Baron Professional

Hey, just wanted to bring this up- as you said it looks good so far on the Commander.. have you already worked on a solution?

@iflygary Well I do not find it difficult but need to admit that I switched from the in-sim bindings to Axis-and-Ohs a long time ago (several years). This way I can avoid the flaws of the sim with the addition benefit of being able to control much more than the ingame binding allows you. Most important in this case would be to use input repetition for the switch, otherwise it will snap back. I can provide you all the scripts you might need for controlling the Baron in case you would like to go this route. Just to give you a few examples, I can control the sunshades, every air ventil, and most of the other knobs and switches with hardware. It was a game changer for me switching to an external tool to control everything. No more lost bindings, no more missing bindings. Easy switching out hardware. Initial setup takes a bit longer sometimes but this is more due to find the right variables than to bind them. Sorry that I cannot supply more support within the Std.

I am using the TDS and getting this problem quite frequently. But this only happens when coming out of HDG mode. When using an RNAV procedure to get myself onto the ILS, it never happens. So far, I only encountered this when using Black Square aircraft. And yes, it might be a problem with the standard autopilot but still it’s quite an annoying bug. I love the Black Square aircraft but the autopilot implementation is really a weak point. A2A for example does a custom autopilot implementation for the Comanche and Aerostar and it shows. Much more realistic behaviour and one can actually operate the autopilot using the original manual. It’s quite a pity that Black Square uses highly customized systems for almost everything but then uses the standard autopilot.

Thanks for the awnser. You right. I am going to report to MS. Rgds.

My apologies! Everything is working fine now. It was probably an issue on my end with the liveries add-on.

Pakistan, what are you doing, ahaha, stop! [image: 8839149d-78b4-4af5-886b-666315ddbc30.png] I honestly gave Bonanza a chance, and I love it, but it's just not Baron enough, if you know what I mean. This bird took me from Essen all the way to Turbat, known as the hottest place in the Gulf. And I didn't stop there - landed in Ahmedabad just a minute ago, almost 5.000 NM behind my back and I just can't have enough of Baron. Two engines, twice as much headache, and it's just so awesome! I love Bo, I really do. Bo with its fancy view out of cockpit makes a journey feel relaxed. A nice shot of the landscape made from between Baron's roaring engines makes a trip feel deserved and every good landing - well-earned. Will see how it conquers Nepal, wish me luck! [image: 12723915-a350-4e4a-8715-30dc65fc0d72.png]

@ploodovic said in Custom Registration confusion: Have you checked, that the EFB option to have the registration visible, is enabled, in the respective versions? Bingo.. that was it! Thanks.

Thanks, this answer a lot of questions for me.

I have same post on reddit about lack of glass cockpit options in MSFS in general. Seems like it requires a lot of work from developers so I doubt that we see anything in near future. However one dude said that he is working on Aspen avionics as an addon and provided couple of screenshots.

Thank you for your reply. I'm familiar with AAO, but unfortunately, it doesn't recognize my hardware, at least not the panels. That's okay, though, so I'm using Spadnext instead Exactly, I found similar variables, but when I set them to 19, 20, or 0, naturally for each page, nothing happens. My guess is that perhaps a "sent" command or some other instruction is missing. As I said, this is purely speculative. Maybe someone else has an idea, or perhaps the team does? Best regards and many thanks, Dennis

Hi, thank you for your reply - it is really interesting how MSFS provides the data differently. I found a way to get the name easily, cause I am also using Simhaptic with a Buttkicker - and this software is more...let's say intelligent than the Moza Cockpit. This detects automatically which aircraft gets loaded (on MSFS, X-Plane or DCS) and it shows the internal name. For your aircrafts those are: bksq-aircraft-baron bksq-aircraft-baronpress bksq-aircraft-baronturbo bksq-aircraft-turbineduke And those names work as well for the Moza presets.

There is also a free tool you can download from Flightsim.to called PushbackHelper. You can use it with all airplanes but it allows to push or pull the plane.

said in Excessive turbulence at low altitude: @Black-Square from my understanding talking to A2A, they use their own flight model and the turbulence is somehow interpolated by them before effecting the aircraft. It has come to my attention that I may be wrong about this... I'm now noticing an absence of turbulance other than the occasional bumps they inject in. Kind of a huge let down if that's the case.

@Black-Square Thanks Nick. I'm probably the only one who has ever tested it, so don't lose sleep over it. Just the fact that you have acknowledged it is good for the time being. I'm sure in due time you will get around to fixing it. Cheers

Thank you for your willingness to resolve any issues we report to you.

I suspect it’s a problem in Wwise where the position is set wrong for certain objects which Windows spatial doesn't use.

Update, it now doesn't start at 0% but not sure if it's because of your suggestion or me uninstalling chase plane. I uninstalled chase plane because it disables the pilot being visible in outside views which bugged me a lot. Will wait till it gets fixed, I did your suggestion the same time of the uninstallation. Either way thanks for the tip again.

Just a quick bump because I'm seeing this in the Bonanza still. I think that's correct, v1.1 was the latest and this fix was made in a yet to be released version, yes? If so, I'm guessing we'll see a rash of BS aircraft updates around when the Caravan drops.