Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Starship
  6. Possible GTN650 integration?

Possible GTN650 integration?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starship
69 Posts 14 Posters 2.7k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P pequenyo

    @MarkS is it out yet? I dont see it...

    RhinozherousR Offline
    RhinozherousR Offline
    Rhinozherous
    wrote last edited by
    #60

    @pequenyo said in Possible GTN650 integration?:

    @MarkS is it out yet? I dont see it...

    I think there was a problem with the Autopilot being controled by the GTN. Possibly because of the 1.1 update of starship? It changed parts of the Autopilot I think.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • P pequenyo

      @MarkS is it out yet? I dont see it...

      M Offline
      M Offline
      MarkS
      wrote last edited by
      #61

      @pequenyo sorry no, it's currently on hold. In Starship version 1.1, the GTN will not drive the autopilot in NAV or APPR modes.

      RhinozherousR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M MarkS

        @pequenyo sorry no, it's currently on hold. In Starship version 1.1, the GTN will not drive the autopilot in NAV or APPR modes.

        RhinozherousR Offline
        RhinozherousR Offline
        Rhinozherous
        wrote last edited by
        #62

        @MarkS Do you have any news? Or is it impossible? Thank you!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Black SquareB Offline
          Black SquareB Offline
          Black Square
          Black Square Developer
          wrote last edited by
          #63

          I will have to be careful about volunteering my time in this particular effort while there are many other features that I should be working on, but I should just say that it's definitely possible. It will take editing of the behaviors XML, and the CDU to make sure all the autopilot variables are set correctly for the GTN, but it's definitely possible.

          RhinozherousR M M 3 Replies Last reply
          4
          • Black SquareB Black Square

            I will have to be careful about volunteering my time in this particular effort while there are many other features that I should be working on, but I should just say that it's definitely possible. It will take editing of the behaviors XML, and the CDU to make sure all the autopilot variables are set correctly for the GTN, but it's definitely possible.

            RhinozherousR Offline
            RhinozherousR Offline
            Rhinozherous
            wrote last edited by
            #64

            @Black-Square Happy to read this!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Black SquareB Black Square

              I will have to be careful about volunteering my time in this particular effort while there are many other features that I should be working on, but I should just say that it's definitely possible. It will take editing of the behaviors XML, and the CDU to make sure all the autopilot variables are set correctly for the GTN, but it's definitely possible.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              MarkS
              wrote last edited by
              #65

              @Black-Square this is where things stand at the moment: the GTN replaces the 430 on the pedestal, but its autopilot will not couple to the Starship autopilot in NAV or APPR modes. In NAV or APPR, it circles in a right-hand bank, and each circle is slightly larger than the last. The GTN does couple to HDG, ALT, and VS, all of which can be set either from the cockpit or the GTN autopilot panel.

              I have also observed that with either the GNS or GTN, NAV and APPR modes cannot be engaged unless an approach is loaded into the GPS. I assume this is by design.

              I can send you the mod in its current state if you'd like.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • G Online
                G Online
                Gilandred
                wrote last edited by
                #66

                In VR, the GTN would be a lot more user friendly. I don’t even need it to drive the AP, just having it for frequencies, traffic alerts, charts, etc. would be good enough for me. Understand if you want to wait for full functionality however.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Black SquareB Black Square

                  I will have to be careful about volunteering my time in this particular effort while there are many other features that I should be working on, but I should just say that it's definitely possible. It will take editing of the behaviors XML, and the CDU to make sure all the autopilot variables are set correctly for the GTN, but it's definitely possible.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mad_X
                  wrote last edited by Mad_X
                  #67

                  Not a big fan of this. A very vocal minority gets special attention. Just for, and let’s be honest, they don’t want to use the GNS430.
                  There are much more important issues than that.

                  Charts for the VR users could better be implemented in the tablet were it would benefit everyone. Gut guess you just have to be pushy enough.

                  RhinozherousR 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • G Online
                    G Online
                    Gilandred
                    wrote last edited by
                    #68

                    Integration of charts on the tablet would be awesome!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mad_X

                      Not a big fan of this. A very vocal minority gets special attention. Just for, and let’s be honest, they don’t want to use the GNS430.
                      There are much more important issues than that.

                      Charts for the VR users could better be implemented in the tablet were it would benefit everyone. Gut guess you just have to be pushy enough.

                      RhinozherousR Offline
                      RhinozherousR Offline
                      Rhinozherous
                      wrote last edited by
                      #69

                      @Mad_X Nobody is pushing anyone...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users