Skip to content
  • King Air: HSI and RMI discrepancy

    Steam Gauge Overhaul
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    46 Views
    T
    Apparently there is an error in the manual, where it says "Also on the HSI compass, two red pointers are available to indicate the bearing to the NAV2 station." (p.28). After tests I realized that HSI's "two red pointers" indicate the bearing to NAV1 (they align perfectly to the direction of RMI's YELLOW needle).
  • Turbo Normalized performance

    Bonanza Professional
    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    499 Views
    D
    Hmm no update or response?
  • OAT Display not honoring Celsius

    TBM 850 tbm 850 oat
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    39 Views
    No one has replied
  • Lack of left turning tendencies

    Caravan Professional
    51
    0 Votes
    51 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    @jmarkows said in Lack of left turning tendencies: I fly the cargo variant more than any of the others and I do not have that left rudder on takeoff issue. I actually think I'm going to start leaving a few turns of right rudder on the trim wheel instead of centering it before every flight. I might have messed up when I installed that variant (using an old installer etc.) then. I'll check tonight.
  • Turbine Duke single Engine

    Piston & Turbine Dukes
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    438 Views
    B
    Bumping this because it's important.
  • Feature Request: Visual Hypoxia Effects

    Caravan Professional
    12
    2 Votes
    12 Posts
    235 Views
    V
    Given the limitations, what comes to mind is a sort of "hack" where a transparent surface lives in front of the pilot and becomes affected by certain conditions. But what do I know, I'm not a developer Another add-on that comes to mind is Chaseplane. They have a "binoculars" mode that blurs the view and vignettes the edges. Could be worth checking out how they achieve that and if the technique could be applied on the pilot view. Anyway, thank you so much @Black-Square for looking into this! Very excited btw to see those Twin Commanders and the King Air!
  • Traffic Control Centre pas installé ?

    FS Traffic
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    62 Views
    DerekD
    @Cybride Le mieux serait de contacter l'assistance de Just Flight. Ils devraient pouvoir vous aider. Voir : https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support
  • 0 Votes
    26 Posts
    975 Views
    S
    I created a bug for this in the FS2024 Official forum. Feel free to add to that discussion. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/bug-multiple-planes-change-from-nav-to-rol-hdg-mode-when-tracking-vor/762974
  • Autopilot goes from VOR to ROLL when tracking VOR

    Starship
    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    915 Views
    S
    Re: the original post (VOR tracking goes from NAV to ROL spontaneously), I created a bug in the FS2024 Official forum. Feel free to add to that discussion. One important piece of info is that it seems only to happen when one is using an external control mapper like Spad.Next or FSUIPC. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/bug-multiple-planes-change-from-nav-to-rol-hdg-mode-when-tracking-vor/762974
  • 0 Votes
    11 Posts
    288 Views
    D
    Going to be a difficult one to run down, but I'm 99% certain it's not flight model related. The reason I say this is that there is nothing in the FM which could give differential aileron in a left / right sense. There IS a table which adjusts the effect up and down, and for a brief moment I wondered if that had become 'altered' in the core game flight model. However, I fired up the Vulcan and see no issue - the extremity of each axis gives me a reading of 1.000 in the controls debug tool.
  • Engine keeps hot starting

    Bonanza Professional
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    67 Views
    D
    Yep, you are correct. It was an unused device. Removing its bindings fixed it. Thanks a lot. I would not have guessed in a million years
  • Bug? Fuel Burn.

    Starship
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    121 Views
    Black SquareB
    @alanfernandes said in Bug? Fuel Burn.: Although fuel flows by gravity from the forward to the aft compartment within the main system during refueling, there is no gravity transfer between the auxiliary and main tanks. In flight, this transfer relies exclusively on jet pumps operated by engine motive flow, which renders the fuel in the auxiliary tanks unusable should the pump system fail. I recall discussing this in one of my videos. Here is what I said in the manual: "Most of the fuel in the aft tanks will transfer to the main tanks by gravity, and the rest can be transferred by the aft tank transfer jet pumps. Should the aft tank transfer jet pumps fail, the total usable fuel may be reduced." Here is what the Flight Safety manual says: "Although a small amount of fuel may gravity-feed from the aft tank without the motive-flow system, the pilot should consider all fuel in the aft tank as unusable and plan the flight accordingly." Without looking right now (sorry, I'm leaving to record sound from the Twin Commanders in a few hours), I recall that I assumed this statement was made out of abundance of caution, and implemented the system such that it would slowly equalize to a certain point, so long as the jet pumps had not failed (emulating a blockage). Given the arrangement of the jet pumps and their no-moving-part nature, I assumed that there would be flow through them, so long as the pressure on the auxiliary tank side is high enough.
  • IRL Caravan Systems/Characteristics

    Caravan Professional
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    373 Views
    Black SquareB
    @taylerf01 Thanks. I assume that means they had to wire the entire annunciator panel power (likely the ground, I would think) through the standby power switch, just to get those two annunciator lights called out in the manual to illuminate for some reason. Thanks for the demo! I'll see if this can be replicated without too much trouble.
  • Startup tutorial

    Bonanza Professional
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    38 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiplayer & Dynamic Registration Problem

    Caravan Professional
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    190 Views
    C
    Hi there, i am experiencing the same issue. We have tested with all variants and we are getting the same blank panels on the tail, lower wing on OEM liveries and community repaints. We tested in MSFS 2024. This issue must be somehow connected to the model which is displayed in multiplayer. Furthermore, the avatar is sitting on top of the aircraft. Any fix for this? Thank you [image: a4cde89b-57ab-40bf-8252-d15a00d94e1e.png] [image: 21475e61-eddd-4322-b4ba-95da183316af.png] [image: 1cc4e08d-f440-464e-a674-936858a26ac2.png]
  • Anyone else experiencing crash to desktop?

    Caravan Professional
    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    577 Views
    F
    Much thanks to you turnandbank! It worked for me. I join in with Black Square Developer with much appreciation for both your discovery of the problem and then letting everyone else in the form here know the cure. Again thanks....
  • STBY ELEC PWR INOP light during preflight

    Caravan Professional
    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    @Black-Square said in STBY ELEC PWR INOP light during preflight: "...before I travel to record sounds for the Twin Commanders."
  • Epic Starship World Tour complete!

    Starship
    4
    7 Votes
    4 Posts
    108 Views
    R
    that looks like a perfect inclusion, thanks for the link!
  • Twin Otter?...

    Black Square Add-Ons
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    458 Views
    J
    I totally support this idea. I've been wishing for a realistic Twin Otter for ages. The Aerosoft version for MSFS2020 was aesthetically awesome. But the systems, flight dynamics, and turboprop simulation left a good bunch to be desired. The default one isn't even worth our time mentioning. I am very impresed with the Blacksquare Caravan and I know they would make an amazing Twin Otter.
  • 13,450lbs - Significance on CG display?

    Starship
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    692 Views
    S
    @C-FJDH said in 13,450lbs - Significance on CG display?: Interesting! But it leads to a question on the implementation of the marker in the tablet. As I read it, the full aft limit is available at all weights. The forward limit is what changes at higher weights. 307 inches aft of datum (farther forward) at lighter weights, but the forward limits is pushed rearward 3 inches for weights above 13,450. I think the marker in the tablet should be near the forward CG limit, not the rear. Old thread, but since Nick may have missed this, I wanted to comment that it appears you're correct. This image is from section 6-27 of the flight manual. The forward CG limit evenly moves rearward after 13,450 lbs. Tablet mistake, indeed. [image: 29297225-5e96-40bc-94e0-76f772417adf.png]