@ErnieBall Glad to hear you're enjoying it! It's a very special aircraft for me too. I'm always here if you have any more questions!

What you're seeing here is that the engine loses power as its health degrades, which makes it difficult to hit the damaging torque range in the final few percent. There are numerous other factors which can degrade engine condition regardless of the torque setting, however, such as FOD, oil temperature, RPM transients, etc. I've thought about fixing this by reducing that damage range as health degrades too, but what I've done instead was increase ITT as health degrades, which will also add some more incentive to keep your engine healthy. This will be rolled out to all my turbine aircraft in their next updates. Let me know if you have any more questions!

Nick, an elegant solution wins the day! Excellent news.

@Chotter why dont you use mousewheel for zoom or maybe try headtracker

An F-90 would be amazing, thanks for your dedication! [image: 7d202cf7-2fb4-4530-8b6b-5d8915ad17bf.jpeg]

By the way @Black-Square, would you be happy for me to share the altered KAS297B.js file along with my Stream Deck profile on flightsim.to with appropriate caveats? Caveats like "no support from Black Square for this" and "backup the original file!" If not, I'll see what I can do to make a semi-functional dial, but without exposing the "armedVS" value it makes it a bit clunky on the Stream Deck.

I'm watching for the Duke bundle also for the same reason.

@Akknk Hi everyone, I have one question regarding the cruise profiles. SimBrief offers the following options: MCR-1600 / MCR-1750 / MCR-1900 LRC-1600 / LRC-1750 / LRC-1900 Is there any documentation or table showing the actual performance values behind these profiles? I am especially interested in the expected cruise data by altitude, such as: RPM torque TAS fuel flow ISA assumptions differences between no cargo pod, cargo pod, cargomaster and amphibian I would like to better match the SimBrief profile in the Black Square Caravan during cruise. For example, if SimBrief plans LRC-1900, I would like to know what torque / fuel flow / TAS I should aim for in the aircraft. Are the profiles based on the Black Square manual tables, the real Cessna POH, or custom SimBrief performance data? Any help or pointers would be appreciated. Thanks!

Hi gazdav787... Thanks... I'm using MDFS2020... And as I noted, the .RTE file(s) are in the correct location for my sim... Rob

Empty Wt: 2355 Fuel: 50-100 gals: 335 - 670 lbs Baggage: 50 lbs Occupants: Pilot + 3 (170lbs ea): 680 TOW (not factoring taxi fuel consumption): 3420 - 3755 lbs (within CG envelope per EFB) Earlier flights in the list were at 50 gals fuel, later flights were longer (100 gals).

Disregard I figured out the issue.... Circuit breaker face palm

After understanding how the damn Reverse Polish Notation works, I managed to configure, using Mobiflight, the prop axis to include the prop feather once the detent is passed. You can program it several ways, even in a single action, but I prefer two actions to keep the expressions simpler. To get these values I used the Mobiflight app "Potentiometer RPN-Tool" which you can find at the link Prop lever: @ -3.2312 / 16383 + 0 max 16383 min (>K:PROP_PITCH_SET) Prop feather: @ 57000 > if{ -16383 (>K:PROP_PITCH1_SET) } The same goes for the flaps. I configured the Mix2 lever as if it were the flaps lever. The configuration is as follows: Flaps 0 > At the top of the lever Flaps 10 > a little lower (value 2000) Flaps 20 > At the detent (between 50000 - 53000) Flaps 30 > In its lowest position (beyond 57000) You can adjust these values to your liking. The four actions I created in Mobiflight are: Flaps up: @ 2000 < if{ (>K:FLAPS_UP) } Flaps 10: @ 2000 > if{ @ 45000 < if{ (>K:FLAPS_1) } } Flaps 20: @ 50000 > if{ @ 53000 < if{ (>K:FLAPS_2) } } Flaps 30: @ 57000 > if{ (>K:FLAPS_3) } For the power and condition lever , I’m still using the configuration I mentioned earlier in this post. I could do something similar to the flaps, but I prefer to keep the beta range configured this way to play with it during taxi. Hope this helps.

I believe I’ve found the cause and it’s related to the issue I mentioned about the COM/MIC buttons in this other post. While I have COM2 and COM2/MIC selected, the GNS430 volumen knob works correctly. As soon as COM1/MIC is active, having COM2 active at the same time, it doesn’t work. In that case only the GNS530 volume works. Occasionally (not always, but it happens sometimes), when all four buttons are selected (COM1, COM1/MIC, COM2 and COM2/MIC), the ATIS selected on COM2 is heard duplicated, as if it were also tuned to COM1.

Ohh ok - will try today - thanks

Ok. I have already verified that by disabling the TCC on FSTraffic, MSFS uses the FS Traffic models. Working very well.

Apologies for the thread resurrection but this appears to closely relate to the issue I am seeing. In the latest version in MSFS2024, I am seeing fuel burn numbers in the simulator approximately 50% lower than the Simbrief estimates. I am using the Just Flight 146 Simbrief profiles and I believe they are accurate, I believe the issue is on the MSFS side. Is anybody else experiencing this? Is it potentially a regression of an earlier fix, either with the product or MSFS2024 itself? I am using Kgs as the units, in case this has any bearing.

I’m glad there are threads about this - i’m have the same issue with the Caravan Pro and the NDB 345.5 NWI - the KR ADF radio wont input the .5s - so annoying when trying to do NDB approaches at EGSH. I’m going to ask at my old flight training centre to see what they say.

Please let me know when you have a video. Always happy to look.