-
Need some help mapping the 3 position lever to HC Bravo using SPAD.Next.
tia
I think I got it. Re-Purpose of the BKSQ KA 350 Condition Lever
First you need 4 variables. I have eight because I also have the BKSQ KA350
Since the 1.1 patch you should replace B:FUEL_1_Condition_Lever_X with BKSQ_ConditionLever works like a top.
:-) -
-
For those of you that use AAO, I had fiddle with things a bit. I found forum post from the Lorby dev (that I didn't bookmark) and ended up on this solution. I highlighted the key settings in blue:
Target the variable
B:FUEL_1_Condition_Lever_Set
, set the axis min and max to0
and2
, respectively, and set the rounding toint
. -
@ianbot From the developer:
'I just wanted to let you know that I have added an L:Var for the condition lever in the next update. It will be "L:BKSQ_ConditionLever, number" (0-2). Now, perhaps you can all help me with something. I have seen this request in my other aircraft, and I have seen people who also insist on using the backup L:Var for the turbocharged mixture control in my Baron and Bonanza. Is there a reason that you don't all just use the default mixture control axis? I will admit that I do not check every possible type of hardware and binding software for every feature in my aircraft, but for something as simple as the default mixture axis, I didn't think it could cause this much trouble. I would really appreciate an explanation, if someone could spare the time. Thank you!'
Hope that helps and we look forward to any further useful replies.
-
@voice-of-reason There have been cases where using the default mixture axis caused unwanted effects in the engine behaviour. That is why a separate axis/events are preferred in my opinion.
-
Thanks for;
The condition lever position can now be controlled via the L:Var L:BKSQ_ConditionLever
from 0-2. This should not be necessary, since the condition lever is most easily
controlled via the default mixture bindings; however, it was added for convenience.