@KarsPilot If you contact Just Flight about this we will be happy to discuss: https://www.justflight.com/contact-us

I agree it would be great to remove the KNS81... I get your point, but in reality no one I could think of would keep a KNS81 when fitting e.g. a GTN750. Also, you can easily check your navigation with your Navigation Software like Navigraph. That all being said, could you maybe explain how to remove the KNS "with the gap"? I figured with my avionics layout it wouldn't hurt too much. Also, is it possible to remove the MD41-328? Not that helpful with a GTN xD Kind Regards, Jannik S.

Thank you for your willingness to resolve any issues we report to you.

I suspect it’s a problem in Wwise where the position is set wrong for certain objects which Windows spatial doesn't use.

Yep - it's real taxiways. First pic is real taxiways on and 2nd pic is with it off. I've noticed this at a few other airports too - just kept forgetting to report it. Hopefully it's a code fix and not just one off fixes. It's always the sign that's wrong. [image: 93b6eb0d-5023-4f78-b50b-54601c0868ec.jpg] [image: a004a75d-9ee3-47e0-a88c-8dd65ea043c5.jpg]

I think that behavior might actually be expected. The continuous-flow masks are only effective up to about FL250. As you approach that altitude the oxygen partial pressure becomes too low for the mask to maintain normal blood oxygen saturation, so the SPO2 reading starts to drop. The FL250 ceiling is basically the altitude where the system can still keep the pilot functional, not necessarily at 90% saturation. For extended flight, most guidance recommends keeping SPO2 around 90%, and increasing oxygen flow or descending if it starts dropping into the high-80s.

Not sure you read the thread (particularly Nick's responses rather than my drivel), but those vars aren't (or weren't) being exposed, they're only internal. So AAO/SPAD/Mobiflight can't see them, at least not until you make the changes to expose them that Nick and I talk though up above. All sorted now though!

@hunterdouglas I think this is something that Just Flight support would be best placed to help with. See: https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support

As long as it's an option - and not forced upon the user -, it's fine. I personally don't want anything turning red, blue, etc.

shouldn't even have that performance lightly loaded.

I think my issue was just related to X-Plane 12 and specifically the Dash8 as I have been flying in MSFS with PMDG 737 and I haven't had a corrupted flight yet (4 flights).

It's like this IRL with nav lights during the daylight. You can argue its a little bit to dark but its still perfectly within range. There are other areas where lights are to dark.

Solved....down loaded Axis and Ohs and configured the whole setup w/out using the MSFS2024 control panel.

@SadBucket you don’t necessarily need to rummage between different pages. Sky4Sim has already implemented a plugin that integrates its tablet into the MSFS tablet - for instance. If you want to use only Sky4Sim’s features, you can: just select the Sky4Sim icon and the S4S interface will appear and can navigate only the features provided by S4S — the only difference is that it shows up inside the MSFS tablet. It definitely improves immersion, especially in aircraft that already have the “3D MSFS tablet” available.

@django1489 Good try but nothing of the sort I'm afraid.

@SadBucket I do fly predominantly without the 430, however if I am flying a rnav departure or arrival, it comes in handy. Especially an intercept of a radial of a waypoint.

I'm mainly flying the Baron Pro, but have had the same problems, especially on short final and if the wind speed is 10kts+. I actually found the plane uncontrollable and nothing could stop it rolling over and crashing inverted. This happened with some other aircraft, but not all. I tried to use the MSFS2024 turbulence settings to fix it, but I found that setting it to Low or Medium resulted in no turbulence at all, so quite boring. Then I discovered and installed ActiveSky. I have set the Turbulence Effect Scale to 50% (the default) and then reduced overall wind turbulence from 100% to 50%. This results in there still being turbulence on the plane in the air, and some more turbulence on short final still, but now it's manageable. And what a great weather synthesis! Much more realistic looking skies, and more closely aligned to Windy.com's winds. Give it a go!

Great! Not problem at all. Despite being really excited with this addon, I’m not one of those toxic fanboys who get upset when their hyped expectations aren't met. I fully understand how challenging it is to produce an addon like this, especially with such a high level of detail. So whatever you can provide will be more than I ever dream. That said, I think I’ll continue having plenty of questions for you! Again, I hope it’s not too much of a hassle. Regards!