage" when flying with all of my aircraft; however, since I hate to see anyone's flight ended prematurely by an errant click on the pilot's storm window. Thank you again so much for your helping tracking this one down! I was really losing sleep over it!

Wonderful! Thank you for putting this together. As I said elsewhere earlier, "anyone who labors to improve the experience of our fellow Black Square pilots deserves a heartfelt thank-you"

Took care of the manual. Thank you.

This is actually good point. Most useful when traversing different time zones.

Thanks again.