@NixonRedgrave That's what I'm here for I'm glad to hear you're enjoying them, and please let me know if you ever have any other questions. You know where to find me!

@Tadeus72 said in Where is the wear?: although a failure is going over to the next flights if you don't fix it. That's a good point, too. You could not repair the aircraft until every system has failed, which be quite an entertaining challenge to see how far you could get. @steveonatorer said in Where is the wear?: Just sad to see it being advertised as such. The quoted sentence has a specific meaning, its not about being stated unclearly. I understand how you interpreted that sentence, but the meaning was that failures of each type are possible, rather than all failures being capable of all types. I sometimes find it difficult to fit descriptions of all the features in my aircraft into my advertising, especially when various marketplaces impose character limits. Although it's not what we're talking about here, the MSFS Marketplace administrators have actually re-written my descriptions, often choosing words and phrases that I would never use! Sorry you feel like the description was not adequate. When system descriptions in my manuals have been confusing in the past, I always ask my users how they would rewrite them for clarity, so please feel free to share your thoughts.

You sir are amazing. Look forward to V1.1

Oh, I forgot there was another post related to this. Here is what I posted elsewhere after some work last night: This turned out to be a little more work than I was expecting, but I've fixed it, and improved the climate control system after a consult with one of my Caravan pilots too. As usual, thanks for the little nudge in the right direction to improve my aircraft

@MiRexer wow, do I feel silly not looking over my shoulder at the seating.

@qqwertzde said in state.cfg settings: the covers are now in place, but the chocks are still missing. This has been discussed numerous other times, unfortunately. The aircraft loading sequence in MSFS 2024 is terribly confused, with the aircraft being thrown up and down while the terrain is loading, while temperatures and wind are loaded from the camera position in low earth orbit. This means that aircraft is still moving so much when it's loaded that the chocks are automatically disengaged. I haven't found a fix for this yet, because I was hoping that Asobo would fix some of these significant regressions from MSFS 2020, but it seems like that's becoming very unlikely.

Another vote for the Beechcraft 1900D here. I've missed this plane since my P3D times 6 years ago.

Just wanted to let you guys know that I was working on this last night. Here is the post from another thread: I think I was able to arrive at the optimal solution with only some small edits to the code. I also improved some other small things in the KAP140 while I was there. The only thing I'm not sure about relates to the behavior of the real world unit. If you engage the autopilot when you are already within 200ft of your selected altitude, the vertical speed will be zero, and it will capture the selected altitude. All things considered, this is a very small tradeoff in my eyes, compared to what is sometimes required to circumvent the native autopilot. It's always amazing when you implement some of these small things, and you can immediately feel how much more intuitive they are. Thanks, guys! An addendum for this thread: The capability to display "PIT" mode still resides in the KAP 140, but you should not see it during normal operation. I've left it there more as a debugging tool, since errant autopilot modes are my best tool for diagnosing GPS addon issues.

@Ratman This turned out to be a little more work than I was expecting, but I've fixed it, and improved the climate control system after a consult with one of my Caravan pilots too. As usual, thanks for the little nudge in the right direction to improve my aircraft

Ah, thanks for letting me know. There is a flag I remember somewhere like, "DO_NOT_APPEND_UNIT_ID", which might be responsible. I'll double check later.

Sorry to hear that. To the best of my knowledge, I haven't done anything different in the configuration files between any of my aircraft in this respect. I know this feature has been inconsistent in MSFS 2024 since release, however. Perhaps someone else will chime in with some advice. You could also try Just Flight Support. Since they deal with a lot more aircraft than just my own, they might have seen this before.

@Black-Square said in Avionics selection, can it be made sticky?: This is just related to the currently bugged state saving, I believe. There are ways to set it permanently, if you really want, and I can figure out a solution for you. You can scratch this off your to-do list.. I did not realize that I had to select this for each variant separately.. Seems to be working now!

https://community.justflight.com/topic/10189/no-internal-sounds/20

[image: 586ac1d4-e963-44c8-a871-0fb3a551568d.png]

@Keirtt https://community.justflight.com/topic/10160/msfs2024-very-twitchy-controls-and-trim/13

Not until we get a full new sound set for the TBM instead of using the Asobo TMB sounds.

@Black-Square I really appreciate and thank you for working on making the lighting effects stronger, more intense, and visually more impressive—especially ensuring they are clearly visible even in daylight. For a professional aircraft, it is very important that the various visual effects are also high-quality and eye-catching, as this further enhances the overall experience. There is definitely a need and demand for this from the user community.

@SadBucket Hello, Thanks for your comments. You are right, navigating around the functionalities is really cumbersome for real world operations. ... I was just about experimenting the auxiliary functionalities of this unit, apart from following the magenta line.