Glad you finally got it working! I have the ProDeskSim King Air levers for the Bravo. I don't really recommend them overall because the quality isn't good for the money imo, BUT they do have inserts with detents for the throttle and condition levers, so I don't need to worry about buttons -- beta, reverse, and hi/low idle/cutoff are easy to deal with. That right there is the best thing about the levers as far as I'm concerned.

@Black-Square said in Aileron trim precision - possible to mod?: I actually reviewed this today, and both the Baron and Bonanza will have values of 0.25 in the next update. I changed it to .1 Otherwise, when using the mouse, I could nerver get the plane perfectly trimmed out. Anybody here using the Brunner yoke? I am working on a profile already quite a long time, but still not 100% happy.

I switched from using (H:) events to the Input Events (IE:) for the GNS430, GNS530 and the GNS 530 Dual. Not familiar with Hanger Control however you or others may find this useful. Examples in Axis and Ohs for DirectTo: 1 1 (>IE:2:AS430_DIRECTTO) 1 1 (>IE:2:AS530_DIRECTTO) If Dual GNS 530's 1 1 (>IE:2:AS530_1_DIRECTTO) 1 1 (>IE:2:AS530_2_DIRECTTO) Perhaps Hanger Control also utilizes Input Events (IE:)

Whilst we haven't been able to reproduce this issue yet, the v1.2 update, due for release this week, will include a lot of AFCAS and ATS fixes and improvements. Please let us know if you still encounter this issue after installing v1.2.

Thanks for the suggestion. We are looking into that now.

@tlvid I usually do a big round of updates in the summer, but I have been a little delayed this year due to forces beyond my control (house struck by lightning last week). I will likely focus my attention on updates as soon as the Commander 114 is released in a couple weeks. Sorry for the wait!

This is so cool!!! I wonder how difficult it would be to implement a G3X, or a G1000 suite into his aircraft. They have so much G1000 hardware on the market but no Black Square level planes. Just ordered a set myself actually. As wrong as that sounds I really think with the Hardware on the market and the great work done by WT he really needs to add or someone should help him add the Garmin Glass as an option for his future aircraft. For home cockpit builders and IRL practice it would be a godsend.

@MD82 I don't think that the interior is to quiet, but exterior is to loud. If I turned the volume down to make the exterior quieter, I would barely hear most cockpit sounds like switches or buttons

Your wish has been granted. [image: 77fef1b1-daac-4bce-9e2c-b092e54a979a.png] [image: 547b70dd-b6f6-441f-8e7f-cccbfff234bb.png]

Here you go. [image: 53a66012-84bc-49f1-aaac-9f37eaa5be35.png]

@Black-Square Thank you for the quick reply, and for trying to fix this quickly... Bug happens and it's alright, the frustrating part is that they have the fix already, and don't release it....

@Morten I wish it were so easy, unfortunately. Deciding whether to intercept and intervene in hardware input events is not something you can turn on/off on the fly. I appreciate the thought, though. As is often the case, the method I'm thinking of would actually be more realistic, with a real additional hopper tank that's fed from the main tanks. The only reason I didn't do this in the first place was because I thought it would be confusing for users looking at the native payload interface and wondering what this third fuel tank was for.

@OELVA Second this. I had erratic speed changes up to 160kts, all the way from 121kts which was selected.

@Martyn Any predictions for update 1.2?

@Martyn said in engines fire discharge bottles: looks like there's an interaction clickspot issue preventing the OVRD button from being used. We are investigating that now. Other planes from other devs have had clickspot issues since SU5 and from what I am hearing it has been fixed in SU6 beta. May be worth testing in SU6 beta first to see if that is the case with this plane too before going on a wild goose chase.

When all else fails: Roll your own I dug into the Dev mode, found the B codes to send, tested them in SpadNext and then wrote my own bridge. I'd still prefer a native solution, but I didn't see a possibility of that. At least this way I control my own code.

@del47 said in Reverse Thrust: @balus Thanks for the quick reply and it works well! Del glad I could help, enjoy

@heyatoa This came up in another topic recently, and I have already fixed it for the next update. Thanks