Skip to content
  • FS Traffic for 2024

    FS Traffic
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    40 Views
    MarkM
    As with all of our MSFS products, the initial MSFS 2024 native updates are focused on bringing the products across with their MSFS 2020 feature sets, albeit in most cases with significant MSFS 2024 compatibility work and improvements. We have not yet fully investigated what new features we can bring to FS Traffic in MSFS 2024, and we'll likely need to wait for some improvements and stability in the simulator's core traffic engine before we can do that. We can only hope those will come in the upcoming MSFS 2024 Sim Updates. The FS Traffic manual for MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024 can be viewed here and includes a Quick Start Guide and our recommended settings in MSFS 2024. Mark - Just Flight
  • Starship Master Minimum Equipment List

    Starship
    11
    2 Votes
    11 Posts
    463 Views
    P
    @SinkRate Would you be willing to share your form. This is the one I made for XPlane, the CL650 specifically based on an operator: https://forums.x-pilot.com/files/file/1359-aircraft-trip-log/
  • Black Square Baron MSFS 2024 Question

    Just Chat
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    17 Views
    No one has replied
  • Avionics on battery only

    Starship
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    201 Views
    sushi.atS
    I found that the COM1 radio is working for me on battery with EICAS and Pilot Avionics turned on. The screens stay black but I was able to use the COM on vatsim like that.
  • Bleed air

    Avro Vulcan B Mk.2
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    10 Views
    No one has replied
  • Internal FMS vs GNS430

    Starship
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    82 Views
    A
    "Pilots shall not fly an RNAV 1 or RNAV 2 SID or STAR unless it can be retrieved from the on-board navigation database using the procedure name and is consistent with the procedure in the chart." No loading SID/STARs from database in the built in system, so European SID/STARs you can legally fly without an external unit are starting to become more rare. DME-arcs and procedure turns (not Radius to Fix procedures) on the other hand are no problem. Anything equipped with VOR/DME can fly them. Just need to do that good old piloting thing PBN capabilities are confusing to say the least. For the 430 and other "normal" equipment you can look up this Foreflight page to see what the units can provide: https://support.foreflight.com/hc/en-us/articles/360049193173-ICAO-Equipment-and-PBN-Code-Setup-Guide Unsurprisingly though, the list does not include the built in Collins avionics. Specific code also depends on whether you disable the built in GNSS in the CDU. Garmin also has an okay page for explaining what each of the codes means: https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=hDbN1ryrqe4GkBour6SzC8
  • landing sheduals

    FS Traffic
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    107 Views
    MarkM
    There is intentionally no arrival schedules displayed in the Traffic Control Centre app, as the arrival traffic generation doesn't conform to the same sort of schedules as the departure traffic, and is instead generated in a way that works around some simulator limiations (a further explanation behind that is included in the link in my previous reply). We do have a feature request logged on our internal tracker to add arrival schedules into the Traffic Control Centre, but there is nothing in progress at the moment. Mark - Just Flight
  • Sound when switching on external power

    Starship sound
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    133 Views
    P
    @DrZGard The pump yes. The CB being pulled, correctly de-energizing the ground idle solenoids, unfortunately is not.
  • One Request, One Observation

    Starship
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    133 Views
    M
    [image: 1d7b7631-fd38-489c-a531-11ea27a4a365.jpg] Well, at least I managed to tinker around enough to get item 2 fixed! Here's my custom baby sitting at the GA Ramp in TNCC with a fresh coat of registration in MSFS 2024 SU3 Beta 1.5.13.0
  • Nick and JustFlight Last Minute Prep

    Starship
    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    210 Views
    Mango-117M
    WOW, wicked clip! Thanks for posting! Any other assembly clips of the Starship?
  • Smoke anyone?

    Starship
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    78 Views
    M
    Do you mean smoke? Or condensation? If you mean smoke, then no. But if you mean condensation ...... then also no.
  • CTD with duke

    Piston & Turbine Dukes
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    738 Views
    B
    @szln6z said in CTD with duke: Sharing my experience. Below is my post in the PMS50 discord un Jun 29, 2025: Repeatable MSFS2020 CTD when PMS GTN750/650 is used. A/C is BlackSquare Duke. I've been testing this all morning, and can consistently and repeatably cause a CTD at the exact same position only when using the GTN750/650. I have NOTHING in my community folder other than the Blacksquare Duke and the PMS50 GTN750. When I try the exact route with the default DA62, no issues. When I try the exact route with the Blacksquare Duke and GNS530/430, no issues. When I try the exact route with the Blacksquare Duke and PMS50 GTN750, I get a CTD. I did this 4x times, and the CTD repeats consistently. I downloaded and installed the latest version 2.2.48 of the GTN750. Still CTD. If I don't use the GTN750, it does not CTD. I've read many post stating that PMS50 GTN750 cannot cause a CTD. I don't know what to say, but that's not my experience. Here's the flight plan. Cruise altitude is 13,000. Departure time about 10am local. KBTV DCT OMPEE DCT SQUAM DCT LIMER DCT KPWM The CTD occurs about halfway between OMPEE and SQUAM. Update: I still had version 2.2.36 on my PC. I had flown ~60 hrs with this version in the BlackSquare Duke without a single CTD, so I reverted to 2.2.36, and tried the problem flight plan. No CTD. So, I'm back to using 2.2.36 indefinitely. That's fine with me. Also, during my testing I had absolutely nothing else running at all, and it still CTDed. I didn't have any third party apps running.
  • CDU "KYBD" Timeout

    Starship
    11
    4 Votes
    11 Posts
    289 Views
    RhinozherousR
    @lancealotg Thank you very much!
  • Fokker 70/100 GPS Retro Fit

    In Development
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    65 Views
    J
    Great thank you for covering this answer. Very excited for the jet - i know its delayed but excited to give it a try
  • FSTraffic/FSHud Integration Needed (Wanted By Many)

    FS Traffic
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    RichR
    Hi, I spent some time chatting with the FSHud developer today and we were able to work out what the problem was here. FSHud should be compatible with FS Traffic once the sim settings have been configured correctly according to the quick start guide in the FS Traffic manual. The FSHud admin has posted a clarification on their Discord: [image: 71ffa6b3-5262-44c0-938f-010b33595cad.png] Thanks for reporting the problem, and thanks to the FSHud admin for their time.
  • Loading a flight plan from the World Map / 2024 EFB

    Starship
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    299 Views
    MarionetteworkM
    @finnisher said in Loading a flight plan from the World Map / 2024 EFB: SU2 seems to work fine, but I don’t use the native ATC and don’t send the FPL from EFB to the aircraft. Do you have to do something special to avoid sending the flight plan to the aircraft? For me, as soon as I open the coms panel and request IFR clearance from ATC, it automatically populates a flight plan in the Starship FMS. I really hope we can have a way to use built in ATC in 2024.
  • Nice Video

    Starship
    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    63 Views
    No one has replied
  • Feature Requests

    Pinned FS Traffic
    119
    0 Votes
    119 Posts
    40k Views
    A
    Support for FS-Hud using their API. MSFS 2024 compatibility needs to be improved in respect of injection. Too many work arounds to get it working properly compared to FSTL which just works.
  • 1 Votes
    13 Posts
    735 Views
    K
    This plane is bonkers, and makes every other plane feel kinda meh... the easter eggs are unreal. More than anything I could have ever thought of doing in an addon. So f'n good.
  • 3 Votes
    18 Posts
    2k Views
    K
    I really like that panel posted above. Not really against the G1000, but it is common enough. My preference will always be the other choice for some reason.