Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Commander 114
  6. Is it maybe possible that the startup procedure is incorrect?

Is it maybe possible that the startup procedure is incorrect?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Commander 114
45 Posts 10 Posters 923 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Black SquareB Black Square

    @Flocat89 @Rimshot @ploodovic @Esoteric @jasmits @kityatyi @mburkhard @SadBucket

    Hi all. After much thinking in the shower, I figured out how to implement this in about six lines of code. Of course this spawned several hours of other code edits, adding more Lycoming behavior, and testing, but it was still easier than I expected.

    This had the byproduct of allowing me to implement the delay between mixture cutoff and engine shutdown that many have been asking about for a long time.

    It's surprisingly easy, so long as everyone is okay adopting the mixture control bindings of my turbocharged aircraft. (It works with the native bindings, so I'm not sure why people continue to struggle occasionally.) If they revolt, I will send them your way πŸ˜‰ Kidding, of course.

    EDIT: I cannot tell you how fun it is starting the engines this way that I am so familiar with from the real world πŸ™‚

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jmarkows
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @Black-Square said in Is it maybe possible that the startup procedure is incorrect?:

    It's surprisingly easy, so long as everyone is okay adopting the mixture control bindings of my turbocharged aircraft. (It works with the native bindings, so I'm not sure why people continue to struggle occasionally.) If they revolt, I will send them your way πŸ˜‰ Kidding, of course.

    Nick, I should really know the answer considering I own just about every single one of your aircraft, but the native Mixture Axis/Mixture X Axis bindings map to the K events you need, yes? I don't think I've had any issues making use of them previously, but I haven't looked too closely at whether they're using K events or the A var you specifically say not to use.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Black SquareB Black Square

      @Flocat89 @Rimshot @ploodovic @Esoteric @jasmits @kityatyi @mburkhard @SadBucket

      Hi all. After much thinking in the shower, I figured out how to implement this in about six lines of code. Of course this spawned several hours of other code edits, adding more Lycoming behavior, and testing, but it was still easier than I expected.

      This had the byproduct of allowing me to implement the delay between mixture cutoff and engine shutdown that many have been asking about for a long time.

      It's surprisingly easy, so long as everyone is okay adopting the mixture control bindings of my turbocharged aircraft. (It works with the native bindings, so I'm not sure why people continue to struggle occasionally.) If they revolt, I will send them your way πŸ˜‰ Kidding, of course.

      EDIT: I cannot tell you how fun it is starting the engines this way that I am so familiar with from the real world πŸ™‚

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jasmits
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @Black-Square That's awesome man!!! Looking forward to it!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Flocat89

        @jasmits Sorry for the late reply to your question, i have talked with my Aircraft mechanic for you. You are actually 100% correct about the "why"! The Lycoming Bendix system is a continuous flow system, so it floods the engine immediately on "Rich" before the engine catches. Continental's system is engine-driven and RPM-dependent, which is why it doesn't flood during start. Spot on!

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jasmits
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @Flocat89 Thanks!!!

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • J jasmits

          @Flocat89 Thanks!!!

          F Offline
          F Offline
          Flocat89
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          @jasmits youΒ΄re welcome!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Black SquareB Black Square

            @Flocat89 @Rimshot @ploodovic @Esoteric @jasmits @kityatyi @mburkhard @SadBucket

            Hi all. After much thinking in the shower, I figured out how to implement this in about six lines of code. Of course this spawned several hours of other code edits, adding more Lycoming behavior, and testing, but it was still easier than I expected.

            This had the byproduct of allowing me to implement the delay between mixture cutoff and engine shutdown that many have been asking about for a long time.

            It's surprisingly easy, so long as everyone is okay adopting the mixture control bindings of my turbocharged aircraft. (It works with the native bindings, so I'm not sure why people continue to struggle occasionally.) If they revolt, I will send them your way πŸ˜‰ Kidding, of course.

            EDIT: I cannot tell you how fun it is starting the engines this way that I am so familiar with from the real world πŸ™‚

            M Offline
            M Offline
            mburkhard
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @Black-Square said in Is it maybe possible that the startup procedure is incorrect?:

            @Flocat89 @Rimshot @ploodovic @Esoteric @jasmits @kityatyi @mburkhard @SadBucket

            Hi all. After much thinking in the shower, I figured out how to implement this in about six lines of code.

            Must be a special kind of water supplied to your place! πŸ˜‰
            Thank you, well done sir, appreciate your efforts massively! I just went ahead and bought the Commander, even though I'm still waiting for that Virpil yoke that seems to take forever to arrive on the market πŸ™ƒ

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users