I'd love to see that too! Love the pre 84 cockpit.

@FrecciaKing Just to be clear, it's not in "reverse" with the power lever at idle. It's at ground idle. In flight, the power lever will be locked out of the beta range unless you have the "unrestricted beta range" option enabled on the tablet's options page. There are three ranges: The normal (flight) range down to "flight idle". The beta (ground) range down to "ground idle". The reverse range. I don't have any specific FSUIPC scripts to achieve what you're looking for (everyone wants something slightly different), but I know there are a lot of FSUIPC scripting experts on the forum. Hopefully one of them will see this post and provide the help where I lack expertise!

The answer is you have to install the FS20 version which does have the Documents folder. Luckily I still had FS20 installed. The Just Flight FS24 installer needs repackaging to include the manuals.

Yes, the idea is cool, I would also like a plane, and even with a g1000. But while I'm enjoying the A36TC, I've already conquered 3 continents.

Maybe it's possible to tie the engine sounds to the values the PED uses instead of the engine simulation variables or calculate separate values specifically for the sounds. That way, you can do whatever you want underneath the hood while fixing the engine sounds. The best of both worlds.

Yes, my experience with both is that they have the same systems depth. The RJ may have EFIS, but don't let that fool you as there's no VNAV, only advisory VNAV (just like the real aircraft). The RJ is much more hands-on than for example the 737NG. Unlike the 146 it has autothrottle, but it won't select a thrust mode automatically like the 737NG would. The procedures are old school just like with the 146 (lenghty procedures with loads of system tests). So it's just a notch above a 146 with an EFIS retrofit. If you want a more hands-on airplane with EFIS that still has a decent autopilot, the RJ is an excellent choice. I prefer the RJ, but that's just my personal taste and not because the product is a better product than the 146.

thank you

@jmarkows, thanks. I will give it another try.

Not had this issue myself so far

Thanks Mark... Rob

@Black-Square Is the three-press functionality correct, as opposed to the two-press?

Hello Nick. Just closing the loop. All good! Cheers. Ken

@roguefoodie It's a file called flight_model.cfg which you'll find buried in the aircraft install folder in Community. The lines to replace are right at the end of the file. Backup the original file somewhere first so you can easily set it back if something goes wrong.

Brilliant! I had pressed the Repair Engine many times thinking that was a "cure all" for anything wrong. After cleaning plugs and clearing cylinders the best plane in FS2024 is running at 100% for me again. Thanks so much for the help and all you do for our hobby!

Disregard... For whatever reason my environment sounds were off?

@Black-Square said in Baron trip: @eltoppolino said in Baron trip: Finally I felt the pain in a flight I was looking for. Ironically, this is music to my ears It's strange to think, but this is exactly the kind of "pain" I want people to feel with my aircraft. I think it's the adversity that makes your flying experience memorable! Thanks for sharing! and i hope you find more ways of letting me feel this. not only through things that break but also for missmanagement like not setting altitude for pressure cabine. i still feel its to easy to pilot a plane (not your planes but in general). PUNISH ME

And of course, thank you thank you thank you to Nick at Black Square. Hands down my favorite product for Msfs!!!

@ImKindaBeefy Excellent! That's good to hear, because it's why I prefer everyone to contact me directly on this public forum instead of something like Discord. I've noticed that the results from this forum rank very highly on Google, which hopefully makes finding answers easy.

No rush intend. Enjoy family.