The 146 and RJ both simulate cabin temperature based on the selected air source and temperature selections, and take into account factors such as if the aircraft is in direct sunlight, or if one or more exterior doors are open. We did make some minor improvements to the Air Conditioning logic with the 146 v2.4 update that will be brought across to the RJ in the next update, but that's primarily related to the DUCT TEMP / CABIN TEMP relationship and rate of change. Mark - Just Flight

I don't recall seeing any other reports of this, so could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you could provide details such as the simulator you're using (including which sim update), and if you have any steps to reproduce this behaviour (including screenshots/video if possible), then our support team will be in the best position to attempt to reproduce this and offer further assistance. Mark - Just Flight

The wipers have the same functionality in 2020 and 2024, with FAST/SLOW/OFF modes. The RJ does not currently support the MSFS 2024 rain effects, so the wipers will not have any effect on the rain on the windows. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. We do have this logged on our internal trackers as it is something we would like to improve too. It's something that would involve a significant amount of development time to rewrite the code behind this logic, so we wouldn't be able to provide any timeframes for when an improvement may make its way into an update, but it is on our radar. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. I have logged this on our internal trackers and we will investigate this further ahead of the next update to the Vulcan. Mark - Just Flight

There haven't been any changes to the IRS alignment or FMS logic recently (other than the addition of Simbrief Import in the v1.4 update). However, any feedback that gets sent to us always gets logged on our internal trackers, and we do consider everything each time an update is planned. The exact scope of each update is typically based on the availability of our development teams at the time of the update, so it's tricky to give timeframes for if/when certain bug fixes/features may be included in an update. Mark - Just Flight

Good to know, and others not chiming in with the same issue supports the notion, that this is only a beta issue Lets see if SU4 relases soon together with the PS release.

Thanks for the feedback. We do have this logged on our internal bug tracker as something to investigate ahead of a future update. Mark - Just Flight

We are aware of some scenarios where changing the simulator time (or using active pause) can cause the timers in the RJ code to go out of sync with the timers in MSFS 2024. We are investigating this, and we aim to have a fix implemented in an upcoming update to the RJ. In the meantime, we would recommend minimising any time changes or active pause usage when using the RJ in MSFS 2024. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the message and interest in our LJ45. Not loads to report but development does continue, we'll share the very latest in our end of year round up from our website later this month. Thank you.

Correction I meant AlpraziTech not KAPA-Flyer.

Fwiw, my mention of tire pressure or true to life spin behavior was only meant as an example, in order to show that a desktop simulation based on a non-professional sim platform simply cannot depict all aspects of a real aircraft. It's always an approximation. Every developer in the high end line within this has his strength and weaknesses, but no one can fulfill all what has been demanded, especially in a well priced 40-50€ addon. I recall paying 160€ for the A320 on P3D, and while being fantastic even this addon came with tradeoffs. I am glad that we actually have these well done addons in this price range, which was more difficult to achieve on the P3D platform due to the smaller user base. BTW I flew the Cows DA40 XLS yesterday, and I must say.. engine starting and early warmup phase is well done for sure..

I have a similar issue with the last several versions of the F28, where when I start from cold and dark the fuel valves are always in the run position. I can move them with my mouse but they are never in the cut off position by default. Between MSFS 2020 and 2024 I've never set any bindings for the fuel and even when I remove fuel related default bindings I still have the issue.

The longer Barons wing is not approved for the tip tank etc, found this out while researching climb rates of the turbo normalized bonanza

I'd love to see that too! Love the pre 84 cockpit.

I was kind of shocked as well that they didn't have them.

@FrecciaKing Just to be clear, it's not in "reverse" with the power lever at idle. It's at ground idle. In flight, the power lever will be locked out of the beta range unless you have the "unrestricted beta range" option enabled on the tablet's options page. There are three ranges: The normal (flight) range down to "flight idle". The beta (ground) range down to "ground idle". The reverse range. I don't have any specific FSUIPC scripts to achieve what you're looking for (everyone wants something slightly different), but I know there are a lot of FSUIPC scripting experts on the forum. Hopefully one of them will see this post and provide the help where I lack expertise!

Thanks, Mark. I suspected MSFS was the culprit given the LOD issues people have been having since launch, but it's nice to have a firm answer.