Feature Requests
-
@fugazi74
Can't put a date on them yet, but the new aircraft models are due to be delivered this month. We'll need to create some liveries first of course, but we hope to have them with you in the near future. -
@starrysky Agree!
-
@noob21
We've had that request a few times and we are going to look into adding this feature.@rich that sounds better than my suggestion. I bought the program today and it works well but found the inputting of the destination a bit vague in terms of knowing if it had actually worked or not. Also it would be nice to see airports busy as we pass over them.
-
-I'd love to see improvemwnts to AI, such as better traffic seperarion and awareness (there is a freeware tool making this possible), a flare for landing aircraft and normal pushback (not always just straight pushback)
-some better effects, like tire smoke, rain effects, better looking contrails (the "other" freeware AI injector does this better)
-an automatic simbrief import, so we don't have to put in out destination manually -
@brokenbroccoli Just curious, which is the traffic separation and awareness tool that you mentioned?
-
All traffic addons focus on airlines which is logical but in the proces General Aviation is forgotten. There was a GA-Traffic tool for FSX or FS9 that was quite good in creating believable traffic. It had options to avoid certain airports (like major hubs) and create both IFR and VFR flights including training flights and aircraft doing touch and go's around smaller airfields.
One could choose which aircraft models to use but it would be nice if FS Traffic came with its own models of popular GA aircraft. -
All traffic addons focus on airlines which is logical but in the proces General Aviation is forgotten. There was a GA-Traffic tool for FSX or FS9 that was quite good in creating believable traffic. It had options to avoid certain airports (like major hubs) and create both IFR and VFR flights including training flights and aircraft doing touch and go's around smaller airfields.
One could choose which aircraft models to use but it would be nice if FS Traffic came with its own models of popular GA aircraft. -
Yes, the earlier incarnations of JF Traffic were awesome. Now that you mention it. It do remember that you could have the AI flight compiler use IFR and GA according to our choice.
@bpfonteyn I did not use FS traffic in my FSX days but if it supported GA there is hope Justflight will implement it at one time.
FS Traffic has a lot of freeware competition right now which is good but where it really could have an edge over these is GA. Especially since lots of simmers fly GA regularly if not mostly, the lack of believable GA traffic is very noticable. -
@bpfonteyn I did not use FS traffic in my FSX days but if it supported GA there is hope Justflight will implement it at one time.
FS Traffic has a lot of freeware competition right now which is good but where it really could have an edge over these is GA. Especially since lots of simmers fly GA regularly if not mostly, the lack of believable GA traffic is very noticable. -
XBOX version please!!!
-
XBOX version please!!!
@monkeypants I doubt that's an option since FS Traffic relies on an external traffic injector.
Just the models and liveries could be added in the MS Marketplace to use with the built-in traffic module. -
@monkeypants I doubt that's an option since FS Traffic relies on an external traffic injector.
Just the models and liveries could be added in the MS Marketplace to use with the built-in traffic module.@allard I suspect it would be possible, for example Vessels Global Shipping by Seafront simulations have no problem injecting their ships for Xbox since last year.
-
@allard I suspect it would be possible, for example Vessels Global Shipping by Seafront simulations have no problem injecting their ships for Xbox since last year.
@monkeypants But these are BGL based, as is the default offline traffic.
Probably a BGL with static flightplans could be generated and used instead of the current "traffic injectors' that AIG, FSLTL and FS Traffic are using but it wouldn't be as flexible as these injectors.
it would have the advantage of being simpler for the end user (nothing to configure) and still create believable traffic in the virtual skies.
