Performance on landing
-
On my side I experienced the same issue with a 4090 and Ryzen 7950x3d and 64 gigs of ram. My settings are high but not all on ultra as I prefer smoothness over visuals. As mentioned on my last post on this thread things are coming to normal after system shut down and battery off. To add some details when I leave my departure airports, there is no stutters even if it’s a more demanding airport than my destination. So it’s why I’m still thinking something stack up in the memory. But that could also be something else.
@boomer If you leave the dep airport you already loaded in all the stuff, if you are approaching, stuff is loaded in at a certain range ! Understand LOD values.
IMO, to own a 4090, 30xx, or 20xx doesn't matter for this issue.
If its a 12GB card and you try to load 11+ Gbs into, its obviously causing issues.A big memory hog btw is "General Options" - "Traffic"
My settings are OFF, OFF, 20, 0, 20, 25,25,70, 25, OFF, OFF,OFF, ULTRAThat helped a bunch
BTW, did you see my privat message ... (if you are GGCH_BOOMer on FS.to)
-
I have stutters and a significant FPS drop (from 80 on takeoff to 5-10) after 1,5 hours of flying. No other plane behaves like this. But the sim itself works well, when I go to the menu, it runs smoothly.
@exp131 said in Performance on landing:
I have stutters and a significant FPS drop (from 80 on takeoff to 5-10) after 1,5 hours of flying. No other plane behaves like this. But the sim itself works well, when I go to the menu, it runs smoothly.
Nope, never saw this ! Its NOT the plane !
-
@exp131 said in Performance on landing:
I have stutters and a significant FPS drop (from 80 on takeoff to 5-10) after 1,5 hours of flying. No other plane behaves like this. But the sim itself works well, when I go to the menu, it runs smoothly.
Nope, never saw this ! Its NOT the plane !
-
@exp131 said in Performance on landing:
I have stutters and a significant FPS drop (from 80 on takeoff to 5-10) after 1,5 hours of flying. No other plane behaves like this. But the sim itself works well, when I go to the menu, it runs smoothly.
Nope, never saw this ! Its NOT the plane !
-
@jetnoise I don't think so. I cleared the community folder - no effect. Flew the same route with another aircraft - everything was fine. The issue exists for this particular aircraft on my system.
-
@exp131 said in Performance on landing:
I have stutters and a significant FPS drop (from 80 on takeoff to 5-10) after 1,5 hours of flying. No other plane behaves like this. But the sim itself works well, when I go to the menu, it runs smoothly.
Nope, never saw this ! Its NOT the plane !
Thats what I said, then the recommendations are wrong, if we are wrong.
Boomer has a top notch sytem and has the problems with this aircraft. For sure destination will load in a certain range, but if this is causing probs on a top notch system what specs should one have? An 128GB GC? Thus Fokker needs infinite memory? Always a GC would load most data as possible, that is not the end of the world, maybe it´s limiting me, thus I reduced settings, but a 24 GB GC should be able to soak up the stuff.
I will open a ticket, "it´s not the plane" is not an answer, the world is not black and white.
-
Thats what I said, then the recommendations are wrong, if we are wrong.
Boomer has a top notch sytem and has the problems with this aircraft. For sure destination will load in a certain range, but if this is causing probs on a top notch system what specs should one have? An 128GB GC? Thus Fokker needs infinite memory? Always a GC would load most data as possible, that is not the end of the world, maybe it´s limiting me, thus I reduced settings, but a 24 GB GC should be able to soak up the stuff.
I will open a ticket, "it´s not the plane" is not an answer, the world is not black and white.
@sparrows69 said in Performance on landing:
Thats what I said, then the recommendations are wrong, if we are wrong.
Boomer has a top notch sytem and has the problems with this aircraft. For sure destination will load in a certain range, but if this is causing probs on a top notch system what specs should one have? An 128GB GC? Thus Fokker needs infinite memory? Always a GC would load most data as possible, that is not the end of the world, maybe it´s limiting me, thus I reduced settings, but a 24 GB GC should be able to soak up the stuff.
I will open a ticket, "it´s not the plane" is not an answer, the world is not black and white.
Sure do it
See my specs above
MSFS and F28 (146, Fenix, Maddog) are just running fine.
F28 from release day, MSFS through all its BETAs.
All i can say ...
Oliver
I'll post my settings if you guys need ... -
@sparrows69 said in Performance on landing:
Thats what I said, then the recommendations are wrong, if we are wrong.
Boomer has a top notch sytem and has the problems with this aircraft. For sure destination will load in a certain range, but if this is causing probs on a top notch system what specs should one have? An 128GB GC? Thus Fokker needs infinite memory? Always a GC would load most data as possible, that is not the end of the world, maybe it´s limiting me, thus I reduced settings, but a 24 GB GC should be able to soak up the stuff.
I will open a ticket, "it´s not the plane" is not an answer, the world is not black and white.
Sure do it
See my specs above
MSFS and F28 (146, Fenix, Maddog) are just running fine.
