Skip to content
  • Stronger exhaust effect

    Caravan Professional
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    81 Views
    B
    Good idea
  • SU5 Cockpit mostly not clickable

    RJ Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    12 Views
    No one has replied
  • TQ6+ and the reverse detent

    Caravan Professional
    32
    0 Votes
    32 Posts
    657 Views
    JibletJ
    I heard back from VirtualFly: "We have spoken with our software development team, and they have confirmed that this is one of the points they have noted for improvement in VFHub. However, they currently have other priorities, so work on this will not begin until after the summer. We really appreciate the level of detail and analysis you have provided, as it helps us identify and prioritize these kinds of improvements." So I guess we'll see. For the record and to close this out at least for now, here's what I sent them: Hardware: TQ6+ Serial: 310540 Software: VFHub (v1.3.9) Sim: MSFS 2024 Description of Issue: I am experiencing a significant scaling issue with the throttle reverse axis on the TQ6+ when using VFHub in Microsoft Flight Simulator. It appears that VFHub sends a fixed throttle variable range of +100 (Full Forward) to -25 (Full Reverse). While this worked for older default aircraft, many modern high-fidelity turboprops (specifically from Black Square, SWS, and Aerosoft) use different min_throttle_limit values in their engines.cfg files. The Problem: Incomplete Reverse Range: For aircraft like the Black Square Caravan, Kodiak 100, or Twin Otter, the min_throttle_limit is set between -0.65 and -1.0. Because VFHub caps the output at -25, I can only access about 25% to 50% of the actual reverse thrust power available, depending on the aircraft. Dead Zones: For aircraft using the -0.15 limit, the hardware lever reaches the sim's maximum reverse value at only 60% of its physical travel past the detent, leaving a large dead zone at the back of the hardware's range. Evidence: Through testing with the Black Square developers, we confirmed that manually changing an aircraft's min_throttle_limit from -1.0 to -0.25 fixes the physical axis behavior for the Black Square Caravan, but ruins the aircraft's flight model and fuel flow realism. Indeed, setting that value for any aircraft is what you have to do to make the throttle line up. The Black Square developer has indicated he intends to move the entire fleet to a -1.0 limit for realism (see https://community.justflight.com/post/49046), which will effectively break the reverse functionality for all TQ6+ users unless VFHub is updated. Steps to reproduce: If you have the Black Square Caravan, it's very noticeable in that. Alternatively the DHC6 Twin Otter included in MSFS 2024 also displays similar behaviour. Run MSFS 2024 and VFHub, with the TQ6+ connected Load in to the game on any runway in the DHC6 Twin Otter or Black Square Caravan - these aircraft show it best but it does affect most turboprops Look at the throttles in game and bring your physical TQ6+ throttles back into reverse, all the way to the bottom of the travel Look at the throttle(s) in game and you'll see that they are not at the full reverse. In fact you can grab them with the mouse and pull them further back. You may also want to use a tool to show the changing value of (A:GENERAL ENG THROTTLE LEVER POSITION:1, percent). That will let you see the data rather than just eyeballing the throttles in game. Requested Solution: Could VFHub be updated to allow for dynamic scaling of the reverse axis? Ideally: VFHub should detect or allow a setting to map the full physical travel of the TQ6+ reverse range (past the detent) to the full available range defined by the aircraft's min_throttle_limit. Alternatively, perhaps provide a user-configurable "Scale" setting for the reverse portion of the axis within VFHub. Or perhaps there's a better way that your team could come up with, I'm not fussy about the solution, I'd just like it fixed I realise that you don't support third party planes directly, but that's not really the issue here. Any plane using a value other than -0.25 for the min_throttle_limit in engines.cfg will have the issues I described above, and I'm yet to find a default plane that uses -0.25 - at best they use -0.15, so this issue is widespread. As a user of VirtualFly hardware, I would love to see the software black box opened up or updated to support these modern aircraft standards.
  • How Xto set the count down timer with the GTX 327?

