RJ Professional

In the example above, choosing the "Just Flight (MSFS) - RJ100 Passenger" airframe will ensure the correct weights are imported into the EFB. Mark - Just Flight

There are no plans at the moment to add the ACARS page to the FMS, but this is something we have logged on our internal feature request tracker as something to consider adding in a future update. Mark - Just Flight

Yes, once an update is available, we will email all customers who purchased the product via JustFlight.com and we will also upload the changelog onto the forum and onto the RJ's Support page. The updates are then sent out to other stores (usually within 24 hours), and they will communicate that via their normal methods. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for reporting this. We'll get this fixed in the next manual update. As other users have correctly stated, each entry in the TRP is as follows: V1: V1 speed Vcross: Vr speed (or Vref speed) Vdot: Vfto speed Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for reporting this. We'll get this fixed in the next manual update. As other users have correctly stated, each entry in the TRP is as follows: V1: V1 speed Vcross: Vr speed (or Vref speed) Vdot: Vfto speed Mark - Just Flight

It is the 'title' value that is used, and the prefix 'Just Flight ' is ignored. So, a new livery with an aircraft.cfg value of 'title = "Just Flight RJ85 Aer Lingus"'' would be added to the livery_config.ini as '[RJ85 Aer Lingus]'. The ini file was developed with only our package liveries in mind, so we'll need to investigate how best to support livery creators adding their own options. In the meantime I think you should be able to just edit the ini file within our package.

You only get brake pressure when you activate the brakes, which means that they indicate 0 in the air because you are not using them. The brake system is not connected to the landing gear retraction/extension mechanism so seeing 0 brake pressure doesn't mean anything for the landing gear extension/retraction, unless you have 0 hydraulic pressure on the hydraulics panel on the overhead.

Ok I need to lift it, thanks! Sorry read to fast

Plus drei...

Weirdest price ever in the UK. I figured it had something to do with conversion/parity with U.S. Marketplace. Usually we have 29.99 or 34.99. I was initially, extremely discombobulated... but once I saw my discount code, I was "inordinately happy about it" ... to steal a line from Bodie in The Professionals...

Funnily enough, I think there was a request on some just flight video comments to use the presenter's voice as pilot monitoring voice. Personally I was surprised when I heard it in one of the trailer and that did put a smile on my face. I like the current voices as it is.

and do you believe that this kind of things about old nav data would be fixed once it makes the transition to msf 2024? or if it would be easier to solve things like this in the new sim? cause this also happens with pmdg 737, i know is xbox related, i’m just asking, great aircraft btw, having a lot of fun

@Mark Regarding this: "I think the OP is assuming TO REDU is the same as TO FLEX, when it is not in this case." The FCOM says: The "REDU values are just particular FLEX values". The mode TO REDU on the TRP carries out the calculation I posted multiple FCOM references to. When you push the TO REDU button, it will set a default T FLEX, this temperature is called T REDU. You can actually calculate the values in the N1 REDU table using the method I provided. The reason for this is simply that N1 REDU is the same as N1 FLEX, it's just been decided that a particular T FLEX will be called T REDU. If your TRP implementation isn't carrying out the calculation I provided from the FCOM, then it's not doing what the real aircraft does. How can I be so sure about this? I did the calculation using real data from 3 videos and my calculations matched the N1 set by the TRP for the particular temperature setting in the videos and pressure altitude (±0.1% N1 precision is acceptable). If I was wrong about all of this, then the calculations should return non-matching values. When I do the exact same scenarios in the JF RJ, the values output by the TRP doesn't match at all.

With regards the the control column lock issue, this isn't something we are able to replicate on our side and we haven't had any other reports of this. I would recommend testing this again with the next update to RJ where we will be adding support for the keyboard pitch control assignments. We will also check if the A/T Throttle Lock is covering the keyboard throttle control assignments. Mark - Just Flight

It's not something that is currently in development, but we do have it logged on our internal feature request tracker as something to consider for a future update. Mark - Just Flight

@nikita_567 There's nothing to worry about. To me, Justflight is the best developer out there in terms of updates and being a responsible developer. You can expect to see patches on a regular basis