Skip to content
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    19 Views
    R
    Not sure if you are in 2020 or 2024. The 2024 version has no nativ support for passangers or copilots. Here you can read a explanation from Nick for the reasoning https://community.justflight.com/post/48275
  • Stronger exhaust effect

    Caravan Professional
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    129 Views
    X1aviationX
    When my cabin gets all stinky because all the jet a fumes I'm blaming yall On a real note yea that would be a good idea
  • Engine Model Accuracy

    Caravan Professional
    20
    5 Votes
    20 Posts
    639 Views
    J
    As far as the lights go, that's MSFS being way overdone with the scattering in SU4. Not sure if a fix is planned in SU5 or not.
  • Fuel Flow indicator during preflight

    Caravan Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    33 Views
    O
    https://community.justflight.com/topic/10288/fuel-flow-guage
  • STBY ELEC PWR INOP light during preflight

    Caravan Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    26 Views
    No one has replied
  • Weather radar

    Caravan Professional
    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    302 Views
    M
    Super good to know! I've been dealing with this for some time lol
  • Amphibian Cargo Version Installer is a Fail.

    Caravan Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    38 Views
    RichR
    The Amphibian version uses a longer path than the Passenger version. Deleting folders shouldn’t do anything to the registry, so I’m not sure what happened there. We would not recommend manually deleting anything though - use the uninstall option in Installed Apps to remove any files or folders. Like you say, deleting the Custom File natal option should allow you to get around the long path issue.
  • Radio dimming doesn't dim screen

    Caravan Professional
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    91 Views
    P
    @Black-Square said in Radio dimming doesn't dim screen: The screens on all the radios in my aircraft are dimmed by integrated photocells, not the dimmer knobs. If you see something like this on the face of an instrument, it's a photocell for light dimming. [image: fafcc330-a26d-4092-8fbf-07e01f0d21d5.png] For me they seem too bright in the dark. Is there a minimum that they don't dim enough?
  • Cannot install

    Caravan Professional
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    149 Views
    D
    I have a similar issue and raised a support ticket. For me it only affects the amphibious version. The passenger version installed perfectly fine. I suspect the installer is having trouble finding files that are not included with the amhipious version. Even having long paths enables in Windows doesn'y prevent this error.
  • 146 PRO Airac 2603

    146 Professional airac 2603 146 pro
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    20 Views
    No one has replied
  • TDS750 & 650 goes dark (turn off)

    PA-28R Turbo Arrow III/IV
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    20 Views
    No one has replied
  • Anyone else experiencing crash to desktop?

    Caravan Professional
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    119 Views
    J
    To close the loop here, after another day of experimentation, I believe I've narrowed the problem down to memory corruption between SU4 and the 59x.x series of Nvidia drivers, not a problem with the Caravan Pro. After dropping back to 591.86, I haven't experienced a crash since.
  • Update

    Caravan Professional
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    294 Views
    H
    @batkizoltan Just to let you know... Even without the patch I can confirm the following: I made several flights with her flying from Wichita in Kansas, USA to Friedrichshafen in Germany. Due to the range restrictions of the airplane I took the "northern route" crossing Canada and flying over Greenland to Iceland and UK (several hops / flights). I was able to tackle severe storms with very low temperatures (sometimes manually because the AP, realistically, couldn't manage any more) and I also think I had several times icing effects. However, I was always able to manage without crash... and I didn't care that much about the weather in advance ;-). The only issue I had was the cabin temperature (but this is another thread and fix is coming up). Here's what I did (please be aware I am no real pilot): 1.) Avoid moist air, namely clouds... Icing equipment shouldn't be an excuse to take needles risks. Of course many times I was not able to outclimb the clouds, etc. Then you have to rely on your Anti-ICE defenses. 2.) Use the Bypass handle if any Clouds or FOD 3.) Bleed Air always on while in climb and cruise (not for Take off and Landing !) ... and in order not to crash ... 4.) If I had any icing on the cockpit window I took the windshield and prop heat to on. But if there was any weather change (or I was coming out of the clouds)... I turned them off again... In doing so I "ensured" that I can see the icing conditions if they happen on my cockpit window and wings and reapply the procedure.
  • Water rudder on the Amphibian very ineffective

    Caravan Professional
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    493 Views
    J
    @Black-Square So with the WRs up, and extremely low throttle. The full rudder deflection gives a massive rate of turn. There isn't enough flow over the rudder to allow the aircraft to have such authority. I brought up the tiller function as another point that if I use my tiller the aircraft turns with ease. This shouldn't even work. (could be nose gear code?) But there is NO difference in turning rate with the WRs up OR down. Its extremely sensitive it with the rudder input and nearly zero airflow over the aircraft vertic al rudder.
  • SU5 Cockpit mostly not clickable

    RJ Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    29 Views
    No one has replied
  • TQ6+ and the reverse detent

