Naw, Hijack away. This has lead really interesting places already. I hadn't thought of how to describe the controls till now, but that pitch thing alone is a super big thing in caravans, the 208B models anyway. They drill it into you from day one that you have to be on the trim immediately whenever you touch the flaps.

Thank you for the kind words. The FMS won't have enough data to perform its calculations without all mandatory fields being completed (including Cost Index). I know we do have an "INITIALIZE COST INDEX" scratchpad message simulated that generates if all other mandatory fields have been completed, but I'm not too sure what the real aircraft would calculate if no Cost Index is entered. We'll make a note to investigate that further. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for the feedback. We have logged this on our internal trackers as something to look into tweaking in a future update. Mark - Just Flight

We don't natively support any external FMS hardware or software at this time. However, we do recognise that FMS hardware and software have become more accessible to larger parts of the community in recent years, and supporting them in our products is something that we have logged on our internal feature request trackers for evaluation. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks for reporting this. We have just taken a look at this, and we believe we've found a scenario where that can occur. That's now logged on our internal trackers, and we'll include a fix in a future update to the product(s). Mark - Just Flight

I will if and when it recurs, thanks Martin.

Thank you for the feedback. We have logged this on our internal trackers, and we'll look into this for a future update. Mark - Just Flight

I’m a bit at a loss with PRF not engaging. My present route is MDPC-TAPA and whilst PRF was initially enabled somehow it switched to FLC and I could not re-engage it (maybe at CLB call-out). My selected FL is within the MCDU max (FL310 vs. FL350) and I’ve tried different routes between the airports. BATC is clearing me to climb through SID constraints, which I’m happy to do (though I wonder if this has something to do with it?). PRF has been OK up until now in my other flights but then I didn’t chop and change CLB modes. Has anyone found a workaround to allow PRF to be re-engaged?

This would be great! The Warrior I fly has a GTN650 and dual G5's and this would make it so much better. I have the TDS GTN package but would be so much better with dual G5's also. Just Flight...........please make this happen!

Lmao yeah, I was just being grumpy

@Chimaeira Yes, I muddled it over for a while before deciding to purchase one. Glad I did though, it is a nice piece of hardware.

In real life, the difference between FCC and speed card would be up to 5 kt. [image: 000b6ae4-0b47-4115-9085-8c8821ea609c.png]

It makes sense, but in any case, the manual doesn't explain it well; it was a copy-paste from the original manual, and they didn't even notice that this version has "auto" instead of "cont1." Another thing is that there's no information on the MFDU indicating that the ignition is on, as the manual also states.

Breaking: I found a way to solve the problem It can probably be done smarter, but the way it was solved was to delete (or rename) the Packages folder, MSFS will rebuild it after a restart, copy Bsq King Air and Asobo King Air from MSFS2020 to the Community folder and restart the sim. I am soooo happy, because now I can run the Gps via Glassout. And it turned out that I was not the only one with this problem, my brother in law had the same problem. But @Black-Square : pretty pretty please with sugar on the top: please release a 2024 version. I got cat pictures

Had a vAPP of 121kn today and I didn't manage to perform a stable approach. Aircraft accelerated to 160kn and even higher as you can see on this screenshot (wasn't able to record a video quickly enough): [image: e023f5a4-4d6b-4ba0-82ef-566b4995e945.png]

It's not so much a question of "do we have failures or don't we", but rather how deep the system simulation is. To me, deep system simulation means the systems need to behave realistically when things go wrong or when a pilot mistake is made. Like others have said above, what's the point of coding deep system fidelity if nothing is ever out of the ordinary. And by that I don't just mean catastrophic events that force you to land immediately. It's more like the little things that happen on a daily basis in airline operations. Chances for a hot start, HYD pressure that can drop for whatever reason, INS issues, a pack that runs hot... just things so that system monitoring and checklists have meaning. Without that, it's hard to enjoy deep system simulation, because there's no reason for it to exist when no parameter can ever go out of line. So yes, please, add system failures, errors, acting up, randomness. I have no problem with paying extra for this. It's just that flying with knowing nothing can ever go wrong is, how should I say, not very fulfilling.

We intentionally link the brightness of the forward galley lights to the cockpit door position to prevent light from bleeding into the cockpit when the cockpit door is closed. Therefore, with the cockpit door closed, the forward galley lighting controls will not have any effect. When the cockpit door is open, the cabin lighting controls will all be fully functional. Mark - Just Flight

yes that's my confusion sorry

@Merikeri I am not so sure many have been upgraded much. Possibly just Australian ones because it's not really economic. Planes like that usually end up in countries not requiring such upgrades, which also makes them more affordable.