RJ Professional

Many late 146-300/200 QT and QC were build with upgraded PFD and ND. They are not the same screens as those used on the RJ. The these aircraft retained the standard type altimeter, asi, sby a/h etc. The was a separate BAe option available to replace the clockwork PFD/HSI of early models with flat screens.

Hi Mark, with AUTO THROTTLE (AT) engaged the THRUST LEVERS on the RJ move in response to thrust changes - much as with manual use of THRUST LEVER/S. It does not (or should not) operate as Airbus thrust levers. With the AT engaged and speed mode in use the pilot is required to respond to any blue or white arrows and so keep the thrust lever motors within their operating range. The motors move the thrust levers in response to commanded thrust changes.

I have just tested this on Xbox and it's not something I am able to replicate. Could I kindly ask you to raise a support ticket via the following link and our support team will be able to assist with troubleshooting this: https://www.justflight.com/support Mark - Just Flight

The "Map" app on the EFB has no SimBrief integration. We will, however, add this to our internal feature request tracker as something to consider for a future update. Mark - Just Flight

There are no new liveries in the works on our side, but like our other products, we may add additional liveries in future updates. You may find that some of the community created 146 liveries on flightsim.to are being converted to be RJ compatible by their creators. So that will allow for easy drag and drop installation into the community folder. Mark - Just Flight

I have the same issue, I opened a support ticket but just wanted to come on the forums to see if anyone resolved this issue?

Thank you!

@Mark I did some more "holding flights" and it definitely needs investigation. -Often i notice that the RJ is turning first a bit in the wrong direction before entering the holding pattern. Example entering the KERKY holding at Brussels -Entering a holding pattern from a direction different from the inbound track seems impossible with LNAV. I manage to enter the holding pattern only with HDG select until the RJ is more or less on the standard inbound track, thereafter switching to LNAV is ok. -Unable to exit the holding using FMS2. -The holding pattern might be flown more accurate too i feel. The RJ should correct wind effects more precise. -Clicking NEXT HOLD deletes the waypoints on the legs page between present position and the next holding fix. Shouldn't it just add a next holding to the legs page ? Flying the RJ is wonderful, congratulations to the developing team

@Martyn I should have thought of that myself 🫢 Thank you Martyn.

...and we really needs this FCOM Volume 3 Part 3 – Abnormal & Emergency Checklist because I just had some failures during the flight (Engine1 out and failures on Gen1&4)... and...no docs for me...

A point of interest. On the RJ aircraft, master switches on the avionics overhead panel MUST be switched on from left to right, and switched off from right to left. Failure will cause spurious warning to be logged by the Flight Guidance System, or Systems, if 2 are fitted

I have just checked this in the nav data and the "D161D" fix does appear in the AIRAC 2301 navdata that is included with the RJ (I haven't checked the latest 2411 cycle but I assume it will too): [image: f0bd30af-8a7a-4c64-afa3-d35e4852fd5b.png] As far as I'm aware, all of the navaids used by the FMS (and displayed on the ND) are pulled directly from the navdata. We're not creating any additional navaids, or moving any of the existing navaids on procedures, we're just using whatever navaids are listed in the procedure and the coordinates associated with them. Mark - Just Flight

The first few times I loaded the RJ Pro 100 at EGKK I had numerous problems with my GSX Pro, either not loading properly or all its addons disappearing then been unable to go back to the MSFS 2020 Main Screen. I have since found by removing "Just Flight FS Traffic" and "GSX Pro" extra ground clutter all is now working smoothly. I am running a 4-year old Alienware m17 R3 which when new seemed to handle anything but now I have to be selective with addons and graphic settings.

Thank you.

Thank you Mark, that does help very much.

Thank you for the info. Changing ND formats shouldn't have any relation to how the flight plan is displayed on the ND. It's not something we have seen reported elsewhere (and not something I've personally seen on my test flights), but we have logged this one internally and we'll keep monitoring it. If we're able to reproduce this one, it'll then make it much easier to fix. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for reporting. We'll try and replicate this on our side. Mark - Just Flight