F28 from release day, MSFS through all its BETAs.
All i can say ...
Oliver
I'll post my settings if you guys need ...That something works for you does not mean it works for everyone.
This is your experience, not an evidence.
I could say MSFS and 146, Fenix, Maddog are just running fine. This is my experience, not an evidence, but leads to the impression that my system is basically not f... up.We talk of Software, and software is made by humans and can contain bugs, that may apply on one system, while on other system it doesn´t hurt. Maybe you are a GC driver version ahead or behind? Who knows?
From this threat I can read there is something some people experienced or I can read one is smart and the others are not on the page. I prefer the first interpretation. -
That something works for you does not mean it works for everyone.
This is your experience, not an evidence.
I could say MSFS and 146, Fenix, Maddog are just running fine. This is my experience, not an evidence, but leads to the impression that my system is basically not f... up.We talk of Software, and software is made by humans and can contain bugs, that may apply on one system, while on other system it doesn´t hurt. Maybe you are a GC driver version ahead or behind? Who knows?
From this threat I can read there is something some people experienced or I can read one is smart and the others are not on the page. I prefer the first interpretation. -
@jetnoise JF just posted in ticket that they think of a memory leak and try to nail it down. I´m the third reporter. What I have to say, what a good support, gettin answer in 20 minutes, not usual in todays days....
-
@jetnoise JF just posted in ticket that they think of a memory leak and try to nail it down. I´m the third reporter. What I have to say, what a good support, gettin answer in 20 minutes, not usual in todays days....
@sparrows69 Hopefully it's not the same problem as the Carenado PC12. With this bird, the frame rate is also halved after about an hour of flight time. After what feels like 10 software updates, they still haven't gotten the problem under control.
There it is connected to an instrument that nobody really needs, the Avidyne EX500, which can display navigation data. Ultimately, disabling this instrument completely prevents the memory leak.I saw that there is a similar function in the Weather Radar (MAP) in the F28. I am not aware that the Honeywell Primus series (or Sperry) offers such a display in addition to the GMAP function. Would be just ballast in an old school plane anyway ;-).
-
@sparrows69 Hopefully it's not the same problem as the Carenado PC12. With this bird, the frame rate is also halved after about an hour of flight time. After what feels like 10 software updates, they still haven't gotten the problem under control.
There it is connected to an instrument that nobody really needs, the Avidyne EX500, which can display navigation data. Ultimately, disabling this instrument completely prevents the memory leak.I saw that there is a similar function in the Weather Radar (MAP) in the F28. I am not aware that the Honeywell Primus series (or Sperry) offers such a display in addition to the GMAP function. Would be just ballast in an old school plane anyway ;-).
@delfin25
Where did you find this info in F28 that using such a function? I mean, could be write in ticket to point them towards this. -
@delfin25
Where did you find this info in F28 that using such a function? I mean, could be write in ticket to point them towards this.@sparrows69 In the manual on page 123. The MAP function is described there. However, unlike the real Honeywell system, this is "only" a display of the airport ICAOs and does not provide real ground mapping.
-
@sparrows69 In the manual on page 123. The MAP function is described there. However, unlike the real Honeywell system, this is "only" a display of the airport ICAOs and does not provide real ground mapping.
Problem seem does not be related , so far I had GPS activated, and face the problem, too.
-
Problem seem does not be related , so far I had GPS activated, and face the problem, too.
@sparrows69 When one instrument is activated on an MSFS aircraft, it does not necessarily mean that the other instrument will be completely deactivated. It is not loaded when loading the aircraft until it is excluded in panel.cfg.
-
@sparrows69 When one instrument is activated on an MSFS aircraft, it does not necessarily mean that the other instrument will be completely deactivated. It is not loaded when loading the aircraft until it is excluded in panel.cfg.
From panel config,but yes, at the end we don´t know,
[VCockpit08]
size_mm=1024,748
pixel_size=1024,748
texture=WXR
background_color=0,0,255
htmlgauge00=Airliners/JF_F28/WXR/jf_f28_wxr.html, 0,0,1024,748//[VCockpit08]
//size_mm=1024,1024
//pixel_size=1024,1024
//texture=WXR
//background_color=0,0,255
//htmlgauge00=WasmInstrument/WasmInstrument.html?wasm_module=JF_F28_WASM.wasm&wasm_gauge=WXR, 0,0,1024,1024 -
From panel config,but yes, at the end we don´t know,
[VCockpit08]
size_mm=1024,748
pixel_size=1024,748
texture=WXR
background_color=0,0,255
htmlgauge00=Airliners/JF_F28/WXR/jf_f28_wxr.html, 0,0,1024,748//[VCockpit08]
//size_mm=1024,1024
//pixel_size=1024,1024
//texture=WXR
//background_color=0,0,255
//htmlgauge00=WasmInstrument/WasmInstrument.html?wasm_module=JF_F28_WASM.wasm&wasm_gauge=WXR, 0,0,1024,1024@sparrows69 You are right!
