Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. 146 Professional
  5. OFP import issue

OFP import issue

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 146 Professional
3 Posts 2 Posters 259 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • b3lt3rB Offline
    b3lt3rB Offline
    b3lt3r
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    It seems to me that the pax count that is imported to the EFB from a Simbrief plan is not correct? Every time I set the required count in SB, it generates correctly in SB but when I say import from OFP in the EFB it is always different for me - have now seen this in -300 and -200.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MartynM Offline
      MartynM Offline
      Martyn
      JF Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      It's likely that our custom logic for passenger quantity and weight differs to SimBrief's calculations. We use the total weight from the SimBrief OFP and convert that into a suitable passenger and cargo load taking into account the 146 payload configuration and requirements.

      Martyn - Development Manager

      b3lt3rB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MartynM Martyn

        It's likely that our custom logic for passenger quantity and weight differs to SimBrief's calculations. We use the total weight from the SimBrief OFP and convert that into a suitable passenger and cargo load taking into account the 146 payload configuration and requirements.

        b3lt3rB Offline
        b3lt3rB Offline
        b3lt3r
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @martyn Thanks for explaining. Would it be possible to consider amending the logic to accept the OFP values in effect as a final loadsheet unless they would exceed airframe maxima?

        Not a showstopper but I do like things tidy :-)

        (Needless to say eagerly waiting news on the RJ, -300 and 747)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users