@osa I voted.
I’m one of those that enjoy the variety offered, so I’m using different combinations in different variants of a plane, e.g. no gps in n/a Baron, KX155 with or without KLN-90 depending on mood and a GTN 650 in TC Baron, and GTN 750 in P Baron. Therefore the experience is different, in the different variants, and I enjoy that.
The variant selection screen in 2024 is not well thought out, and gets unruly quickly. I think the SWS Kodiak has 20 different variants, depending on cabin, undercarriage, cargo pod or not (I’m probably forgetting something). ”Luckily”, it only has one set of avionics, otherwise you’d have to multiply the variants by however many different variants of avionics there were. 40-60 variants in a horizontal scrolling list, with seemingly no logical order to it?
Someone suggested a drop-down menu system instead, which would definitely make things easier. But that’s all from a user perspective. I’m guessing, from a developer perspective, it’s all the same, with all these different variants needed to be produced and maintained. Hot-swapping avionics would seem to make life easier for developers, and therefore offering more variety in general, which in the end benefits users.