@Black-Square I was reading this topic and I wanted to provide some feedback. As other users are saying, I personally would love to see the Walkaround elements to be independently removed: each Pitot Cover, each Static Port Cover, etc. Brings more realism and immersion to the Walkaround, specially in airplanes with multiple of these elements, like the Dukes where 1 click removes 4 Pitot and Static Covers. I also highly support the clicksposts for entering and exiting the aircrafts. Have a good day!

I tried to make this pretty quick based off the PA24... Not sure how well it will work. AC11 Simbrief

Did you read this from the FAQ in the manual? Why does the mixture behave strangely in the turbocharged version, and I cannot bind it to hardware controls? Microsoft Flight Simulator’s turbocharger simulation has been significantly flawed for several generations. This aircraft has a custom turbocharger that fixes nearly all of these issues, and is much more realistic, as a result. To make these changes, the new “Input Event” system is used to intercept hardware and key-bindings for the mixture control axis. Please make sure that your hardware bindings are using the Key Events, such as “K:MIXTURE1_DECR_SMALL”, or “K:MIXTURE1_SET” to set the mixture, and NOT setting either “A:GENERAL ENG MIXTURE LEVER POSITION:1”, or “B:FUEL_Mixture_1_Set”. Alternatively, setting “L:BKSQ_MixtureLeverPosition_1” from 0-100 will also work to set the mixture axis.

I also want to add my vote for this. It would be awesome to see the fokker with the winctrl MCDU.

@s.mellah Did you press "Load aircraft" in the msfs efb after adding the passenger weights? I forgot this the first time and only saw the copilot, but when trying again now and pressing load aircraft and confirming, I had visible passengers too.

Fantastic, thanks Mark. That worked!

That's what I would have thought, but the OP seemed to suggest something different. I was just checking before I purchased ... which I'm delaying for a few days until I'm less busy and can commit the time to what I already know is a marvelous piece of virtual general aviation.

@Mark Thanks, rgr wildo...

@ksmith Wonderful news, Keith! I've been wondering if anyone had read my changelogs regarding updates for compatibility with mysterious online services. I can't wait to hear stories about how my users make use of this feature. Thank you so much for bringing us that opportunity.

Solved! I had to unistall it and reinstall it in a custom folder and then move it to the Community. The installer put everything in a JustFlight folder that my fs2024 does not recognize in the game. @Black-Square [image: e6c0ced4-b49c-402f-b328-7ca4d92b62d6.png]

When creating custom SimBrief Profiles, the only control we have over altitude is a "Service Ceiling" value, which is correctly set to 35,000ft, and a "Cruise Offset" value, which is intentionally set at P0000. The former controls what the aircraft's maximum altitude is, and the latter applies a global offset to that (for example, if we set a Cruise Offset of M2000 to the current profiles, then the maximum possible cruise altitude would be 33,000ft, even on 5-hour flights). Using a combination of the default SimBrief profile for the aircraft, as well as the values in the custom SimBrief Profiles, SimBrief then calculates what it believes is the ideal cruise altitude. We have no control over what cruise altitude SimBrief generates, other than what the maximum cruise altitude can be. The OPT/MAX altitudes in the CDU will always be a more accurate indication of the aircraft's optimum and maximum cruise altitudes, and if a cruise altitude generated by SimBrief is greater than those values, the SimBrief OFP can always be regenerated after manually lowering the cruise altitude. Mark - Just Flight

I'll give it a try. I like a good challenge (hence I bought this plane ;-))

@Black-Square No problem!

@SadBucket said in Awesome Release | minor bug/ Requests: Would be awesome if you could make engine start work from Mixture ICO I second that. It would make a great plane even more realistic!

Sounds like one for the makers of the plane, CJ Simulations. It's been out a long while so I expect someone would have mentioned it to them by now.

@Black-Square yeah, I do. I could be touching down too slow perhaps?...

Here's the rudimentary beginning of the Starship panel: [image: aae49598-9525-4412-ad67-07cc968a9742.jpeg]

@evan_richard1 there was a Neptune scheme made for the old version. I tried to load it into the updated FS2024 version and couldn’t get it to work unfortunately. I have no idea how to get it to work. Old version someone can maybe use as a template. https://flightsim.to/addon/31965/justflight-bae-146-neptune-aviation-tanker-10-old-livery

That's awesome, thank you for confirming! It would have been a surprise if not, because your wingflex animations are among - if not the best. The reason I asked was that I flew out of virtual Chicago-Joliet towards Frasca, and it was super windy from take-off to landing, with lots of turbulence, but I didn't notice any flexing. I am excited to see the wing flex in action! Just need to find out what route to fly next.