Apparently there is an error in the manual, where it says "Also on the HSI compass, two red pointers are available to indicate the bearing to the NAV2 station." (p.28). After tests I realized that HSI's "two red pointers" indicate the bearing to NAV1 (they align perfectly to the direction of RMI's YELLOW needle).

Hmm no update or response?

@jmarkows said in Lack of left turning tendencies: I fly the cargo variant more than any of the others and I do not have that left rudder on takeoff issue. I actually think I'm going to start leaving a few turns of right rudder on the trim wheel instead of centering it before every flight. I might have messed up when I installed that variant (using an old installer etc.) then. I'll check tonight.

Bumping this because it's important.

Given the limitations, what comes to mind is a sort of "hack" where a transparent surface lives in front of the pilot and becomes affected by certain conditions. But what do I know, I'm not a developer Another add-on that comes to mind is Chaseplane. They have a "binoculars" mode that blurs the view and vignettes the edges. Could be worth checking out how they achieve that and if the technique could be applied on the pilot view. Anyway, thank you so much @Black-Square for looking into this! Very excited btw to see those Twin Commanders and the King Air!

@Cybride Le mieux serait de contacter l'assistance de Just Flight. Ils devraient pouvoir vous aider. Voir : https://community.justflight.com/topic/2/product-support

I created a bug for this in the FS2024 Official forum. Feel free to add to that discussion. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/bug-multiple-planes-change-from-nav-to-rol-hdg-mode-when-tracking-vor/762974

Re: the original post (VOR tracking goes from NAV to ROL spontaneously), I created a bug in the FS2024 Official forum. Feel free to add to that discussion. One important piece of info is that it seems only to happen when one is using an external control mapper like Spad.Next or FSUIPC. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/bug-multiple-planes-change-from-nav-to-rol-hdg-mode-when-tracking-vor/762974

Going to be a difficult one to run down, but I'm 99% certain it's not flight model related. The reason I say this is that there is nothing in the FM which could give differential aileron in a left / right sense. There IS a table which adjusts the effect up and down, and for a brief moment I wondered if that had become 'altered' in the core game flight model. However, I fired up the Vulcan and see no issue - the extremity of each axis gives me a reading of 1.000 in the controls debug tool.

Yep, you are correct. It was an unused device. Removing its bindings fixed it. Thanks a lot. I would not have guessed in a million years

@alanfernandes said in Bug? Fuel Burn.: Although fuel flows by gravity from the forward to the aft compartment within the main system during refueling, there is no gravity transfer between the auxiliary and main tanks. In flight, this transfer relies exclusively on jet pumps operated by engine motive flow, which renders the fuel in the auxiliary tanks unusable should the pump system fail. I recall discussing this in one of my videos. Here is what I said in the manual: "Most of the fuel in the aft tanks will transfer to the main tanks by gravity, and the rest can be transferred by the aft tank transfer jet pumps. Should the aft tank transfer jet pumps fail, the total usable fuel may be reduced." Here is what the Flight Safety manual says: "Although a small amount of fuel may gravity-feed from the aft tank without the motive-flow system, the pilot should consider all fuel in the aft tank as unusable and plan the flight accordingly." Without looking right now (sorry, I'm leaving to record sound from the Twin Commanders in a few hours), I recall that I assumed this statement was made out of abundance of caution, and implemented the system such that it would slowly equalize to a certain point, so long as the jet pumps had not failed (emulating a blockage). Given the arrangement of the jet pumps and their no-moving-part nature, I assumed that there would be flow through them, so long as the pressure on the auxiliary tank side is high enough.

@taylerf01 Thanks. I assume that means they had to wire the entire annunciator panel power (likely the ground, I would think) through the standby power switch, just to get those two annunciator lights called out in the manual to illuminate for some reason. Thanks for the demo! I'll see if this can be replicated without too much trouble.

Hi there, i am experiencing the same issue. We have tested with all variants and we are getting the same blank panels on the tail, lower wing on OEM liveries and community repaints. We tested in MSFS 2024. This issue must be somehow connected to the model which is displayed in multiplayer. Furthermore, the avatar is sitting on top of the aircraft. Any fix for this? Thank you [image: a4cde89b-57ab-40bf-8252-d15a00d94e1e.png] [image: 21475e61-eddd-4322-b4ba-95da183316af.png] [image: 1cc4e08d-f440-464e-a674-936858a26ac2.png]

Much thanks to you turnandbank! It worked for me. I join in with Black Square Developer with much appreciation for both your discovery of the problem and then letting everyone else in the form here know the cure. Again thanks....

@Black-Square said in STBY ELEC PWR INOP light during preflight: "...before I travel to record sounds for the Twin Commanders."

that looks like a perfect inclusion, thanks for the link!

I totally support this idea. I've been wishing for a realistic Twin Otter for ages. The Aerosoft version for MSFS2020 was aesthetically awesome. But the systems, flight dynamics, and turboprop simulation left a good bunch to be desired. The default one isn't even worth our time mentioning. I am very impresed with the Blacksquare Caravan and I know they would make an amazing Twin Otter.

@C-FJDH said in 13,450lbs - Significance on CG display?: Interesting! But it leads to a question on the implementation of the marker in the tablet. As I read it, the full aft limit is available at all weights. The forward limit is what changes at higher weights. 307 inches aft of datum (farther forward) at lighter weights, but the forward limits is pushed rearward 3 inches for weights above 13,450. I think the marker in the tablet should be near the forward CG limit, not the rear. Old thread, but since Nick may have missed this, I wanted to comment that it appears you're correct. This image is from section 6-27 of the flight manual. The forward CG limit evenly moves rearward after 13,450 lbs. Tablet mistake, indeed. [image: 29297225-5e96-40bc-94e0-76f772417adf.png]