Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

Request - G1000NXI Option For Future Black Square Aircraft In Development

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Black Square Add-Ons
20 Posts 13 Posters 3.5k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kestrel21

    @Buzz I think that would be the best option, make it optional for folks that would like this that wouldn't mind paying for it, just like in real life!

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Buzz
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @Kestrel21 The question is, would there be enough demand for Nick to do the extra development?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      Kestrel21
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      I think there would be, especially since Nick would be doing it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Black SquareB Black Square

        While I have no current plans to add G1000 support to my aircraft, the most likely candidates would be the TBM and the King Air. I will say that I have a future aircraft planned to include glass panel avionics, but I was leaning towards the WT G3X + GNS 750 combo that I have in the velocity, as this more closely resembles the upgrades done to this particular aircraft in the real world.

        Since I love seeking the advice of my users, what do you all think of the WT G3X + GNS 750 vs. WT G1000 for a GA aircraft?

        toby23T Offline
        toby23T Offline
        toby23
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        @Black-Square G1000Nxi please. Optional TDS GTN always please.

        Ryzen 5800X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 4090, Windows 11

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • O Offline
          O Offline
          Outermarker
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          But please only if there is an STC for it unless it's an airplane natively equipped with the G1000. It's a super rare retrofit option.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            Kestrel21
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            WT G3X + GNS 750 in the Bonanza and the TBM, I don't think I would fly anything else!

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mikesimpilot
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              note that a Kingair has the Proline 21 or fusion now, not Garmin avionics !
              so pls if you want to do a more modern variant a PL21 would be great.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M mikesimpilot

                note that a Kingair has the Proline 21 or fusion now, not Garmin avionics !
                so pls if you want to do a more modern variant a PL21 would be great.

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Callsign_DISCO
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                @mikesimpilot the G1000/G1000 NXi is a very popular retrofit for the Big King Air, all but one of the six that I flew regularly IRL were G1000/G1000 NXi with the odd duck being Fusion Touch (also nice). The Blackhawk conversion that puts 1200 shp engines on the B350 requires the G1000 retrofit for example. I'd love a BS B350 with the G1000 on it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  Kevo_G
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  I really like that panel posted above. Not really against the G1000, but it is common enough. My preference will always be the other choice for some reason.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Black SquareB Black Square

                    While I have no current plans to add G1000 support to my aircraft, the most likely candidates would be the TBM and the King Air. I will say that I have a future aircraft planned to include glass panel avionics, but I was leaning towards the WT G3X + GNS 750 combo that I have in the velocity, as this more closely resembles the upgrades done to this particular aircraft in the real world.

                    Since I love seeking the advice of my users, what do you all think of the WT G3X + GNS 750 vs. WT G1000 for a GA aircraft?

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bradsena
                    wrote last edited by Bradsena
                    #19

                    @Black-Square Hello Nick, a King Air 350 by Black Square with G1000 Nxi would definitely be a day one purchase for me! I’ve already quite extensively modded it in MSFS2020 to make it work with my G1000 cockpit but if I could get it out of the box for 2024 I’d be very happy!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      St. Agre
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      Everything would be dependent on Aircraft. For example, in the Caravan or King Air which are frequently used by commercial operators, a G1000 option would be welcome as many of these airplanes in commercial service are equipped this way, and the G3X is only certified for piston aircraft.

                      For the TBM850 as well, the G1000 was equipped on later aircraft from the factory, whereas we don't have the option of a G500/G500txi which is the most common retrofit on the pre-G1000 aircraft, so I'd rather see a G1000 as the glass panel option here.

                      That said, G1000s aren't something you can retrofit on most piston aircraft, so in this case if you wanted to offer a glass panel option the G3X + G750 would be the obvious choice.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users