@pieroni IIRC, Nick has said a few times that he's currently working on the latest wave of updates for the entire fleet of current BlackSquare products. I believe the Twin Commanders are next in the lineup for release after these updates, and the King Air sounds like it will be sometime after the Twin Commanders. Safe to say that Nick/JF will provide progress updates when they are ready to provide them, as they have in the past with their other products. With that in mind, do we really need to keep tagging Nick in this thread over and over asking for updates on the King Air? Safe to say he has quite a lot on his plate already: providing responses to users with support requests, working on the updates, and working on new products. You've tagged him multiple times consecutively in the past month and it didn't elicit a response, so maybe Nick doesn't have any response to provide yet. Does it really make sense to continue to do it? Excitement is one thing but this feels a little disrespectful to Nick and his time.

@afowle23 Most of the time when this comes up, it's because auto-mixture is enabled in the simulator menu. If that's not it, then please feel free to supply more details, and I will be happy to help

@PeterWillie2026 said in PS5 BAe 146/ Avro RJ: but this is a bit frustrating We can understand that. It's quite frustrating for us too. We have no control over the process once a product is submitted. Hopefully the update will get released soon.

Thanks, I will!

I have to admit I was dissapointed to see there was a 90 in the sim by default as I had hoped Nick would wan to make one! I'll still hope for that!

Oh wait! I put this in the wrong thread! Oops! Bye!

@Black-Square Thanks for the response! Yeah of course it makes sense to not delay updates that are ready any further. I note on the github of one of the creators they have added the mod as a separate variant to a few payware aircraft all ready. The downside is it isnt toggleable of course. Also says "The issue with custom variants for third-party aircrafts, such as PA28/38 is that any update to the base aircraft can break the G5 unit. Due to that, it's better to request support for custom variants directly from manufacturer of the aircraft." So it seems there is a desire for it to be implemented in a similar way to the PMS50 etc. thanks.

@Black-Square https://community.justflight.com/post/49264 After a bunch of digging this was the best thing I could find to reference what I was thinking of. At launch, Caravan propeller RPM was too low for the regular generator to power the aircraft, leading to questions about why the standby alternator was on. You made some changes to RPM values but noted the underlying sim inaccuracy.

Oh dear - I just upgraded from XP11 and re-purchased the XP12 version of this aircraft. It still (Nov 26) has this behaviour of over-steering after a small input and becoming uncontrollable. I'm also training in a Warrior IRL and can confirm - it absolutely doesn't do this!

Is your Aircraft Stress Damage setting on?

I also just experienced engine issues on SU7.2. I will post it under its own thread.

@Mark Created a ticket months ago for this issue. Should I paste all of my findings from this thread into the ticket so it gets to dev team?

@Dinamika70 https://community.justflight.com/post/55398 This was the latest we have, posted yesterday. Hopefully everything is alright.

@tlvid That's some accusation but each to their own and you're entitled to your own opinion. For the record though, this very product has received 19 separate updates since the release. Our other GA aircraft around the same number. So that would suggest quite the opposite of leaving it to rot. These products were released some five years ago and have proved immensely popular but over time they are going to show their age and become eclipsed somewhat by more recent offerings. We try our best given the size of the team and business to improve all of our aircraft, which is no mean feat given the constant stream of sim updates, new third party add-ons for GA aircraft and the like but there comes a time when commercial reality rears its ugly head and we simply have to move on and prioritise other projects to ensure the viability and safety of the business. Furthermore and to defend ourselves further (not that it should be a requirement) we have managed just two brand new releases in the past 24 months and that's largely down to us spending the majority of our time updating current products to ensure 2024 compatibility and to give everything quality of life improvements where requested and possible. That again wouldn't suggest we're keen on leaving our products to rot. Finally, we do aim to supply a set of updates for the GA fleet (that will be the 20th update) and then we'll be following up with something a lot more exciting on this front but more on all of that fairly soon. Sorry you're not happy with how things have turned out and are currently with your PA-28 Warrior and the current solutions suggested aren't helping you but there was a bit of balance required here so I hope this post gives a little context to the situation. Thank you.