@Black-Square from my understanding talking to A2A, they use their own flight model and the turbulence is somehow interpolated by them before effecting the aircraft. I was really hoping since they claim their flight model is so accurate (and to their claim, their aircraft do fly better than anything I have flown in a sim...), that they would make it available for other developers to license and utilize. I would love to see how their model would handle canard aircraft for instance... I have tried both Active Sky and RealTurb and can say both work far better as a substitute for turbulence injection. I would love to see weather get a big makeover from Asobo.

@alanfernandes Ok, I did some digging. The Starship was originally designed in the 1980s and produced between 1989 and 1995. The original Collins AMS-850 had no GPS capability; it relied primarily on dual IRS with DME/DME and VOR/DME updating. However, the avionics suite was designed so that GPS sensors could be integrated later. During the aircraft’s production run, many were equipped with dual Collins GPS-4000 LRUs feeding the FMS, likely in the early–mid 1990s. This allowed the system to fly basic LNAV GPS approaches, though the GPS was mainly used to improve long-term inertial navigation accuracy by providing position updates to the FMS. The newer GPS-4000S units are generally backward-compatible replacements with higher precision and WAAS/SBAS capability, and they’re easier to source today since the GPS-4000/4000A units are no longer produced. Some Starships may have been upgraded to the 4000S, but since the AMS-850 predates many of the 4000S capabilities, it cannot use vertical guidance from WAAS approaches and would only benefit from improved integrity and lateral accuracy.

Not sure you read the thread (particularly Nick's responses rather than my drivel), but those vars aren't (or weren't) being exposed, they're only internal. So AAO/SPAD/Mobiflight can't see them, at least not until you make the changes to expose them that Nick and I talk though up above. All sorted now though!

@hunterdouglas I think this is something that Just Flight support would be best placed to help with. See: https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support

As long as it's an option - and not forced upon the user -, it's fine. I personally don't want anything turning red, blue, etc.

shouldn't even have that performance lightly loaded.

I think my issue was just related to X-Plane 12 and specifically the Dash8 as I have been flying in MSFS with PMDG 737 and I haven't had a corrupted flight yet (4 flights).

It's like this IRL with nav lights during the daylight. You can argue its a little bit to dark but its still perfectly within range. There are other areas where lights are to dark.

What makes you think that?

Solved....down loaded Axis and Ohs and configured the whole setup w/out using the MSFS2024 control panel.

I'm up to 495 hours in the Black Square Baron - so you know my vote lol

@SadBucket you don’t necessarily need to rummage between different pages. Sky4Sim has already implemented a plugin that integrates its tablet into the MSFS tablet - for instance. If you want to use only Sky4Sim’s features, you can: just select the Sky4Sim icon and the S4S interface will appear and can navigate only the features provided by S4S — the only difference is that it shows up inside the MSFS tablet. It definitely improves immersion, especially in aircraft that already have the “3D MSFS tablet” available.

@django1489 Good try but nothing of the sort I'm afraid.

@SadBucket I do fly predominantly without the 430, however if I am flying a rnav departure or arrival, it comes in handy. Especially an intercept of a radial of a waypoint.

I'm mainly flying the Baron Pro, but have had the same problems, especially on short final and if the wind speed is 10kts+. I actually found the plane uncontrollable and nothing could stop it rolling over and crashing inverted. This happened with some other aircraft, but not all. I tried to use the MSFS2024 turbulence settings to fix it, but I found that setting it to Low or Medium resulted in no turbulence at all, so quite boring. Then I discovered and installed ActiveSky. I have set the Turbulence Effect Scale to 50% (the default) and then reduced overall wind turbulence from 100% to 50%. This results in there still being turbulence on the plane in the air, and some more turbulence on short final still, but now it's manageable. And what a great weather synthesis! Much more realistic looking skies, and more closely aligned to Windy.com's winds. Give it a go!

Great! Not problem at all. Despite being really excited with this addon, I’m not one of those toxic fanboys who get upset when their hyped expectations aren't met. I fully understand how challenging it is to produce an addon like this, especially with such a high level of detail. So whatever you can provide will be more than I ever dream. That said, I think I’ll continue having plenty of questions for you! Again, I hope it’s not too much of a hassle. Regards!