Bonanza Professional

I'm aware, as this existed in my previous incarnation of this aircraft. I don't know why Asobo's decal material would behave this way. There is one thing I can think to try, but it might have other strange results. I'll give it a shot, though.

No worries at all! Just thought I'd ask!

@Black-Square it's awesome! Thank you for the quick response and for all the detailed information. Much appreciated.

Isn't the 0-100 for the given K event?

More info: It seems, that it is also partially persistent. When i wrote the initial mail i was flying in the normal A36. At some point i could change to the TP or TC models and there i had normal behaviour. Going back to the normal A36 i had the big increments from the get go. Great, i thought, something reproduceable. Unfortunately after flying the TP for the last hours it somehow reset on the normal model. Now the course knob behaves there as usual as well ... And again thx, had so much fun today flying from the smaller VFR airports in the Bretangne, trying to fly VOR approaches manually, going along the coast clockwise. I have no idea what is realistic but i like the new sounds. Yesterday, while flying the Baron i suddenly had some tapping noise, first i thought i had a failure but i only had inadvertendly clicked on the keys ... ... so open baggage door ... nice touch.

low_rpm_shake_scalar = 0 didnt do anything. I then tried these in the flight model: min_castering_angle = 0 ground_new_contact_model_up_to_speed_lateral = 0 ground_new_contact_model_up_to_speed_lateral_steering = 0 (added) enable_high_accuracy_integration = 0 _lateral seemed to help the most.. now the high accel's go away with even very slow movements, but when you brake to a stop there's a jolt and continued hard lateral accelerations. also shutting the engine off while stopped brings accel to 0 [image: dca889de-cb4e-4576-854a-dc74f57c5ada.png]

I was able to patch one file to have L-variables for all buttons and rotaries of the KLN90B. May I send these to BlackSquare as an Idea for the update? If yes: which way? @Black-Square

Thanks. Missed holding it down for three seconds. Works as advertised.

It is in 2024, yes. It does look like it sweeps across the screen like a weather scan or test pattern, then remains white.

In MSFS2024 You need to load passengers and crew via the ATC Ground menu. First You need to load the Co-pilot and Passengers in the MSFS2024 EFB Payload menu, then call "Ground" and ask for boarding. Look here: Youtube Video

I've done some tests on this, and also looked at the tables more closely. Interestingly, the only table in which there's a significant discrepancy in fuel flows between the normally aspirated (NA) and the turbonormalized (TN) variant (at altitudes where the NA variant can still achieve the same MAP as the TN variant) is the 55% power table. For example, at 6,000 feet, 55% power, the fuel flow for the NA variant is 56 PPH, whereas the fuel flow for the TN variant is 70 PPH. At 65% power, on the other hand, the fuel flow given for both variants is exactly the same: 87 PPH. I did some testing in the sim. It looks to me as if, in the 55% power table, the fuel flow for the NA variant corresponds to a 100 LOP lean, whereas the fuel flow for the TN variant corresponds to a 50 ROP lean. The fuel flow in the 65% power table (which, as noted is the same for both variants) seems to correspond to a 50 ROP lean. So there does seem to be a difference in leaning strategies, but only for the 55% power table, where the NA variant uses LOP, whereas everything else seems to be ROP.

The math comes out to 4.977hrs with four 170lb people at 15,000ft. With 190lb people, this will be 4.453hrs.

I wish I had a better answer for you on that one. Brake efficacy is not something I have control over in MSFS. I suppose if any real pilot encountered the same problem, he/she would just do their best to ensure the correct operation of the aircraft's systems at whatever power setting they could maintain.

@Black-Square I can tell you tomorrow. Wife insisted on some we time.

I've made this same mistake in the starship clicking through the cover of the circuit breakers. Maybe a hidden click spot to lock the breakers?

I had no idea about that as a setting. I’ll take a look and turn it off if it’s on by default. Thanks for the tip.

@jmarkows You are correct, an open storm window wont cause a plane to crash. Incidentally, at higher speeds its almost impossible to open the storm window (at least in a Cherokee). Once its open you don't notice it all that much, unless you get a piece of paper close to the open window- then its literally gone in a blink of an eye lol. Now when you board an airliner, before you tell them of your PMDG experience, hold up a fuel strainer and ask if they have already sumped the tanks. We LOVE that