Hello. I can't configure a key for the projector on MSFS2024. Is it possible to set up a key?

@Black-Square I posted to the FSUIPC support forums, and John Dowson had this to say: Some standard controls don't work when assigned externally, and this is aircraft-dependent and I assume an issue with the event implementation in the aircraft. I cannot do anything about this in FSUIPC. I did sort of see this experimentally while I was checking my technique for calling K events via FSUIPC; the Kollsman Increase K event works, the BATTERY1_SET K event works when given a state (1 or 0), but as an example I could not use K:MIXTURE1_SET with any value and get the mixture lever to move. I don't think I had any success trying the LVar, either, but I also had a control bound to a hardware axis in the sim so that may have been interfering. Left Pitot Heat (hence the above question about the existence of right pitot heat in the Bonanza) worked, as well as the Alternate Static Air K events worked, as well. Nick, does what John said ring any bells with regards to how the magneto might be implemented compared to something that I could get working, like the Kollsman increase or Alternate Static Air?

Hi again, Now another remark: As I installed the wonderful BS TBM850 I was astonished there was no sound… So I enabled the Asobo TBM, which I had previously disabled, and the sounds came… So obviously the BS TBM850 is using most of the sounds of the default Asobo TBM. Now… Is there a way to disable the arcade, ugly, ridiculous default Asobo TBM and at the same time keep the sounds in the BS TBM850?

@Black-Square I've created a short video of the issue. This was made with an empty Community folder. https://youtu.be/bh8zNGI6B-Y

for Bonanza adding my code from here: https://community.justflight.com/post/41908 resolving issue and copilot looks ok, but I can't make copilot on/off regarding removing front seat mass from EFB. So maybe there is a time to check it again by Dev. I wonder if it would also be possible to introduce characters sitting in the back like in Carenado products.

I've made this same mistake in the starship clicking through the cover of the circuit breakers. Maybe a hidden click spot to lock the breakers?

@Black-Square so at the current time what version of the sim would you recommend flying the baron and bonanza in? 2020 or 2024 i have both installed so its not a problem to keep them installed in one or the other? like which am i more likley to get the better and more full experience of your planes with the least amount of bugs/issues arise (through no fault of yours of course) just a sim thing. Thanks

@jmarkows said in Feathering animation: @raul791 said in Feathering animation: Hello, do you know what button I need to setup for feather position? Can't get it with "Propeller decrease" and/or "Toggle feather" options in-game and nothing on SPAD works either... I'm using HC Bravo throttle. I don't use SPAD, but through FSUIPC I have the button at the bottom of my propeller axis do Propeller Decrease with a value of 30 when pressed, and when released set Propeller Pitch High (moves it to the bottom of the prop axis so I don't need to think about the value). I used to add whatever value I subtracted back to it, but for some reason that would often cause funny results in twin engine aircraft. Just figured it out using dev mode in MSFS 2024 (Tools->Behavior tab). For detent pressed it is set as: send event -> PROP_PITCH1_DECR event (100) - used 100 for full detent. And for released it is set as: Send B:ENGINE_PROPELLER_1_IDLE Event (0) - used 0 (or nothing) because that means propeller on idle. That way when I release detent it goes back to idle - without it, it stays on detent unless added anything on axis, even 0.1%.

@Black-Square said in Questions on performance tables in the manual: I've already fixed that typo, but thanks for pointing it out. Great, thanks for confirming! My immediate thought on differences goes to the most obvious difference, which is the propeller. The turbonormalized conversation is equipped with a propeller with a greater coarse pitch angle, which would allow it to perform better at cruising speeds, and especially at lower propeller RPM. Interesting -- wasn't aware of this difference! Thanks also for your thoughts on the other possible differences. Whatever the reason, it seems obvious that the two sets of tables were obtained using different leaning strategies. If I find some time I may try and work out how the leaning was done in each case (i.e. how many degrees rich or lean of peak).

@Kestrel21 I don’t think so, I believe he meant every radio configuration now has a partner version where there is no radar screen.

Practicing cold weather ops...[image: 501100e9-2041-499c-8616-fb90645c2fa4.jpeg]

@Mark W Wonderful glad to hear Mark

@Black-Square Yeah I am using the GTN750/650 from TDI I switched to the all King stack then back the the 750/650 and that seemed to fix it.