PA-28R Arrow III

@martyn Thank you. TDS has been in contact to provide support.

Please submit a support ticket if you haven't already done so, as we'll need to investigate further to find the cause (assuming you're not using the TDS GTNXi).

@thtanner Yeah definitely not plane breaking at all, but nice to know its not just me then Thank you for checking!

Would be a nice thing indeed

Next I changed to the livery G-BGKU. Same CG as before: [image: e073b22c-8cc4-4dbd-96cc-5583f3058361.jpg] Then I changed the weight for the back row and the passengers. But no change in indication of CG: [image: 852f4a9c-9c0f-4c48-add8-ee1bfe3f0034.jpg] After closing and opening the weight settings again, the old values re-appeared: [image: aa80bd6b-e4dc-451b-aaa0-e82e83939408.jpg] That is quite strange and in my opinion broken. Please have a look and provide a fix for this behavior.

Ok. I’m embarrassed to admit this but I must have pulled the mixture lever instead the propeller rpm. ‍️. I’m sorry about that. But still the amps are going to 0 even though the engine is still spinning. That shouldn’t happen either should it?

@martyn I did some more research. The slow motion rudder was due to wrong setting for the reactivity in msfs, so my bad. I checked some of the default aircrafts in regard to yoke animation and the elevators. They also show the same behaviour, so obviously the fault is not on your side. Sorry for the inconvenience and I will delete this post a little later.

Ah wel,l thanks for your help

@berniev Thanks Bernie, glad to hear that you're enjoying it

@flyme2dunoon Hi, flyme. Thanks for chiming in as well. I tried the GTN 750 settings as well. Still nothing. I think you're on to something though. It happened after the latest update but I must be the only one having the issue which is a bit odd.

Various GPS compatibility issues introduced by AAU 1 will be addressed in the update that we're aiming to release next week.

Hi weptburrito Thank you! It works well. Regards Richard

@ghrasko I am also experiencing the same discrepancies when comparing against the published performance tables. Can anyone let us know if there are any plans in tweaking the performances to match as close as possible the ones found on the POH? It does have a big impact when working on the Navlog... Many thanks for any feedback. Julian

@derek Thank you much.

Thank you, i had not been notified about that. Will have a look if my version is up to date.

@martyn I’d love to help with this (and mainly the warrior as I have real time on type).