    Caravan Professional
    32
    0 Votes
    32 Posts
    677 Views
    JibletJ
    I heard back from VirtualFly: "We have spoken with our software development team, and they have confirmed that this is one of the points they have noted for improvement in VFHub. However, they currently have other priorities, so work on this will not begin until after the summer. We really appreciate the level of detail and analysis you have provided, as it helps us identify and prioritize these kinds of improvements." So I guess we'll see. For the record and to close this out at least for now, here's what I sent them: Hardware: TQ6+ Serial: 310540 Software: VFHub (v1.3.9) Sim: MSFS 2024 Description of Issue: I am experiencing a significant scaling issue with the throttle reverse axis on the TQ6+ when using VFHub in Microsoft Flight Simulator. It appears that VFHub sends a fixed throttle variable range of +100 (Full Forward) to -25 (Full Reverse). While this worked for older default aircraft, many modern high-fidelity turboprops (specifically from Black Square, SWS, and Aerosoft) use different min_throttle_limit values in their engines.cfg files. The Problem: Incomplete Reverse Range: For aircraft like the Black Square Caravan, Kodiak 100, or Twin Otter, the min_throttle_limit is set between -0.65 and -1.0. Because VFHub caps the output at -25, I can only access about 25% to 50% of the actual reverse thrust power available, depending on the aircraft. Dead Zones: For aircraft using the -0.15 limit, the hardware lever reaches the sim's maximum reverse value at only 60% of its physical travel past the detent, leaving a large dead zone at the back of the hardware's range. Evidence: Through testing with the Black Square developers, we confirmed that manually changing an aircraft's min_throttle_limit from -1.0 to -0.25 fixes the physical axis behavior for the Black Square Caravan, but ruins the aircraft's flight model and fuel flow realism. Indeed, setting that value for any aircraft is what you have to do to make the throttle line up. The Black Square developer has indicated he intends to move the entire fleet to a -1.0 limit for realism (see https://community.justflight.com/post/49046), which will effectively break the reverse functionality for all TQ6+ users unless VFHub is updated. Steps to reproduce: If you have the Black Square Caravan, it's very noticeable in that. Alternatively the DHC6 Twin Otter included in MSFS 2024 also displays similar behaviour. Run MSFS 2024 and VFHub, with the TQ6+ connected Load in to the game on any runway in the DHC6 Twin Otter or Black Square Caravan - these aircraft show it best but it does affect most turboprops Look at the throttles in game and bring your physical TQ6+ throttles back into reverse, all the way to the bottom of the travel Look at the throttle(s) in game and you'll see that they are not at the full reverse. In fact you can grab them with the mouse and pull them further back. You may also want to use a tool to show the changing value of (A:GENERAL ENG THROTTLE LEVER POSITION:1, percent). That will let you see the data rather than just eyeballing the throttles in game. Requested Solution: Could VFHub be updated to allow for dynamic scaling of the reverse axis? Ideally: VFHub should detect or allow a setting to map the full physical travel of the TQ6+ reverse range (past the detent) to the full available range defined by the aircraft's min_throttle_limit. Alternatively, perhaps provide a user-configurable "Scale" setting for the reverse portion of the axis within VFHub. Or perhaps there's a better way that your team could come up with, I'm not fussy about the solution, I'd just like it fixed I realise that you don't support third party planes directly, but that's not really the issue here. Any plane using a value other than -0.25 for the min_throttle_limit in engines.cfg will have the issues I described above, and I'm yet to find a default plane that uses -0.25 - at best they use -0.15, so this issue is widespread. As a user of VirtualFly hardware, I would love to see the software black box opened up or updated to support these modern aircraft standards.
  • How Xto set the count down timer with the GTX 327?

    Caravan Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    21 Views
    No one has replied
  • Missing glass on instruments

    Caravan Professional
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    556 Views
    B
    @Black-Square I would like to ask — and also kindly request — whether the upcoming update will address the glass effect and instrument reflections on the cockpit gauges, as this is currently something that is noticeably missing from the overall visual experience. I understand what the developer previously mentioned: that there are limitations on the Asobo Studio side regarding this aspect, and that this issue may not be resolved until those limitations are addressed. However, it is also visible that since release, the developers of Microsoft Flight Simulator have not really focused on this problem, and in my personal opinion, they are unlikely to do so in the future. For this reason, I would like to ask the Caravan developer to consider implementing their own solution for instrument glass effects and reflections. Even an interim or custom solution would significantly enhance immersion and visual quality for users, at least until — or if ever — Asobo addresses this limitation.
  • TDS Update PSA

    Caravan Professional
    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    86 Views
    No one has replied
  • Water operations on rough water.

    Caravan Professional
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    133 Views
    S
    Would be nice if msfs modelled wave height with fetch ...