That's it. Thank you so much!

I'll try some of the others. I'm using the pms50 gtn750

Ok thanks i'll Look

@Villajota I'm still hoping this is something at the TDS level, since I don't think there's anything different about how these new aircraft are configured, but since you suggest that other GPS units are involved too, have you tried temporarily removing the TDS package from your community folder to see if the others then work? That could help us narrow it down.

Update 2: all is well, no issues. It could well have been user error, since the "Master Radio" switches have to be on for 60 seconds.

This would be super-cool to have this capability. I did post this same question here for the RJ Professional. The PMDGs, Fenixes, iFly 737 Max, FlightFX Citation X, and the TFDi MD11 each expose their display data, and Spad.Next works for them all. Would hope that JF could do the same for the Avro and the UNS-1 for 146/F28. (I've also asked Inibuilds as well to do the same.)

Indeed! The TDS developer was actually nice enough to add that at my request! Perhaps others requested it too, but it still made me feel special while we were discussing how it would be implemented Yes, I will add this to the TBM for the next update after SU4.

The ones you see in default aircraft were all modeled specifically for those aircraft, and use the new 2024 character system, which was very poorly implemented, in my opinion. Theoretically, I could model my own inside the aircraft model, but then I have no way to detect the visibility of the characters, so you might get floating seat belts. In short, this just isn't something I've prioritized. I've taken note of your request, however. When enough users call for a new feature, I'm always happy to explore it.

@jmarkows Oh. Very much sorry! I just copied without seeing what i got ! That was the PL REV! I sincerely hope i did not mess things up for anyone.. [image: 62c96042-c204-43fe-9d71-6c82006a6d27.png]

Uh oh, week running out ... hope for something tomorrow ... or Friday ... or not ... gulp

It's been a while since I've flown the 146 (waiting for 2024 variant) - not sure if I remember something like that kick in the behind, but it did certainly have some awkwardness with GSX pushbacks. Whenever a towbarless tug was used, the lifting action would somehow mess with the brakes, and they would aggressively heat up to +750 C. (less than ideal in case of an aborted TO!). Could this be related to what you are seeing as well (perhaps with the kick coming once the tug sets the nosewheel free again?). Not sure if it eliminated the problem, but in GSX you can select configure aircraft, and set it to not actually lift the aircraft on pushbacks. A biiig patch reworking a lot of things is also just about to drop (I'm betting on release tomorrow), so perhaps the issue will go away with that.

said in ND Data and Alt hold small bugs: @awde Looks like the standard reply should have been sent out which is basically "we will log these issues and pass them to the dev team". This was done but someone probably forgot to reply. Apologies for that. Meanwhile, the dev team is aware and will be looking at what's possible to resolve in a future update(s). Thanks for passing it on.

@Outermarker and @hangar_101 Thanks chaps for your wisdom regarding the Asobo tablet - I wasn't aware it could was integrated as a 3D device. Having it and the Black Square tablet combined in the cockpit is sounding like a great idea

Taxi and takeoff were uneventful (but the takeoff roll was SHORT - 400 feet MAYBE). Engine startup was easy lol - mags on mixture rich.

I’m not sure just how accurate the simbrief figures are. What I’d probably recommend is trying to determine your fuel requirements by using the figures in the manual (pages 167-8 for turboprop variant) which shows estimated fuel to climb and cruise PPH. You can use SimBrief for the routing, winds, ISA, and estimated time/groundspeed (if they have the right airspeed figures) and plug those numbers into the charts from the manual to predict fuel requirements. For example if climbing to 9000ft at ISA you’d need just under 5 gallons and then about 33 gallons per hour after that. If simbrief shows a 2.5 hour flight then you’d want about 90 gallons (about 600lb rounded up) before adding your reserve. The turboprop variant consumes a HUGE amount of fuel compared to the piston variant so it’s very easy to run out early. Sorry, I can’t say I’ve tried simbrief for the B36 yet so I’m not sure how close or far off the figures are.

Glad to hear it! Let me know if you have any more questions

What a wonderful note. Thank you so much. I hope moments like that can bring you joy in your virtual flying! Next time it happens, you can try using your real world procedure to burn off the deposits instead of pressing the "cheat" button. Have fun, and let me know if there's ever anything else I can do for you!