If it's always returning to this value, I suspect this is related to the broken state saving with SU4 that you may have seen others complaining about. Unfortunately, there isn't anything I can do about this, except pressure Asobo to look into this issue for SU5. In the meantime, there is currently a discussion on the official forums about a workaround with how you exit the simulator. That might be worth a try. Also, have you tried editing the state.cfg? I think others have had luck setting any values in there as they like.

@kletzi said in Occasional aggressive pitch-down events on approach: Yesterday and today (2.1.2026) I had very aggressive pitch down in a reproducable setup on short final at ELLX runway 24. The airport is on an elevated plateu, together with the wind 25012KT this creates quite some turbulence when entering the plateu. However, with Starship this seems especially bad, causing a pitch down that I couldn't recover from (AP and handflying) at first, and finally managed to just barely catch with full elevator deflection when expecting it beforehand. I tried the approach with another aircraft and while it got violent turbulence as well, there was not nearly as much pitch down as with Starship. Speed is not the issue. With calm weather there is no issue. Is Starship especially vulnerable to this kind of turbulence? Should it be? I also had something similar happen at Rimini in the meantime, though it was higher up and gave me a chance to recover. It might be exaggerated in starship because of the methods the developer has to use to get the canard wing to properly behave and feel within the confines of the sim. I notice a few developers of planes with complex flight dynamics, specifically airliners, recommend setting the msfs turbulence from realistic or medium, all the way down to low. Low is not as fun but it might be worth the try to prevent this kind of odd behaviour.

Well the indicator seems to have resolved itself lol. Yeah I found an earlier message later yesterday talking about the oil door. Man there's a couple really weird things about the Duke - setting off a master caution for a normal operation with the oil door and no indication for cowl flap position!? Beech quirks

Thank you for the detailed write-up, this might help me narrowing down the problem I've checked some vidoes on youtube searching for people with the same issue but sadly all of the youtubers only use the standard close view when going external, so even if they had the same problem they wouldn't know My hardware is super mainstream. i5 12600k, 5060Ti 16GB, 32GB, with the newest drivers, but I would assume if this would be a problem the issue would appear more under load and less when there's less going on, but it's always at the same ranges and the debug monitor doesn't show anything special when it comes to resources used. No special settings for MSFS2024 in the NVIDIA applications. In the sim everything is set to High (other than NPC and airports traffic, but I've also checked rising them to high). As of now, I have only found one person on the MSFS forums that has reported the same issue. An exciting mystery to solve, will continue investigating

I don't know if this was clear from above, but I just wanted to confirm that this is the intended behavior, and not a bug. This is very typical in aircraft with alternators and analog voltage regulators. It's actually often one of the first things that I hear real world pilots remark about when they test my aircraft, "you even got the low voltage light correct!" In my own flying, the cabin lights dimming and pulsing at low RPM while taxiing is actually a great indicator that you forgot to return the engine to an idle RPM of 1,000-1,200, which keeps the battery charged, and the engine healthy. Always happy to answer if you have any more questions!

The Navigraph takeoff perf calc for the Avro is inaccurate. Flex coming up as 50 degrees, sometimes the TRP does not even allow me to dial such high value in. Other times I run out of runway and climb out in a 100 fpm manner or even better, the jet nosedives to achieve the desired speed. Again, this is supposed to be a Professional stuff, allegedly study level. At this price range, I expect the devs to either provide a proper calculator (tool) or at least supply perf charts so we can properly obtain the required values. Otherwise the feature (flexi) is unusable, at least in a realistic manner. Derates absolutely require tools to determine their values.

ups,fdx,dhl

thanks ill try that i already knocked a few out hard to weed thru

Agreed, same reason I only ever use the G530 and G430 combo.

ILS 17 in to Porto with both ND's showing critical nav data to the approach. [image: 61e7a1d6-5abc-42e3-94a5-5191e75c9201.jpg] [image: 802b7776-606b-4b27-a408-ab2643c98855.jpg]

Thank you, I will try to find the solution in the MSFS Forums.

Hello! I took advantage of the sale to get a hold of the program in anticipation of the custom route feature that will come out over the coming months. I have been playing around the program and have found the 16 aircraft limitation a problem for me too. I hope this will change in the next big update. Counting all the variants of the planes I have in my hangar, NOT counting long haul planes that are sometimes used for short haul: Airbus narrow body (4 variants) F28 (4 variants) Bae 146 (3 variants) Avro RJ (3 variants) Boeing 737 (4, including the MAX8) CRJ (4 variants) Boeing 727 (3 variants) MD-80 (3 variants) NAMC YS-11 Thats already about 30 planes and that's not counting the F70/100 that will come out eventually. I think you get the point. So, I think the best solution is having the ability to have unlimited aircraft profiles and not stick to a specific maximum. Changing the interface where the profiles are picked from buttons to a list box would make more sense.

Oh, I was going to send you a link to another thread where I explained how I fixed this, but I see that you were the one who started that thread. Yes, this is already done for all my aircraft, and will be included in the next update for the Dukes. Enjoy

I've tried to bind a variety of ground operations using Axis and Ohs, across quite a few planes -- and I think the only thing I've ever bound successfully is toggle jetway, which works regardless of aircraft, but is a bit airport dependent.

The navigation logic used in the PA28 largely depends on what GPS is selected at the time. If the GPS100 is selected, the aircraft will be using our in-house autopilot/navigation code. If the Working Title GNS530, PMS50 GTN750, or TDS GTNXi is fitted, then the respective GPS autopilot/navigation code is used. There will be some differences in logic between each GPS as each GPS is developed by a different developer, and there will likely also be differences between MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024 due to differences in framework between the GPS logic in both simulators (particularly with the Working Title GNS530 and PMS50 GTN750). However, with all of the GPSs, it should be the same steps to get the HSI displaying the GPS flight plan: Load a flight plan into the GPS (in MSFS 2024, this can be done manually or via the MSFS 2024 EFB) Press the CDI button on the GPS so that "GPS" mode is active (this should also be linked to the NAV/GPS switch on the console). If you wish to track a navaid with the GPS, press the CDI button again so that VLOC mode is active and then tune the VOR frequency into the VHF radios (remembering to flip the frequency from the standby to active field). Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for reporting this. The ROLL mode should re-datum when the AP SYNC button is depressed, so I have logged this on our internal tracker as something to investigate ahead of the next update. Mark - Just Flight

You are correct. the jetway is connected!

Thanks for reporting. We have this logged on our internal bug tracker and it will be investigated ahead of a future update. In the meantime, airports can be added to FS Traffic manually via the "Adding a new airport" method listed on Pages 26-28 of the FS Traffic manual: https://downloads.justflight.com/products/JFF003616/FSTraffic_MSFS_manual.pdf Mark - Just Flight

It is logged on our internal feature request tracker, but it's not something we are currently working on. It is something we will be considering for future updates and/or upgrades to our PA-28 fleet. Mark - Just Flight