@Black-Square Yes, that's the case, thanks. Now just need to figure out how to set the LVar up correctly. Oh, and overall, I love the quirks of this airplane. The Bo is faster but this one is more fun.

@jmarkows Thanks a lot for the hints. I’ll test with turbulence set to low and also disabling msfs stress damage. What you describe seems to match what I see too, about the turbulence stuff. @lilycrose A always just fly the TN version. Never had the idea to test the non-TN. But at first, I will test the turbulence stuff

It's me again... After a lot of experimentation, I discovered that you can simply clone the effects and line them up one after another --> this amplifies the effect clearly noticeable and, in my opinion, looks quite good. F.e. like this 30x lines: effect.0 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.1 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.2 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.3 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.4 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.5 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.6 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.7 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.8 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.9 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.10 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.11 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.12 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.13 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.14 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.15 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.16 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.17 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.18 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.19 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.20 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.21 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.22 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.23 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.24 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.25 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.26 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.27 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.28 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.29 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 Stock / 2x effect-lines: [image: e1fe93c5-3857-4e72-a853-3c4260728cc3.png] 30x effect-lines: [image: 0a977262-f667-47de-b642-e53d4fd1dfef.png] 60x effect-lines: [image: 3c63b7c0-f762-452d-b363-4678353cf0d3.png] Just in case anyone is interested...

Unfortunately not fixed with the latest update.

Last I checked the Starship is not compatible with MSFS 2024 built-in ATC. It will mess with your flight plan if you do anything more than request flight following. Hopefully this can be improved in the future...

Hi I didn’t end up trying it because I thought it wouldn’t work

Hi, are these still planned? Thanks

@Tim-HH said in Just curious - Wooden panel....: @DROGE192 Thank you very much! It’s this livery here https://flightsim.to/addon/112811/black-square-commander-114-d-ehgo-dynamic-registration Thanks Tim!

As Nick said, there is no STC to fit a G1000 in any version of the Commander. So it would be very unrealistic. There are very, very few STCs to fit the G1000 as an aftermarket option, as Garmin don't intend it for that use. There are some for the Beech King Airs and analogue Caravans and that's about it.

What exactly are you looking to do with the bindings?

@Torcsen Check again and let me know what you think. Read the red text associated with it. p.s. I've found the Starship consistently flies about 3-4 knots faster than book values. I've done about 15 spot checks for accuracy, and all results were within 2 knots of what the POH has. I also implemented automatic Light/Dark Mode based on local computer time. Mode can always be manually switched.

Alright, thank you

@Black-Square Sounds good! Once we connect, I'll share some photos of my 840 with you, and tell you all about why I think the -10 690C is the ultimate Commander. Talk soon!

Did the engine health on the weather radar differ from the engine health on the tablet? I would think they would show the same thing.

If you have any queries or require support for Just Flight or Just Trains titles, your best bet is always to contact our Support team. The forum is mainly aimed at those who wish to discuss or ask general questions about our titles and replies are usually all from users. See: