@Dinamika70 I don't use FS2020 any more, so I can't be sure, but I remember being able to add procedures including SIDs, STARs, etc, to the 530 enroute.

I didn't want to leave your thorough post without a reply, but I also wanted to be honest about expectations. I'm glad you shared this, because it's a new concept to me regarding how some shared cockpit applications work. Like anything that is shared with me, I try to keep it in mind while designing new aircraft systems; however, making a change like this across all my aircraft would probably required editing ~70 files, a couple hours of testing across platforms, and documenting my changes. I make similar changes to my entire fleet frequently, but I like to do them universally, for all interactions, and across all aircraft. Otherwise, I will end up duplicating my work when someone else asks about a specific event for another piece of equipment in another aircraft. I've been trending that way over time, but I know there are still a few instances of the old method in my new aircraft too. I will absolutely keep this in mind, and try to be conscious of this in the future, but I didn't want you to think that I was ignoring a simple request either. I hope that makes sense, and that my explanation is clear. Finally, I would be happy to help you create your own solution if you were willing to be adventurous with editing code. Just because it would take a lot of effort for me to make this change to all my aircraft and push updates to all platforms/marketplaces doesn't mean you can't have the exact solution you're looking for in the meantime!

If there are any annunciators that are working "out of the box", they must be programmed with default behavior and know nothing specific about the aircraft. That's convenient, but it means that some annunciators might not reflect the true state of the aircraft. If you are able to program the annunciator panel in any way, all variables are accessible in my aircraft, and I could help you write any code or find any variables necessary to get exactly what you're looking for.

I have several other areas like this that a little tweak can assist in getting a fully compatible synch. I would respectfully ask if you can take a look at the differences and be willing to update by adding a specific H:event to get the interaction and leave the K:event to set the change for synchronization. Thank you for considering this.

@Data I'll check in on this. The last time all these marketplace packages were in my hands was September of last year, so I've been just as confused by these delays as you have...

i have never had these ILS capture issues that I see everyone having, I will give it a try now and let you know if I find any shenanigans.

I believe C208 is next on agenda along with the commander 114 and aero commander 685... I do know Nick plans to bring over all the steam gauge overhaul aircraft so the king air will come eventually. Hopefully it's not too far out. You can port the analog king air into msfs2024, I believe you have to disable the king air in msfs2024, copy the asobo msfs2020 king air and black square king air folders into msfs2024 community folder and it should load up and work with only minor lighting issues (that is the light's are abnormally bright).

As far as I can remember I only noticed this only with the KNS81 RNAV setup and now with the KLN90 GPS. Can't recall encountering this when the GNS 530/430 suite was used.

You keep saying that for 2 or 3 years... In the mean time,others devs such as inibuilds, pmdg or aerosoft implemented a way to update na data from inside the sim. So it shouldn't be too complicated. But apparently it's clearly not your priority, which is a little bit a shame for products of great quality that I otherwise appreciate. Just tired of hearing the same melody again and again...

@Black-Square Yeah everything is completely fine now. I just wanted to ask, even though it’s a bit of a different topic and I don’t want to create a new thread for it—I noticed that the aircraft is already a bit dirty by default, which is nice, but does it no longer get visually dirtier along the way?

Sound update - the quality of the sound of the Baron is MUCH better than the Duke IMO (piston duke). So good on the Baron that I taxi with the pilots window open to hear it better :).

I think that's exactly right. IIRC I got those SIMCONNECT Vars from within Developer Mode (Tools -> Behaviors) I think they are correct, since assigning button presses to them results the breaker tripping/resetting in the virtual cockpit. But in SPAD Data Monitor 'CIRCUIT CONNECTION ON:40' isn't changing state. Same for 41,42,43,44,45. I'll look at Dev Mode to see whether the Vars are changing state there.

@AlphaEcho You're more than welcome to join the server anyway. You don't have to be an RJ maniac. The topics will stay focused on the 146/RJ though.

Out of Las Vegas on the way to Jackson Hole [image: 9c8fb7c9-01eb-46b1-bdca-02b764a0771f.jpg] And a different sort of screenshot, I knew I was flying the Starship quite a bit since it's been out, but I didn't think it'd be at the top of my list for the year in Volanta [image: c985b3e8-37d5-45de-be9f-87ffe58975c6.png]

@Black-Square if only Microsoft allowed freeware on the marketplace...

@neinnunb great. Thank you for the answer. Maybe I will buy it and give it a try