Glad you're enjoying the aircraft so far. The very short answer is that this sounds like something to take up with the GPS developer. The longer answer is that I think I have seen similar comments in the past. I think they were reference to the PMS50 GTN, and whether the user had Navigraph data installed or not may have also made a difference, but don't quote me. As I recall saying last time, this is just not a combination that I am very familiar with from my testing, since my instinct from real world flying is always to avoid selecting RNP approaches in light aircraft, for obvious reasons.

Wonderful all around! Thank you all so much for keeping me informed of the user experience, and being patient while we sorted that issue. Please enjoy the TBM, and always let me know if there is anything I can do for you!

@TemplarOfSyrinx said in Parking Brake fails to work: I swear under some circumstances that simulated aviation is far more complicated than the real thing. A sentiment that I share with pilot friends almost weekly! I'm glad it's working for you now. Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you!

@VT I'm glad to hear that there's some benefit, because it's been an unfortunate struggle to deal with Asobo's sometimes-working/sometimes-not native state saving. Unfortunately, I suspect you are in the minority, but I appreciate you sharing. There are so many ways that people use my aircraft on so many different platforms, the only way I can learn about these things is if you share them with me!

The accumulation of icing is up to the simulator, but there is a constant in the flight model for the rate of accumulation. I don't recall ever changing it, but that doesn't mean it's not something I've carried through all of my aircraft to today. I'll compare it to some other aircraft later and see if there's anything obvious.

You can read a little more about these questions in the manual. The short answer is that MSFS 2020 didn't offer as reliable or user-friendly tools for managing scenery layers, but MSFS 2024 improved that situation with the Package Reorder Tool. In MSFS 2024, you should be able to either override, or not override both bespoke default airports and 3rd party sceneries with the Package Reorder Tool, right from within the simulator. The only combination that might still require you to manually remove/rename a file from the Real Taxiways installation is if a 3rd party airport has its own taxiway sign 3D models, and doesn't contain any default taxiway sign record in the airport's scenery files. I'm not sure I've seen anyone complain about this, but I know there is the possibility for it. Do my explanations make sense? I know it's a complicated subject, because there are so many ways to make scenery for the simulator, and an infinite number of combinations for how they might be layered. I'm happy to help you however I can to ensure that things are working as well as possible on your system, however! Let me know if you have any more questions.

I highly recommend a good read through of the manual. In this case, the compressor is connected to the right engine accessory gearbox, so the right engine must be running.

Thanks for letting me know, Mark.

[image: b5e6e9a7-7309-4fb5-91e0-98952f3e68a7.webp] Kilimanjaro, flying around the world on vatsim with 3 other pilots.

I got update 0.1.1a - taxi lights were working, but now I can’t get the Nav lights to work in the TP . Hope there is a complete update soon. Contrail didn’t even has more than V 0.1.1

I'm waiting for the addition of a random unruly passenger to really kick up the immersion level.

The 146 and RJ both simulate cabin temperature based on the selected air source and temperature selections, and take into account factors such as if the aircraft is in direct sunlight, or if one or more exterior doors are open. We did make some minor improvements to the Air Conditioning logic with the 146 v2.4 update that will be brought across to the RJ in the next update, but that's primarily related to the DUCT TEMP / CABIN TEMP relationship and rate of change. Mark - Just Flight

I don't recall seeing any other reports of this, so could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support via the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you could provide details such as the simulator you're using (including which sim update), and if you have any steps to reproduce this behaviour (including screenshots/video if possible), then our support team will be in the best position to attempt to reproduce this and offer further assistance. Mark - Just Flight

The wipers have the same functionality in 2020 and 2024, with FAST/SLOW/OFF modes. The RJ does not currently support the MSFS 2024 rain effects, so the wipers will not have any effect on the rain on the windows. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. We do have this logged on our internal trackers as it is something we would like to improve too. It's something that would involve a significant amount of development time to rewrite the code behind this logic, so we wouldn't be able to provide any timeframes for when an improvement may make its way into an update, but it is on our radar. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. I have logged this on our internal trackers and we will investigate this further ahead of the next update to the Vulcan. Mark - Just Flight

There haven't been any changes to the IRS alignment or FMS logic recently (other than the addition of Simbrief Import in the v1.4 update). However, any feedback that gets sent to us always gets logged on our internal trackers, and we do consider everything each time an update is planned. The exact scope of each update is typically based on the availability of our development teams at the time of the update, so it's tricky to give timeframes for if/when certain bug fixes/features may be included in an update. Mark - Just Flight

Good to know, and others not chiming in with the same issue supports the notion, that this is only a beta issue Lets see if SU4 relases soon together with the PS release.

We are aware of some scenarios where changing the simulator time (or using active pause) can cause the timers in the RJ code to go out of sync with the timers in MSFS 2024. We are investigating this, and we aim to have a fix implemented in an upcoming update to the RJ. In the meantime, we would recommend minimising any time changes or active pause usage when using the RJ in MSFS 2024. Mark - Just Flight