Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. FS Traffic
  5. Feature Requests

Feature Requests

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved FS Traffic
118 Posts 67 Posters 40.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lukas3433
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    it would be great if there is a similar airport configuration like with GSX, so that we can fix wrong gate sizes. In my opinion it is quite annoying that at some airports bigger planes just disappear because there is no gate for them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      brunorene8410
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      Hi,
      Are you planning to support FSHUD?
      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        cbcdesign
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        It would be nice if possible if you could find a way to load the destination airport in the same way that you load the departure airport so that when I input a flight plan departure and arrival in the sims map, FSTraffic doesnt require input from me for an arrival airport from the popup menu. It seems a bit odd that the application can know where I am starting from but not where I am going when both are pre-set in the sims flight plan system.

        1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          FlighSim_Passion
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          Please support FSHud in FS Traffic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            FlighSim_Passion
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Tire smoke is missing at the moment, please also add this as it decreases immersion and the "other product" also can do this for free.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              FlighSim_Passion
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              And, please see this as up-vote for

              • automatic simbrief recognition
              • to not have to type in the destination ICAO.
              Q M 2 Replies Last reply
              11
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Seth2413
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Add actual callsigns for flights. This is what I get with flight out of Charlotte using ProATC/SR. Screenshot 01-29-2023 09.03.13.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  FlighSim_Passion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  And the last one today:
                  Please integrate an auto updater in FS Traffic Control Centre. When I remeber right, anywhere was to read, that one have to visit the website for updates...
                  Thank you.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • F FlighSim_Passion

                    And, please see this as up-vote for

                    • automatic simbrief recognition
                    • to not have to type in the destination ICAO.
                    Q Offline
                    Q Offline
                    qqwertzde
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    @flighsim_passion
                    Yep, entering the ICAO code is quite easy to forget. Simbrief (or MSFS destination) recognition would be perfect, but a pop-up reminder would help as well.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • DigFSD DigFS

                      For usability. If before regenerating the traffic, you have to press the remove traffic button, I think it would be more logical to put the "Remove Traffic" button first and the "Regenerate traffic" button below.

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      FlighSim_Passion
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @digfs Or even better:
                      Not to have to click on remove. The button should remove first and implement after confirmation that it has been removed (internally)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sleepy81
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29
                        1. Make AI spawn based on distance from user aircraft, not based on a pre planned route. Do the injection often enough to fill the skies with realistic amounts of AI traffic (also Enroute)

                        2. Make it so AI Enroute aircraft can communicate with ATC

                        3. Fix the callsigns (as stated above in a separate post)

                        4. Make the program more stable, and not in such a way that you have to recommend that users quit and restart MSFS for each flight.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        9
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nick
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          When pushback occurs, it would be nice if the aircraft is pushed back and "turned" on to the taxiway so it is lined up and ready to go, as IRL in most cases, and doesn't have to do an unrealistic 360 to get on to it. May not be possible due to MSFS limitations, but would be a nice addition.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            milo1404
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            In my opinion I think its nice that when you load into the sim you wait about 10 min for traffic ton start moving but I think its awful that when you are arriving to your destination, you have to wait as well for traffic to start moving for example I arrived at KMIA and it seemed every aircraft was asleep and parked but when starting the deboarding process that when the airport starts to feel alive,

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            6
                            • P Offline
                              P Offline
                              panzer2181
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              Add more livery variety, including unique one of a kind... It is a bummer to just see one type of livery per airline... Example Frontier Airlines or Jet Blue...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • L leinsters

                                Is it possible to set a number of parked aircraft that remain parked?

                                When I'm on VATSIM I like to fill up empty airports with some parked aircraft using FSLTL and would consider buying this product if it could offer that solution.

                                Thanks.
                                Len

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                leinsters
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                I want to bump this one. Is it possible to have the airplanes parked and not move? Use case is: having some parked aircraft at airports when on VATSIM as airports are often mostly empty.

                                (FSLTL currently offers this which is pretty cool).

                                Thanks!

                                DerekD 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • L leinsters

                                  I want to bump this one. Is it possible to have the airplanes parked and not move? Use case is: having some parked aircraft at airports when on VATSIM as airports are often mostly empty.

                                  (FSLTL currently offers this which is pretty cool).

                                  Thanks!

                                  DerekD Offline
                                  DerekD Offline
                                  Derek
                                  JF Staff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @leinsters said in Feature Requests:

                                  I want to bump this one. Is it possible to have the airplanes parked and not move? Use case is: having some parked aircraft at airports when on VATSIM as airports are often mostly empty.

                                  (FSLTL currently offers this which is pretty cool).

                                  Thanks!

                                  Thanks for the suggestion - I have moved this to feature requests.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • DerekD Derek

                                    @leinsters said in Feature Requests:

                                    I want to bump this one. Is it possible to have the airplanes parked and not move? Use case is: having some parked aircraft at airports when on VATSIM as airports are often mostly empty.

                                    (FSLTL currently offers this which is pretty cool).

                                    Thanks!

                                    Thanks for the suggestion - I have moved this to feature requests.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    leinsters
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @derek nice thanks

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F FlighSim_Passion

                                      And, please see this as up-vote for

                                      • automatic simbrief recognition
                                      • to not have to type in the destination ICAO.
                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mach 2
                                      wrote on last edited by Mach 2
                                      #36

                                      @flighsim_passion said in Feature Requests:

                                      • to not have to type in the destination ICAO.

                                      THIS, surely there is a way to generate traffic without the cumbersome need to remember to type in a destination. Alot of times I fly VFR and just fly to random airports and would like to see traffic when I get there.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      9
                                      • D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        dommel
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        Option to remove airplane on approach. This is essential when you try to land and the tower has not separated enouph the aircrafts resulting in go arounds.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          steve67
                                          wrote on last edited by steve67
                                          #38

                                          I'd like to have a feedback if the module has crashed or if the module (not the toolbar thingy) has recognized and understood my destination input!
                                          Like a message from the module itself(!!): "destination XYZ confirmed"
                                          So I know everything under the hood is still working and operative and there are no surprises ...

                                          Thank you, Stefan

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users