Autopilot keeps disengaging NAV mode (VOR-to-VOR navigation)
-
@HansDeVlieger Hans, I read your post and wondered if you have tried using ‘empty” hardware control profiles in MSFS to find the problem, not just an empty Community folder?
I had a related problem with the Honeycomb Bravo where commands pre-assigned to the default Honeycomb Bravo controller profile conflicted with a command that I was trying to assign in Axis and Ohs (similar keyboard software to Spad.next).
Once I created an empty hardware profile for the Honeycomb Bravo, my problems disappeared. After that I was able to add commands back in step by step. I only mention this as the Bravo fires commands constantly and the default Bravo profile contains commands for all of the autopilot controls and something there could potentially by causing your problem.
I could also be completely wrong but wanted to let you know my experience and how I solved it, in case it helps you too.
@toby23 Thanks for joining.
Yes, I empty any MSFS hardware profile for the Honeycomb Bravo with any new aircraft as I use SPAD.neXt (only exception: for some aircraft I use the standard axes bindings). Conflicting bindings are very often the root cause of strange behaviour of the sim, so I agree with you to look for those first. -
I tried using the RNAV receiver, tuned to a 0 distance so essentially VOR mode, never had any disconnects for an hour long flight.
@SteveKane That sounds very interesting. Not only as a work-around but it could also point into the direction of isolating the cause of this. I'll try to confirm this later today.
-
I tried using the RNAV receiver, tuned to a 0 distance so essentially VOR mode, never had any disconnects for an hour long flight.
@SteveKane said in Autopilot keeps disengaging NAV mode (VOR-to-VOR navigation):
I tried using the RNAV receiver, tuned to a 0 distance so essentially VOR mode, never had any disconnects for an hour long flight.
Yes, I can confirm that. With RNAV receiver I never had problems.
And for me, it does not seem to be altitude depend, but I didn't actually test that. -
@SteveKane That sounds very interesting. Not only as a work-around but it could also point into the direction of isolating the cause of this. I'll try to confirm this later today.
@HansDeVlieger said in Autopilot keeps disengaging NAV mode (VOR-to-VOR navigation):
@SteveKane That sounds very interesting. Not only as a work-around but it could also point into the direction of isolating the cause of this. I'll try to confirm this later today.
Yes, a good work-around, though not for aircraft that don't have RNAV. Like the PMDG DC-6.
-
@HansDeVlieger said in Autopilot keeps disengaging NAV mode (VOR-to-VOR navigation):
@SteveKane That sounds very interesting. Not only as a work-around but it could also point into the direction of isolating the cause of this. I'll try to confirm this later today.
Yes, a good work-around, though not for aircraft that don't have RNAV. Like the PMDG DC-6.
@George-Curious
@SteveKane
You're right of couse about this working only for RNAV equipped airplanes (including the KLN-90B I suppose).
Well, I did some more testing again today and I can confirm the issue occurs when navigating directly to a VOR station. As soon as you switch to RNAV the AP NAV mode doesn't disengage, no matter what radial/distance you set.
I also didn't notice any difference at various altitudes. -
Hi, just a thought. When an aircraft like the Commander 114 is performing VOR signal degradation is it only doing it when the in game setting is ON (as per attached) or is it just doing its own thing? So in other words does the in game setting interfere with the Commander's own logic at all?
-
Hi, just a thought. When an aircraft like the Commander 114 is performing VOR signal degradation is it only doing it when the in game setting is ON (as per attached) or is it just doing its own thing? So in other words does the in game setting interfere with the Commander's own logic at all?
@Woolies Hi, I think this setting refers to ATC communication, but I just finished a test flight to see if I can discover some interference anyway.
Well, I must say that with the VHF signal degradation set to OFF, the AP NAV mode still disconnects at the same random intervals. To bad, it would have been nice to discover a lead
Have a nice evening. -
@HansDeVlieger said in Autopilot keeps disengaging NAV mode (VOR-to-VOR navigation):
What I will do is empty my Community folder except for the Commander 114 and do a test flight without SPAD.neXt or any other program running besides MSFS2024. Then I'll do a flight with my "normal" setup in one of the Bonanzas to see whether it occurs or not. After that, I'll report back.
This will be greatly appreciated! Unfortunately, I think this is going to be a deep simulator level issue, but I've found that unless we can really pinpoint the issue, bug reports are likely to be sidelined. I will really appreciate even one more data point!
@Black-Square
I did another two test flights today to see if I could discover some pattern.-
I took the standard Piper Dakota for a VOR-to-VOR flight at 6500 ft.
Empty Community and Community2024 folders.
No external programs running (no SPAD.neXt, TrackIR5, MSFS AutoFPS, Navigraph Charts, Little NavMap etc.).
All standard MSFS2024 hardware bindings and mouse control.
Observations: Autopilot NAV did NOT disengage during climb-out and cruise (1h30m). -
Second flight was with the Just Flight BAe146-100 on the same VOR-to-VOR route at 7500 ft.
Selected applicable and my usual "standard" Add-ons in Community and
Community2024 folders via Addons Manager.
External programs running: SPAD.neXt, TrackIR5, MSFS AutoFPS.
Observations: Autopilot V/L Mode did NOT disengage during climb-out, cruise and ILS approach (about 50 min).
Conclusion: standard aircraft (only one tested: Dakota) and some but not all third-party aircraft don't show this issue, while several third-party aircraft are affected. It seems to me that a relationship between the Commander 114 (amongst others) and the disengaging NAV mode can not be excluded.
This NOT an accusation that something is wrong with the aircraft. On the contrary, it might be the perfectionist and advanced design of the systems that proof to be too good or sensitive for what MSFS2024 can deliver. But I am convinced Nick has taken that into consideration. It just came up as a thought …...
BTW one advantage of doing so many test flights is that you get to learn and enjoy this wonderful gem of an aircraft. For me this is the best and most enjoyable single engine GA aircraft, though I must say the TBM850 comes very close.
-
-
Did some flying today flying in South Africa in the Commander with twin MX 170B and the RNAV 511, weather was LIVE and clear and fine.
First leg was FAPA to FAEL (57nm) and set the 'ELV' VOR as my NAV1 to get me to FAEL. I initially climbed to about 2000ft and the NAV dropped once, understandable as quite low altitude tbf. I then continued climbing to 6000ft and during cruise it dropped again, cant remember exactly but 30nm out. It then also dropped NAV about 15nm out with me at 6000ft with clean line of sight which seems unlikely that it would be a poor signal? I also had NAV2 tuned the same and the needle seemed rock solid and not showing signs of signal loss.
Second leg was from FAEL to FAUG using the same VOR for outbound. Weirdly as I climbed out it dropped again at about 15nm on the outbound.
In other legs I used the RNAV 511 and this 'holds' signal all the time but it does seem to lose signal SOFT lock and then CAP again and stays in NAV. So still I guess losing signal briefly but does its best to recapture and then proceed.
Conclusion, not really sure but the degradation does seem to either be over sensitive or there is some other factor at play. I really couldn't see a reason for losing signal and NAV at about 15nm in and out at decent altitude and clear line of sight.
Apart from that it was 6hrs of bliss touring around South Africa in the 114 ... such a great aircraft.
