Nick's statement that the Twin Commanders are "the first Black Square aircraft modelled and textured professionally" is the most unbelievably humble instance of "selling yourself short"... So stoked for everything to come. P.S. Mayhaps could we get an FAA Flight Check bird with the King Air? Although their B300s have a ton of modifications (to such a degree that they are hardly recognizable as KA300s), would it be possible to represent some of the superficial differences on the exterior? (E.g. the two window deletes on the left side, extra antennas, winglets.)

I don't think this is a limitation of the non-GPS architecture of this aircraft. DME/DME and IRS should not deviate that much during short flights (and I doubt they have simulated degradation either). The plane is artificially not following the track, so it's up to JF to fix it.

@Energyzer Similar answer, but that one is technically easier. Boris and I just need to arrive at an agreement for the schedule to tackle these updates.

How did you create custom waypoints…?

We have a fix developed for this, and it will be included in the next update(s) for the affected aircraft. Mark - Just Flight

I can confirm it is still logged on our internal feature request tracker, and it'll be considered by our development team for future updates and/or upgrades to our PA-28 fleet. Mark - Just Flight

Hi again, could I please get some support on my config. control bindings in MSFS2024 not saving on the Grand Duke (but all OK on the Stock Duke and Turbine Duke) - I'm at a loss to explain or fix it? I have to go ina and select the binding profiles (and aircraft livery) every time whenever I select the Grand Duke. Many thanks.

@LeoPilot That's what I'm here for! Any time

This came up a couple weeks ago. I don't know what you're seeing at the beginning, but the inertial separator state was missing from the ITT calculations. I've fixed this now for the next update. Thanks for posting!

@meh1951 said in AC in Phoenix: Is there someplace that has a description of how it works? Pages 58-63, 104, and 107

This could be improved if Nick added the new state saving system featured in the 114. Hopefully the Starship and the rest of the fleet receive some feature updates and fixes in the near future

Thanks Mark, Now it's clear to me. It's not my mistake, you are aware about it and working on issue and, until there, I can use an intermediate solution. Best regards

The next major update for Fly the Line is currently available as Early Access on the Fly the Line Discord server, with a full release scheduled in the not too distant future. Latest changelog of the upcoming update: https://community.justflight.com/topic/8860/fly-the-line-changelog-v1.0.454-early-access-updated-08-07-26 Fly the Line Discord server: https://community.justflight.com/topic/8876/fly-the-line-discord-server-early-access-builds Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. We've logged this on our internal tracker for our development team to look into further. Mark - Just Flight

Thank you for the feedback. We'll log this feedback for our development team to look into for a future update to the F70 & F100 Professional. Mark - Just Flight

The EFIS warning on the LH MFDU typically indicates that one of the EFIS displays has its brightness set to the lower position (OFF). I would recommend double-checking that the PFD/ND knobs on both EFIS Control Panels are all rotated above their minimum positions. Mark - Just Flight

Hi Mark...doh..yes contrails, my apologies. I must be flying in every warm area known to man lol not seen a single contrail yet and have been upto 34,000ft. Will continue to watch for them and thank you for the kind response. Tony

@Mark Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply and for taking the time to explain. I completely understand that the current PA-38 is based on G-BNKH. I just wanted to add that there is a genuine demand for a more modern Tomahawk configuration, especially here in New Zealand where the PA-38 is still one of the main training aircraft used by many flying schools. A lot of student pilots, including myself, fly these aircraft in real life and would love to train in a version that more closely matches what we fly every day. Even if it wasn't a completely new aircraft, small optional upgrades like a modern antenna configuration, Garmin avionics option, and a few updated cockpit variations would go a long way. Having these as optional configurations would keep everyone happy while making the aircraft more appealing to a wider audience. It's also been around a year since the last update, and I think an update like this would generate a lot of interest. Many current owners would be excited to revisit the aircraft, and it could also attract new customers who train on the PA-38 in countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the UK. There aren't many high-quality Tomahawks available in MSFS, so it feels like a great opportunity. Thanks again for listening and for continuing to support the aircraft. I'd love to see the Tomahawk get some attention in the future.

What I do is use the vertical nav button on the CDU and set the altitudes for the STAR and approach waypoints and then shoot for a 2000 fpm descent. It'll give you a needed descent rate and you can watch that count up as you get closer. [image: 3efdfa4b-9b51-4526-bfa4-608a0ed6efab.jpg]

@alanfernandes Yes you are correct but a lot of 3rd party devs have added in other features that aren’t included with the base working title avionics. Like for the G3000/G5000 Skyward developed a whole Datalink functionality with it and it has some protections built in. Especially now that we know that the King Airs are gonna be the 300 and the 1900D both of them could get garmins. The 1900D has a slightly specialized one called the G950nxi and the 300 has the regular G1000nxi.