@HansRoaming said in checklist item: pitch/roll/rudder trim set to 0 (neutral): I thought it meant numeric 0. Maybe putting pitch trim all the way down to 0 helps with taxiing in some fashion? Part of my confusion stems from this video: https://youtu.be/lGYOBP8VFVA?si=rry5RAripGu-FQrs&t=192 At 3:12, Nick calls for checking the trims, and Emanuel looks at them and responds "trims are neutral" with pitch trim in the default middle position, and Nick continues the checklist without commenting on that. But I'm not sure how much this means, because even if it's really supposed to be moved down to 0, Nick might've just decided to avoid slowing down the pace of the video for something that was unlikely to matter.

@Padinn No. This was present in SU2.

Hello, I have found where the problem (aircraft template missing) was coming from. When creating the aircraft template I was confused because I choozed WoW in the field "aircraft template" to get GA aircrafts and I thought it was logical to activate the WoW button. In fact not. Perhaps there is something to clarify. Best regards

i believe some Aircraft Options, such as the Reflections and altimeter settings, are saved between flights. However, other options such as chocks, doors and windows are not saved. I'll raise this feedback on our internal bugs/feature request tracker for the development team to consider expanding the logic of in a future update. Mark - Just Flight

@Mark Thanks for the detail!

That's not something I have seen reported before, so hopefully, it was just an anomaly! If it does happen again, could I kindly ask you to generate a Support Package within the Fly the Line app (instructions here) and then create a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link with that attached: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team will then be able to pass the logs onto the development team for further investigation. Mark - Just Flight

This isn't something I have personally seen on my flight using the software. I have mostly been using airlines though, so I couldn't say if I've seen this logic with smaller GA types. In order for us to get some more information on this, could I kindly ask you to generate a Support Package within the Fly the Line app (instructions here) and then create a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link with that attached: https://www.justflight.com/support Our support team will then be able to pass the logs onto the development team for further investigation. Mark - Just Flight

It sounds like the throttle is full forward and the engine overtorques

With regard to the settings which were added/expanded with SU3, they should follow the same basic philosophy we have recommended previously. Essentially, the fewer other objects the simulator is generating, the more I don't believe there is anything mandatory that we would recommend setting with the new SU3 options, and the settings can largely be set per each user's personal preferences. However, we do recommend that the "Parked Aircraft Quantity" is set to OFF, as that will prevent any MSFS default Ai aircraft from generating at gates and taking parking spaces away from FS Traffic aircraft. I have attached a screenshot of how I have those new settings set on my PC for reference: [image: 74004c71-d99c-4d3c-971c-0d141fc24ec0.png] Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight

Same problem. It's a dice roll with very poor odds that anything will show up at the departure airport. 0% success in anything en route or at the arrival airport. Using GSX Pro, default airports, compatibility options enabled. Opened a support case. Will give them a week to offer progress on a solution or a refund, after that PayPal dispute if I must. Really unfortunate. Back to FSLTL I guess.

Status: Solved Solution: I deleted my settings in the cloud.

Awesome, made the change, hopefully now the MSFS updates have come out then 1.12 will be released soon.

Yes. I use this airport in 2024 (haven’t used 2020 since 2024 was released).

@MD82 thank you.

OK I understand Mark, thank you. Very much looking forward to this.

@Black-Square

Thanks Mark... I'll give it another go... Rob