In Development

147 Topics 1.0k Posts

Subcategories


  • 57 Topics
    646 Posts

    Hello guys! At this point are there any screenshot from the exterior and interior? How the project is progressing? Tks

  • 8 Topics
    33 Posts

    found this on a newsletter from may this year from FlightSim.com:

    Following on from their award-winning Canberra PR9, Hawk T1/A Advanced Trainer, Vulcan and Tornado GR1, this highly detailed simulation of the Tornado F3 for Prepar3D adds to Just Flight's stable of military aircraft, having been developed with hands-on research and access to both real-life aircraft and training simulators.

  • 12 Topics
    30 Posts

    @exp131 It's not related to the plane. I had this issue with MSFS in general.
    Follow everything in this video. It completely fixed the issue for me :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2M8z31fyAA&t=502s
    Also go to "This PC" and right click on C drive. Then in the General tab, press "Clean up this disk" and delete everything in the list, including DirectX cache. This may help a lot!

  • 27 Topics
    125 Posts

    @greg-goodavish said in UPS livery request:

    @derek

    Said to hear, Derek. I know a ton of pilots still flying P3d V4.5 and 5.0, with no plans to go over to MSFS because of issues with that program. Too bad this aircraft will not be available to us. Good luck.

    Sadly, our experience doesn't bear that out. When a solid P3D title goes from steady sales of 25 per week to 3 per month, it is a pretty clear indication that almost everyone has moved elsewhere. P3D has vanished faster than FS2002, FS2004 and XP10 did when a new version of the host game appeared.

  • Questions about the Fokker 100/70

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    180 Views

    Our F70 and F100 Professionals are both still in development, so we haven't yet finalised the feature set, but we do aim to include as many customisation options as possible. We do have a request logged on our internal feature request tracker for the difference in FD bars, and we already have sound recordings of the Tay 620 and Tay 650 engines (see our development update on that here: https://www.justflight.com/in-development/f70-100-professional) so the correct engine types will be included with both the F70 and F100.

    Mark - Just Flight

  • How's progress on the Fokker 100/70?

    11
    1 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views

    Thanks for the dev update, loved it!

    As strange as it might sound I am very happy to get the mulitple door configs. When I did my MX apprenticeship on the Fokker fleet I loved the fact that our company didn't get all frames new from factory so they all had their own configurations both inside and out. Apart from difference in door configs we had differences concerning lavatories/closets and seats, but also the upward opening cargo doors as well as downward (which had an easy step to get in the belly hold). I think my company never used the L2 serice door for catering (bc the fact that damage to the wing and/or engine was huge a risk) but those doors were lovely for maintenance jobs inside the cockpit or cabin. Only way to get some fresh air by opening fornt door(s) and the service door when the a/c was inside the hangar.

    After release I'll have to repaint OFK OFL and OFO in KLC colors to have all external door configs.

  • 757 in the works

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    769 Views

    Thanks for that, I don’t use social media I wasn’t aware of that, but sounds like it’s moving 👍

  • Why isn't the RJ Avro in this list ?

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    305 Views
    No one has replied
  • The wait is almost over? BSquare TBM

    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    175 Views

    @eker All the same, am so pleased with A2A Comanche, but can't wait for the BKSQ TBM850 ;-))

  • Fokker F100 Leading Edge devices

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    204 Views

    @celti OK thanks Celti

  • BSquare TBM Manual

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    136 Views

    @gabe777 Will see what we can do for you.

  • A request for your upcoming UNS-1 FMS

    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    237 Views
    No one has replied
  • Avro RJ Liveries

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    343 Views

    @cadenp

    Maybe wait for a release date.

    Still awaiting the UNS1 for the 146.

  • Blacksquare TBM

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    468 Views
  • AVRO Vulcan B for MSFS

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    666 Views

    Third item in... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUoS2BBw5yI :thumbs_up_light_skin_tone:

  • 737-Professional start-up

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    184 Views
    No one has replied
  • Tornado GR.1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    217 Views

    @brems26

    You're correct it was announced but we didn't at that point add it to the In Development section of the website. The reason being and this applies to many of our in-house a/c is that the graphical aspect of the work can become very advanced fairly quickly, the coding aspect though will take longer and in many cases ends up being queued whilst the team continue to completion other projects.

    There is more graphical work required but yes it's quite advanced and the coding work hasn't really kicked in just yet. As soon as that happens and we're more confident of a timeframe for completion the Tornado will get added to the In Development section of our website and more frequent updated will be the way of things at that point. Currently that's still a few months off though so you'll need to be patient with this one I'm afraid.

    Sorry for raising hopes prematurely but rest assured it is still part of our plans.

    I hope that helps. Thanks.

  • Traffic Global for MSFS2020?

    13
    1 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views

    Hello,
    as beta started some time ago....?
    what`s status on now?
    When we can get it?
    brds

  • FS Traffic

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    153 Views
    No one has replied
  • RJ Pro and hardware

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    398 Views

    @f737max

    Use Spad.next or Axis and Ohs... and all those controllers can be used.

    They are also good for Streamdeck profiles.

    In fact I'm finding they negate the need for FSIUPC... which in MSFS is somewhat inconsistent and patchy.

  • Model matching online traffic with FS traffic?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    279 Views

    @lawk said in Model matching online traffic with FS traffic?:

    Hi!

    Will the upcoming FS Traffic be able to do just model matching for standard MSFS online traffic? I am not really looking for AI traffic, I just want that the real online traffic aka other simmers be in their correct livery. Or at least correct aircraft.

    Yes that should be possible using FS Traffic

  • Normal 747-8i liveries for msfs

    1
    -2 Votes
    1 Posts
    167 Views
    No one has replied
  • 146 for MSFS

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    582 Views

    Hi Martyn,
    I see the 146 will be delivered with a great variety of operators, but, maybe on forehand a bit to much, will there be AVRO RJ 70/85 and 100 models later?
    Those were my favorites in P3D.

  • Is the VC-10 still in development?

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    837 Views

    @voice-of-reason
    Dear team,
    also I was shocked when I received the notification. I was full of joy when I read the VC10 header hoping for it to be ready for release.
    I am sure that after such a long development time and certainly also significant financial investments you did not take this decision easy.
    Being an early customer for the FXS and P3D VC10 and a VC10 lover, I was really looking forward to this plane as I have meanwhile switched to XPlane.
    Of course you can judge it better than any outside customer and VC10 aficionado and any certainly you had many internal discussions and decisions, but would it perhaps nevertheless be a possibility to release what you have ? If you consider it incomplete then just release it as a give-away or sell it for a symbolic amount or just clearly indicate that it is a pre-release product with not follow-up updates to be expected.
    I know the quality of your products and I can assume your own expectations. But a VC10 with incomplete systems or incomplete exterior is by far better than no VC10. And from the pre-release pictures the plane looked really great. And perhaps there are testbed variants with only one swith to turn on the respective (non-functional) system(s).
    Thanks & best,
    Florian