[image: 66335820-25ca-427d-922a-8d200d1eec34.png] I did also see TRU1 taking the brunt of the starting power compared to TRU2, I'm not sure if they should have approximately the same load or not.

Espero que tenha mais sorte em encontrar uma resposta na secção do PA-28 deste fórum. Só queria garantir que a sua mensagem não se perdesse por aqui. [Google Translate]

That is a purposeful choice that myself and some other developers have taken. The way the MSFS rendering engine works, objects spinning at high speed will develop a fuzzy and jittering halo around them. To me, this is infinitely more distracting to a real world pilot than the static spinner with a blurred material. I appreciate the feedback, and if the majority of the community says they prefer the way it is in the default aircraft, then I will reconsider my opinion, as I always want as many of my users to be happy as possible.

I've seen a couple reports of this in MSFS 2024 with several different aircraft. To the best we've been able to determine, there is some residual payload that it left in the payload interface between sessions. I completely believe this, because MSFS 2024 retains many variables and states from previous sessions, which make debugging and switching aircraft on the fly very difficult for us developers. Try applying a new payload from the EFB payload interface and see if that helps. Otherwise, hopefully someone else who has seen this before and fixed it might chime in.

okay good to know.

Well yes, the option is disabled otherwise. Originally it was removed entirely, but after some people were able to force it to work pre-SU4, Nick put the option in for those who wanted to tinker with it. At some point I would imagine that will be patched out and it will be enabled permanently.

You were Right, the mouse solved the Problem Thx

Yes, I noticed the same thing yesterday after installing SU4. It was only 1 flight, so I'll be trying some other flights today.

Thanks for the update and fix, sorry I should have stated I was in the SU4 beta.

That's also been my experience and solution, but I hadn't looked at the file(s) to see what was funky about them. I wonder if the failed save file is related to backing out of the initial load.

Thanks, @Mark.

@jmarkows That did it! Thanks so much. A regular display did not have this option that I could see, but the action designer did, and after I worked out I had to apply the offset before the scale...its all good. I really appreciate you taking the time to look at the Pilots Deck guide, I'm pretty new to this and keep missing the obvious. [image: cc726cda-a2f1-4642-a5e3-a2920f9a365a.jpg]

World tour, leg #172. Mount Pleasant, Falkland Islands [image: dd7e36e6-b3dd-4844-ab5d-aa5bb8550abe.png]

Excellent, thanks Mark

Even better now that SU4 has fixed the wingtips and made the dynamic tail number work!![image: 4d88c0a8-431b-4e74-a315-03d129750210.jpg]

@Black-Square Thanks I have tried your suggestion, that is good for me

@gazdav787 exactly. thanks so much for the help

The RJ currently simulates the Split Cue flight directors. We don't have an option to toggle between the two types in the product; however, we do have this logged on our internal feature request tracker as something to consider for a future update. Mark - Just Flight