Yes, that is intentional. We removed the tutorial flight files from our aircraft packages in order to comply with some MSFS Marketplace requirements. The manuals likely do still refer to the tutorial flight files, and it is something we have logged to get corrected the next time the manuals get updated. The old tutorial flight files simply loaded the aircraft at the location stated in the tutorial flight; they didn't affect the aircraft systems in any way. So as long as a flight is loaded at the departure airport stated in the manual, it'll still be possible to complete the tutorial flight in full. Mark - Just Flight

@Voxen strange. The click spots on both sides work for me turning the ANC up and down.

@Black-Square Is the Garmin GMA 340 audio panel no longer needed then?

I’m interested as well

Hi Mark, a suggestion integrated into this post. I think it would be more useful, in our order table within our account, to have the "Added Date" (when you add updates) instead of the "Order Date" (when we buy the product). What I want to know immediately in the order list is the last update of everything to check if I'm not outdated. You could keep both columns, but I think it's too narrow for that. Is a matter of layout Thank You!!

Found the report I was writing about. Commendable effort on the side of the user, but I think he gave up in the end https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/bug-multiple-planes-change-from-nav-to-rol-hdg-mode-when-tracking-vor/762974/10 BTW. It not happening for me in the F28 and Bae146 might be suggesting that it's about the standard AP units. Both planes are larger and have the AP functions spread over the cockpit, with probably some custom coding involved to make it happen - and not just a standard AP panel. - decided to withdraw the conclusion as I just realized the 114 also has a custom AP panel and it also happened with the Starship Either way, have some examples from YT (link should point to the specific moment): https://youtu.be/1a-g3UMooCs?t=4393 On glideslope for some time now, clear view of the runway, APR randomly moves back to ROLL (the popped breaker is not about this, it's an icing sensor and was known). Here a similar situation: https://youtu.be/300F3IcCAqM?t=3593 The same, but with only a localizer. Normally it happens with VORs, was just easier to remember and find those two.

@vliah There's a clickspot below the red "feather" label on the throttle quadrant to show/hide all the levers. You have an interesting suggestion. I haven't heard anyone else complain about this, because I guess they must have dual lever inputs. Unfortunately, overriding hardware inputs is always a decision made very carefully as a developer, because the last thing I would want is someone jumping in the airplane for the first time and not being able to get their hardware propeller levers to work for some reason. I'll think about if there is any other way to do this, though. Sometimes it takes few days, but I might come up with something when I least expect it. Thanks for the suggestion! I can definitely see how it would be helpful for some hardware.

Hi, everyone. I looked into this more today, and found the obvious: The fuel flow gauge is highly non-linear at the very bottom of its scale. Since these real instruments are full of real mechanical eccentricities, I've just added a little piece of "cheater" code to help boost the fuel flow indication just enough to read on the scale. Hopefully that should help eliminate any confusion.

Confirmed lost my FP that I had built when switching to GPS.

Thanks Nick! I have guessed a limitation of approx. 15% but I will try with a quarter. I assume that one quarter tank is meant as one quarter of the main tanks which is 15.5 gallons, or approx. 104lbs/47kg (Jet-A).

@SebAvi I tested this today, and I found that horsepower increased by ~9 hp from sea level to the critical altitude.

+1 to this - I also have the "other" one, and while it scratches an itch - a BlackSquare version with all that entails, would blow the other one out of the water. Something about the Avantis have always appealed to me, but sadly have never had a super high quality one in the sim that also functions to the level I'd hoped.

@Marionettework It should work, though I can hardly say it would provide you with realistic ATC. Best free option is VATSIM for sure (and only option for myself as SayIntentions and BeyondATC are both quite unrealistic...). If it's just general ATC that you want it should work with the starship fine as it relies on Simbrief.

@intjmastermind I agree with @Marionettework and @AvApollo. The avionics in the Starship are coded the way the plane is and currently flown IRL. It is technically still possible to fly it IFR utilizing RNAV as the primary Nav Source. the VNAV page can be utilized to help achieve the correct rate of climb or descent needed to avoid having to level off for an altitude restriction. Also manually keying in fix-by-fix waypoints for SIDS and STARs is how it's done on the GNS 430/530 and many other common GPS units commercially today. Though IRL turboprops and smaller aircraft usually don't fly on the same procedures as larger airliners at all and are commonly vectored in (*depends on the airport). I usually only ever file direct IFR in real life unless it's a longer route or a Mandatory/Preferred IFR Route in the flight supplement exists. *Note: Simbrief works best when used for airliners and will consistently provide you with a SID or STAR meant for turbojet aircraft only (Not turboprop). Sometimes turboprop SIDs and STARs exist, so it's best to look up the available procedures before starting the flight (if you're trying to be realistic). If none exist, then expect to be vectored and if planning to stay IFR, brief yourself on the minimum IFR altitudes to be sure of adequate terrain clearance.

I purchased it from Just Flight. I did try the mod approach and it did not take. I'll take a look at that thread. Thank you.

No it's not sufficient. You have to engage the AP Master if it's not already on, and then activate set heading mode variable. With mobiflight it's working well this way, using only one hardware button. .

@Ratman I don’t really see this coming. I really think it is a detriment to continue to support MSFS2020. There is no walk around mode in 2020 anyway and the only way it could be a thing is if you click it in 3rd person and that would cause way more problems than it would be worth. It’s harder to support 2 sims and I think 2024 is actually more stable than 2020 right now. If you have the internet speed to support it I would absolutely make the jump if not, I would absolutely make yourself heard about a need for an offline mode in the MSFS forums because I think that is the only thing keeping people on 2020.

@NixonRedgrave said in Velocity Issues in MSFS 2024: The EGT & TIT(?) Temperatures are nearly always extremely hot unless the engine is barely working. This is a huge part of the fun of this aircraft! In all my flights I don't go all out at first, even during takeoff you can climb like a rocket with 75% throttle. During climb you can change the prop pitch and once your workload is reduced, start leaning the mixture. Leaning is the fun part, you enable the engine page in the G3X to keep an eye on things and use both the throttle and mixture. When you lean, you can't just lean, there's a peak when the temperatures go in the red. So you have to reduce the throttle as you lean, and once you're past the peak you can increase the throttle again. Afterwards, it's a mini-game to increase the throttle while leaning and still stay in the orange or green range. Different altitudes will require different values, and also it depends what fuel flow you're targetting. Another mini-game is to nail the fuel predictions in your LittleNavMap flight plan, so you watch your FF as you're doing all this (download the Velocity performance figures for LittleNavMap). During the flight, you watch your ground speed with satisfaction as you eek out the best performance from the aircraft while staying within the desired temps. Between this and all the GNT 750 features, there's hardly any time to look outside, only really on 1h+ flights.