@Black-Square

I've seen them used on passenger versions too. The weight goes to the back when all the passengers get up at once and cram to the exit, so it can sit down on its tail! Pilots I saw always put the pole in place before opening the passenger door. Would be a nice little addition, I agree.

I know PMDG recommend low, I think most developers might. I'll let Nick chime in himself though As I mentioned, depending on your tolerance for third party apps I've heard only good things and am personally enjoying RealTurb, though it does need some user tweaking.

Hi Derek. Thank you for your reply. I completely understand, and I apologise for the repeated posts. I was experiencing some issues when posting and I also noticed a few errors in my original post that I was unfortunately unable to edit by the time I realised.

Thanks for the feedback. I can confirm we have logged this on our internal trackers, and we'll investigate possible improvements for future updates. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. The equipment we have modelled in the F70 & F100 is the same equipment fitted to our reference aircraft. We don't have any plans at the moment to add additional versions of these; however, I have logged these requests on our internal trackers for future consideration. Mark - Just Flight

@DashMan Is there something you're looking forward to in particular?

MSFS Zendesk does have a way to delete your cloud save but use it with extreme caution as it can def improve things but it will also wipe a lot of things including your control profiles. You need to export them all somewhere safe first. Also, things like P42 Flow is stored in it and possibly some P42 Chaseplane amongst others. I have felt the pain of this lol

I can confirm that these requests are logged on our internal trackers. We're just coming to the end of a block of work that will form the basis of the v1.4 update, and I'll make a note to push these requests through to our coding team to look into adding. They're QOL features I'd like to see in the product too! Mark - Just Flight

The RJ Professional v1.6 update was exclusively to fix a compatibility bug caused by SU7. The changelog can be viewed here: https://support.justflight.com/en/support/solutions/folders/17000143559 No other changes were planned in this update, but further additions, fixes and improvements will come in future updates. Mark - Just Flight

Excellent explanation! And I agree it would be great to have this interplay of the old and new in BlackSquare aircraft.

@Black-Square Yes, that's the case, thanks. Now just need to figure out how to set the LVar up correctly. Oh, and overall, I love the quirks of this airplane. The Bo is faster but this one is more fun.

It's me again... After a lot of experimentation, I discovered that you can simply clone the effects and line them up one after another --> this amplifies the effect clearly noticeable and, in my opinion, looks quite good. F.e. like this 30x lines: effect.0 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.1 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.2 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.3 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.4 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.5 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.6 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.7 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.8 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.9 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.10 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.11 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.12 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.13 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.14 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.15 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.16 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.17 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.18 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.19 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.20 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.21 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.22 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.23 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.24 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.25 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.26 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.27 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.28 =Exhaust_2#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 effect.29 =Exhaust_1#(A:GENERAL ENG COMBUSTION:1, boolean)#FX_ASOBO_M_REACTORHEAT_CAP10 Stock / 2x effect-lines: [image: e1fe93c5-3857-4e72-a853-3c4260728cc3.png] 30x effect-lines: [image: 0a977262-f667-47de-b642-e53d4fd1dfef.png] 60x effect-lines: [image: 3c63b7c0-f762-452d-b363-4678353cf0d3.png] Just in case anyone is interested...

Last I checked the Starship is not compatible with MSFS 2024 built-in ATC. It will mess with your flight plan if you do anything more than request flight following. Hopefully this can be improved in the future...

Hi I didn’t end up trying it because I thought it wouldn’t work

@Tim-HH said in Just curious - Wooden panel....: @DROGE192 Thank you very much! It’s this livery here https://flightsim.to/addon/112811/black-square-commander-114-d-ehgo-dynamic-registration Thanks Tim!

As Nick said, there is no STC to fit a G1000 in any version of the Commander. So it would be very unrealistic. There are very, very few STCs to fit the G1000 as an aftermarket option, as Garmin don't intend it for that use. There are some for the Beech King Airs and analogue Caravans and that's about it.

What exactly are you looking to do with the bindings?