@Pixella The link to this thread is to explain how to obtain support. As it says above: *If you need support for any of our products, technical or otherwise, or have problems with ordering or accessing your account, the fastest way to get an answer is to contact our Support Team - https://www.justflight.com/support You'll find a range of FAQs - some general and some product specific - and if they don't answer your question you can ask a direct question. A 'ticket' will be confirmed as received via email and we'll endeavour to respond within 3 working days. By all means ask questions in the forum, but these may only be answered by other forum members, our support team aren't monitoring the forum 24/7.*

@Putannna said in MSFS 2020 & 2024 Needs a Super VC 10: maybe together we can get their attention! You've already got our attention - see my replies above. However, just for the record, here are the main discussion points on Project VC10 for MSFS2024: Pros There is a real one at Cosford that can be accessed by developers Just Flight has prior knowledge and data on many of the more complex systems in this arcraft which could serve to shorten the development time. Just Flight has previously done Jetliner and Pro versions of this aircraft series for FSX, P3D and X-Plane. Cons Producing a sound set to take advantage of current game technology might be a problem Very limited appeal outside the UK. To maintain our quality reputation - as per the 146, Vulcan, RJ, F28 etc - it would need to be built from scratch. Even with our experience on previous versions, this is a 2-3 year project with a very significant development bill. Commercially, based on our experience with VC10 Jetliner and VC10 Professional for FSX, P3D and X-Plane, the meagre sales returns would never be enough to warrant the cost and time involved. Here at Just Flight we have a huge amount of enthusiasm for older aircraft and we would jump at the chance of doing another VC10. However, we also need to accept that we are not working for a lifestyle/hobby business or a freeware co-op and we do have to consider the ROI of every project we undertake. We're currently working on our Tornado and we also have plans for another British classic (subject to a successful ROI discussion) but, as far as the VC10 goes, we are unlikely to ever revisit that one. One thing to add - if any other developer fancied doing a VC10 for MSFS2024 we would always be open to licensing our source code at reasonable cost. Please form an orderly queue....

I made a Lua script for FSUIPC7 that sets the active frequency to a dummy frequency when COM CIRCUIT ON is off, and restores it to the previous frequency when COM CIRCUIT ON is on, for COM1 and COM2 separately. (Initially I tried using SI's start/stop ATC keybind, muting the whole SI app, changing COM volumes, and changing COM receive selection, but changing the frequency worked out the best.) Requires the payware version of FSUIPC7 to run. com1_power_offset = 0x66DE -- A:CIRCUIT COM ON:1 com2_power_offset = 0x66DF -- A:CIRCUIT COM ON:2 com_active_hz = {} com_active_hz[com1_power_offset] = 0x05C4 com_active_hz[com2_power_offset] = 0x05C8 RADIO_SET_HZ = {} RADIO_SET_HZ[com1_power_offset] = 67240 RADIO_SET_HZ[com2_power_offset] = 67242 stored_frequency = {} stored_frequency[com1_power_offset] = nil stored_frequency[com2_power_offset] = nil dummy_frequency = 111000000 function check(power_offset,power_status) if power_status == 0 then stored_frequency[power_offset] = ipc.readUD(com_active_hz[power_offset]) ipc.control(RADIO_SET_HZ[power_offset],dummy_frequency) else if stored_frequency[power_offset] then --script is meant to be run before radios are first turned on, but check just in case ipc.control(RADIO_SET_HZ[power_offset],stored_frequency[power_offset]) end end end event.offset(com1_power_offset,"UB","check") event.offset(com2_power_offset,"UB","check")

Is it possible to show upcoming neutral sections on the mini HUD when driving along the West Coast Main Line, particularly around the Shap section? Having this information visible in advance could help drivers prepare more easily and manage power changes more smoothly during gameplay. Tks

@ch0llis another big thanks to you. It looks a lot better now with those bits ironed out. I'm grateful for your efforts.