The only thing I can think of is that you're hearing the strobe light power supply. The Duke strobes work by charging and discharging high-voltage capacitors that illuminate the xenon flash tube strobe lights.

@Black-Square Thank you for the response. I can definitely live without the FD, I'd just prefer to have it. To me it seems like the same effort to have each one (not swapping) so I just wanted to know why you didn't choose the more advanced one. Sure, having some variety is nice, but I still would prefer the more capable unit:)

A Just Flight DC-9 would be awesome to see developed in the future for all of the above reasons by piedmonitor. I'd totally buy one as I have enjoyed the JF Avro RJ, BAe 146 and Fokker F28.

@Black-Square Thanks Nick. I'm probably the only one who has ever tested it, so don't lose sleep over it. Just the fact that you have acknowledged it is good for the time being. I'm sure in due time you will get around to fixing it. Cheers

@Chotter said in Aircraft age: Neither the best movie nor the best RPG could offer such a level of immersion. Now you're speaking my language! While there are many users who tell me they couldn't care less about the failure features in an aircraft, they have provided me with some of my most memorable simulator experiences. Even a simple item, like the "Cabin Door" annunciator lighting up on short final in IMC, as if just to spook you, is such a delight to me. While I have received your comments about aerodynamics and engine performance, I would still encourage you not to overlook the failure rate slider as your source of enjoyment for the Caravan. I very much understand your point, but at least in my estimation, a propeller governor failure or fuel control failure would be a much more entertaining and challenging experience than an engine routinely running a few degrees hotter due to its imagined age. Just my opinion, however!

Are there any plans for an updated FS Traffic manual to show the SETUP global settings for the latest MSFS 2024 version-would be extremely beneficial to me and others?

@Outermarker Oh that's really cool! I have a wishlist thread on the main msfs forums asking for a native G500/600 architecture. The G1000 is cool and all, but it's limited to just a handful of airframes - can't just drop it into any plane and be realistic. Same with the G3X - it is certified for the Bo, but wouldn't work for the Baron because it's not multi-engine compatible. That's why the G500/600 would be perfect. You could drop it into just about anything and connect it to a GNS or GTN, and still have a lot of the familiar Garmin functionality of the G1000/G3X.

Thanks, @gazdav787 I think I've found the cause. My code has the form 1·(>L:GNLU910_L_FMS_XXXXX_ANIM,·Number) (WAIT:150) 0·(>L:GNLU910_L_FMS_XXXX_ANIM,·Number) But in this case is not necessary to come back to 0

Same here, I can't get my Logitech Radio Panel to work with the Dukes (in MSFS2024). I then exited the flight, launched in with a default Asobo aircraft and the radio panel worked fine, so then exited that flight and launched back into the Duke and the panel went off. I confirmed that Master and Avionics switch positions didn't seem to make any difference ... so not sure what's going on there as it's OK with other aircraft (although standby frequency selection currently doesn't work in the FenixSim A320).

Thanks for the quick reply :).

I would like to join the party here. This airplane is absolutely amazing! The detailed work with the external as well as internal model as well as with the flight physics and the engine, failures etc. - really top notch!

Any update on this? Also the yoke's chrono wont turn on and the KN 62A DME while turns on doesn't display any info. Ah and the autopilot on Nav mode wont follow the tuned VOR for the selected radial. When I turn the cuopler knob to NAV it snaps back to to hdg.

@Black-Square 2-4 months! Might as well spend more to buy that time then. I think its a better way to support the dev as well but obviously the surplus conversion rates are going to govt. Nevertheless, 2-4 months is quite substantial

@KarsPilot If you contact Just Flight about this we will be happy to discuss: https://www.justflight.com/contact-us

I agree it would be great to remove the KNS81... I get your point, but in reality no one I could think of would keep a KNS81 when fitting e.g. a GTN750. Also, you can easily check your navigation with your Navigation Software like Navigraph. That all being said, could you maybe explain how to remove the KNS "with the gap"? I figured with my avionics layout it wouldn't hurt too much. Also, is it possible to remove the MD41-328? Not that helpful with a GTN xD Kind Regards, Jannik S.

Thank you for your willingness to resolve any issues we report to you.

I suspect it’s a problem in Wwise where the position is set wrong for certain objects which Windows spatial doesn't use.