Hey Nick! Looking forward to the Turbo Commanders! In the latest update you released yesterday I couldn't see it in the photos but is the bottom triple flash beacon light going to be modelled if not already? Would loveeeee to have that! [image: 040a50ae-3a3a-46b0-ba8c-385757f10c22.jpg] [image: 490d2bce-701b-4cf0-9f22-87d943e2ac66.jpg]

@Mark Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply and for taking the time to explain. I completely understand that the current PA-38 is based on G-BNKH. I just wanted to add that there is a genuine demand for a more modern Tomahawk configuration, especially here in New Zealand where the PA-38 is still one of the main training aircraft used by many flying schools. A lot of student pilots, including myself, fly these aircraft in real life and would love to train in a version that more closely matches what we fly every day. Even if it wasn't a completely new aircraft, small optional upgrades like a modern antenna configuration, Garmin avionics option, and a few updated cockpit variations would go a long way. Having these as optional configurations would keep everyone happy while making the aircraft more appealing to a wider audience. It's also been around a year since the last update, and I think an update like this would generate a lot of interest. Many current owners would be excited to revisit the aircraft, and it could also attract new customers who train on the PA-38 in countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the UK. There aren't many high-quality Tomahawks available in MSFS, so it feels like a great opportunity. Thanks again for listening and for continuing to support the aircraft. I'd love to see the Tomahawk get some attention in the future.

What I do is use the vertical nav button on the CDU and set the altitudes for the STAR and approach waypoints and then shoot for a 2000 fpm descent. It'll give you a needed descent rate and you can watch that count up as you get closer. [image: 3efdfa4b-9b51-4526-bfa4-608a0ed6efab.jpg]

@alanfernandes Yes you are correct but a lot of 3rd party devs have added in other features that aren’t included with the base working title avionics. Like for the G3000/G5000 Skyward developed a whole Datalink functionality with it and it has some protections built in. Especially now that we know that the King Airs are gonna be the 300 and the 1900D both of them could get garmins. The 1900D has a slightly specialized one called the G950nxi and the 300 has the regular G1000nxi.

@Matchstick To my knowledge all 1900D’s were EFIS-85 from the factory. I hope he doesn’t keep the 2 Tubes exclusive to the 1900 though. I hope be make is an option for the Super King Air 300 as well. Unfortunately I would assume they are pretty early in development though, we haven’t got any screenshots of them and just now found out it was a Model 300 and a 1900D. I personally was wanting the F90 but thinking about it I’m glad he went with the 300 and 1900D. There is Avionics galore for them and upgrades. The 1900D has its own specialized version of the G1000nxi called the G950nxi built exclusively that type of work

@Voice-of-Reason still some gremlin about; some FS Expo (?) photos showing for me.

Thanks, that makes sense. I'd only seen the default Caravan at 65 and assumed a sim update had changed it. Appreciate the explanation.

@martijn Hello! I understad, but over the Atlantic (and desert) I ended up far way from the point too. I red when the CDU doens't capture automatically (in bottom screen) the nearests VOR's (150NM...200NM signals) because is far from them, the accuracy, in a long leg tend to decrease, the IRS system makes kind of a triagulation with those VOR's. Not sure with IFR points... But when I asked "Am I right?" was for the specialists to awnser. The airplane doesn't have GPS as you know. Don't know if the "problem" worsne more with latitude or longitude. I belive, anyway, someone can explain you much better than me. Best!

Cool, thanks!

I had a feeling it was North America but I never would have guesses it's Not! Thank you - I'll let you get back to the Twin Commanders... which in case no-one has mentioned, are looking incredible!

Thanks. Good thought on the high zoom level - lens effects was the issue I was running into trying to grab screen shots. I got close with pics off search engines but I think I can still do better. This is my first foray into air manager . . . . got all the avionics displays working except the KFC 150 (Glass Out isn't finding the KFC) - still have to get the buttons working on the KNS 81, KFC 150, KR87 and the radar but I'll get there. This will be on a 24" touch panel to the right of an altimeter motives Baron panel that's on the way [image: 4aaa50d0-6516-4b7b-8fdf-d83f1cf6d5cb.jpg] .

@toby23 Interesting.... thanks for letting me know. I've seen that chaseplane does some strange things, like showing interior models when you should be seeing exterior models. I've come to take this as the way thing are, but I would love to know why.

I would say out of the 107 Bonanza's and Barons my FBO hosted last week, 97 percent of them had a variation of above. I'm really looking forward to this and much thanks to Black Square for being so engaging with the modders and much thanks to the modders for having the skill set to bring this kind of glass to life!

@SimRaceFly Typically, a cockpit control being held in one position is caused by a controller conflict. I would recommend checking if you have any controls assigned to the APU OFF or APU STARTER control assignments. Mark - Just Flight

Now that Got Friends Man's Best Friend is out, what are the chances we could get this back? It's got built in ability to adjust the position of the pet and since their legs are much much much shorter, I'm guessing clipping will be much less of a concern.

Hey all, I can confirm that ILS capture is still a bit odd. Just made my second flight now with 1.2a. Also to comment on the AT behavior: I consistently see the speed drop quite a lot when lowering gear on final. AT reacts way too late and then shoots speed up way too much. In this last case ref speed was 130, AT accelerated to 165 knots before it came down again. Many thanks for the otherwise wonderful plane and efforts to improve, kind regards !

@Genista So from the manuals, NA (Noise abatement) button activates this mode called NAP, noise abatement profile, that essentially is a vertical mode activated. And in fact it does limit the engine power in orde to reduce noise, by: Inhibiting Flex EPR, and changing it to NEPR (Noise EPR) Activates NA on the Flight mode anunciator, that comands the Flight Director to initiate during the takeoff a rotation of 3deg/sec until it achieves a pitch of 22deg or a speed of V2+10kt, wichever comes first. At 400ft (lower than any possible selected THR RED) by manual selection of CLB THR reduces pitch and power even further to achieve lower noise leves. At ACCEL ALT selection of PROF or LVLCH reverts to a normal acceleration (250kt) and continues normal climb. [image: 91f25876-8b4e-4a00-bec3-2044bf530ff5.png]

Apologies for the belated reply. I try to keep a fairly basic profile on my Honeycomb Bravo; otherwise, I forget something is assigned to one of the switches and end up chasing a bug that isn't actually a bug! The following screenshots show everything I have assigned to my Honeycomb Bravo: [image: 19a76055-e7d1-465c-bc86-b9e5fab93157.png] [image: a630e359-042f-44bb-93b6-90c0308c97e1.png] [image: 21427077-02be-443e-9443-d567df107cd9.png] All my sensitivity curves are at the deafult (linear) settings. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight

The livery_config.ini file must be placed in the correct folder in order for the configuration to be correctly loaded. The exact location varies based on the product (F70/F100), simulator (MSFS 2020/MSFS 2024), and simulator version (MS Store/Steam). Instructions for installing the livery_config.ini file can be found towards the bottom of the following FAQ: https://support.justflight.com/en/support/solutions/articles/17000151438-f70-f100-professional-msfs-paintkit Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight