Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Aspen Evolution PFD on BS aircrafs installed by me. (Implementation test)

Aspen Evolution PFD on BS aircrafs installed by me. (Implementation test)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Black Square Add-Ons
29 Posts 11 Posters 1.1k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SliderCDN

    Unless you're putting full G1000 or something in a super old, run down, trashed C150, cost of airframe will always be higher than the avionics upgrade.

    Black SquareB Offline
    Black SquareB Offline
    Black Square
    Black Square Developer
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    @SliderCDN I don't want to turn this into a real world aviation economics conversation, but I have routinely seen those (much luckier than I) spend $150k on a panel redesign for an airframe otherwise worth $150k. A complete panel redesign for a G1000 Nxi and autopilot in a 70's or 60's era piston twin can be expected to cost $100-150k including parts, fabrication, and labor. Many such aircraft are worth a similar amount or less (including their currently installed avionics) due to rising maintenance and insurance costs. For instance, the average cost of an Aztec with conventional avionics on Trade-a-Plane right now is $120k, and $160k for a C310. Of course, more modern airframes will be different, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trashed C150.

    My apologies. I know this has relatively little to do with the workload of adding new avionics to my aircraft, except the number of systems and 3D models that must change), but I had to speak to what I've seen in the real world.

    S K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Black SquareB Black Square

      @SliderCDN I don't want to turn this into a real world aviation economics conversation, but I have routinely seen those (much luckier than I) spend $150k on a panel redesign for an airframe otherwise worth $150k. A complete panel redesign for a G1000 Nxi and autopilot in a 70's or 60's era piston twin can be expected to cost $100-150k including parts, fabrication, and labor. Many such aircraft are worth a similar amount or less (including their currently installed avionics) due to rising maintenance and insurance costs. For instance, the average cost of an Aztec with conventional avionics on Trade-a-Plane right now is $120k, and $160k for a C310. Of course, more modern airframes will be different, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trashed C150.

      My apologies. I know this has relatively little to do with the workload of adding new avionics to my aircraft, except the number of systems and 3D models that must change), but I had to speak to what I've seen in the real world.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      SliderCDN
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      @Black-Square said in Aspen Evolution PFD on BS aircrafs installed by me. (Implementation test):

      panel

      The range of numbers is huge. Also heavily depends on part of the world. US is cheapest in that regard.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Black SquareB Black Square

        @SliderCDN I don't want to turn this into a real world aviation economics conversation, but I have routinely seen those (much luckier than I) spend $150k on a panel redesign for an airframe otherwise worth $150k. A complete panel redesign for a G1000 Nxi and autopilot in a 70's or 60's era piston twin can be expected to cost $100-150k including parts, fabrication, and labor. Many such aircraft are worth a similar amount or less (including their currently installed avionics) due to rising maintenance and insurance costs. For instance, the average cost of an Aztec with conventional avionics on Trade-a-Plane right now is $120k, and $160k for a C310. Of course, more modern airframes will be different, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trashed C150.

        My apologies. I know this has relatively little to do with the workload of adding new avionics to my aircraft, except the number of systems and 3D models that must change), but I had to speak to what I've seen in the real world.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kestrel21
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        @Black-Square said in Aspen Evolution PFD on BS aircrafs installed by me. (Implementation test):

        @SliderCDN I don't want to turn this into a real world aviation economics conversation, but I have routinely seen those (much luckier than I) spend $150k on a panel redesign for an airframe otherwise worth $150k. A complete panel redesign for a G1000 Nxi and autopilot in a 70's or 60's era piston twin can be expected to cost $100-150k including parts, fabrication, and labor. Many such aircraft are worth a similar amount or less (including their currently installed avionics) due to rising maintenance and insurance costs. For instance, the average cost of an Aztec with conventional avionics on Trade-a-Plane right now is $120k, and $160k for a C310. Of course, more modern airframes will be different, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trashed C150.

        My apologies. I know this has relatively little to do with the workload of adding new avionics to my aircraft, except the number of systems and 3D models that must change), but I had to speak to what I've seen in the real world.

        Oh absolutely in a twin but I question those that are going out and buying a piston twin these days. Beech just ended the Baron line (they said they will offer support but for how long), Cessna doesnt have a twin, Piper has the little Seneca and I think that's about it. There just is not a lot of support for them anymore. When I started line service in 2006 you'd see 414's and 310's and Barons and everything in between. Nowadays if a Navajo shows up its like "holy shit, check out this relic"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          SliderCDN
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          You forgot Diamond's products. They're going strong. All depends what you need to do. Twins offer peace of mind, but many singles offer similar performance in that smaller cabin segment or get a TBM if you want proper performance with 6 people.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Truffoff
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            Amazing work! It would be great if we could choose between the analog panel, Aspen, or G3X, just like we can currently switch between the different GPS options. I can't wait for this mod to be released!

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              Kestrel21
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              I would say out of the 107 Bonanza's and Barons my FBO hosted last week, 97 percent of them had a variation of above. I'm really looking forward to this and much thanks to Black Square for being so engaging with the modders and much thanks to the modders for having the skill set to bring this kind of glass to life!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • jerrivelJ Offline
                jerrivelJ Offline
                jerrivel
                wrote last edited by
                #26

                commander_aspen.PNG

                1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Truffoff
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  Amazing! Do you have a timeframe for when the add-on will be released?

                  jerrivelJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Truffoff

                    Amazing! Do you have a timeframe for when the add-on will be released?

                    jerrivelJ Offline
                    jerrivelJ Offline
                    jerrivel
                    wrote last edited by jerrivel
                    #28

                    @Truffoff Not yet, but its only missing AOA display and GPSS and a few background stuff.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • jerrivelJ jerrivel

                      @Truffoff Not yet, but its only missing AOA display and GPSS and a few background stuff.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Skrelk
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      @jerrivel can't wait to fly the baron with this!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users