Thank you for the feedback. I have checked the latest internal builds and can confirm that these are fixed. Mark - Just Flight

If that's the case, then it suggests that the GTN is still writing to the message variable, even when the feature is disabled. Looking at the current integrator's guide for the GTN, there isn't a mention of the the original message variable, so I would have to go looking through the code to see if the disabled state is exposed. I'll mention this to the developer next time we're speaking.

Hey guys, I noticed in the April 8 Development Update Chart that FS Traffic was submitted to the Marketplace for Xbox but I don't see it on there yet, is this true? Are we just waiting on Microsoft to publish it at this point? Thanks for any info!

@SadBucket Somehow I doubt the canard wing lobby is very strong in MSFS and will convince Asobo to do it Either way, not saying it's easy, but it's Nick after all, if somebody can do it, then it's him.

@KRoy7 You can also use the recently released GlassOut to retract the display. It is capable of cropping the screen e.g to get rid of the black padding around these displays.

@Black-Square Thank you Looking forward to its release on the PC marketplace for msfs2020.

Nice to see another tech in the flight sim world contributing to quality of product. I haven't had time to really make a list, but these are all spot on from my experience on the TBM range (also for a service center). There are some minor cosmetic remarks too, but again, no time for me to make a proper post.

@JakobFB If an aircraft has the cockpit door, there is a nonslip pad on the wing. It's not just a sticker, but also a metal strip to protect from airflow peeling it off (Item 7). [image: 96972800-970f-4e02-81a8-6c093459e7ae.png]

Yes I bought it in the 2024 marketplace and for me a couple hours later it showed up in the 2020 content manager as an owned product.

Thanks for the heads-up, Derek! Seb

Are we ever going to get paint kits for this trio?

Thanks for your attention, sir. I'll wait patiently because, despite that problem the plane is amazing. Cheers

There's a couple of things here, I think: They've got the distance in metres correct but mixed up between the RJ85 and the RJ100 ... RJ85 should be 1380m and the RJ100 should be 1509m The conversion from feet to metres is wrong: 1509m is actually 4950ft (not 6725ft)! Cheers!

@toby23 It's a great plane! I don't fly it enough because I have a slight preference for the more manual 146.

@Black-Square Thanks