The only difference I see between your install and mine is that my TBM 930s are streamed, while it looks like you downloaded yours. Maybe try them streamed if you haven't already, and see if it fixes it? We have all the same versions enabled. I tried messing with my graphics settings but couldn't get my instruments to look like yours. I just have a variety of fingerprints and scratches that look like wear and tear, yours looks drastically different. [image: 09a9f5d1-1115-42fa-a8b5-7116a72beeac.png]

Tried the same flight again and it went fine. Both the failure and sucess on runway rnav z 19. Then tried same flight and landed on ILS 01 runway and it ctd again. I'm lost it happened with the grand duke and regular duke. Don't have any failure with PMDG 736. Never had the problem before su5.

Oh sorry, the beginning of the sentence is identical... but the end is not...

@KRoy7 Simply put...It's just not for us currently. Many other developers only have one or at most a handful of products to monitor customer engagement on. We're far away from that and have literally hundreds of products and the volume of interaction that is required to run a smooth and reliable customer support department means we need to keep it well managed with a ticketing system in place. Discord channels can quickly run away with you and become a complete spiders web to deal with. Staffing there would need to be full time and it's simply not user-friendly when it comes to dealing with customer's issues be it simple questions about orders or more technical topics that can sometimes require long running back and forth posts. Really wish all the other developers good luck using the platform but right now, rest assured, our time is better spent on a lot of other areas. As individuals we do tend to take a look at areas of Discord where our contributions might be of use as we do with all other areas of Social Media that are relevant for us but having our own dedicated Discord space right now isn't going to be for us. Hope that helps at least give you some understanding of our thoughts and approach to this.

Just did a short flight with the A36. As you can see the Hobbs did move. @Kaaplink Would be interessting to find out what the difference is, why does it work for me and not for you. Strange.... [image: b706d3f5-7a5c-437f-8c4d-3479e0a1adca.png]

@jmarkows It makes sense, but it still creates a bit of a conflict with the click spot used to open the cargo pod door.

For me the default has always been in the middle (and I never touch it). Maybe it got moved at some point accidentally?

@Black-Square Is it possible to implement this restriction in the next update? I assume it would work similarly to the door logic, where it won’t close if the stairs are deployed.

@Black-Square got it! Thanks!

I use the Prop Pitch 1 Decrease event via FSUIPC (I would imagine it's the same as Mobi) and use a value of about -50 for my Black Square aircraft for feathering. For unfeathering, I have found using Prop Pitch 1 Hi to be better than trying to us a set value to bring it back.

@fabristunt said in A list of Squawks as a 10+ year TBM Maintainer: will the update also apply to the MSFS 2020 version of the TBM or will it be 2024 only? I will do my best to keep both versions in parity with each other as long as I can. So far, there is nothing (other than preflight walkarounds) that can't be done in MSFS 2020, as well. I made a promise to continue supporting and releasing new aircraft for MSFS 2020 as long as I could, and I will continue to uphold my end of the bargain for the time being. Your end is simply to enjoy my aircraft, and do some really great flying

@ronstew said in Air Manager panel to match the Black Square Baron Professional?: This forum does not seem to have private messaging? That is correct. It is, as Nick says, partly about legal compliance but also a choice we've made having observed mulitple abuses of it in the past, both here and on other forums.

Models are built but awaiting work to make them function in MSFS. Totally different coding to P3D and, unfortunately, not simple to do. Definitely something we'd like to finish - from a commercial perspective, if nothing else - but no timeline I'm afraid.

For your information, I turned Raymarched Reflections to OFF (Graphic settings > Custom) and it did the trick. No more reflections in the glass of the cockpit. Of course the effect is also removed in other areas but I have not noticed in my usage.

Awesome explanation!!

@Black-Square That worked perfectly. Thanks a lot for taking the time to explain it!

@kityatyi said in The Black Square fleet-wide ILS tracking issue continues: Working Title Cirrus SR22T and the Grumman Albatross Just in case it saves you some time, if both of those aircraft use the WT G1000, then I would expect them not to exhibit the issue, as they have the same WT autopilot as the GNS 530. To obtain useful information from the default aircraft, it would have to be from one without any avionics besides nav/com radios.