Have you found out something about the issue?

Same. This really kills the immersion on groupflights. Bought the Bonanza and Baron and both have no Sounds at all really.

Thanks for your reply. That’s understood fully. There are a few aircraft on the market place on Xbox that allow if you press jettison it removes the we[on from the payload which is a little more immersive. So not specifically seeing the weapon drop but as close as we can get etc. would this be possible for the marketplace versions at some point? The aircraft that allow this are the IFE aircraft. Sorry for name dropping another developer but it adds to the immersion that big extra. Cheers Rg

I've noticed that the electronic gate guidance appears not to work. Looking into it I understand the VGDS has to be active. Seen the file sim.cfg and see that for every gate, there are a list of airplane types. I'm flying the CRJ-700 atm which is not listed, I guess this is the reason?

@SadBucket agreed on those points. Hopefully they do someday. I really like the default caravan though many people complain of it, but what i disliked in it was the face glow of the screens. Gauges with their night glow is always more soothing amd more challenging. So i am looking forward to black squares. Not to forget, the added systems depth and simulations ofcourse

@Voice-of-Reason Thank you for the reply Looking forward to it

License Failure errors on the EFB/tablet are typically activation/installation related. We would recommend contacting Just Flight Support for further assistance with this: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight

@jasmits almost done from what it seems. I hope beta testers dont take forever

Thank you so much

Normally, I would offer you a custom code solution to extract that state from my software as an L:Var, but the GTX 327 is the only piece of default avionics still in use in my aircraft. I've been meaning to create my own version for ages now, but I know it's also low on the priority list for most of my users. You can still make an edit to the default simulator's files to get what you want, but be prepared for it to reset every time the simulator updates. You can also make a package with an improved GTX 327 to keep in your community folder. I would be happy to give you some pointers on that, if you need any.

Just checked on both the Turbine Duke and the Grand Duke - in both aircraft if you pull either the Cabin Temp breaker or the Vent Blwr Breaker the blower fan shuts off regardless of what Cabin Temp Mode you are in.

This isn't something I recall seeing reported before; however, if it is hydraulic-related, the HYD.1 or HYD.2 caption would be illuminated on the CWP. HYD.1 system pressure will vary depending on usage, but should automatically increase pressure once the load on the system is reduced. HYD.2 system requires resetting after engine start via the "HYD 2 RESET" button on the left console. In any case, could I kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight support at the following link: https://www.justflight.com/support In the ticket, if you would be able to provide any screenshots/videos of the behaviour, as well as steps on how we can replicate the behaviour, then that will put our support team in the best position to offer assistance. Mark - Just Flight

The front and rear countermeasure equipment for the 146 RAF variants is located on the EXT_01 texture sheet. For the equipment to appear on a livery, the word "RAF" needs to be included in the Title= entry of the livery's aircraft.cfg. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight

@jmarkows said in Repeated NAV mode disconnects while VFR hopping: are you reverting to roll mode when you're still receiving the tuned VOR? Yes. In the most recent case, the FMS / VOR Status page showed the VOR in all three slots plus the DME. It was listed with a 130 nm range, the dropouts occurred on inbound and outbound legs beyond 50 nm. Inside 50 nm it's generally been fine. @DrZGard said in Repeated NAV mode disconnects while VFR hopping: we would much more often utilize the OMNI needle for verification of being on course and heading mode Thanks for the tip, I will give that a shot.

Digging up an old thread because I got back into the Starship after a few months. I was busy going over the equipment requirements again, to update my SimBrief profile. In short, if you're not using the GNS 430, but you accept the fact that your Starship has ONE GPS receiver: You are not capable of RNAV10 or RNP4 remote or oceanic as this requires two independent Long Range Navigation Systems. The Starship has 2 FMC's, but they are linked to only ONE receiver. Hence, they are not independent. (There is a designated area where only one LRNS is sufficient) Even though you meet all requirements for Terminal RNAV 1 SID's and STAR's, you can't accept one because it is not line-selectable from your FMS (FAA AC 90-100A 10. b. (3) "General Operating Procedures" pg. 13 You can fly an RNAV GPS approach down to LNAV minima, because you have a GPS receiver and the approach IS line-selectable from the database. Due to having only one GPS receiver, NAT HLA is also not approved. (Except for the fact that you're not RNP4/RNAV10 qualified anyways). Cheers,

@Black-Square did you ever have any luck with this? I dusted off Starship tonight to help someone learn how to program the FMS and very quickly rediscovered the joy. I had the same issue reported above though. I tried dialing in a speed on the ASI and then activating IAS PROF, and it didn't do anything. I cleared the setting on the ASI and tried IAS PROF again and it immediately picked up my current airspeed and started climbing.

I love this attention to detail! I just started flying the B36T after spending a lot of time in the Baron and noticed the fuel discrepancy and thought it was a bug too LOL.

@MiRexer Ok will try switch both ON and await to see the cycling.

@Black-Square i agree that youll need to pull out the entire root if you think of yanking the bush. And in its current state the sim wont/ cant like that. But maybe implement the gear damage to the extent of default planes? They penalise the poor landings and choice of offairport ops and thus makes the pilots involve themeselves more and thus higher inmersion. Rest of course is your call

Interesting. I'll keep that in mind for my development, and I'll test that behavior through the debugger to see if that's the intended behavior. Thanks for letting me know.