Ohh ok - will try today - thanks

Ok. I have already verified that by disabling the TCC on FSTraffic, MSFS uses the FS Traffic models. Working very well.

Apologies for the thread resurrection but this appears to closely relate to the issue I am seeing. In the latest version in MSFS2024, I am seeing fuel burn numbers in the simulator approximately 50% lower than the Simbrief estimates. I am using the Just Flight 146 Simbrief profiles and I believe they are accurate, I believe the issue is on the MSFS side. Is anybody else experiencing this? Is it potentially a regression of an earlier fix, either with the product or MSFS2024 itself? I am using Kgs as the units, in case this has any bearing.

I’m glad there are threads about this - i’m have the same issue with the Caravan Pro and the NDB 345.5 NWI - the KR ADF radio wont input the .5s - so annoying when trying to do NDB approaches at EGSH. I’m going to ask at my old flight training centre to see what they say.

Please let me know when you have a video. Always happy to look.

Thanks for the awnser. You right. I am going to report to MS. Rgds.

Further info here, in that an afternoon spent doing ILS approaches with the freight or Cargomaster variant has been rock solid and a World removed from what I see in the clean, no pod pax version. Solid as a rock and on rails at all speeds down to an improbable 70 knos indicated. There is definitely something odd here, but what it might be, I haven't a clue.

@Black-Square Do you have any interest in looking into this?

My apologies! Everything is working fine now. It was probably an issue on my end with the liveries add-on.

If I understand what you're looking to do, this would be determined solely by the font you include in your package. You should be able to accomplish almost any effect you're looking for, so long as you're willing to edit the font.

I have the same question myself. In the flight_model.cfg file this damaging speed 190 is under the "flaps" section, which makes sense since the max flaps extended speed is 180. Should this really apply to the landing gear as well?

@Rhinozherous thank you!!! ... Just checked it out - perfect!!

@Subsonic said in A list of Squawks as a 10+ year TBM Maintainer: The engine is slow to spool on the starter. I looked into this today, and unfortunately found that there appears to be a bug in the simulator, as the parameter that's supposed to adjust this has no effect. Apparently, this was a known issue for turbojet aircraft years ago, but it was not fixed for turboprop aircraft. I'll see if I can convince Asobo to make the fix for turboprops too.

Thanks for sending them another reminder to fix this issue, asobo should be ashamed of themselves for doing nothing to fix it on their end its unacceptable I'm very disappointed in them.

Pakistan, what are you doing, ahaha, stop! [image: 8839149d-78b4-4af5-886b-666315ddbc30.png] I honestly gave Bonanza a chance, and I love it, but it's just not Baron enough, if you know what I mean. This bird took me from Essen all the way to Turbat, known as the hottest place in the Gulf. And I didn't stop there - landed in Ahmedabad just a minute ago, almost 5.000 NM behind my back and I just can't have enough of Baron. Two engines, twice as much headache, and it's just so awesome! I love Bo, I really do. Bo with its fancy view out of cockpit makes a journey feel relaxed. A nice shot of the landscape made from between Baron's roaring engines makes a trip feel deserved and every good landing - well-earned. Will see how it conquers Nepal, wish me luck! [image: 12723915-a350-4e4a-8715-30dc65fc0d72.png]

Have the same issue with bonanza and baron

Figured that was still the case. Landing lights workaround is fine until they do. From your comment it sounds like SU5 did not tackle this, maybe SU6.