We are aware of some scenarios where changing the simulator time (or using active pause) can cause the timers in the RJ code to go out of sync with the timers in MSFS 2024. We are investigating this, and we aim to have a fix implemented in an upcoming update to the RJ. In the meantime, we would recommend minimising any time changes or active pause usage when using the RJ in MSFS 2024. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the message and interest in our LJ45. Not loads to report but development does continue, we'll share the very latest in our end of year round up from our website later this month. Thank you.

The longer Barons wing is not approved for the tip tank etc, found this out while researching climb rates of the turbo normalized bonanza

I'd love to see that too! Love the pre 84 cockpit.

@FrecciaKing Just to be clear, it's not in "reverse" with the power lever at idle. It's at ground idle. In flight, the power lever will be locked out of the beta range unless you have the "unrestricted beta range" option enabled on the tablet's options page. There are three ranges: The normal (flight) range down to "flight idle". The beta (ground) range down to "ground idle". The reverse range. I don't have any specific FSUIPC scripts to achieve what you're looking for (everyone wants something slightly different), but I know there are a lot of FSUIPC scripting experts on the forum. Hopefully one of them will see this post and provide the help where I lack expertise!

The answer is you have to install the FS20 version which does have the Documents folder. Luckily I still had FS20 installed. The Just Flight FS24 installer needs repackaging to include the manuals.

Yes, the idea is cool, I would also like a plane, and even with a g1000. But while I'm enjoying the A36TC, I've already conquered 3 continents.

Maybe it's possible to tie the engine sounds to the values the PED uses instead of the engine simulation variables or calculate separate values specifically for the sounds. That way, you can do whatever you want underneath the hood while fixing the engine sounds. The best of both worlds.

Yes, my experience with both is that they have the same systems depth. The RJ may have EFIS, but don't let that fool you as there's no VNAV, only advisory VNAV (just like the real aircraft). The RJ is much more hands-on than for example the 737NG. Unlike the 146 it has autothrottle, but it won't select a thrust mode automatically like the 737NG would. The procedures are old school just like with the 146 (lenghty procedures with loads of system tests). So it's just a notch above a 146 with an EFIS retrofit. If you want a more hands-on airplane with EFIS that still has a decent autopilot, the RJ is an excellent choice. I prefer the RJ, but that's just my personal taste and not because the product is a better product than the 146.

thank you

@jmarkows, thanks. I will give it another try.

Not had this issue myself so far

Thanks Mark... Rob

@Black-Square Is the three-press functionality correct, as opposed to the two-press?

Hello Nick. Just closing the loop. All good! Cheers. Ken

@roguefoodie It's a file called flight_model.cfg which you'll find buried in the aircraft install folder in Community. The lines to replace are right at the end of the file. Backup the original file somewhere first so you can easily set it back if something goes wrong.

Brilliant! I had pressed the Repair Engine many times thinking that was a "cure all" for anything wrong. After cleaning plugs and clearing cylinders the best plane in FS2024 is running at 100% for me again. Thanks so much for the help and all you do for our hobby!

Disregard... For whatever reason my environment sounds were off?