Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Black Square Add-Ons
16 Posts 9 Posters 2.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Black SquareB Black Square

    While I have no current plans to add G1000 support to my aircraft, the most likely candidates would be the TBM and the King Air. I will say that I have a future aircraft planned to include glass panel avionics, but I was leaning towards the WT G3X + GNS 750 combo that I have in the velocity, as this more closely resembles the upgrades done to this particular aircraft in the real world.

    Since I love seeking the advice of my users, what do you all think of the WT G3X + GNS 750 vs. WT G1000 for a GA aircraft?

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Outermarker
    wrote on last edited by Outermarker
    #6

    @Black-Square The G3X + GTN750/650 stack would be perfect for your lineup of aircraft. It's one of the most common and popular retrofits nowadays, even my cheap flying club has recently upgraded an old C172N to the G3X/GTN.

    Personally, if it's not too much to ask for and not too late already, I'd love to see that as an option in addition to the steam gauge variants in your upcoming Bonanza/Baron professional series. One can dream I guess.

    garmin beech.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      Kestrel21
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      I will give you my first born son if we could have that!

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        Buzz
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Here's my opinion. Offer the Pro version aircraft in a default avionics configuration as a single product. Then, if there is demand for a particular avionics upgrade for particular planes, offer an avionics upgrade as an add-on product.

        You could have a G1000 upgrade and A G3X upgrade as two additional products. I would be cool paying for WT avionics integrated in your fine aircraft.

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jouxeur33
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          imagine the epic e1000 by blacksquare omg

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • B Buzz

            Here's my opinion. Offer the Pro version aircraft in a default avionics configuration as a single product. Then, if there is demand for a particular avionics upgrade for particular planes, offer an avionics upgrade as an add-on product.

            You could have a G1000 upgrade and A G3X upgrade as two additional products. I would be cool paying for WT avionics integrated in your fine aircraft.

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Kestrel21
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            @Buzz I think that would be the best option, make it optional for folks that would like this that wouldn't mind paying for it, just like in real life!

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • K Kestrel21

              @Buzz I think that would be the best option, make it optional for folks that would like this that wouldn't mind paying for it, just like in real life!

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Buzz
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @Kestrel21 The question is, would there be enough demand for Nick to do the extra development?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                Kestrel21
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                I think there would be, especially since Nick would be doing it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Black SquareB Black Square

                  While I have no current plans to add G1000 support to my aircraft, the most likely candidates would be the TBM and the King Air. I will say that I have a future aircraft planned to include glass panel avionics, but I was leaning towards the WT G3X + GNS 750 combo that I have in the velocity, as this more closely resembles the upgrades done to this particular aircraft in the real world.

                  Since I love seeking the advice of my users, what do you all think of the WT G3X + GNS 750 vs. WT G1000 for a GA aircraft?

                  toby23T Offline
                  toby23T Offline
                  toby23
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  @Black-Square G1000Nxi please. Optional TDS GTN always please.

                  Ryzen 5800X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 4090, Windows 11

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Outermarker
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    But please only if there is an STC for it unless it's an airplane natively equipped with the G1000. It's a super rare retrofit option.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kestrel21
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      WT G3X + GNS 750 in the Bonanza and the TBM, I don't think I would fly anything else!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mikesimpilot
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        note that a Kingair has the Proline 21 or fusion now, not Garmin avionics !
                        so pls if you want to do a more modern variant a PL21 would be great.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users