Skip to content
  • Baron Persistence State not saving

    Baron Professional
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    868 Views
    Black SquareB
    @Energyzer Similar answer, but that one is technically easier. Boris and I just need to arrive at an agreement for the schedule to tackle these updates.
  • Offsets

    Starship
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    127 Views
    A
    How did you create custom waypoints…?
  • 1 Votes
    7 Posts
    448 Views
    MarkM
    We have a fix developed for this, and it will be included in the next update(s) for the affected aircraft. Mark - Just Flight
  • KLN90B?

    PA-28R Turbo Arrow III/IV
    10
    6 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    MarkM
    I can confirm it is still logged on our internal feature request tracker, and it'll be considered by our development team for future updates and/or upgrades to our PA-28 fleet. Mark - Just Flight
  • Grand Duke Bindings

    Piston & Turbine Dukes
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    341 Views
    C
    Hi again, could I please get some support on my config. control bindings in MSFS2024 not saving on the Grand Duke (but all OK on the Stock Duke and Turbine Duke) - I'm at a loss to explain or fix it? I have to go ina and select the binding profiles (and aircraft livery) every time whenever I select the Grand Duke. Many thanks.
  • Flaps position indication

    Baron Professional
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    76 Views
    Black SquareB
    @LeoPilot That's what I'm here for! Any time
  • ITT and intertial separator

    Caravan Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    61 Views
    Black SquareB
    This came up a couple weeks ago. I don't know what you're seeing at the beginning, but the inertial separator state was missing from the ITT calculations. I've fixed this now for the next update. Thanks for posting!
  • AC in Phoenix

    Baron Professional
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    45 Views
    Black SquareB
    @meh1951 said in AC in Phoenix: Is there someplace that has a description of how it works? Pages 58-63, 104, and 107
  • Default 8.33kHz COM radios

    Starship
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    38 Views
    A
    This could be improved if Nick added the new state saving system featured in the 114. Hopefully the Starship and the rest of the fleet receive some feature updates and fixes in the near future
  • Adding Paper Charts

    PA-28R Arrow III
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    712 Views
    M
    Thanks Mark, Now it's clear to me. It's not my mistake, you are aware about it and working on issue and, until there, I can use an intermediate solution. Best regards
  • Any future updates planned?

    Fly the Line
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    43 Views
    MarkM
    The next major update for Fly the Line is currently available as Early Access on the Fly the Line Discord server, with a full release scheduled in the not too distant future. Latest changelog of the upcoming update: https://community.justflight.com/topic/8860/fly-the-line-changelog-v1.0.454-early-access-updated-08-07-26 Fly the Line Discord server: https://community.justflight.com/topic/8876/fly-the-line-discord-server-early-access-builds Mark - Just Flight
  • F100 FsCopilot Profile

    F70 & F100 Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    65 Views
    MarkM
    Sadly I don't have any experience with the software you are using, so I wouldn't be able to comment on the specifics of what is required. The LVARs for the FMP controls and displays should all have "AFCAS_" prefixes. For example, the IAS/M control and window all have "AFCAS_SPD_" prefixes: AFCAS_SPD_SrcSel AFCAS_SPD_SelLight AFCAS_SPD_KNOB_ROTATE AFCAS_SPD_KNOB_INC AFCAS_SPD_KNOB_DEC AFCAS_SPD_SrcSel_INC AFCAS_SPD_SrcSel_DEC AFCAS_SPD_PUSHPULL AFCAS_SPD_Window_1 AFCAS_SPD_Window_2 AFCAS_SPD_Window_3 AFCAS_SPD_Mach AFCAS_SPD_DP AFCAS_SPD_Knob AFCAS_Spd_Sel The ILS and ADF controls/displays should all follow a similar naming scheme, with the former have "ILS_" prefixes, and the latter have "ADF_" prefixes. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight
  • Arming the Lift Dump.

    F70 & F100 Professional
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    140 Views
    MarkM
    Thanks for the feedback. We've logged this on our internal tracker for our development team to look into further. Mark - Just Flight
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    122 Views
    MarkM
    Thank you for the feedback. We'll log this feedback for our development team to look into for a future update to the F70 & F100 Professional. Mark - Just Flight
  • ND Blacks out

    F70 & F100 Professional
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    105 Views
    MarkM
    The EFIS warning on the LH MFDU typically indicates that one of the EFIS displays has its brightness set to the lower position (OFF). I would recommend double-checking that the PFD/ND knobs on both EFIS Control Panels are all rotated above their minimum positions. Mark - Just Flight
  • Vapour Trails

    F70 & F100 Professional
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    146 Views
    T
    Hi Mark...doh..yes contrails, my apologies. I must be flying in every warm area known to man lol not seen a single contrail yet and have been upto 34,000ft. Will continue to watch for them and thank you for the kind response. Tony
  • Hardware support

    F70 & F100 Professional
    31
    2 Votes
    31 Posts
    2k Views
    N
    @Mark_Hazeldine said in Hardware support: As for Mobiflight/Spad.next, that's all great, but it is a pain to set up, and I would rather it just work out of the box. It's enough work learning how to fly the plane without having to figure out all that extra setup too. Unless WinCtrl creates a profile in SimApp Pro for this plane, which is very unlikely, you'll have to use programs like Spad Next, Mobiflight, etc. I think the only thing that Just Flight would need to open up is access to the MCDU. You can control the plane's autopilot and everything else using WinCtrl hardware now. I already have two snippets for this plane in Spad Next. One for the FCU+Left EFIS (snippet 17282) and the other for the TCAS (snippet 17363)
  • aerial/Garmin glass cockpit

    PA-38 Tomahawk
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    90 Views
    T
    @Mark Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply and for taking the time to explain. I completely understand that the current PA-38 is based on G-BNKH. I just wanted to add that there is a genuine demand for a more modern Tomahawk configuration, especially here in New Zealand where the PA-38 is still one of the main training aircraft used by many flying schools. A lot of student pilots, including myself, fly these aircraft in real life and would love to train in a version that more closely matches what we fly every day. Even if it wasn't a completely new aircraft, small optional upgrades like a modern antenna configuration, Garmin avionics option, and a few updated cockpit variations would go a long way. Having these as optional configurations would keep everyone happy while making the aircraft more appealing to a wider audience. It's also been around a year since the last update, and I think an update like this would generate a lot of interest. Many current owners would be excited to revisit the aircraft, and it could also attract new customers who train on the PA-38 in countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the UK. There aren't many high-quality Tomahawks available in MSFS, so it feels like a great opportunity. Thanks again for listening and for continuing to support the aircraft. I'd love to see the Tomahawk get some attention in the future.
  • Top of Descent marker

    Starship
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    86 Views
    M
    What I do is use the vertical nav button on the CDU and set the altitudes for the STAR and approach waypoints and then shoot for a 2000 fpm descent. It'll give you a needed descent rate and you can watch that count up as you get closer. [image: 3efdfa4b-9b51-4526-bfa4-608a0ed6efab.jpg]
  • 6 Votes
    40 Posts
    9k Views
    McOatmealM
    @alanfernandes Yes you are correct but a lot of 3rd party devs have added in other features that aren’t included with the base working title avionics. Like for the G3000/G5000 Skyward developed a whole Datalink functionality with it and it has some protections built in. Especially now that we know that the King Airs are gonna be the 300 and the 1900D both of them could get garmins. The 1900D has a slightly specialized one called the G950nxi and the 300 has the regular G1000nxi.