    Caravan Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    14 Views
    No one has replied
  • Missing glass on instruments

    Caravan Professional
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    534 Views
    B
    @Black-Square I would like to ask — and also kindly request — whether the upcoming update will address the glass effect and instrument reflections on the cockpit gauges, as this is currently something that is noticeably missing from the overall visual experience. I understand what the developer previously mentioned: that there are limitations on the Asobo Studio side regarding this aspect, and that this issue may not be resolved until those limitations are addressed. However, it is also visible that since release, the developers of Microsoft Flight Simulator have not really focused on this problem, and in my personal opinion, they are unlikely to do so in the future. For this reason, I would like to ask the Caravan developer to consider implementing their own solution for instrument glass effects and reflections. Even an interim or custom solution would significantly enhance immersion and visual quality for users, at least until — or if ever — Asobo addresses this limitation.
  • Update

    Caravan Professional
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    166 Views
    B
    @Black-Square I would like to express my sincere thanks to the developer and the entire development team for their work. The Caravan Professional has been one of the most highly anticipated aircraft for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. I personally waited for its release for over a year, and I was truly happy when it finally arrived—and it did not disappoint. We received a highly professional product, both in terms of the external 3D model and the cockpit, which is of premium quality. I am also very much looking forward to future updates for the aircraft. I would like to thank the developer and the team for listening to the community’s feedback and actively addressing any shortcomings. Their commitment to releasing updates ensures that the model becomes even more visually impressive and enjoyable over time. This applies to the aesthetics, the flight model, and every other aspect. Once again, I can only express my gratitude for the developer’s work and patience.
  • TDS Update PSA

    Caravan Professional
    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    65 Views
    No one has replied
  • Water operations on rough water.

    Caravan Professional
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    122 Views
    S
    Would be nice if msfs modelled wave height with fetch ...
  • Heating too weak?

    Caravan Professional
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    424 Views
    S
    @asnamara I was thinking of doing same. Make sure the temp probe is not in direct sunlight tho...
  • Water rudder on the Amphibian very ineffective

    Caravan Professional
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    463 Views
    Black SquareB
    I may have found the problem here. There was an undocumented change in MSFS 2024, which prevents the water rudders from extended or retracting when the extension time was set to 0. Of course, I did this because MSFS 2024 interprets any water rudder movement as requiring the hydraulic gear pump, causing the gear pump light on the instrument panel to flash. It seems that a time of 1/100th of a second is short enough that the light doesn't illuminate. If this was the cause of the confusion here, then I think you will be much happier with the water handling now!
  • Multiplayer & Dynamic Registration Problem

    Caravan Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    36 Views
    No one has replied
  • Engine Model Accuracy

    Caravan Professional
    12
    5 Votes
    12 Posts
    549 Views
    B
    @kbnsalem On the real Caravan?
  • weight distribution

    Caravan Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    34 Views
    No one has replied
  • Radio dimming doesn't dim screen

    Caravan Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    67 Views
    Black SquareB
    The screens on all the radios in my aircraft are dimmed by integrated photocells, not the dimmer knobs. If you see something like this on the face of an instrument, it's a photocell for light dimming. [image: fafcc330-a26d-4092-8fbf-07e01f0d21d5.png]
  • Weather radar

    Caravan Professional
    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    256 Views
    Black SquareB
    @Persojet said in Weather radar: After that it's just a mess: This is because you have the NEXRAD imagery up on the GNS 530. It's a known bug in MSFS since day one, and we haven't been able to coax a solution out of Asobo yet, to the best of my knowledge.
  • Visible passengers?

    Caravan Professional
    48
    0 Votes
    48 Posts
    2k Views
    O
    @hangar_101 I know, but since Andy suspected that Chaseplane may be the reason that only the Copilot shows up for him but no passengers, I wanted to clarify that it does indeed work with Chaseplane installed.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    87 Views
    P
    @Buzz It’s not about staring at the plane from the outside, it’s about visual consistency. Since the spinners are part of the pilot's field of view, a static ice effect on a rotating part looks like a glaring oversight. Black Square is known for 'study-level' systems, so the visuals should match that level of detail. As I mentioned, Just Flight has already proven it’s possible to do it right.
  • Your favorite medium-long range cruise altitude

    Starship
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    163 Views
    MarkSM
    @Tadeus72 said in Your favorite medium-long range cruise altitude: Thank you, often when crossing the States I actually look for a scenic route, this might be a great inspiration, will check it out. If you fly it, please let me know how you like it. I think there's one small "error" in it near the Grand Canyon, one airfield you can get into but the runway might be too short to get out of again. Of course, if you're not flying it for the VA you can skip it no problem. I've yet to fly it myself.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    50 Views
    K
    @09tir98 Oh, of course, thanks for the answer! I can't believe that explanation didn't cross my mind, but I guess I have spent too much time facing forward in the cockpit.
  • Wing icing not always visible?

    Caravan Professional
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    115 Views
    P
    @django1489 there is icing on the windows